RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Superior and inferior ramus fractures, termed straddle fractures, are high-energy fractures often accompanied by unstable pelvic ring injuries. However, consensus is lacking regarding indications for surgical treatment or fixation methods. We aimed to compare clinical and radiological outcomes of unilateral ramus fixation (URF) and bilateral ramus fixation (BRF) for straddle fractures with unilateral posterior pelvic ring injuries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We enrolled 118 patients (73 males, 45 females; mean age, 47 years) diagnosed with straddle fractures between March 2015 and December 2021 with > 1 year of follow-up. Patients were divided into URF (n = 60) and BRF (n = 58) groups based on the anterior pelvic ring fixation method. Preoperative factors including body mass index, diabetes, smoking, injury mechanism, injury severity score, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification system, Tile classification, and Young and Burgess classification were compared. Intraoperative blood loss, operation time, postoperative bone union rate, complications, and the need for additional surgeries were analyzed. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant preoperative differences between the two groups. However, the URF group showed a significantly lower mean operative time and blood transfusion requirement (63 min and 2 units, respectively) than the BRF group (104 min and 3 units, respectively) (both p < 0.001). Postoperatively, bone union was achieved in 57 (95.0%) and 56 (96.6%) patients in the URF and BRF groups, respectively. Complications occurred in 17 (28.3%) and 14 (24.1%) patients in the URF and BRF groups, respectively, with additional surgeries needed in 3 (5.0%) patients in the URF group and 2 (3.4%) patients in the BRF group. CONCLUSIONS: Unilateral anterior fixation can provide sufficient stability and clinical effectiveness in the surgical treatment of straddle fractures in areas with posterior pelvic ring injuries. Compared with bilateral anterior fixation, unilateral fixation significantly reduces operation time and blood loss, making it a viable fixation method for straddle fractures.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To review surgical complications after fixation of stress-positive minimally displaced (< 1 cm) lateral compression type 1 (LC1) pelvic ring injuries. METHODS: A retrospective study at a level one trauma center identified patients who received surgical fixation of isolated LC1 pelvic ring injuries. Surgical complications and additional procedures were reviewed. RESULTS: Sixty patients were included. The median age was 61 years (Interquartile range 40-70), 65% (n = 39) were women, and 57% (n = 34) had high-energy mechanisms. Anterior-posterior, posterior-only, and anterior-only fixation constructs were used in 77% (n = 46), 15% (n = 9), and 8% (n = 5) of patients. Anterior fixation was performed with rami screw fixation in 82% (49/60), external fixation in 2% (1/60), and open reduction and plate fixation in 2% (1/60). There were 15 surgical complications in 23% (14/60), and 12 additional procedures in 17% (10/60). Complications included loss of reduction ≥ 1 cm (8%), symptomatic hematomas (8%), symptomatic backout of unicortical retrograde rami screws (5%), deep infection of the pelvic space after a retrograde rami screw (1.6%), and iatrogenic L5 nerve injury (1.6%). All losses of reduction involved geriatric females with distal rami fractures sustained in ground-level falls. Loss of reduction was found to be more likely in patients with low energy mechanisms (proportional difference (PD) 62%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 18% to 76%; p = 0.01) and 2 versus 1 posterior pelvic screws (PD 36%; CI 0.4% to 75%; p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical complications and additional procedures routinely occurred after fixation of LC1 injuries. Patients should be appropriately counseled on the risks of surgical fixation of these controversial injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic, Level III.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to compare the biomechanical properties of two types of intramedullary nails - reconstruction nails (RCN) and cephalomedullary nails (CMN) - each with different proximal fixations, in a model of an osteoporotic subtrochanteric femoral fracture. This study focused on assessing stiffness and load to failure of RCN and CMN nails to provide insight into their clinical applications in osteoporotic fracture treatments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten synthetic osteoporotic femoral models were used to generate a comminuted subtrochanteric fracture model. Five femurs were fixed using an RCN, and the remaining five were fixed using a CMN. The constructs were subjected to axial compression to measure their structural stiffness, load to failure, and failure modes. RESULTS: The CMN group demonstrated a slightly higher load to failure (mean, 2250 N) than the RCN group (mean, 2100 N), which was statistically significant (p = 0.008). However, the stiffness in both groups was statistically similar (RCN, 250 N/mm; CMN, 255 N/mm; p = 0.69). Both groups showed a load to failure exceeding 1500 N, a typically exerted load on the femoral head by a 75 kg individual. The failure patterns differed, with CMN failures starting at the nail insertion area and RCN failures starting at the reconstruction screw area. CONCLUSION: The RCN offers stiffness comparable to that of the CMN; although its load to failure is slightly lower than that of the CMN, it still exceeds the physiological tolerance limit. These findings suggest that the RCN is a viable alternative for treating osteoporotic subtrochanteric fractures.
