[A Case of Adenocarcinoma of Pancreatic Head of Liver Disfunction after Pancreaticoduodenectomy with Celiac Artery Stenosis Treated by Urgent Median Arcuate Ligament Release].

This patient visited our hospital for the purpose of detailed examination of prostate cancer in his seventies. Abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography(CT)revealed a low-density mass of 2 cm in the pancreatic head. He was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. Pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed after 2 courses of gemcitabine and S-1 therapy were performed as neoadjuvant chemotherapy. An intraoperative clamp test of the gastroduodenal artery showed that the pulsation of the common hepatic artery and the proper hepatic artery was weak but sufficient, so the gastroduodenal artery was cut and the operation was completed as planned. A blood test on the 1st day after the operation showed elevated levels of AST 537 U/L, ALT 616 U/L, and 7 hours later blood sampling showed further increases in AST 1,455 U/L, ALT 1,314 U/L. After a detailed review of the preoperative CT, celiac artery stenosis due to compression of the arcuate ligament was suspected, and urgent median arcuate ligament release was performed on the same day. Dissection of the arcuate ligament significantly improved the pulsation of the common hepatic artery and proper hepatic artery. Postoperatively, hepatic enzymes improved and ISGPS showed Grade B pancreatic juice leakage, but the patient was discharged from the hospital on the 49th postoperative day without any other complications. He took S-1 as adjuvant chemotherapy, and no signs of recurrence have been observed 9 months after the operation.

Results of a Randomized Clinical Study of Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel Versus Gemcitabine Plus S-1 as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (RCT, CSGO-HBP-015).

BACKGROUND: The optimal neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) regimen for patients with localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains uncertain. This trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) regimens, gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GA) and gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS), in patients with resectable/borderline-resectable (R/BR) PDAC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Treatment-naïve patients with R/BR-PDAC were enrolled and randomly allocated. They received two cycles (2 months) of each standard protocol, followed by radical surgery for those without tumor progression in general hospitals belonging to our intergroup. The primary endpoint was to determine the superior regimen on the basis of achieving a 10% increase in the rate of patients with progression-free survival (PFS) at 2 years from allocation. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients were enrolled, with 94 patients randomly assigned to the GS arm (N = 46) or GA arm (N = 48). The 2-year PFS rates did not show the stipulated difference [GA, 31% (24-38%)/GS, 26% (18-33%)], but the Kaplan-Myer analysis showed significance (median PFS, GA/GS 14 months/9 months, P = 0.048; HR 0.71). Secondary endpoint comparisons yielded the following results (GA/GS arm, P-value): rates of severe adverse events during NAC, 73%/78%, P = 0.55; completion rates of the stipulated NAC, 92%/83%, P = 0.71; resection rates, 85%/72%, P = 0.10; average tumor marker (CA19-9) reduction rates, -50%/-21%, P = 0.01; average numbers of lymph node metastasis, 1.7/3.2, P = 0.04; and median overall survival times, 42/22 months, P = 0.26. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that GA and GS are viable neoadjuvant treatment regimens in R/BR-PDAC. Although the GA group exhibited a favorable PFS outcome, the primary endpoint was not achieved.

Influence of Percutaneous Transhepatic Gallbladder Aspiration and Drainage for Severe Acute Cholecystitis on the Surgical Outcomes of Subsequent Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Post Hoc Analysis of the CSGO-HBP-017 (CSGO-HBP-017C).

