Opioid-sparing Effects of SoluMatrix Indomethacin in a Phase 3 Study in Patients With Acute Postoperative Pain.

OBJECTIVES: To report the opioid-sparing effects of SoluMatrix indomethacin, developed using SoluMatrix Fine Particle Technology, in a phase 3 study in patients with acute pain following bunionectomy. METHODS: This phase 3, placebo-controlled study randomized 462 patients with moderate-to-severe pain following bunionectomy surgery to receive SoluMatrix indomethacin 40 mg 3 times daily, SoluMatrix indomethacin 40 mg twice daily, SoluMatrix indomethacin 20 mg 3 times daily, celecoxib 400-mg loading dose followed by 200 mg twice daily, or placebo. Patients were permitted to receive opioid-containing rescue medication throughout the study. The proportion of patients who used rescue medication and the amount of rescue medication used on the first (0 to 24 h) and second (>24 to 48 h) days following initial dose of study medication, as well as time to first rescue medication use, were assessed. RESULTS: Significantly fewer patients who received SoluMatrix indomethacin 40 or 20 mg 3 times daily used opioid-containing rescue medication on day 1 compared with those receiving placebo (P≤0.034), and fewer patients in all active treatment groups used rescue medication during the second day compared with those in the placebo group (P<0.001). All active treatment groups used significantly fewer rescue medication tablets on days 1 and 2 following randomization compared with placebo (P<0.001). The most common adverse events were nausea, postprocedural edema, and headache. DISCUSSION: SoluMatrix indomethacin was associated with opioid-sparing effects in patients with acute postoperative pain.

Low-dose SoluMatrix diclofenac in patients with osteoarthritis pain: impact on quality of life in a controlled trial.

Low-dose SoluMatrix diclofenac was developed to provide effective pain relief for osteoarthritis pain. We evaluated the effects of SoluMatrix diclofenac on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measures in patients with osteoarthritis, hypothesizing that SoluMatrix-treated patients would experience significant improvement compared with placebo. In this 12-week, phase 3 randomized controlled trial, 305 patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee received SoluMatrix diclofenac 35 mg three times (TID) or twice (BID) daily or placebo. Measures included HRQoL, assessed by Short Form 36 (SF-36, version 2), and pain, stiffness, and physical function, assessed by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) at baseline and at week 12. Descriptive statistics were calculated for mean changes from baseline; inferential statistics compared treatment groups with placebo. SoluMatrix diclofenac 35 mg BID (6.2 [0.75]; P = 0.0048) or TID (6.6 [0.80]; P = 0.0014) produced large improvements in the SF-36 physical component summary (PCS) scores at week 12 (least squares mean change from baseline [SE]) compared with placebo (3.5 [0.78]). Minimum clinically important differences were observed in six out of eight SF-36 domains among patients in SoluMatrix diclofenac groups and five out of eight domains in the placebo group; treatment with SoluMatrix diclofenac 35 mg TID produced significant improvements (P ≤ 0.03) in five out of eight domains versus placebo. SoluMatrix diclofenac 35 mg TID significantly improved responses to 23 out of 24 questions in the WOMAC versus placebo (P ≤ 0.0334). Low-dose SoluMatrix diclofenac 35 mg TID and BID significantly improved HRQoL, pain, stiffness, and physical function in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee.