Asunto(s)
Clavos Ortopédicos , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas , Fracturas de Cadera , Fracturas Osteoporóticas , Humanos , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/instrumentación , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/métodos , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/cirugía , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/fisiopatología , Fracturas de Cadera/cirugía , Fracturas de Cadera/fisiopatología , Ensayo de Materiales , Fracturas Conminutas/cirugía , Fracturas Conminutas/fisiopatología , Soporte de Peso/fisiologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Fractures of the distal femur with metaphyseal comminution and complete intra-articular involvement (AO/OTA classifications 33C2 and 33C3) present challenges for reduction and fixation. However, an optimal fixation method remains unknown. This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of locking extramedullary plating (LEP) and retrograde intramedullary nailing (RIN) for complete distal femoral intra-articular fractures with metaphyseal comminution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2016 and May 2022, 80 patients (45 men and 35 women; average age, 56.7 years) diagnosed with AO/OTA 33C2 and 33C3 were treated with either LEP or RIN and followed up for at least one year. Post-operative evaluations included radiographic assessments of bone union rate, timing, and alignment. Clinically, the knee joint range of motion (ROM), lower extremity functional scale (LEFS), and Kellgren and Lawrence (KL) grade were analyzed. The complications were also compared. RESULTS: 36 underwent LEP and 44 underwent RIN. Bone union was observed in 69.4% and 63.6% of the patients in the LEP and RIN groups, respectively (p = 0.64). The average union time was 6.9 months for the LEP group and 6.6 months for the RIN group (p = 0.51). A tendency toward varus deformity was observed in the RIN group, although the difference was not statistically significant. No significant differences were observed in knee ROM, LEFS, or KL grade. Complications included non-union (33.8%; RIN, 11; LEP, 16), varus deformity (5%; RIN, 4; LEP, 0), infection (1.3%; RIN, 0; LEP, 1), heterotrophic ossification (1.3%; RIN, 0; LEP, 1), and wound dehiscence (2.5%; RIN, 2; LEP, 0). CONCLUSIONS: The surgical fixation methods, RIN and LEP, for complete distal femoral intra-articular fractures with metaphyseal comminution showed similar clinical and radiological outcomes. However, regardless of the type of fixation device used, there was a reduced rate of bone union owing to high energy and a less favorable prognosis.
Asunto(s)
Placas Óseas , Fracturas del Fémur , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas , Fracturas Conminutas , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Masculino , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/métodos , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/instrumentación , Fracturas del Fémur/cirugía , Fracturas del Fémur/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano , Fracturas Conminutas/cirugía , Fracturas Conminutas/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fracturas Intraarticulares/cirugía , Fracturas Intraarticulares/diagnóstico por imagen , Rango del Movimiento ArticularRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The treatment of segmental tibial bone defects remains a surgical challenge. While Bone Transport (BT) and Induced Membrane Technique (IMT) are effective strategies for regenerating bone, there are few comparative studies between them. This investigation undertakes a comparative analysis of BT and IMT for large segmental tibial defects stabilised through plate fixation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with segmental tibial defects exceeding 5 cm were prospectively enrolled from 2008 to 2021 in a single institution, with a minimum follow-up duration of two years. All patients underwent either BT or IMT with plate fixation of the tibia. Procedural success, primary union as well as bone and functional outcome scores were compared. Complications, including non-unions, joint contractures and deep infections requiring surgical intervention, were also compared. RESULTS: 41 patients were recruited in total. 28 patients underwent Bone Transport Over a Plate (BTOP), while 13 patients underwent IMT with Plate fixation (IMTP). The procedural success rate trended higher in IMTP compared to BTOP (100% vs. 85.7%). The primary union rate also trended higher in IMTP compared to BTOP (92.3% vs. 79.2%). BTOP and IMTP achieved similar rates of satisfactory bone outcome scores (78.6% vs. 84.6%) and functional outcome scores (75% vs. 76.5%). There was no statistical difference between procedural success, primary union, bone and functional outcome scores. The complication rate in BTOP was 78.6% (22 of 28), including five docking site or regenerate non-unions, eight deep infections and nine joint contractures. IMTP had a 38.5% (5 of 13) complication rate, including one non-union, two deep infections and two joint contractures. The complication rate was 2.04 times higher in BTOP compared to IMTP (p = 0.0117). CONCLUSIONS: BTOP and IMTP are both equally effective techniques for regenerating bone in large tibial bone defects. However, IMTP may be a safer procedure than BTOP, with a lower probability of requiring additional procedures to address complications.