OBJECTIVE: Percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder aspiration (PTGBA) and/or drainage (PTGBD) are useful approaches in the management of acute cholecystitis in patients who cannot tolerate surgery because of poor general condition or severe inflammation. However, reports regarding its effect on the surgical outcomes of subsequent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) are sparse. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the influence of PTGBA on surgical outcomes of subsequent LC by comparing the only-PTGBA group, including patients who did not need the additional-PTGBD, versus the additional-PTGBD group, including those who needed the additional-PTGBD after PTGBA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a post hoc analysis of our multi-institutional data. This study included 63 patients who underwent LC after PTGBA, and we compared the surgical outcomes between the only-PTGBA group (n = 56) and the additional-PTGBD group (n = 7). RESULTS: No postoperative complications occurred among the 63 patients, and the postoperative hospital stay was 11 ± 12 days. Fourteen patients (22.2%) had a recurrence of cholecystitis, of whom 7 patients (11.1%) needed the additional-PTGBD after PTGBA. Significantly longer operative time (245 ± 74 vs 159 ± 65 min, P = 0.0017) and postoperative hospital stay (22 ± 27 vs 10 ± 9 d, P = 0.0118) and greater intraoperative blood loss (279 ± 385 vs 70 ± 208 mL, P = 0.0283) were observed among patients in the additional-PTGBD group compared with the only-PTGBA group, whereas the rates of postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3: 0% each) and conversion to open surgery (28.6% vs 8.9%, P = 0.1705) were comparable. CONCLUSION: PTGBA for acute cholecystitis could result in good surgical outcomes of subsequent LC, especially regarding postoperative complications. However, we should keep in mind that the additional-PTGBD after PTGBA failure, which sometimes happened, would be associated with increased operative difficulty and longer recovery.

Neuroendocrine tumor of the minor duodenal papilla with lymph node metastasis: a case report and literature review.

Whether pancreatoduodenectomy or papillary resection should be performed to achieve curative treatment for neuroendocrine tumors of the minor duodenal papilla with a diameter of ≤2 cm is controversial. We report a 35-year-old male patient with a rare case of a neuroendocrine tumor of the minor duodenal papilla. The patient was referred to our hospital from a different clinic for dilatation of his minor duodenal papilla. Duodenoscopy revealed a smooth mass of 2 cm in diameter in the minor papilla, and the biopsy specimen was diagnosed as neuroendocrine tumor G1. The patient underwent subtotal stomach-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Histological evaluation showed a single nodule of 15 mm in diameter in the mucosa with metastasis to the regional lymph node. The tumor cells exhibited immunoactivity against synaptophysin and chromogranin A. The molecular immunology Borstel-1 index was less than 1%, and the grade was neuroendocrine tumor G1. We reviewed the characteristics of 24 cases of patients who underwent PD for NETs of the minor duodenal papilla in English literature. In 22 of these cases, the tumor depth was described. Lymph node metastasis was observed in none of the three cases (0%) in which the tumor was limited to the intra-sphincter; however, it was noted in three (30%) of the 10 cases in which the tumor had invaded the duodenal submucosa and in eight (89%) of the nine cases in which the tumor had invaded the muscularis propria, pancreas, peripancreatic/periduodenal tissues, or duodenal serosa. Making a definitive diagnosis preoperatively or intraoperatively whether the tumor invades beyond the sphincter or not and whether regional lymph node metastasis is present may not be possible. Therefore, we believe that pancreatoduodenectomy with lymphadenectomy is preferable for curative treatment of neuroendocrine tumors of the minor duodenal papilla.

[A Case of Strangulated Bowel Obstruction after a Laparoscopic Hartmann's Operation for Rectal Cancer].

A 98-year-old woman presented with hematochezia and a circumferential type 2 tumor in the rectum Rb identified on fiberoscopy. We a performed laparoscopic Hartmann's operation and D2 lymphadenectomy for advanced rectal cancer. A sigmoid colostomy was created via the intraperitoneal route. On the postoperative day 12, the patient experienced abdominal pain. Computed tomography showed that the small intestine formed a closed loop in the pelvic space. The patient was diagnosed with a strangulated bowel obstruction of the small intestine for which an emergency exploratory laparotomy was performed. The small intestine, which had passed through a defect between the lifted sigmoid colon and the left abdominal wall, was strangulated by the lifted sigmoid colon. We performed partial resection of the small intestine. The patient died on postoperative day 32 of acute deterioration of aortic valve stenosis. There have been few reports of strangulated bowel obstruction resulting from internal hernia associated with colostomy. These findings demonstrate that it is important to select the appropriate route for colostomy creation in each case.

