RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Controversial issues in registering candidates for deceased-donor kidney transplantation (DDKT) comprise various factors, including age, life expectancy, and dialysis duration. We investigated patient characteristics on the waiting list and discussed suitable criteria in Japan, which has a long waiting period. METHODS: This study included 592 patients on the waiting list for DDKT at our institute between 1982 and 2023. We retrospectively reviewed patients' medical charts and obtained their clinical information. Patient characteristics according to outcomes and eligibility criteria for applying for or renewing registration were investigated. No prisoners were used in the study, and the participants were neither coerced nor paid. RESULTS: Approximately 70%, 45%, and 14.5% of the registered patients were aged >60, >70, and 80 years, respectively. The number of patients aged ≥70 years gradually decreased over time. The median waiting periods of patients who underwent and interrupted DDKT were 13 and 7 years, respectively. Patients in their 70s with a >15-year dialysis period tended to have opportunities for DDKT. Living-donor kidney transplantation was performed in patients aged <60 years. Waiting patients were significantly younger and had a shorter dialysis duration. Advanced age at registration was associated with a significantly high risk of interruption. CONCLUSIONS: Advanced age and longer dialysis periods were considered at registration because patients with these factors tended to experience interruptions despite the long waiting period and high cost. Although older patients can undergo DDKT, factors including surgical cost and risks are considered. Eligibility/ineligibility criteria should be established for DDKT waiting lists in Japan.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Listas de Espera , Humanos , Japón , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Adulto , Selección de Paciente , Diálisis Renal , Determinación de la Elegibilidad , Donantes de Tejidos/provisión & distribución , Factores de Edad , Sistema de Registros , Pueblos del Este de AsiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The clinical importance of nutrition and inflammation in patients with end-stage renal disease is well established. In this study, we investigated the role of nutritional and inflammatory indicators in the patient outcomes of living donor kidney transplant recipients. METHODS: We included 204 consecutive patients who underwent kidney transplantation at our institute between 2003 and 2022. We retrospectively reviewed medical charts to obtain clinical information. Six nutritional indicators and two inflammatory indicators were assessed. Patient outcomes were investigated, and predictive factors were explored. RESULTS: The median patient age and follow-up period were 48 years and 99 months, respectively. The cohort included patients with preoperative malnutrition and microinflammation. No significant differences in graft survival were identified according to nutritional and inflammatory indicators, whereas the survival index, controlled nutritional status, and C-reactive protein levels were associated with patient survival. The survival index was an independent indicator of survival and death in patients with functioning grafts (P = 0.047 and P = 0.013, respectively). Furthermore, the C-reactive protein level could distinguish between low and high mortality risks in patients with good nutrition (P = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that nutrition and inflammation indicators play important roles in predicting outcomes in living donor kidney transplantation recipients. Further research is warranted to establish optimal management strategies.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND/AIM: This study investigated the follow-up rate of living kidney donors and explored the factors related to continuous follow-up and remnant renal function, enabling the optimal management of living kidney donors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 180 living kidney donors who underwent donor nephrectomies at our institute. Clinical information was obtained from medical charts, and remnant renal function was defined as the estimated glomerular filtration rate 12 months after donor nephrectomy. RESULTS: Overall, 6/180 donors (3.3%) were lost to follow-up within a year, and the follow-up rate gradually declined yearly. Independent risk factors for loss to follow-up included a follow-up period <60 months and graft survival of the recipient (p=0.002 and p=0.043, respectively). Recipient survival was correlated with loss to follow-up; however, this was not significant (p=0.051). Regarding remnant renal function, age ≥60 years, preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate <74 ml/min/1.73 m2, and a Δsingle-kidney estimated glomerular filtration rate <9.3 ml/min/1.73m2 were independent risk factors for poorly preserved remnant renal function (p=0.036, p<0.0001, and p<0.0001, respectively). Using propensity score matching to adjust for preoperative factors, a Δsingle-kidney estimated glomerular filtration rate <9.3 ml/min/1.73 m2 was the only significant postoperative factor for poorly preserved remnant renal function (p=0.023). CONCLUSION: An increased 5-year follow-up rate could lead to an increase in long-term follow-up, and recipient prognosis may be correlated with the living kidney donor follow-up status. Furthermore, Δsingle-kidney estimated glomerular filtration rate was identified as a factor for establishing the optimal precision follow-up management of living kidney donors.