SoluMatrix® Diclofenac: Sustained Opioid-Sparing Effects in a Phase 3 Study in Patients with Postoperative Pain.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate opioid rescue medication usage and the opioid-sparing effect of low-dose SoluMatrix® diclofenac developed using SoluMatrix Fine Particle Technology™ in a phase 3 study in patients experiencing pain following bunionectomy surgery. DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study (NCT01462435). SETTING: Four clinical research centers in the United States. SUBJECTS: Four hundred twenty-eight patients aged 18 to 65 years who experienced moderate-to-severe pain following bunionectomy surgery. METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive low-dose SoluMatrix diclofenac 35 mg or 18 mg capsules three times daily (35-mg group or 18-mg group), celecoxib 400 mg loading dose followed by 200-mg capsules twice daily (celecoxib 200-mg group), or placebo capsules postsurgery. Patients were permitted to receive opioid-containing rescue medication as needed. RESULTS: Significantly fewer patients who received SoluMatrix diclofenac 35 mg or 18 mg or celecoxib required rescue medication during 0-24 h and >24-48 h postsurgery compared with placebo. Patients in the SoluMatrix diclofenac 35 mg or 18 mg groups or in the celecoxib group used fewer mean rescue medication tablets over 0-24 h and >24-48 h compared with placebo-treated patients. Patients in the SoluMatrix diclofenac 35 mg and 18 mg groups and in the celecoxib group also required rescue medication at later times and at slower rates compared with placebo-treated patients. No serious adverse effects occurred in patients receiving SoluMatrix diclofenac. CONCLUSIONS: SoluMatrix diclofenac at two dosage strengths demonstrated an opioid-sparing effect postoperatively in this phase 3 study. SUMMARY: The opioid-sparing effect following low-dose SoluMatrix diclofenac (35 mg or 18 mg three times daily) administration was evaluated in patients experiencing pain following bunionectomy. Significantly fewer patients receiving SoluMatrix diclofenac or celecoxib (400 mg loading, 200 mg twice daily) required rescue medication during 0-24 h and >24-48 h following bunionectomy compared with placebo. No serious adverse events were reported among patients who received SoluMatrix diclofenac. SoluMatrix diclofenac may reduce opioid usage in the postoperative setting in patients with acute pain.

Pharmacokinetic properties of low-dose SoluMatrix meloxicam in healthy adults.

SoluMatrix® meloxicam has been developed using SoluMatrix Fine Particle Technology™ to produce a meloxicam drug product with enhanced absorption properties to enable treatment at lower doses than available oral meloxicam drug products. This follows recognition of serious dose-dependent adverse events (AEs) associated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, including meloxicam. This study investigated the pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of SoluMatrix meloxicam 5-mg (fasting conditions) and 10-mg capsules (fasting and fed conditions) and compared SoluMatrix meloxicam 10-mg capsules with meloxicam 15-mg tablets under fasting conditions. This four-period crossover study randomized 28 healthy adult participants to receive single doses of SoluMatrix meloxicam 5-mg capsules (fasting) and 10-mg capsules (fasting or fed) and meloxicam tablets 15 mg (fasting). Meloxicam plasma concentrations were assessed through 96 h postdose. Safety was assessed. Twenty-five participants (89.3 %) completed the study. Under fasting conditions, SoluMatrix meloxicam 10 mg [1252.8 (254.22) ng/mL] produced similar meloxicam mean (standard deviation (SD)) maximum plasma concentrations vs meloxicam 15-mg tablets [1288.8 (424.40) ng/mL]. The overall mean (SD) systemic meloxicam exposure was 33 % lower for SoluMatrix meloxicam 10 mg [29,173.01 (11,042.09) ng*h/mL] vs meloxicam 15-mg tablets [40,875.6 (11,733.47) ng*h/mL]. The median time to maximum plasma meloxicam levels occurred earlier following SoluMatrix meloxicam 5 mg (2.0 h) and 10 mg (2.0 h) administration vs meloxicam 15-mg tablets (4.0 h). Few study-medication-related AEs were reported. SoluMatrix meloxicam 10 mg was more rapidly absorbed and associated with a lower overall exposure compared with meloxicam 15-mg tablets in this study in healthy adults under fasting conditions.

Efficacy and safety of low-dose SoluMatrix meloxicam in the treatment of osteoarthritis pain: a 12-week, phase 3 study.