Effect of Preserving the Percutaneous Gallbladder Drainage Tube Before Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy on Surgical Outcome: Post Hoc Analysis of the CSGO-HBP-017.

BACKGROUND: When percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD) is followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), there is no consensus regarding whether the drainage tube should be preserved or removed before LC. We hypothesized that the surgical results of LC might differ between cases with PTGBD tube preservation versus removal. Here, we investigated how drainage tube preservation or removal affected the surgical outcome of LC. METHODS: Using data from our previous multicenter study, we compared LC outcomes after PTGBD between patients with PTGBD tube preservation versus removal. This study included 208 patients who underwent LC over 12 days after PTGBD. In 83 cases, the PTGBD tube was preserved until LC, and in 125 cases, the tube was removed before LC. The results were verified by propensity score matching with 50 patients in each group. RESULTS: Cases with tube preservation versus removal exhibited significantly longer surgery duration (174 ± 105 min vs 145 ± 61 min, P = .0118) and postoperative hospital stay (14 ± 16 days vs 7 ± 7 days, P < .0001), a significantly higher postoperative complication rate (13.2% vs 3.2%, P = .0061), and a marginally higher incidence of open conversion (12.0% vs 4.8%, P = .0547). Propensity score matching verified the inferior surgical outcomes in cases with tube preservation. CONCLUSIONS: These results imply that when LC is performed > 12 days after PTGBD, the surgical outcome may be inferior when the drainage tube is preserved rather than removed before LC.

Preoperative risk score to predict subtotal cholecystectomy after gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis: Secondary analysis of data from a multi-institutional retrospective study (CSGO-HBP-017B).

INTRODUCTION: Subtotal cholecystectomy (STC) has become recognized as a "bailout procedure" to prevent bile duct injury in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Predictors of conversion to STC have not been identified because LC difficulty varies based on pericholecystic inflammation. We analyzed data from patients enrolled in a previously performed multi-institutional retrospective study of the optimal timing of LC after gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis (AC). These patients presumably had a considerable degree of pericholecystic inflammation. METHODS: In total, 347 patients who underwent LC after gallbladder drainage for AC were analyzed to examine preoperative and perioperative factors predicting conversion to STC. RESULTS: Three hundred patients underwent total cholecystectomy (TC) and 47 underwent conversion to STC. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) (P < .01), severity of cholecystitis (P = .04), previous history of treatment for common bile duct stones (CBDS) (P < .01), and surgeon experience (P = .03) were significantly associated with conversion to STC. Logistic regression analyses showed that ECOG PS (odds ratio 0.2; P < .0001) and previous history of treatment for CBDS (odds ratio 0.37; P = .0073) were independent predictors of conversion to STC. Our predictive risk score using these two variables suggested that a score ≥2 could discriminate between TC and STC (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Poor ECOG PS and previous history of treatment for CBDS were significantly associated with conversion to STC after gallbladder drainage for AC.

[A Case of Liver Metastasis Complete Resection for Concurrent Overlapping Cancer of the Transverse Colon and Renal Cell Carcinomas that were Difficult to Differentiate from Hepatocellular Carcinoma].

A 79-year-old man visited the hospital because of constipation. Colonoscopy showed a transverse colon carcinoma. Dynamic CT showed a renal neoplastic lesion and 2 lesions in the liver with early staining and late wash out, and the liver lesions showed ring enhancement on EOB-MRI. The preoperative diagnosis was either transverse colon cancer, renal cell carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, or metastatic liver cancer. The patient underwent partial transverse colon resection, partial right nephrectomy, and partial hepatic resection. Additional to the 2 liver lesions in S6, an intraoperative ultrasound showed 1 tumor in S5; therefore, 3 partial hepatectomies were performed. Histopathological findings revealed that the tumors in S5 and S6 were liver metastases of transverse colon cancer and renal cell carcinoma, respectively. The final diagnosis was transverse colon cancer, pT4a, pN0, pM1, pStage Ⅳa and papillary renal cell carcinoma, pT1a, pN0, pM1, pStage Ⅳ. For 9 months postoperatively, there was no apparent recurrence.

