Skin boosters: Definitions and varied classifications.

BACKGROUND: The concept of "skin boosters" has evolved, marking a shift from traditional uses of hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers primarily for augmenting skin volume to a more diverse application aimed at improving dermal conditions. Restylane Vital and other HA fillers have been repurposed to combat skin aging and wrinkles by delivering HA directly to the dermis. OBJECTIVES: This review aims to define the term "skin booster" and to discuss the various components that constitute skin boosters. It seeks to provide a comprehensive overview of the different ingredients used in skin boosters, their roles, and their impact on enhancing dermal conditions. METHODS: A comprehensive review was conducted, focusing on representative skin booster ingredients. The approach involved analyzing the different elements used in skin boosters and their specific roles in enhancing dermal improvement. RESULTS: The findings indicate that skin boosters, encompassing a range of ingredients, are effective in improving the condition of the skin's dermis. The review identifies key ingredients in skin boosters and their specific benefits, including hydration, elasticity improvement, and wrinkle reduction. CONCLUSIONS: Skin boosters represent a significant development in dermatological treatments, offering diverse benefits beyond traditional HA fillers. This review provides valuable insights into the constituents of skin boosters and their effectiveness, aiding readers in making informed decisions about these treatments. The potential of skin boosters in dermatological practice is considerable, warranting further research and application.

Dermatology Life Quality Index in Thai Patients with Facial Port-Wine Stains.

INTRODUCTION: Port-wine stains (PWS) are congenital capillary abnormalities caused by immature, venule-like vasculature that progressively dilates due to poor endothelial cell differentiation. PWS affects between 0.3% and 0.9% of newborns, with 90% of cases occurring on the face. Individuals with facial PWS and their parents had a significant negative impairment on their quality of life (QoL) and also suffered from psychological disabilities. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey study in Thailand from July 2021 to April 2022. The questionnaires included demographic data, subjective evaluation (SE), and the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). The questionnaire was performed with a full scale and adjusted scale of validity and reliability test of DLQI using factor analysis and Cronbach's alpha. The study outcome was a subjective evaluation and DLQI in patients who received pulsed dye laser (PDL) treatment. RESULTS: Of the 54 patients, 35.2% (19) are male, and 64.8% (35) are female. Regarding age groups, 64.8% (35) are below 5 years old, and 35.2% (19) are older than 5 years. SE results showed that males evaluated an improvement of the facial PWS lesion significantly better than females (P < 0.05). The older age group graded the percentage of improvement better than the younger age group (P < 0.01). The result of the DLQI showed no difference in DLQI between gender. Older age result resulted in a significantly different DLQI compared with younger age (P < 0.01). Parent-reported DLQI improvement was less than self-reported DLQI improvement in patients with PWS treated with PDL (P < 0.05). Concerning the instrument of the study, the validity and reliability analysis of the DLQI questionnaire using factor analysis and Cronbach's alpha have been performed. The adjusted scale with the 5-item DLQI questionnaire is more appropriate in terms validity and reliability. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that facial PWS reduces the QoL as measured by DLQI. We discovered that the QoL of patients and parents with PWS was significantly impaired. The main influencing factors were older age, the improved perception between gender, and PDL treatments. In addition, we found only five questions that are reliable for PWS. The adjusted five-item DLQI questionnaires are more appropriate regarding validity and reliability. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: TCTR20230210001, COA no. si 1059/2020.

Phenotype and genotype correlation of inherited epidermolysis bullosa in Indonesia.

BACKGROUND: Inherited epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a group of genodermatoses with considerable clinical and genetic heterogeneity. Clinical diagnosis of the EB subtypes is frequently imprecise and requires confirmation with genetic testing. There is still limited study using genetic testing to identify EB subtypes in Indonesia. This study aims to identify the pathogenic variants of inherited EB patients at the Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Universitas Padjadjaran-Dr Hasan Sadikin General Hospital in Bandung, West Java, Indonesia and to describe the correlation between the phenotype and genotype of our patients. METHODS: Twelve patients clinically diagnosed with EB were included in this study. Genetic testing was performed in collaboration with KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore. RESULTS: Pathogenic variants were identified in the COL7A1 gene in seven patients, namely Dominant Dystrophic EB (DDEB) with mutation types c.5945G>T, c.6218G>A, Recessive Dystrophic EB (RDEB) c.2005C>T, c.6081dup, c.1268C>T, c.1784C>T which are all known mutations. Novel mutations were found in the COL7A1 gene in two patients namely DDEB c.6253G>T and RDEB c.6740C>T. Two EB Simplex (EBS) patients showed mutation KRT14 gene as c.356T>C, c.373C>T which are known mutation. In addition, a novel mutation in LAMA3 gene c.2649del was found in one Junctional EB (JEB) patient. CONCLUSION: The molecular diagnoses of 12 Indonesian EB patients were identified, of which three were novel pathogenic variants. Concordance between the initial clinical diagnosis and genetic testing was only 33%. This demonstrated the importance of early genetic testing for accurate diagnosis, prognostication, management and genetic counselling.