OBJECTIVE: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) such as meloxicam are commonly used to treat osteoarthritis (OA) but are associated with potentially serious dose-related adverse events (AEs). SoluMatrix meloxicam has been developed with the goal of enabling effective treatment at low doses. This phase 3 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of low-dose SoluMatrix meloxicam capsules 5 mg and 10 mg administered once daily for 12 weeks in patients with OA-related pain. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This randomized, double-blind study enrolled patients ≥40 years of age with confirmed hip or knee OA (Kellgren-Lawrence grade II-III) who were chronic users of NSAIDs and/or acetaminophen for OA pain and had Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain subscale mean scores ≥40 mm. Eligible patients experienced an OA pain flare (defined as a ≥15 mm increase in the WOMAC pain subscale score) following discontinuation of NSAIDs/acetaminophen. Patients were randomized to receive once-daily SoluMatrix meloxicam 5 mg or 10 mg, or placebo for 12 weeks. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01787188. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the mean change from baseline in WOMAC pain subscale score at week 12. RESULTS: Low-dose SoluMatrix meloxicam 5 mg (-36.52 [2.49]; P = 0.0005) and 10 mg (-34.41 [2.68]; P = 0.0059) once-daily treatment significantly reduced the mean (standard error) WOMAC pain subscale score from baseline at week 12 compared with placebo (-25.68 [2.64]). Patients treated with SoluMatrix meloxicam 5 mg or 10 mg reported significantly greater improvements in total WOMAC score and in WOMAC stiffness and function subscale scores at 12 weeks compared with placebo. The most common AEs in the combined low-dose SoluMatrix meloxicam group were headache, diarrhea, nausea, osteoarthritis, and urinary tract infection. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose SoluMatrix meloxicam may have a potential role as a new therapeutic option for the management of OA-related pain.

Advances in NSAID development: evolution of diclofenac products using pharmaceutical technology.

Diclofenac is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) of the phenylacetic acid class with anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and antipyretic properties. Contrary to the action of many traditional NSAIDs, diclofenac inhibits cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 enzyme with greater potency than it does COX-1. Similar to other NSAIDs, diclofenac is associated with serious dose-dependent gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, and renal adverse effects. Since its introduction in 1973, a number of different diclofenac-containing drug products have been developed with the goal of improving efficacy, tolerability, and patient convenience. Delayed- and extended-release forms of diclofenac sodium were initially developed with the goal of improving the safety profile of diclofenac and providing convenient, once-daily dosing for the treatment of patients with chronic pain. New drug products consisting of diclofenac potassium salt were associated with faster absorption and rapid onset of pain relief. These include diclofenac potassium immediate-release tablets, diclofenac potassium liquid-filled soft gel capsules, and diclofenac potassium powder for oral solution. The advent of topical formulations of diclofenac enabled local treatment of pain and inflammation while minimizing systemic absorption of diclofenac. SoluMatrix diclofenac, consisting of submicron particles of diclofenac free acid and a proprietary combination of excipients, was developed to provide analgesic efficacy at reduced doses associated with lower systemic absorption. This review illustrates how pharmaceutical technology has been used to modify the pharmacokinetic properties of diclofenac, leading to the creation of novel drug products with improved clinical utility.

Low-dose SoluMatrix diclofenac : a review of safety across two Phase III studies in patients with acute and osteoarthritis pain.

INTRODUCTION: Similar to other NSAIDs, diclofenac is associated with serious dose-related cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, and renal adverse events. Low-dose SoluMatrix diclofenac , containing submicron particles of diclofenac, was developed to provide effective analgesia at lower drug doses compared with currently available NSAIDs. AREAS COVERED: The efficacy and safety of low-dose SoluMatrix diclofenac was evaluated in two randomized, placebo-controlled Phase III studies: a study in patients with acute pain following bunionectomy surgery and a study in patients with osteoarthritis pain of the hip or knee. In this review article, we summarize safety data from these studies. EXPERT OPINION: The safety results from the Phase III studies indicate that all dosing regimens of low-dose SoluMatrix diclofenac up to 12 weeks are generally well tolerated. Few serious gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, renal, or hepatic adverse events commonly associated with NSAID use were reported in these studies. Although not directly compared, the safety of SoluMatrix diclofenac was similar to findings for other diclofenac drug products. The potential for safe and effective management of acute and chronic pain at reduced NSAID doses is attractive; definitive characterization of SoluMatrix diclofenac safety requires confirmation by long-term studies.

Low-dose SoluMatrix diclofenac in the treatment of osteoarthritis: A 1-year, open-label, Phase III safety study.