[A Case of Retroperitoneal Leiomyosarcoma Resected Radically by Pancreaticoduodenectomy with Vascular Resection].

A 54-year-old woman visited to a doctor nearby medical clinic complaining of loss of appetite. She was diagnosed with right hydronephrosis on abdominal ultrasonography, and referred to our hospital for further examination. Contrast abdominal computed tomography(CT)revealed that a 6.2 cm tumor with a contrast-enhancing effect inside in the retroperitoneum near the lower pole of the right kidney. She was diagnosed with hydronephrosis due to infiltration of the right kidney of a retroperitoneal tumor. The tumor was suspected of invading the duodenum and inferior vena cava, but no obvious lymph node or distant metastasis was observed. Abdominal MRI revealed a tumor showed hyperintensity on T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted images. We performed pancreaticoduodenectomy with inferior vena cava resection and right nephrectomy. The pathological diagnosis was leiomyosarcoma originating from retroperitoneum and pT2, pN0, pM0, pStage ⅢA. The postoperative course was good, and she was discharged 10 days after the operation. Thoracoabdominal CT showed a tumor 4 cm at the hepatic hilum three months after surgery, and EOB-MRI showed many tumors other than the same site, so multiple liver metastases were diagnosed as recurrence. Doxorubicin has been started and is still being treated.

Randomized phase II study of gemcitabine and S-1 combination therapy versus gemcitabine and nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel combination therapy as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for resectable/borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC-GS/GA-rP2, CSGO-HBP-015).

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a lethal disease, and multimodal strategies, such as surgery plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC)/adjuvant chemotherapy, have been attempted to improve survival in patients with localized PDAC. To date, there is one prospective study providing evidence for the superiority of a neoadjuvant strategy over upfront surgery for localized PDAC. However, which NAC regimen is optimal remains unclear. METHODS: A randomized, exploratory trial is performed to examine the clinical benefits of two chemotherapy regimens, gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GA), as NAC for patients with planned PDAC resection. Patients are enrolled after the diagnosis of resectable or borderline resectable PDAC. They are randomly assigned to either NAC regimen. Adjuvant chemotherapy after curative resection is highly recommended for 6 months in both arms. The primary endpoint is tumor progression-free survival time, and secondary endpoints include the rate of curative resection, the completion rate of protocol therapy, the recurrence type, the overall survival time, and safety. The target sample size is set as at least 100. DISCUSSION: This study is the first randomized phase II study comparing GS combination therapy with GA combination therapy as NAC for localized pancreatic cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry UMIN000021484 . This trial began in April 2016.

Two-way Revascularization to Manage Celiac Artery Stenosis during Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Case Report.

Celiac artery (CA) occlusion, or stenosis, is not uncommon, and most cases are asymptomatic. If the CA is occluded, collateral circulation from the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) is maintained through the pancreaticoduodenal arcade. However, the pancreaticoduodenal arcade is removed if pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is performed, which results in ischemia of the liver, stomach, and residual pancreas. Thus, these patients require CA revascularization, which can include antegrade endovascular reconstruction and retrograde reconstruction using vascular anastomosis from the SMA system to the CA system. Both methods carry risks of restenosis or anastomotic thrombosis. We report a technique that involves a combination of both revascularization methods in an 89-year-old man who underwent PD for lower bile duct cancer. Preoperative endovascular stent placement in the CA preserved antegrade blood flow to the liver, and intraoperative vascular anastomosis of the jejunal artery and right gastroepiploic artery achieved retrograde blood flow. Although we confirmed both stent and anastomosis patency and blood circulation in our case, obstruction of 1 of these revascularization pathways would not likely lead to ischemia of the liver. Thus, our 2-way revascularization technique for managing celiac artery stenosis during PD may reduce the risk of organ ischemia.