A Cross-Sectional Study on Factors Affecting the Decision to Conduct Dermatologic Surgery Procedures During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has greatly affected medical practices worldwide. Due to the transmissibility of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, the risks and benefits of conducting non-emergent and aesthetic procedures have shifted. This study primarily aimed to investigate the different factors affecting the physician's decision to conduct dermatologic surgery procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic based on their own vaccination status. Secondly, this study also aimed to determine the level of institutional trust in the respondents' respective governments and ministries of health. METHODS: This was a questionnaire-based cross-sectional study conducted from October to December 2021. The survey was electronically distributed to members of the Cyber Conference of Aesthetic Dermatology and Skin Surgery in APAC (CyAsia) and members of dermatological societies across nine countries in Asia. The survey asks the participants' tendencies to perform procedures based on patient willingness to undergo nasal swabbing prior to the procedure, the type of procedure to be performed (cancer removal vs. filler augmentation), and the type of vaccine received by the physician (inactivated, viral vector, mRNA or protein-based). RESULTS: A total of 351 participants completed the questionnaire. Data were analyzed using a conditional logistic regression model according to the participants' country of origin, specialty, age, level of trust in the national government, and level of trust in their respective health ministries. Tendencies to conduct dermatologic procedures were highest for doctors who received mRNA vaccines and lowest among doctors who received inactivated vaccines. Willingness of the patients to undergo pre-procedure nasal swabbing was also a significant factor in deciding to treat, whereas the type of procedure performed was a non-significant factor. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the important factors that influence the decision to conduct dermatologic procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Willingness to Pay and Time Trade-off in Thai Patients with Port-Wine Stains.

Background: Port-wine stains are congenital vascular abnormalities that impact children's and parents' quality of life (QoL). There are currently no established criteria for assessing the quality of life in PWS patients. Utility measures such as willingness-to-pay (WTP) and time trade-off (TTO) can be used to quantify disease burden, impact on QoL, and assess the cost-effectiveness of interventions. Methods: This was a cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey study in Thailand from July 2021 to April 2022. The questionnaire included sociodemographic data and preference-based measurement, WTP and TTO. The primary outcome was a WTP and TTO for PWS laser treatment. The subsample analysis for the primary outcome was based on gender (male and female) and age (<5 years and ≥5 years). The household income was measured for time trade-off outcome. Results: Out of 46 respondents, WTP for the base case at 40% improvement cost 6109.01 baht per visit. Patients were willing to spend their time 9.95 hours per visit for a clinical improvement of 40%. Female was willing to pay and spend more time than male, while those aged≥5 years were willing to pay and spend more time than those aged <5 years. High household income >100k per month willing to spend less time than lower income groups. Conclusion: There were obvious correlations between WTP and TTO with clinical outcomes. Utility indicators such as WTP and TTO can be used to measure disease burden, impact on QoL, and assess the cost-effectiveness of interventions. WTP and TTO could provide a more personalized approach to improving QoL, considering each patient's unique treatment plan and priority. This could help with patient uncertainty and long-term planning strategies to increase the QoL cost-effectively.

Efficacy and Safety of Monopolar Radiofrequency for Treatment of Lower Facial Laxity in Asians.

INTRODUCTION: Monopolar radiofrequency (MRF) is a valuable modality for tightening and contouring mild-to-moderate facial skin laxity. Few studies have evaluated new-generation MRF devices for lower facial laxity in Asians. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MRF for treating lower facial laxity in Asians. METHODS: This prospective cohort study enrolled 30 volunteers with Fitzpatrick Skin Types III-V and mild-to-moderate skin laxity. Subjects received a single MRF treatment. Self-assessments and adverse events were recorded. Two blinded dermatologists graded improvements (6-point scale) after treatment and 1, 3, and 6 months later. RESULTS: All subjects completed the study. Treatment energy levels ranged from 2 to 4. The average number of shots was 412 ± 49, delivered in 3-4 passes with 15-30% overlap. All patients reported improvement in lower facial laxity immediately after treatment. Most patients had mild-to-moderate improvement over the 6-month follow-up. Continuous improvement was observed at the 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-ups (P < 0.01). Significant improvement was seen at the 6-month follow-up compared with the 1-month follow-up (P < 0.01). Subjects tolerated the procedure well: the average pain score was 3.13 out of 10, and no serious adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The new-generation MRF device we tested was effective and safe for mild-to-moderate lower facial laxity in Asian skin. The latest MRF technology offers improved safety to prevent complications. Appropriate patient selection, setting, and protocols are mandatory to achieve optimal clinical outcomes. THE TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: TCTR20210326002.

Efficacy and Safety of Using Noninsulated Microneedle Radiofrequency Alone versus in Combination with Polynucleotides for Treatment of Periorbital Wrinkles.