INTRODUCTION: Diclofenac is used for the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA); however, like other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) it can be associated with serious dose-related adverse events (AEs). Low-dose SoluMatrix® diclofenac has been developed to provide efficacy at lower diclofenac doses. A recently published Phase III study evaluated the efficacy and safety of SoluMatrix diclofenac 35 mg twice daily (b.i.d.) and thrice daily (t.i.d.) in patients with OA pain treated for 12 weeks. METHODS: This Phase III multicenter, open-label study assessed the safety of SoluMatrix diclofenac in patients with OA dosed up to 52 weeks (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01510912). The study enrolled 602 chronic NSAID/acetaminophen users, aged ≥40 years with OA of the knee or hip. Patients received SoluMatrix diclofenac 35 mg b.i.d., which could be increased to t.i.d. and subsequently reduced to b.i.d. as needed. Safety assessments included AEs, vital signs, physical examination findings, 12-lead electrocardiogram, and clinical laboratory test results. Patient-reported outcomes were evaluated by the Short Form-36 (SF-36). RESULTS: A total of 601 patients received SoluMatrix diclofenac; 373 of 601 patients (62.1%) received treatment for ≥11 months. The most frequent AEs included upper respiratory tract infection, headache, urinary tract infection, diarrhea, nasopharyngitis, and nausea. Serious gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, renal, and hepatic AEs were uncommon. A small proportion (99 patients, 16.5%) of patients discontinued participation in the study due to AEs. Clinically meaningful improvements from baseline in Physical Component Summary Scores of the SF-36 were noted at week 12 and were sustained through week 52. Improvements in six of the eight individual physical and mental SF-36 domains were also noted. CONCLUSION: SoluMatrix diclofenac treatment for up to 1 year was generally well tolerated in patients with OA pain and associated with improvement in quality of life measures. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01510912.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of low-dose submicron indomethacin 20 and 40 mg compared with indomethacin 50 mg.

INTRODUCTION: Indomethacin is a potent analgesic that, similar to other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, is associated with serious dose-related adverse events. There is a need for newer nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug products with improved tolerability. Low-dose submicron indomethacin was developed using SoluMatrix Fine Particle Technology™ to enable treatment at lower doses than commercially available indomethacin drug products. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics and safety of submicron indomethacin 20 and 40 mg compared with indomethacin 50-mg capsules. METHODS: This was a phase 1, randomized, open-label, 4-period, 4-sequence, single-dose crossover study. Forty healthy volunteers received low-dose submicron indomethacin 20- or 40-mg capsules, or indomethacin 50-mg capsules under fasting or fed conditions. Pharmacokinetic parameters and safety were assessed. RESULTS: Comparable fasting peak plasma levels (mean ± standard deviation) were demonstrated for submicron indomethacin 40 mg (2368.79 ± 631.38 ng/ml) and indomethacin 50 mg (2369.40 ± 969.06 ng/ml). The overall systemic exposure (geometric least squares mean; 95% CI) was > 21% lower for submicron indomethacin 40 mg (6007.71 ng·h/mL; 5585.73-6461.58) compared with indomethacin 50 mg (7646.23 ng·h/ml; 7110.44-8222.40) under fasting conditions. Food delayed the rate but did not affect the extent of indomethacin absorption from submicron indomethacin 40 mg. Submicron indomethacin 40 mg administration resulted in earlier time to peak plasma levels (median 1.67; min-max 0.5-3.5 hours) under fasting conditions compared with indomethacin 50 mg (2.02; 0.5-5.0 hours). Submicron indomethacin 20 and 40 mg were dose proportional and generally well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Compared with indomethacin 50 mg, submicron indomethacin 40 mg achieved similar peak plasma concentrations, lower systemic exposure, and a faster time to peak plasma concentration, indicating rapid absorption. The current formulation of low-dose submicron indomethacin has recently demonstrated efficacy in 2 phase 3 studies in patients with acute pain following bunionectomy and represents a new, low-dose treatment option for patients with acute pain.

Pharmacokinetic properties and tolerability of low-dose SoluMatrix diclofenac.