Asunto(s)
Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Trasplante de Riñón , Donadores Vivos , Nefrectomía , Humanos , Nefrectomía/métodos , Nefrectomía/efectos adversos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trasplante de Riñón/métodos , Adulto , Estudios de Seguimiento , Factores de Riesgo , Riñón/fisiopatología , Riñón/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Supervivencia de Injerto , Periodo Posoperatorio , Pruebas de Función Renal , AncianoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is known to be high in kidney transplant recipients; however, the risk factors for COVID-19 infection in these patients has not been studied extensively. Therefore, we explored the predictors of COVID-19 infection and severity in kidney transplant recipients in Japan. METHODS: This study included kidney transplant recipients who were regularly followed-up at our hospital from February 2021 to March 2023. We retrospectively reviewed the patients' medical charts; obtained their clinical information, including comorbidities, immunosuppressant usage, and presence of COVID-19 infection; and assessed the risk of COVID-19 infection and severity. Severe illness was defined as a decrease in oxygen saturation. RESULTS: Among the 155 patients, 50 (32.3%) were infected with COVID-19. Multivariate analysis revealed that recipients taking >5 mg of prednisolone or taking tacrolimus instead of cyclosporine were at higher risk of infection (odds ratio [OR] 2.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-5.40; OR 2.29, 95% CI 1.03-5.07, respectively). Furthermore, of the 50 infected recipients, 42 had minor illness and eight had severe illness. Multivariate analysis revealed that recipients taking >5 mg of prednisolone were at a higher risk of severity (OR, 11.60, 95% CI 1.19-113.00). CONCLUSION: In kidney transplant recipients, the infection rate and severity of COVID-19 tended to increase with higher maintenance doses of steroids. Recipients taking >5 mg of prednisolone should be considered a switch from tacrolimus to cyclosporine because cyclosporine may inhibit viral replication and reduce the risk of infection.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Inmunosupresores , Trasplante de Riñón , SARS-CoV-2 , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Anciano , Factores de Riesgo , Japón/epidemiología , Adulto , Tacrolimus/uso terapéutico , Prednisolona/uso terapéutico , Receptores de Trasplantes , Ciclosporina/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Background: Pseudoaneurysm formation sometimes complicates transplant nephrectomy. We report a case of bleeding from a pseudoaneurysm after transplantation nephrectomy that resulted in shock and emergency endovascular treatment. Case presentation: A 56-year-old man underwent transplant nephrectomy 3 years and 9 months following transplantation for pyelonephritis-related infection control. On postoperative day 7, he developed sudden pain in the lower abdomen and subsequently went into shock. A pseudoaneurysm at the anastomosis was detected, and urgent endovascular treatment was performed to stem the bleeding. Conclusion: Vascular complications, including pseudoaneurysms, following transplant nephrectomy can be life-threatening, and comprehensive awareness is needed in careful postoperative management.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Living kidney donors are evaluated to determine their physical and psychological suitability for transplantation and ensure their safety. During this process, we frequently encounter cases where a donor is found to be ineligible. In this study, we surveyed donors who are ineligible for transplantation at our hospital to educate patients, their families, and medical staff regarding transplantation in the future. METHODS: We examined the proportion of ineligible donors among 237 potential donors who visited our hospital between January 2002 and March 2022. Data were collected retrospectively from electronic medical records and evaluated from various aspects such as age, body mass index, medical history, medications, and renal function. RESULTS: The mean age at presentation was 55.5 years, the male-to-female ratio was 1:1.6, and no significant difference was found between the ineligible and eligible donor groups. The transplant ineligibility rate was 23.6%, and the categories were for medical, backout, immunologic, and recipient-related reasons, in descending order. Furthermore, a low glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was the most common cause of medical cases. CONCLUSIONS: Many patients were judged ineligible because of lifestyle-related diseases such as low GFR, diabetes mellitus, and obesity. Therefore, thorough patient education should be conducted using these data as a reference to reduce the number of donors ineligible because of lifestyle-related diseases.