Asunto(s)
Placas Óseas , Fijación Interna de Fracturas , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Fracturas de la Tibia , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fracturas de la Tibia/cirugía , Adulto , Estudios Prospectivos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/instrumentación , Tibia/cirugía , Anciano , Trasplante Óseo/métodos , Regeneración ÓseaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To determine the incidence of nonunion, clinical and radiological outcomes, and risk factors for nonunion in conservatively treated pubic ramus fractures among patients diagnosed with pelvic ring injury. METHODS: A total of 546 patients (192 men, 354 women) diagnosed with pubic ramus fracture, treated conservatively, and who had completed > 1 year follow-up at three level 1 trauma centers between January 2014 and December 2020, were enrolled. Clinical and radiological evaluations were compared between union and nonunion groups. Logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used. RESULT: At the final follow-up, 527 (96.5%) and 19 (3.5%) patients had union and nonunion of fractures, respectively. The union and nonunion groups exhibited statistically significant differences in posterior injury (p = 0.040), bilateral ramus fracture (p < 0.001), initial displacement (p < 0.001), and clinical result (p < 0.001). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, initial displacement (odds ratio, 4.727; p = 0.005) was analyzed as a risk factor for nonunion. According to the Kaplan-Meier analysis, the median initial displacement of nonunion occurrence was 17.9 mm (standard error, 1.211; 95% confidence interval 15.526-20.274), and nonunion patients were included if the displacement was > 15.9 mm (standard error, 1.305) on the 75th percentile. CONCLUSION: Conservative treatment is ineffective in some ramus fracture cases with pelvic ring injury. As ramus nonunion causes functional deterioration, active treatment is required if the displacement is ≥ 16 mm.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas Óseas , Fracturas no Consolidadas , Huesos Pélvicos , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Huesos Pélvicos/lesiones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tratamiento Conservador , Fracturas Óseas/terapia , Fracturas no Consolidadas/epidemiología , Fracturas no Consolidadas/etiología , Factores de Riesgo , Fijación Interna de FracturasRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Subtrochanteric femur fractures treated with intramedullary nails present biomechanical benefits, early weight-bearing, and reduced soft tissue damage, promoting bone union. However, improper reduction due to muscular forces and fragmented proximal bone increases nonunion risk. This study evaluates the efficacy of the blocking screw technique in preventing malalignment during intramedullary nailing. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In cases of subtrochanteric femoral fractures where malalignment, such as varus and anterior angulation, was anticipated during intramedullary nailing, proper reduction was ensured using blocking screw technique on the proximal bone fragment from the coronal or sagittal plane. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 25 patients (14 males, 11 females; average age 55.12 years) who were followed up for more than 1 year. The postoperative neck-shaft angle, anterior angulation angle, and limb length discrepancy were compared radiologically with those on the healthy side, and the presence and duration of bone union were measured. The Harris hip score was used for functional evaluation, and complications, including infection, were analyzed. RESULTS: At the final follow-up, primary bone union was achieved in 21/25 patients (84%), with an average bone union time of 21.81 weeks (range, 14-42 weeks). Of the four nonunions, bone union was achieved in three cases through bone grafting and supplemental plating and in the other case through intramedullary exchange, supplemental plating, and bone grafting. The femoral neck-shaft angle and anterior angulation showed no statistically significant differences compared with the healthy side, with averages of - 1.15° and - 1.4°, respectively. The limb length discrepancy was an average of - 2.4 mm. Regarding functional outcomes, the Harris hip score averaged 89.52 points (range 82-94 points). CONCLUSIONS: In subtrochanteric femoral fractures, the blocking screw technique effectively prevents malalignment during intramedullary nailing, ensuring not only appropriate reduction but also high bone union rates.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas del Fémur , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas , Fracturas de Cadera , Masculino , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clavos Ortopédicos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tornillos Óseos , Fracturas de Cadera/cirugía , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/métodos , Fracturas del Fémur/cirugía , Curación de FracturaRESUMEN