PURPOSE: This study compared the pharmacokinetic properties and safety profile of low-dose (18- and 35-mg) diclofenac capsules manufactured using SoluMatrix Fine Particle Technology (Trademark of iCeutica Inc. (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania), and the technology is licensed to Iroko Pharmaceuticals, LLC (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) for exclusive use in NSAIDs), which produces submicron-sized drug particles with enhanced dissolution properties, to those of diclofenac potassium immediate-release (IR) 50-mg tablets. METHODS: This Phase 1, single-center, randomized, open-label, single-dose crossover study was conducted in 40 healthy volunteers. Subjects received, in randomized order, SoluMatrix diclofenac 18- or 35-mg capsules in the fasting condition, SoluMatrix diclofenac 35-mg capsules under fed conditions, and diclofenac potassium IR 50-mg tablets under fasting and fed conditions. Pharmacokinetic parameters (T(max), C(max), AUC(0-t), AUC(0-∞)) were calculated from the concentrations of diclofenac in the plasma. Absorption, food effect, and dose proportionality were determined using a mixed-model ANOVA for C(max), AUC(0-t), AUC(0-∞). Tolerability was assessed by recording adverse events, physical examination findings, vital sign measurements: clinical laboratory test results. FINDINGS: Overall, 35 healthy volunteers aged 18 to 52 years completed the study. The mean age of the subjects was 33.4 years, and approximately half were men (47.5%). Median T(max) values were similar between the low-dose SoluMatrix diclofenac 35-mg capsules and the diclofenac potassium IR 50-mg tablets (both, ~1.0 hour). The mean maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) after the administration of low-dose SoluMatrix diclofenac 35-mg capsules was 26% lower than that with diclofenac potassium IR 50-mg tablets under fasting conditions (868.72 vs 1194.21 ng/mL). The administration of low-dose SoluMatrix diclofenac 35-mg capsules was associated with a 23% lower overall systemic exposure compared with that of diclofenac potassium IR 50-mg tablets under fasting conditions. Food decreased the rate but not the overall extent of absorption of SoluMatrix diclofenac. No serious AEs and no clinically significant abnormalities in physical examination findings, including vital sign measurements, or clinical laboratory test results, were noted during this study. IMPLICATIONS: The pharmacokinetic properties of low-dose SoluMatrix diclofenac capsules in the healthy volunteers in this study suggest rapid diclofenac absorption as measured by T(max). Low-dose SoluMatrix diclofenac capsules represent a potential option for the management of acute and osteoarthritis-related pain.

Efficacy and safety of low-dose submicron diclofenac for the treatment of osteoarthritis pain: a 12 week, phase 3 study.

OBJECTIVE: NSAIDs, such as diclofenac, are the most commonly used medications to treat osteoarthritis (OA), but they are associated with dose-related adverse events (AEs). Low-dose submicron diclofenac was developed using a new, proprietary dry milling process that creates submicron drug particles (SoluMatrix Fine Particle Technology * ), enabling effective treatment at lower doses than other commercially available diclofenac drug products. This phase 3 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of low-dose submicron diclofenac 35 mg three times daily (tid) and twice daily (bid) in patients with OA pain. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This double-blind study enrolled patients ≥40 years of age with clinically and radiographically confirmed (Kellgren-Lawrence grade II-III) hip or knee OA. Eligible patients were chronic NSAID and/or acetaminophen (APAP) users with baseline Western Ontario and McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain subscale scores ≥40 mm by visual analog scale and an OA flare (≥15 mm increase in WOMAC pain subscale score following discontinuation of NSAIDs/APAP at screening). Patients were randomized to submicron diclofenac 35 mg tid, submicron diclofenac 35 mg bid, or placebo for 12 weeks. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01461369. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Efficacy parameters included mean change from baseline in WOMAC pain subscale score at week 12 (primary efficacy parameter) and in average total WOMAC score over 12 weeks. RESULTS: Submicron diclofenac 35 mg tid significantly improved WOMAC pain subscale scores from baseline at 12 weeks (-44.1; p = 0.0024) compared with placebo (-32.5). Submicron diclofenac 35 mg bid provided numerical improvement in pain at week 12 that did not reach statistical significance (-39.0; p = 0.0795) compared with placebo. Submicron diclofenac 35 mg tid (-35.9; p = 0.0002) and 35 mg bid (-30.3; p = 0.0363) improved the average total WOMAC score in treated patients over 12 weeks compared with placebo (-23.2). The most frequent AEs in the submicron diclofenac-treated groups were diarrhea, headache, nausea, and constipation. The inclusion of patients with a documented requirement for analgesic therapy (OA 'flare') at baseline and the high rates of rescue medication usage in the placebo group may have impacted the study outcome for the submicron diclofenac treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose submicron diclofenac is an effective therapeutic option for the treatment of OA pain.