INTRODUCTION: A few studies have evaluated the efficacy and safety of noninsulated radiofrequency microneedling (RFMN) to treat periorbital wrinkles in Asian patients. Recently, wound healing accelerators, polynucleotides (PNs), have received attention in wound management. However, their efficacy and safety have not been fully elucidated following RFNM. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of noninsulated RFMN for periorbital wrinkles and the synergistic effect of PNs after RFMN. METHODS: Thirty subjects with Fitzpatrick skin types III to V and facial wrinkles (Fitzpatrick grades I and II) were enrolled. All volunteers were treated over the entire face with noninsulated RFMN for three sessions at 2-week intervals. The left and right sides of each patient's face were randomly assigned to receive PNs (treatment group) or normal saline solution (control group). The indentation and maximum depth of wrinkles were objectively measured using Antera 3D. Subjective self-evaluations were obtained at baseline, 2 weeks after the third treatment, and at 1, 2, 3, and 6 months after the final treatment. In addition, pain scores, immediate reactions, and other adverse effects were evaluated. RESULTS: Twenty-nine subjects completed the treatment protocol. Most presented with grade II wrinkling (69%). At 2-month follow-up, Antera 3D image analysis revealed faster improvement for the treatment group. At 6-month follow-up, the majority of subjects reported an improvement of 25-75% in their periorbital wrinkles. The average pain score was 2.2 out of 10. No serious adverse events (infection, pigmentary alteration, persistent erythema, or scarring) were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Noninsulated RFMN is safe and effective for treating periorbital wrinkles and can be used as a modality for transdermal drug delivery. Topical polynucleotides as an adjunctive treatment provide additional benefits for periorbital wrinkle treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: TCTR20201105007.

Clinical efficacy of biocellulose, carboxymethyl cellulose and normal saline dressing in epidermolysis bullosa.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of a biocellulose, a carboxymethyl cellulose and a normal saline wound dressing in the wound care management of epidermolysis bullosa (EB) skin wounds. METHODS: This was a single-blind, randomised controlled trial involving wounds from patients with EB. Wounds were divided into three groups: group I with biocellulose wound dressing, group II with carboxymethyl cellulose wound dressing and group III with normal saline wound dressing as a control. All dressing changes and wound parameters were recorded. Observations were conducted every three days until complete wound closure or up to one month. RESULTS: The outcomes of treatment of 36 wounds from four patients were evaluated in this study. Mean healing time in group I was seven days, eight days in group II and 14 days in group III. There were significant differences in healing times between group I and group III (p=0.0001) and between group II and III (p=0.001). The results showed a significant reduction in the percentage of wounds area on day three for each group: 51.7% in group I, 51.9% in group II, and 26% for group III. All wounds in groups I and II had healed at day 12 (100%) and at day 24 (100%) in group III. There were significant differences in the reduction of percentage wound area between group I and group III at day three (p=0.044) and day six (p=0.000), and between group II and III at day six (p=0.003). CONCLUSION: The study demonstrates that both the biocellulose and the carboxymethyl cellulose wound dressings significantly reduced percentage wound areas and complete healing times compared with the normal saline wound dressing in EB skin wounds, demonstrating they are both equally good for wound care management in EB patients.

Clinical efficacy of dialkylcarbamoylchloride-coated cotton acetate dressing versus combination of normal saline dressing and 2% mupirocin ointment in infected wounds of epidermolysis bullosa.

Dialkylcarbamoylchloride (DACC)-coated cotton acetate dressing works directly through hydrophobic interaction to reduce the number of bacteria without the risk of resistance. It is easy to use and therefore expected to improve patient's compliance. This study aimed to assess the clinical efficacy of DACC-coated cotton acetate dressing compared to a combination of normal saline dressing and 2% mupirocin ointment. A single-blind controlled trial was conducted and included 14 infected epidermolysis bullosa (EB) wounds which were divided into two groups. Group I received DACC-coated cotton acetate dressing, and Group II received the combination of normal saline dressing and 2% mupirocin ointment. Study results showed that the average time required for complete wound closure was 8.6 and 11.1 days in Groups I and II, respectively (p = .014), which was statistically significant. Both groups showed complete bacterial elimination on Day 3 based on negative Gram stain results and on Day 6 based on clearance of clinical manifestations (p = 1.000). This is a novel study in EB-infected wounds, which shows that DACC-coated cotton acetate dressing promotes faster wound closure and is as effective as the combination of normal saline dressing and 2% mupirocin ointment in eliminating bacterial infection.

Reactive perforating leprosy, erythema multiforme-like reactions, sweet's syndrome-like reactions as atypical clinical manifestations of Type 2 leprosy reaction.

Type 2 leprosy reactions commonly known as erythema nodosum leprosum, but various clinical manifestations of type 2 leprosy reaction were exist. The highlight of this case series was to report various atypical clinical manifestations of type 2 leprosy reaction such as reactive perforating leprosy, erythema multiforme-like reaction, and sweet's syndrome (SS)-like reaction.