Background: Vitamin D concentrations are associated with sepsis, pneumonia, and mortality in critically ill patients. However, the role of vitamin D in critically injured patients with trauma remains unknown. This study investigated the effects of vitamin D concentrations on outcomes in critically injured patients with trauma. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted by randomly selecting 100 patients among those who visited our trauma center. The serum vitamin D concentration was measured upon arrival at the hospital, and the length of stay in a trauma intensive care unit after admission, duration of mechanical ventilation, number of days spent in the hospital, development of complications, and death were investigated. The association between the surveyed variables and vitamin D concentrations was investigated using regression analysis. Results: Of the 100 patients, 69 were men and 31 were women with an average age of 51.7 years. The average intensive care unit stay length was 18.4 days, and 6 patients (5.9%) died. Univariate regression analysis showed that the factors affecting patient mortality were age (p = 0.02), volume of blood transfused within 24 hours of arrival (p = 0.009), systolic blood pressure measured upon hospital arrival (p = 0.01), and serum lactate concentration measured upon hospital arrival (p = 0.03). Multivariate regression analysis showed that the factors affecting patient mortality were age (p = 0.01), volume of blood transfusion (p = 0.04), and systolic blood pressure measured upon hospital arrival (p = 0.01). Conclusions: There were no statistically significant effects of serum vitamin D concentrations in critically ill patients with trauma on death during hospitalization.
Asunto(s)
Deficiencia de Vitamina D , Vitamina D , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Enfermedad Crítica , Centros Traumatológicos , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/complicaciones , Vitaminas , Pronóstico , Tiempo de InternaciónRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The distal femur comprises a wide intramedullary cavity and thin cortical bone. Firm internal fixation of comminuted fractures with displacement is challenging. Although many comparative studies have reported retrograde intramedullary nailing (RIN) and distal femoral plating (DFP) as the usual fixation methods for distal femoral fractures, no clear conclusion has been reached. Therefore, a meta-analysis and systematic review of the clinical and radiological results were conducted to determine the appropriate treatment method for distal femoral fractures. METHODS: A systematic search of the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases from their inception to December 19, 2022, was performed using predefined criteria. Studies comparing the effects of RIN and DFP were considered. The analyzed outcome measures included duration of surgery, blood loss, time to union, delayed union, nonunion, malalignment, implant failure, infection, reoperation, limb length discrepancy, range of motion, persistent anterior knee pain, knee stiffness, and functional scores. Meta-analysis of pooled data was conducted using a random-effects model to determine the standard mean difference (SMD) or odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Thirty-three studies with 2,432 patients were included. Compared to DFP, RIN was associated with a shorter time to fracture union (SMD, 1.83 months; 95% CI - 2.76 to - 0.90; P < 0.001) and a lower incidence of postoperative infection (OR 0.54; 95% CI 0.31-0.94; P = 0.03). Pooled analysis revealed no significant differences in other outcome measures between the two treatment modalities. CONCLUSION: In distal femoral fractures, RIN had a shorter bone union time and was more resistant to infection than DFP. However, there were no significant differences in the other clinical parameters. Therefore, the characteristics, strengths, and weaknesses of RIN and DFP should be carefully identified, and appropriate treatment should be provided based on the patient's medical condition and fracture pattern.