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Donadores Vivos , Estudios de Cohortes , Índice de Masa Corporal , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , RiñónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The clinical significance of nutrition and inflammation in dialysis patients is well established. This study aimed to evaluate the association between prognosis and indicators of nutrition and inflammation. METHODS: A total of 253 consecutive patients who underwent peritoneal dialysis (PD) as primary renal replacement therapy at our institute between 2006 and 2021 were included. We retrospectively reviewed the patient's medical charts and obtained their clinical information. Nine nutritional and two inflammatory indicators were assessed. Patient outcomes were investigated, and predictive factors were explored. RESULTS: The median age and follow-up period were 65 years and 54 months, respectively. Most nutritional indicators and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels showed a significant correlation with residual renal function. Multivariate analysis revealed that the survival index, nutritional risk index for Japanese hemodialysis patients, and CRP levels were independent indicators of patient survival (P < 0.001, P = 0.034, and P = 0.005, respectively) and cardiovascular disease-free survival (P = 0.009, P = 0.04, and P = 0.017, respectively). Patients with a survival index < 19 and CRP ≥ 0.5 had a high risk of mortality and cardiovascular death (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0002, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that indicators of nutrition and inflammation play important roles in predicting patient outcomes. Further research is warranted to establish optimal management strategies for patients on PD.
Asunto(s)
Fallo Renal Crónico , Diálisis Peritoneal , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Inflamación , Diálisis Peritoneal/efectos adversos , Estado NutricionalRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To investigate the emotional attributes and vaccine implementation rate of patients waiting for kidney transplants during the prolonged COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We included 145 patients who were on the waiting list at our institution. Clinical information was obtained from medical charts, and emotional changes were assessed using a telephone questionnaire comprising 13 questions, including vaccine implementation. We also investigated factors affecting the decision to accept or decline deceased-donor kidney transplantation during the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: Of the 145 patients, 121 (83.4%) provided informed consent and completed the questionnaire. The median age at registration on the waiting list for deceased-donor kidney transplantation and the median waiting period was 45.5 years and 103 months, respectively. This cohort comprised 84 males and 37 females. Twenty patients (16.5%) were diagnosed with COVID-19, and 15 (12.4%) were more curious about deceased-donor kidney transplantation. One hundred patients (82.6%) were vaccinated against COVID-19 more than thrice. Thirty patients (24.8%) declined, and 91 patients (75.2%) accepted an organ transplant offer during the COVID-19 pandemic. Multivariate analysis revealed that the long-term waiting period (P = .038) and anxiety about COVID-19, such as visiting the transplant facility (P < .0001) and prudence over time (P < .0001), were independent factors influencing the decline of a kidney transplant offer. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that some patients hesitated to undergo deceased-donor kidney transplantation during the pandemic. There is a need to develop an appropriate system to ensure safe and secure kidney transplantation during prolonged pandemics.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Trasplante de Riñón , Masculino , Femenino , Humanos , Pandemias , Listas de Espera , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , RiñónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This multi-institutional, observational study examined whether the outcomes after peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter placement in Japan meet the audit criteria of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis (ISPD) guideline and identified factors affecting technique survival and perioperative complications. METHODS: Adult patients who underwent first PD catheter placement for end-stage kidney disease between April 2019 and March 2021 were followed until PD withdrawal, kidney transplantation, transfer to other facilities, death, 1 year after PD start or March 2022, whichever came first. Primary outcomes were time to catheter patency failure and technique failure, and perioperative infectious complications within 30 days of catheter placement. Secondary outcomes were perioperative complications. Appropriate statistical analyses were performed to identify factors associated with the outcomes of interest. RESULTS: Of the total 409 patients, 8 who underwent the embedded catheter technique did not have externalised catheters. Of the 401 remaining patients, catheter patency failure occurred in 25 (6.2%). Technical failure at 12 months after PD catheter placement calculated from cumulative incidence function was 15.3%. On Cox proportional hazards model analysis, serum albumin (hazard ratio (HR) 0.44; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.27-0.70) and straight type catheter (HR 2.14; 95% CI 1.24-3.69) were the independent risk factors for technique failure. On logistic regression analysis, diabetes mellitus was the only independent risk factor for perioperative infectious complications (odds ratio 2.70, 95% CI 1.30-5.58). The occurrence rate of perioperative complications generally met the audit criteria of the ISPD guidelines. CONCLUSION: PD catheter placement in Japan was proven to be safe and appropriate.