[A Resected Case of Adeno-Squamous Carcinoma of Gallbladder with Liver Invasions].

A patient was 70-year-old female. Because unknown fever following operation of left knee in December 20XX-1, abdominal simple CT was performed, diagnosed as cholecystitis and liver abscesses. However, her unknown fever did not improve with antibiotics therapy. Abdominal enhanced CT and MRI revealed to gallbladder cancer with liver invasion and metastases. These lesions were relatively localized in liver S4a/S5 and gallbladder, hepatoduodenal mesentery. Because unknown fever was exhausting, cholecystectomy, S4a+S5 hepatectomy with extrahepatic bile duct resection and lymph node dissemination were performed in January 20XX+1. In these pathological findings, there were moderate to poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma with squamous cell differentiation in almost area of gallbladder, diagnosed as adeno-squamous carcinoma with liver invasion and metastasis(pT3a[SI][H-inf], int, INF-ß, ly1, v3, pn1, pN1, pM1, pStage ⅣB). One months after operation, abdominal CT revealed multiple liver metastatic recurrences. She died 7 months after operation. Although gallbladder adeno-squamous carcinoma has a poor prognosis, these many cases had a tendency to local infiltration accompanied with tumor fever. If curative resection might be obtained and the symptoms might be improved, aggressive resection should be performed.

[A Case of Mesh Infection Due to Transverse Colon Cancer].

A 69-year-old female underwent a mesh repair for an abdominal incisional hernia 4 years previously in our hospital. She visited local hospital for abdominal pain and fever. Abdominal CT showed a localizes abscess formation above the mesh, then she was taken to our hospital. We suspected mesh infection and performed emergent mesh removal. After the operation, we examined for her anemia. Her colonoscopy and CT findings pointed to transverse colon cancer. We performed right hemicolectomy, and final diagnosis was transverse colon cancer pT4aN0M0, pStage Ⅱb. She underwent adjuvant chemotherapy, and 9 months after surgery, no recurrence was found.

[Hyperprogressive Disease during Treatment with Nivolumab for Recurrence of Gastric Cancer].

A man in his 60s with a large Type 3 gastric cancer presented with the chief complaint of epicardial discomfort. We decided to perform laparoscopy. The patient was diagnosed with cT4aN2M1(CY1), cStage Ⅳ disease and was treated with XP(capecitabine plus cisplatin[CDDP])plus trastuzumab(HER). After chemotherapy, CY0 was confirmed using laparoscopy. The patient underwent total gastrectomy and D2 lymph node dissection. Histopathological examination revealed ypT4aN3M0, ypStage ⅢC disease. Therefore, adjuvant treatment with XP plus HER was continued. Four months after surgery, liver, lung, and # 16b1latLN metastases were observed on CT. The metastatic foci were observed even after 3 courses of ramucirumab plus paclitaxel. Nivolumab was administered as the third-line treatment; after 3 courses, the liver metastasis increased markedly. Hence, our final diagnosis was hyperprogressive disease(HPD).

[A Case of Intestinal Obstruction Caused by Peritoneal Metastatic Recurrence One Year after Radical Operation for Pancreatic Cancer].

In December 20XX-1, abdominal enhanced CT of a 73-year-old female patient showed a 28mm-in-diameter pancreatic tail cancer with splenic venous invasion. She underwent neoadjuvant GEM/TS-1 combination chemotherapy but abandoned this chemotherapy due to melena and exanthema. She underwent a distal pancreatectomy with lymph node dissemination. In these pathological findings, the tumor was diagnosed as a pancreatic tail cancer with splenic venous invasion(T3, N0, M0, Stage ⅡA). She underwent adjuvant GEM chemotherapy, but she abandoned this chemotherapy due to exanthema and was managed with observation. In September 20XX, she had a postoperative bowel obstruction and was treated with natural light. However, she had a postoperative bowel obstruction again in July, 20XX+1. Fluoroscopic images revealed stenosis in the intestine located 170 cm from the nasal cavity. She underwent open surgery to manage the bowel obstruction. There was a peritoneal tumor with adhesion to each intestine serosa in 3 areas located 80 cm, 100 cm, and 150 cm from the Treitz ligament. Therefore, she underwent a small intestine resection and anastomosis 70 cm to 110 cm from the Treitz ligament. Pathological findings showed that there was a 3mm-in-diameter adenocarcinoma in this peritoneal tumor. In these findings, this final diagnosis was an adhesive intestinal obstruction caused by peritoneal metastasis. Curative resection for single peritoneal recurrent metastasis might be useful for prognosis prolongation.