RESUMEN
Background: Although most studies focused on the alignment or union of the tibia in same-level distal third tibiofibular fractures, the outcome of a concomitant fibular fracture is generally regarded as being of secondary importance in the literature. This study aimed to assess the outcomes of fibular fractures in same-level distal third tibiofibular fractures. Methods: In this retrospective study, we enrolled 111 patients with same-level distal third tibiofibular fractures treated at our institute between January 2016 and August 2020. Tibial fractures were stabilized with intramedullary nailing, and the cases were divided into two groups based on whether they additionally underwent fibular fixation (group 1, 57 cases) or not (group 2, 54 cases). Clinical and radiographic outcomes were used for the evaluation of tibial and fibular alignments, union of the tibia and fibula, number of interlocking screws in the distal tibial fragment, range of motion of the ankle joint, and complications. Results: No statistically significant differences in the tibial union rate or mean tibial alignment were observed between the two groups on either the immediate postoperative or final radiographs. The fibular union rate in group 1 was significantly higher than that in group 2 (fibular nonunion, 0 vs. 15; p < 0.001). Statistically significant differences in fibular displacement were observed on immediate postoperative radiographs between patients with fibular union and those without it. At the final follow-up, the mean range of ankle motion and lower extremity functional scale scores did not differ between the two groups. Conclusions: Regardless of whether fibular fixation was performed, the overall tibial alignment with intramedullary nailing was well restored and the union rate of the tibia was comparable in the two groups. Fibular nonunion is not uncommon in unfixed fibula fractures. Displacement of the fibula as seen on immediate postoperative radiographs was related to fibular nonunion.
Asunto(s)
Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas , Fracturas de la Tibia , Humanos , Peroné/diagnóstico por imagen , Peroné/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fijación Interna de Fracturas , Fracturas de la Tibia/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas de la Tibia/cirugía , Tibia/cirugía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The extra-articular distal humerus plate (EADHP) has been widely used for surgical treatment of distal humerus shaft fracture (DHSF). However, the surgical approach, fixation methods, and implant positions of the EADHP remain controversial owing to iatrogenic radial nerve injury and complaints such as skin irritation related to the plate. Anterior plating with a modified (upside-down application) proximal humerus locking plate (PHILOS) has been proposed as an alternative, However, research on its biomechanical performance remain insufficient and were mostly based on retrospective studies. This study quantitatively compared and evaluated the biomechanical performance between posterior plating with the EADHP and anterior plating with a modified PHILOS using finite element analysis (FEA). The FEA simulation results that both the EADHP and PHILOS had adequate biomechanical performance and stability under axial, bending, and varus force load conditions. The PHILOS has a fixed stability comparable to that of the EADHP, and fixation was achieved using only four locking screws within a fixed range of 30 mm just above the olecranon fossa. The results show that the PHILOS could be an option for the fixation of a DHSF when considering the dissection range and complaints (e.g. skin irritation) associated with the EADHP.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas Humerales Distales , Fracturas del Húmero , Humanos , Fracturas del Húmero/cirugía , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Análisis de Elementos Finitos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Húmero/cirugía , Placas Óseas , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodosRESUMEN
Purpose: The study aims to identify the optimal approach for femoral head fracture (FHF) by comparing the postoperative complications and outcome score of the Kocher-Langenbeck posterior approach (KLP) and trochanteric flip osteotomy (TFO) through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for studies published up to 22 January 2023, which compared TFO to the KLP for FHF treatment. The main outcomes of this meta-analysis were the rate of postoperative complications including osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH), heterotopic ossification (HO), and total hip replacement (THR) conversion rate and Thompson-Epstein (T-E) score at the final follow-up. Results: We included four studies with 57 cases of FHFs; 27 and 30 patients underwent TFO and the KLP, respectively. Following the pooled analysis, HO incidence was significantly higher in TFO than in the KLP (OR = 4.03; 95% CI 1.10-14.81; P = 0.04; I 2 = 0%), but there were no differences in other variables, including the incidence of ONFH (OR = 0.41; 95% CI 0.07-2.35; P = 0.32; I 2 = 0%), THR conversion rate (OR = 0.82; 95% CI 0.16-4.29; P = 0.81; I 2 = 0%), and number of inferior results in the T-E score (OR = 0.49; 95% CI 0.14-1.73; P = 0.27; I 2 = 0%). Conclusions: Amongst the posterior approaches for FHFs, the KLP and TFO did not present significant clinical and radiological differences; hence, the approach can be selected depending on the surgeon's experience and preference.