Asunto(s)
Fallo Renal Crónico , Diálisis Peritoneal , Adulto , Humanos , Diálisis Peritoneal/efectos adversos , Diálisis Peritoneal/métodos , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Japón , Cateterismo/métodos , Peritoneo , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Fallo Renal Crónico/etiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The stepwise initiation of peritoneal dialysis (PD) using Moncrief and Popovich's technique (SMAP) for catheter insertion is recommended for the systemic introduction of PD and prevention of catheter-related infections. In this study, we investigated patient outcomes in patients who underwent insertion of a PD catheter with a direct method versus the SMAP method. METHODS: We enrolled 295 consecutive patients who underwent PD as a primary renal replacement therapy and underwent insertion of a PD catheter at our institute between 2006 and 2021. We retrospectively reviewed their data and investigated patient outcomes, including mortality and PD catheter-related complications. RESULTS: Median age at PD induction was 65 years in the direct insertion group and 65 years in the SMAP group (P = 0.80). The rate of PD introduction after emergency hemodialysis was significantly higher in the direct insertion group than in the SMAP group (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in survival between the direct insertion and SMAP groups during the median follow-up period of 54 months (P = 0.12). Additionally, patients who transitioned to hemodialysis or kidney transplantation after PD showed significantly longer survival (P < 0.001). The incidence of PD catheter-related complications was not significantly different between the two groups. A body mass index ≥ 23 kg/m2 was an independent risk factor for peritonitis and exit-site infection (P = 0.006 and P = 0.011, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Planned sequential renal replacement therapy including hybrid hemodialysis, complete hemodialysis, and kidney transplantation after PD is important for improving patient outcomes. PD catheter insertion by SMAP may not be mandatory in our clinical practice.
Asunto(s)
Fallo Renal Crónico , Diálisis Peritoneal , Peritonitis , Humanos , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cateterismo/efectos adversos , Cateterismo/métodos , Diálisis Peritoneal/efectos adversos , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Peritonitis/epidemiología , Peritonitis/etiología , Peritonitis/prevención & control , Fallo Renal Crónico/diagnóstico , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Fallo Renal Crónico/complicacionesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Various donor characteristics have been reported as predictive factors for graft survival in kidney transplantations. The living kidney donor profile index (LKDPI) was established in 2016 to evaluate the quality of living donor kidneys. Herein, we verified whether the index score was associated with graft survival and analyzed various donor factors to identify predictors of graft survival in living donor kidney transplantations. METHODS: This retrospective study included 130 patients who received a living donor kidney between 2006 and 2019 at our hospital. Clinical and laboratory data were obtained from the medical records. Living donor kidneys were categorized into 3 groups by LKDPI score, and the death-censored graft survival and predictors of graft survival were evaluated. RESULTS: The median LKDPI score was 35 (IQR: 17-53). The index scores of the living donor kidneys in this study were higher than in previous studies. The groups with the highest scores (LKDPI >40) had significantly shorter death-censored graft survival compared with the group with the lowest scores (LKDPI <20; hazard ratio = 4.0, P = .005). There were no significant differences between the group with the middle scores (LKDPI, 20-40) and the other 2 groups. Donor/recipient weight ratio <0.9, ABO incompatibility, and 2 HLA-DR mismatches were identified as independent predictive factors for shorter graft survival. CONCLUSION: The LKDPI was correlated with death-censored graft survival in this study. However, more studies are required to establish a modified index that is more accurate for Japanese patients.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Humanos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Japón , Donadores Vivos , Supervivencia de Injerto , Rechazo de Injerto , AloinjertosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Recent studies indicate that split renal function calculated by computed tomography (CT) volumetry is equally or more useful than that calculated by nuclear renography for donated kidney side selection. However, it remains unclear if CT volumetry accurately reflects split renal function as measured by nuclear renography. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the reproducibility of CT volumetry. METHODS: Data from 141 donors who underwent living donor nephrectomy at Nara Medical University from March 2007 to June 2021 were reviewed. The correlation and agreement between the predicted postdonation estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) by 99mTc-diethylenetriamine penta-acetic acid (DTPA) scintigraphy and by CT volumetry were evaluated by the Pearson's correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analysis, respectively. Moreover, a comparison in split renal function categorization between 99mTc-DTPA scan and CT volumetry was performed. RESULTS: A total of 133 donors were included in the analysis. There was high correlation between the predicted postdonation eGFR by 99mTc-DTPA scintigraphy and by CT. Moreover, there was agreement in the predicted postdonation eGFR between 99mTc-DTPA scintigraphy and CT volumetry (Bland-Altman analysis [bias, 95% limits of agreement]; 0.83%, -5.6% to 7.3%). However, in one of 17 donors with absolute split renal function greater than 10% by 99mTc-DTPA scintigraphy, this clinically significant difference was missed by CT volumetry. CONCLUSION: There are donors for whom a clinically significant split renal function is not accurately reflected in CT volumetry. Future studies need to amend this discrepancy.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Humanos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Riñón/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pentetato de Tecnecio Tc 99m , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Riñón/diagnóstico por imagen , Riñón/fisiología , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Donadores VivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To investigate the quality of life (QOL) of patients with nocturia after kidney transplantation (KT) and the association between nocturnal polyuria and sleep quality. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, a patient who consented was evaluated using the following items: international prostate symptom QOL score, nocturia-quality of life score, overactive bladder symptom score, Pittsburgh sleep quality index, bladder diary, uroflowmetry, and bioimpedance analysis. Clinical and laboratory data were obtained from medical charts. RESULTS: Forty-three patients were included in the analysis. Approximately 25% of patients urinated once at night, and 58.1% had nocturia twice. Nocturnal polyuria was observed in 86.0% of patients, and overactive bladder was observed in 23.3% of patients. According to the Pittsburgh sleep quality Index, 34.9% of patients had poor sleep quality. Multivariate analysis revealed that patients with nocturnal polyuria tended to have a high estimated glomerular filtration rate (P = .058). On the other hand, multivariate analysis for poor sleep quality revealed that high body fat percentage and low nocturia-quality of life total score were independently correlated factors (P = .008 and P = .012, respectively). Furthermore, the patients with nocturia ≥3/night were significantly older than those with nocturia ≤2/night (P = .022). CONCLUSION: Nocturnal polyuria, poor sleep quality, and aging may decrease the QOL of patients with nocturia after KT. Further investigations, including optimal water intake and interventions, can lead to better management after KT.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Nocturia , Vejiga Urinaria Hiperactiva , Masculino , Humanos , Nocturia/etiología , Poliuria/complicaciones , Poliuria/diagnóstico , Calidad de Vida , Calidad del Sueño , Estudios Transversales , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Tacrolimus (TAC) has several problems due to its narrow therapeutic window and variations pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Recently, several studies reported that TAC metabolism, defined by TAC blood trough concentration to dose (C/D) ratio, was associated with TAC toxicity. Reports on once-daily extended-release TAC (TAC-ER) are limited. The present study aimed to investigate the effect of the TAC metabolic rate on TAC-ER and compare TAC area under the curve (AUC) between fast and slow metabolizers. METHODS: A total of 58 recipients were included in this study. The optimal cut-off value and time of the C/D ratio on TAC-ER for fast and slow metabolizers was determined using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for biopsy-proven calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) nephrotoxicity. RESULTS: The optimal time to evaluate the C/D ratio was 1 month after kidney transplantation (KT) and the cut-off value was 0.9. The multivariate analysis for CNI nephrotoxicity risk showed that only TAC metabolism was associated with CNI nephrotoxicity (hazard ratio 10.60, P = .005, 95% CI 2.03-55.22). Cytomegalovirus infection occurred more frequently in fast metabolizers when the cut-off value of the C/D ratio was set to 0.9 at 3 months after KT (P = .04). The TAC C4, AUC2-8, was higher in fast metabolizers than in slow metabolizers (P < .01, P = .03, respectively). CONCLUSION: The study revealed that TAC fast metabolizers on TAC-ER may be classified as a high-risk group for CNI nephrotoxicity and cytomegalovirus infection. The result of TAC AUC supported the hypothesis that fast metabolizers tended to be overexposed to immunosuppressive agents early after oral administration.