RESUMEN
Oncology pharmacists, pharmacy technicians and assistants are key members of the multidisciplinary health care team (MHT) caring for patients receiving immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors. The International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners (ISOPP) developed this position statement to provide guidance on the role of oncology pharmacy practitioners in caring for patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors.Four key recommendations were identified: 1) participation as an integrated, collaborative member of the MHT;2) provision of education and training for patients, students, residents, fellows and other members of the MHT;3) involvement in clinical governance to optimise the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors and4) involvement in research and development in the field of immunotherapy.In summary, oncology pharmacy practitioners play essential roles within the MHT in caring for patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Servicios Farmacéuticos , Farmacia , Humanos , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Farmacéuticos , InmunoterapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Upfront docetaxel (UD) with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) has been demonstrated to improve survival outcomes in metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). However, existing studies have included predominantly Caucasian patients. STUDY QUESTION: To compare the efficacy of addition of UD to ADT in mCSPC to ADT alone among minority patients. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study of mCSPC patients. MEASURES AND OUTCOMES: Patients treated with UD and ADT between January 2014 and December 2017 (UD + ADT, n = 44) were compared with those treated with ADT alone between January 2008 and January 2017 (ADT, n = 38); patients of Caucasian ethnicity were excluded. The outcome of interest was progression-free survival (PFS), which was estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 63 (76.8%) patients were African American and 16 (19.5%) were Hispanic. Fifty-five (67%) patients had high-volume mCSPC. The median follow-up was 14 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 10.4-16.5] for UD + ADT and 42 months (95% CI: 17-66.9) for ADT. Median PFS did not differ between groups: UD + ADT: 16 versus ADT: 18 months [hazard ratio (HR) for UD + ADT = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.48-1.62; P = 0.70]. In patients with high-volume disease, median PFS remained similar (UD + ADT: 16 vs. ADT: 14 months (HR for UD + ADT = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.33-1.25; P = 0.19). On multivariable analysis, prolonged time to nadir PSA, HR = 0.83 (95% CI: 0.76-0.90), was independently associated with PFS. The most common toxicities in UD + ADT were anemia and fatigue. Major limitations include small sample size and potential for selection bias due to the retrospective study design. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective review of a minority mCSPC cohort, UD + ADT was not associated with improved PFS compared with ADT alone. Although further study with larger sample size is needed, these results underscore the importance of ensuring accrual of minorities in clinical trials, reflective of the real-world setting.
Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Andrógenos , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Antagonistas de Andrógenos/uso terapéutico , Andrógenos , Castración , Docetaxel , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
With the development of innovative cancer treatments over recent decades, the cost of cancer care has risen exponentially, limiting patient access to patented originator biotherapeutics in many countries. The introduction of biosimilars to the market has created new opportunities as well the need for changes in practice within healthcare institutions. A 'biosimilar' is a biotherapeutic product which is highly similar in terms of quality, safety and efficacy to an already licensed originator product. Although biosimilars lack clinically meaningful differences in therapeutic activity as compared to the originator product, these complex biological molecules are not considered identical chemical copies, unlike generics, and minor differences in molecular structure and inactive compounds may exist. A thorough understanding of these differences and their clinical implications is necessary for optimising medicines-use practices involving biosimilars. This position statement, developed by the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners Biosimilars Taskforce, aims to provide the global oncology pharmacy community with guidance to support decisions around biosimilar use. The 11 statements cover the regulation and evaluation of biosimilars, practical issues around local implementation, the education of healthcare staff and patients, and the requirement for ongoing pharmacovigilance and outcome monitoring.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Servicios Farmacéuticos/organización & administración , FarmacovigilanciaAsunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Mieloma Múltiple , Oligopéptidos , Adulto , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/inducido químicamente , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etnología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiple/epidemiología , Mieloma Múltiple/etnología , Oligopéptidos/administración & dosificación , Oligopéptidos/efectos adversos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Tumor lysis syndrome is a constellation of metabolic disturbances commonly seen during therapy of bulky, rapidly proliferative tumors. Multiple myeloma is a low proliferation tumor with rare incidence of tumor lysis syndrome in the pre-Bortezomib era. Post Bortezomib use, a rise in the incidence of tumor lysis has been noted. We present seven cases of tumor lysis syndrome with three patients in spontaneous tumor lysis and four developing the same after chemotherapy. In the previous studies, elevated LDH and deletion of chromosome 13 has been associated with risk of TLS. In our study, we noted several abnormal karyotpes including del 9p13, del 17 and monosomy 13 were more frequently found but larger studies are needed to explore the causative nature of these associations. Prognosis in these patients is relatively poor reflecting the higher tumor burden. However, further studies are needed to learn about other poor prognostic markers.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Capecitabine is an oral fluoropyrimidine that is used to treat various malignancies. Hand-foot syndrome (HFS) is a dose-limiting toxicity of capecitabine that can limit the use of this agent in some patients. Some investigators have observed that pyridoxine (vitamin B6) can ameliorate HFS that is caused by capecitabine. We designed a prospective trial to determine if pyridoxine can prevent HFS in patients who receive capecitabine. METHODS: In our double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned eligible patients who were treated with capecitabine to receive either daily pyridoxine 100 mg or placebo along with their capecitabine-containing chemotherapy regimen. Patients were observed during the first 4 cycles of capecitabine treatment. The primary endpoint was the incidence and grade of HFS that occurred in both study arms. RESULTS: Between 2008 and 2011, 77 patients were randomly assigned to receive either pyridoxine (n = 38) or placebo (n = 39). Dosages of capecitabine were equally matched between both arms of the study. HFS occurred after a median of 2 chemotherapy cycles in both groups. HFS developed in 10 of 38 (26%) patients in the pyridoxine group and in 8 of 39 (21%) patients in the placebo group (P = .547). Therefore, the risk of HFS was 5 percentage points higher in pyridoxine group (95% confdence interval [CI] for difference, -13 percentage points to +25 percentage points). Given our study results, a true benefit from pyridoxine can be excluded. No difference in HFS grades was observed. LIMITATIONS: Single-institution study. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic pyridoxine (vitamin B6), given concomitantly with capecitabine-containing chemotherapy, was not effective for the prevention of HFS.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To review the information currently available on rasburicase for treatment and prevention of hyperuricemia. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE (1966-August 2002) was searched for primary and review articles. STUDY SELECTION/DATA EXTRACTION: Studies evaluating rasburicase, including abstracts and proceedings, were considered for inclusion. English-language literature was evaluated for the pharmacology, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, therapeutic use, and adverse effects of rasburicase. DATA SYNTHESIS: Rasburicase, a recombinant urate oxidase, has been shown to be effective in lowering uric acid and preventing uric acid accumulation in patients with hematologic malignancies who had hyperuricemia or who were at high risk for developing hyperuricemia. It has been approved for pediatric use in the US. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to allopurinol, hydration, and urinary alkalinization, rasburicase is a new alternative for the treatment and prevention of hyperuricemia in patients with hematologic malignancies. Its rapid onset of action and the ability to lower preexisting elevated uric acid levels are the advantages of rasburicase compared with allopurinol. It may allow the patient to receive chemotherapy treatment without delay.