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Owing to its distinct biomechanical properties, nonunion is common (7-20%) after intramedullary (IM) nailing of subtrochanteric femoral fractures. Unlike diaphyseal nonunion, it is difficult to provide sufficient stability by exchanging nailing alone in subtrochanteric nonunion. This study investigated the clinical outcomes of femoral subtrochanteric nonunion initially treated with an IM nail and subsequently managed with minimally invasive augmentative plate fixation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nineteen patients were enrolled retrospectively. The mechanisms of initial injury were traffic accidents in 8, falls from a height in seven, and slipping in two patients. Two patients with atypical subtrochanteric femoral fractures without a specific trauma history were further included. All patients underwent IM nailing as the index operation. Nonunion surgery was performed an average of 45.2 weeks after the initial surgery. In cases of hardware damage and/or atrophic nonunion, exchange nailing and bone grafting were performed in addition to augmentative plating, as necessary. Conversely, augmentative plating alone was performed in cases of hypertrophic nonunion without any failure of the preexisting IM nail or malalignment. A narrow locking compression plate was fixed after contouring according to the shape of the proximal femur. The mean follow-up period was 36.1 months. RESULTS: Bony union was achieved in 18/19 patients (94.7%), at an average of 19.8 weeks after nonunion surgery. In the case that did not heal even after exchange nailing, additional plating and bone grafting, further autogenous bone grafting was required after 11 months, which healed uneventfully. There were 2 cases of soft tissue irritation over the plate, but no major complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Additional plate augmentation over a retained IM nail yields satisfactory outcomes in terms of the bony union in subtrochanteric nonunion. Given its expected biomechanical superiority and relatively easy surgical technique, it may be a reasonable option for the management of femoral subtrochanteric nonunion.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas del Fémur , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas , Fracturas no Consolidadas , Fracturas de Cadera , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/métodos , Fracturas no Consolidadas/cirugía , Fracturas de Cadera/cirugía , Fracturas del Fémur/cirugía , Fémur , Placas Óseas , Clavos OrtopédicosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Tension band wiring (TBW) and screw fixation (SF) are common surgical treatments for medial malleolar fractures (MMFs); however, no systematic review has identified which fixation method is superior. This study aimed to determine the most optimal MMF fixation method by comparing the clinical and radiological outcomes of TBW and SF through a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that there may be differences in outcomes between TBW and SF for treating MMFs. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for studies that compared TBW and SF for MMF treatment published through June 8, 2021. Fracture union, outcome scores, and postoperative complications were analyzed. RESULTS: We included 10 studies with 512 MMF cases; 218 and 294 patients were treated with TBW and SF, respectively. Pooled analysis revealed no significant differences between them for all outcome variables, including the time to fracture union (mean difference=-0.59 weeks; 95% confidence interval [CI], -1.82 to 0.64; p=0.35; I2=70%), number of excellent or good outcomes based on the final Olerud and Molander Ankle score (odds ratio [OR], 1.46; 95% CI, 0.53-5.02; p=0.47; I2=0%), delayed union rate (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.34-2.59; p=0.91; I2=17%), superficial infection rate (OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.33-4.26; p=0.79; I2=0%), and number of fixation failures (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.16-1.74; p=0.29; I2=13%). CONCLUSIONS: Both TBW and SF are excellent clinical and radiological methods for MMF fixation. However, an appropriate fixation method should be chosen according to the fracture type and size and bone quality considering the advantages and disadvantages of each method. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, meta-analysis.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas de Tobillo , Fijación Interna de Fracturas , Humanos , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Fracturas de Tobillo/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas de Tobillo/cirugía , Tornillos Óseos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Articulación del Tobillo/cirugía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Increased anterolateral bowing of the femur is associated with atypical femoral fractures among older patients (including both those receiving and those not receiving treatment with bisphosphonates) as well as a greater likelihood of occurring in the diaphyseal versus the subtrochanteric region. Prophylactic intramedullary (IM) nailing is recommended for the treatment of incomplete atypical femoral fractures, which are radiographically evident. However, this bowing deformity is considered to be a major obstacle to IM nailing as it may be associated with postoperative complications. Corrective osteotomy combined with IM nailing straightens the exaggerated curvature of the femur. We hypothesized that this technique may lead to the safe and rapid healing of incomplete diaphyseal atypical femoral fractures, thereby reducing lateral tensile stress. METHODS: From