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Citomegalovirus , Enfermedades Renales , Trasplante de Riñón , Humanos , Tacrolimus/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Calcineurina , Japón , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: We investigated the diagnostic and therapeutic benefits of limited or extended pelvic lymph node dissection during a robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer. METHODS: Diagnostic and therapeutic benefits were assessed according to the rates of pN1 and biochemical recurrence, respectively. The primary outcome was the biochemical recurrence-free rate, and secondary outcomes included the diagnostic and therapeutic benefits of pelvic lymph node dissection. RESULTS: A total of 534 patients were analyzed. Out of the 534 patients, 207 (38.8%) received limited pelvic lymph node dissection while 134 (25.1%) received extended dissection. There were 297 patients with a Briganti index ≥5%. Extended dissections yielded significantly more resected lymph nodes (p < 0.0001), and 72.2% of cases of pN1 were located outside the obturator. The incidence rate of pN1 was 6.1%, and performance of extended lymph node dissection was an independent predictor for pN1 (odds ratio 9.0, 95% confidence interval 2.5-33.1). The rate of biochemical recurrence was 14.9%, and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis of the propensity score matched population revealed that patients with high or very-high risk tended to benefit from limited lymph node dissection (hazard ratio 8.4, 95% confidence interval 0.8-82.3) while the therapeutic benefit of extended dissection was unclear by comparison. CONCLUSIONS: Extended pelvic lymph node dissection significantly improves diagnostic accuracy; however, the therapeutic benefit of pelvic lymph node dissection was not observed in this study.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata , Robótica , Masculino , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Puntaje de Propensión , Relevancia Clínica , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Prostatectomía , Pelvis/patología , Pelvis/cirugía , Ganglios Linfáticos/cirugía , Ganglios Linfáticos/patologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare the perioperative outcomes of patients with complex renal tumors treated with open versus robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. METHODS: This retrospective study included 273 patients diagnosed with localized renal tumors at our institution between January 2007 and October 2020. Patients with moderate to high complexity tumors based on the RENAL nephrometry score were included. Perioperative outcomes were compared between open and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy patients. Remnant renal function was defined as the estimated glomerular filtration rate at 12 months after surgery. RESULTS: Open and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy were performed in 43 and 77 patients, respectively. There was no significant difference in overall, cancer-specific, recurrence-free, and metastasis-free survival between the two groups. Remnant renal function was significantly better preserved in the open group, and body mass index was identified as an independent predictive factor (odds ratio 3.05, P = 0.017). Ischemia or type of surgery were not related to remnant renal function. The trifecta achievement rate was 51.2% in the open group and 71.4% in the robot-assisted group (P = 0.031), and the incidence of complications was significantly higher in the open partial nephrectomy group (P = 0.0030). Multivariate analysis revealed that open partial nephrectomy was an independent predictive factor for the incidence of complications (odds ratio 3.92, P = 0.0020). CONCLUSION: Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy can provide good and acceptable oncological and functional outcomes with fewer complications in patients with more complex renal tumors. Further research is needed to establish appropriate treatment strategies and guidelines in current clinical practice.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Renales , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Robótica , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/efectos adversos , Nefrectomía/efectos adversosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate the effect of available treatment modalities on primary treatment selection in patients with localized prostate cancer and that of introducing robotic surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 12 061 patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer between 2004 and 2018 from 21 institutions. These institutions were divided into five groups according to the availability of surgery and radiotherapy. Differences in primary treatment selection between the institutions were investigated, and the predictive factors involved in the selection were explored. RESULTS: Surgery, radiotherapy, androgen deprivation therapy, and active surveillance/watchful waiting were selected as primary treatment in 4115, 3621, 3188, and 821 patients, respectively, while the remaining 316 patients selected other modalities. The number of patients, particularly young patients, was much higher in institutions with both surgery and radiotherapy. With the introduction of robotic surgery, open radical prostatectomy has decreased, and robotic surgery made up approximately 70% of all prostatectomies. Institutions with both surgery and radiotherapy tended to treat patients with very low or low risk by surgery or radiotherapy, while institutions without surgery and radiotherapy tended to select active surveillance or watchful waiting. Multivariate analysis revealed that primary treatment selection for prostate cancer was affected not only by clinical factors, but also by the available modalities in each institution. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in available treatment modalities affect the selection of primary treatment for localized prostate cancer. Introduction of robotic surgery also has a strong influence on the number of patients in each institution.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Masculino , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Antagonistas de Andrógenos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Prostatectomía/efectos adversosAsunto(s)
COVID-19 , Fallo Renal Crónico , Trasplante de Riñón , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Pandemias/prevención & control , Donantes de Tejidos , Listas de EsperaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Perioperative management of fluid status during kidney transplantation is important, because volume overload can increase the risk of cardiovascular disease in recipients. The edema index calculated by bioelectrical impedance analysis is commonly used to correctly evaluate fluid status. We evaluated the relevance of the edema index for cardiovascular disease in kidney transplant recipients, and searched for predictors of high edema index in the perioperative period during kidney transplantation. METHODS: A total of 88 recipients were included in this study. The group in which the edema index at discharge was >0.40 was termed as the "high edema index group", and that with ≤0.40 was termed as the "low edema index group". We assessed cardiovascular disease-free survival and cardiovascular disease-specific survival in the two groups by using Cox proportional regression analyses adjusted by inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis. The patients' background and conventional cardiovascular disease risk factors were assessed to estimate predictors for a high edema index. RESULTS: A high edema index was significantly associated with short cardiovascular disease-free survival after kidney transplantation (hazard ratio 10.01; P < 0.05) in the inverse probability of treatment weighting model. There were no significant differences in the cardiovascular disease-specific survival. In multivariate logistic regression analyses, non-pre-emptive kidney transplantation and dyslipidemia were significant independent predictors of a high edema index (odds ratio 3.59, P < 0.05 and odds ratio 4.05, P < 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: A high edema index is associated with the incidence of cardiovascular disease. Overhydration should be especially avoided in recipients with these factors, and their fluid volume should be carefully managed.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Trasplante de Riñón , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Edema/diagnóstico , Edema/etiología , Impedancia Eléctrica , Humanos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Donadores Vivos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of vibegron for the treatment of antimuscarinic-resistant neurogenic bladder dysfunction in patients with spina bifida. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 15 patients with antimuscarinic-resistant neurogenic bladder dysfunction due to spina bifida underwent a video-urodynamic study before and during the administration of vibegron 50 mg once daily instead of antimuscarinic agents from February 2019 through April 2021. The video-urodynamic study was carried out to evaluate bladder compliance, maximum cystometric bladder capacity, detrusor overactivity, detrusor leak point pressure and vesicoureteral reflux before and >3 months after the beginning of vibegron administration. RESULTS: Treatment with vibegron significantly improved bladder compliance and maximum cystometric bladder capacity compared with antimuscarinic agents, respectively (7.4 ± 4.2 vs 30.4 ± 48.2 mL/cmH2 O, P = 0.0001; 231.4 ± 81.2 vs 325.2 ± 106.5 mL, P = 0.0005). Detrusor overactivity did not change after the administration of vibegron. Bladder deformity, which was confirmed in 12 patients, improved in half of the patients after taking vibegron. Vesicoureteral reflux, which was confirmed in two patients, was extinguished after taking vibegron. Newly occurring adverse events were not observed, and all patients continued to take vibegron during the treatment period. CONCLUSIONS: Favorable efficacy of vibegron for antimuscarinic-resistant neurogenic bladder dysfunction due to spina bifida was shown video-urodynamically without apparent adverse events. Vibegron is a favorable option for the treatment of antimuscarinic-resistant neurogenic bladder dysfunction in patients with spina bifida.