Optimal timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis: A multi-institutional retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the optimal timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) after gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis (AC). To obtain evidence for a consensus, we investigated surgical outcomes of LC after gallbladder drainage with respect to the time elapsed from gallbladder drainage to surgery in a multi-institutional retrospective study. METHODS: This study enrolled 347 patients who underwent LC after gallbladder drainage for AC at 15 institutions. Surgical outcome of LC was investigated in the cases based on the interval from gallbladder drainage to surgery. RESULTS: The median interval from gallbladder drainage to surgery of the patients was 34 days, with a mean ± standard deviation of 58 ± 99 days. Patients were divided into four groups based on quartiles of the interval: Group A, cases with an interval of 1-12 days; Group B, cases with an interval of 13-34 days; Group C, cases with an interval of 35-73 days; and Group D, cases with an interval of ≥74 days. Surgical outcomes, which were evaluated with respect to intraoperative blood loss, operation time, postoperative hospital stay, rate of intraoperative accident, conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery, and postoperative complication, were worse in Group B than in the other groups. The finding was verified by propensity score-matched analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical outcome of LC after gallbladder drainage for AC was inferior in Group B compared with the other groups. This finding could be useful for determining the optimal timing of LC after gallbladder drainage for AC.

[A Case of Laparoscopic Assisted Resection for Small Intestinal Cancer Diagnosed Preoperatively].

A 50-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital due to intermittent epigastric pain and vomiting for 2 months. Contrast enhanced CT scan showed stenosis in the upper jejunum. She was diagnosed with small intestinal ileus. A small enteroscopy revealed a peripheral type 2 lesion in the upper jejunum, approximately 10 cm from the Treitz's ligament. Upon biopsy, she was diagnosed with a well-differentiated adenocarcinoma. A laparoscope-assisted extracorporeal operation was performed due to the ease of raising the umbilical wound. Swollen lymph nodes were found in the mesentery. A surgical margin of 5 cm on the oral side and 20 cm on the anal side was secured. We performed partial resection of the small intestine, including the mesentery with the enlarged lymph nodes. The histopathological diagnosis was a Type 2, 3×2 cm, tub2, pT4aN1aM0, pStage Ⅲb small intestinal cancer. Due to the development of small intestinal ileus, the small bowel cancer was diagnosed preoperatively. Hence, it was slightly we will report including the literature consideration of.

[Bilateral Multiple Liver Metastases after Pancreatoduodenectomy for a Duodenal Neuroendocrine Tumor-A Case Report].

The patient was a 79-year-old woman. In January 20XX, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed a duodenal tumor with bleeding and ulceration. This tumor was diagnosed as a duodenal neuroendocrine tumor(NET)based on biopsy findings. In March 20XX, the patient underwent pancreatoduodenectomy with lymph node dissemination. Based on these pathological findings, the tumor was diagnosed as a duodenal NET(G2)with a lymph node metastasis(T2, N1, M0, Stage Ⅲ). Twenty months after the operation, abdominal CT revealed multiple liver metastases(S4, S7, and S8). After this recurrence, she underwent the subcutaneous somatostatin analogue injection therapy every 28 days, and transarterial chemoembolization( TACE)when these recurrent tumors showed remarkable regrowth, once a year, accounting for her age. She has maintained good disease control for 5 years.