October 2015 through March 2020, 17 female patients (20 femora) with a mean age of 76.1 years (range, 68 to 86 years) underwent a surgical procedure for the treatment of an incomplete diaphyseal atypical femoral fracture associated with anterolateral bowing. The surgical technique consisted of minimally invasive osteotomy and reconstruction with use of IM nailing, with or without an augmentation plate. Preoperative and postoperative radiographic findings (lateral and anterior bowing angles, anterolateral bowing grade, and lateral distal femoral angle [LDFA]) were compared. Primary union, time to union, and complications were evaluated as the outcomes. RESULTS: Primary bone union was achieved in 19 of the 20 femora at a mean of 24.9 weeks (range, 20 to 40 weeks). There were 2 instances of delayed union, which healed at 36 and 40 weeks. The lateral bowing angle, anterior bowing angle, and LDFA significantly improved postoperatively (from 12.0° to 3.3°, from 17.3° to 11.5°, and from 93.5° to 88.8°, respectively) (p < 0.001). There was 1 instance of nonunion, which healed after plate augmentation without a bone graft. CONCLUSIONS: Given the pathophysiology of elevated lateral tensile stress, corrective osteotomy and IM nailing may be an acceptable solution for the treatment of incomplete diaphyseal atypical femoral fractures associated with increased anterolateral bowing. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas del Fémur , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Probabilidad , Fracturas del Fémur/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas del Fémur/cirugíaRESUMEN
This study proposes a finite element analysis (FEA) model for complex fractures at the osteoporotic proximal humerus and investigates the relevance of using a calcar screw in surgical treatments using this model. Two types of three-dimensional (3D) fracture models of patients with osteoporotic humerus were constructed reflecting the mechanical properties of the osteoporotic humerus, such as the Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio, and two load conditions mimicking the clinical environment were applied for simulation. Using the 3D models and the conditions, the FEA software calculated the concentration and distribution of stresses developing in the humerus, locking compression plate (LCP), and screws. Then, we evaluated and predicted the fixed state of a LCP system depending on whether the maximum stress value exceeded tensile strength. When axial force was applied, insertion of the calcar screw led to significant reduction of stress applied on screws in the fracture model having a medial gap by approximately 61%, from 913.20 MPa to 351.84 MPa. Based on the results, it was clearly confirmed that using of calcar screws improved the stability of a three-part fractures and simultaneously reinforced medial support.
Asunto(s)
Fijación Interna de Fracturas , Fracturas del Hombro , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Placas Óseas , Tornillos Óseos , Análisis de Elementos Finitos , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Humanos , Húmero/cirugía , Fracturas del Hombro/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas del Hombro/cirugíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: We aimed to report the clinical and radiological outcomes of staged surgery using the acute induced membrane technique with an antibiotic-impregnated cement spacer (ACS) and soft-tissue reconstructive surgery and to identify factors affecting clinical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients with severe open tibia fractures were treated via staged surgery from January 2014 to December 2019 and followed up for ≥1 year. In the first surgery, an ACS was inserted into the bone defect site along with debridement and irrigation and was temporarily fixed in place with an external fixator. The internal fixator was placed, and flap surgery and cement spacer changes were performed during the next surgery. In the third surgery, an autogenous bone graft was performed. Radiologic and functional results were investigated according to the Association for the Study and Application of the Method of Ilizarov (ASAMI) criteria, and factors affecting the ASAMI score were analyzed. RESULTS: The average bone defect width was 43.9 mm, and the size of soft-tissue defect was 79.3 cm² . Bone union was achieved in all cases except one and required 9.4 months on average. Complications occurred in 10 cases (31.2%). Good or better clinical effects, in terms of ASAMI radiologic and functional scores, were observed in 29 and 24 cases, respectively. Complications and additional surgery were common factors affecting the two scores. CONCLUSION: Staged surgery using the acute induced membrane technique and soft-tissue reconstructive surgery is an efficacious treatment for open tibial fractures with bone defects.