Asunto(s)
Hiperuricemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Urato Oxidasa/uso terapéutico , Animales , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Humanos , Hiperuricemia/prevención & control , Síndrome de Lisis Tumoral/complicaciones , Urato Oxidasa/administración & dosificación , Urato Oxidasa/efectos adversos , Urato Oxidasa/economía , Urato Oxidasa/farmacocinéticaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To review the currently available information on the once-daily combination of niacin extended-release (ER)/lovastatin in the treatment of patients with hypercholesterolemia and mixed dyslipidemia at high risk for cardiovascular events. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE (1966-July 2002) was searched for primary and review articles. Data from the manufacturer were also included. STUDY SELECTION/DATA EXTRACTION: All articles and product labeling deemed relevant to the combination of niacin and statins (i.e., lovastatin) were included for review. English-language studies selected for inclusion were limited to those with human subjects. DATA SYNTHESIS: The Food and Drug Administration approved a new fixed-dose combination of niacin-ER/lovastatin, which is administered once daily. The efficacy and safety of the combined agent have been proven to be similar to either component used alone or in combination for management of hyperlipidemia and mixed dyslipidemia. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is independently associated with a higher risk for cardiovascular events. Lowering of elevated LDL-C concentrations with statin monotherapy may be insufficient in patients at high risk for cardiovascular events. In fact, consideration of elevated triglycerides (TGs) and/or low concentrations of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) in patients with elevated LDL-C places them at greater risk. The addition of niacin may enhance or improve the lipid profile of those who require a further decrease of TGs and/or increase of HDL-C even after stable statin therapy. Niacin-ER offers efficacy similar to that of immediate-release niacin, but minimal myopathy and hepatotoxicity (compared with sustained-release niacin). Although no clinical outcomes are available, current evidence shows that the combination product offers adequate lowering of LDL-C and TGs and increasing HDL-C. The data suggest that therapy with the niacin-ER and lovastatin combination product is safe and does not increase the incidence of adverse effects.
Asunto(s)
Hipolipemiantes/uso terapéutico , Lovastatina/uso terapéutico , Niacina/uso terapéutico , HDL-Colesterol/sangre , LDL-Colesterol/sangre , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada , Combinación de Medicamentos , Humanos , Hiperlipidemias/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipolipemiantes/efectos adversos , Hipolipemiantes/farmacología , Lovastatina/efectos adversos , Lovastatina/farmacología , Niacina/efectos adversos , Niacina/farmacologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To review the currently available information on rosuvastatin in the treatment of primary hypercholesterolemia. DATA SOURCES: MEDLEY (2000-January 2001), MEDLIT, MEDLINE, EMBASE, SciSearch, Current Contents, Derwent, Drug, BIOSIS, Adis LMS Drug Alerts, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1994-July 2001) were searched; unpublished data obtained from the manufacturer were also included. STUDY SELECTION: Studies evaluating rosuvastatin including abstracts, proceedings, and data on file from the manufacturer were considered for inclusion. English-language literature was evaluated for pharmacology, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, therapeutic use, and adverse effects of rosuvastatin. Additional relevant citations were used in the introductory material and discussion section. DATA EXTRACTION: English-language study abstracts selected for inclusion were limited to those on human subjects. Animal data were included only if human data were not available. DATA SYNTHESIS: Resuvastatin, a new synthetic hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor (HMG-CoA RI), recently completed Phase III clinical trials. At a dosage of 1-80 mg/d, the drug significantly reduced total cholesterol and low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and produced beneficial effects on other lipid parameters as well. Overall, resuvastatin was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: In hypercholesterolemic patients, rosuvastatin reduced LDL-C and other lipid parameters to a greater degree than currently available agents. One advantage of rosuvastatin is that it achieves target LDL-C goals in a greater proportion of treated patients with similar adverse events compared with those treated with other HMG-CoA RIs. The potential to reduce risk of coronary heart disease events and decrease mortality as well as cost comparisons with currently used HMG-CoA RIs remains a subject of further investigation.