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos de los Tejidos Blandos , Fracturas de la Tibia , Antibacterianos , Fijadores Externos , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Traumatismos de los Tejidos Blandos/cirugía , Tibia , Fracturas de la Tibia/complicaciones , Fracturas de la Tibia/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas de la Tibia/cirugía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Although many studies have reported the use of dynamic hip screws (DHS) and cephalomedullary nailing (CMN) for basicervical femoral neck fracture (BFNF), no clear treatment protocols have been recommended. The present study aimed to compare the surgical outcomes associated with DHS and CMN to determine the appropriate fixation method for BFNF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for studies published up to January 9, 2021 that compared the treatment outcomes between CMN and DHS in BFNF. The primary outcomes of the present meta-analysis were fracture union time, postoperative cut-out rate, and reoperation rate. RESULTS: We included seven studies involving 353 cases of BFNF in our review. Of these, 206 patients were treated using CMN, and DHS were utilized in 147 patients. In a pooled analysis, the DHS group required a longer time to achieve fracture union compared to the CMN group [mean difference (MD): -0.41; 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.70, -0.12; p=0.006; I²=0%]. However, the cut-out and reoperation rates exhibited no statistically significant differences between the DHS and CMN groups [cut-out odds ratio (OR): 0.54; 95% CI: 0.10, 2.82; p=0.47; I²=24%, reoperation rate OR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.15, 2.86; p=0.57; I²=19%, respectively]. CONCLUSION: Stable fixation using DHS and CMN does not show a significant clinical or radiographical difference in BFNF, and the implant can be selected based on the surgeon's preference.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas del Cuello Femoral , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas , Fracturas de Cadera , Clavos Ortopédicos , Tornillos Óseos , Fracturas del Cuello Femoral/etiología , Fracturas del Cuello Femoral/cirugía , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Fracturas de Cadera/cirugía , Humanos , Reoperación , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of cerclage wiring with intramedullary nail surgery in the treatment of proximal femoral fractures. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched for studies that evaluated the impact of cerclage wiring on proximal femoral fractures published up to September 20, 2021. Pooled analysis identified differences in the (1) fracture healing profile, (2) perioperative variables, (3) complications, and (4) clinical outcome score between cerclage wiring and non-cerclage wiring. RESULTS: Fourteen studies involving 1,718 patients with proximal femoral fractures who underwent cephalomedullary nailing surgeries were included. The pooled analysis revealed a longer fracture union time in the non-cerclage wiring group than in the cerclage wiring group (mean difference [MD] = - 1.03 months; 95% confidence interval [CI]: - 1.47 to - 0.59; P < 0.001), and there was no difference in the nonunion rate. The operation time was longer in the cerclage wiring group (MD = 14.32 min; 95% CI: 6.42-22.22; P < 0.001), but there were no differences in blood loss and the rate of poor quality of reduction. Superficial and deep infection rates showed no difference between the groups, and the readmission rate also showed no difference. The cerclage wiring group had a higher Harris hip score than the non-cerclage wiring group (MD = 2.13; 95% CI: 0.77-3.49; P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Intramedullary nailing with cerclage wiring is considered a useful treatment method for proximal femoral fractures. It enables anatomic reduction and stable fixation, thereby reducing union time and facilitating rapid functional recovery.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas del Fémur , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas , Fracturas de Cadera , Humanos , Hilos Ortopédicos , Fracturas de Cadera/cirugía , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/métodos , Fracturas del Fémur/cirugía , Fijación Interna de Fracturas , Resultado del Tratamiento , Clavos Ortopédicos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The study aim was to report the treatment outcomes of trochanteric flip osteotomy (TFO) with surgical hip dislocation (SHD) for femoral head fracture and dislocation (FHFD) and to investigate the risk factors for avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head. METHODS: The data of 34 patients (29 men, 5 women; mean age 37.9 years) diagnosed with FHFD and treated with TFO with SHD between May 2009 and February 2018 with an average follow-up period of 5.1 years (range 2.8-10.5 years) were analyzed. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Merle d'Aubigné-Postel score and Thompson-Epstein Scale. Radiologic outcomes were classified according to the Matta classification. AVN was confirmed using magnetic resonance imaging or single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography. The occurrence of complications was examined, and factors influencing complications, AVN. RESULTS: Regarding the Pipkin's classification, there were 7 patients with type II, 2 patients with type III, and 25 patients with type IV fractures. Posterior wall fractures accompanied all associated acetabular fractures in the patients with Pipkin type IV fractures. Radiologically, the union of acetabular and femoral head fractures was observed within 6.1 months on average (range 4-10 months) in 32 patients, except two patients who developed femoral head AVN. Clinically, the average Merle d'Aubigné-Postel score was 14.4 points (range 8-17 points), and 22 patients had good or excellent results on the Thompson-Epstein Scale. Two patients developed femoral head AVN with both having displaced femoral neck fractures associated with FHFD. AVN was significantly correlated with femoral neck fractures (P = 0.000). CONCLUSION: TFO with SHD is a safe and useful approach for the treatment of FHFD. Particular attention should be paid when treating femoral head fractures associated with displaced femoral neck fractures because of the high risk of AVN development.