A phase 2 study of lower-dose, indomethacin submicron particle capsules demonstrates early onset of acute pain relief.

OBJECTIVES: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are efficacious for the treatment of acute and chronic pain; however, they have the potential for serious adverse events (AEs). The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of investigational, lower-dose, indomethacin submicron particle capsules compared with placebo in a study of patients with postsurgical pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This phase 2, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, single-dose, and placebo-controlled study enrolled 203 patients (18 to 50 y old) following extraction of ≥ 2 third molars who experienced moderate-to-severe pain intensity ≤ 6 hours after surgery. Patients received indomethacin submicron particle capsules (20 or 40 mg), celecoxib 400 mg, or placebo. The primary efficacy endpoint was the sum of total pain relief over 0 to 8 hours (TOTPAR-8) determined from the area under the curve for pain relief over 0 to 8 hours following administration of the study drug, where pain relief was measured on a 0 to 4 scale. Safety and tolerability were also assessed. RESULTS: Mean ± SE TOTPAR-8 scores were 10.8 ± 1.4 (indomethacin submicron particle capsules 20 mg), 12.6 ± 1.3 (indomethacin submicron particle capsules 40 mg), 14.8 ± 1.3 (celecoxib), and 3.0 ± 1.3 (placebo; P<0.001 for active treatments vs. placebo). Indomethacin submicron particle capsules treatment groups demonstrated better mean TOTPAR over 4 hours than placebo (P<0.001). Similar rates and profiles of treatment-emergent AEs were reported by patients across treatment groups. DISCUSSION: Lower-dose, indomethacin submicron particle capsules provide good overall pain relief in patients with postsurgical pain and are generally well tolerated. Indomethacin submicron particle capsules are a potentially promising option for treatment of acute pain and warrant further study.

Indomethacin submicron particle capsules provide effective pain relief in patients with acute pain: a phase 3 study.

Although frequently prescribed to relieve acute pain in patients, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are associated with dose-related gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, and renal complications. Investigational, submicron particle NSAIDs are being developed that could provide effective pain relief at lower doses than currently available oral NSAIDs. This is the first phase 3 study evaluating the analgesic efficacy and safety of lower-dose indomethacin submicron particle capsules in patients following elective surgery. This multicenter, double-blind study enrolled patients aged 18 to 68 years who underwent bunionectomy under regional anesthesia. Patients with a pain intensity rating of ≥40 mm on a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale were randomized to receive indomethacin submicron particle capsules (40 mg 3 times daily [TID], 40 mg twice daily [BID], or 20 mg TID), celecoxib (400 mg loading dose, then 200 mg BID), or placebo. The primary efficacy parameter was the overall (summed) pain intensity difference measured by a Visual Analog Scale during a period of 48 hours. Scheduled assessments measured secondary efficacy parameters such as patient pain intensity differences. Indomethacin submicron particle capsules 40 mg 3 times daily (509.6 ± 91.9 overall [summed] pain intensity difference), 40 mg twice daily (328.0 ± 92.9 overall [summed] pain intensity difference), and 20 mg 3 times daily (380.5 ± 92.9 overall [summed] pain intensity difference) reduced pain intensity from 0 to 48 hours (P ≤ 0.046 for all 3 groups) compared with placebo (67.8 ± 91.4 overall [summed] pain intensity difference). There was some evidence of patient analgesia for celecoxib (279.4 ± 91.9 overall [summed] pain intensity difference; P = 0.103). Some evidence of pain control was observed in patients as early as 2 hours following administration of indomethacin submicron particle capsules and was sustained throughout the treatment period. Indomethacin submicron particle capsules were generally well tolerated by patients. These results suggest that lower-dose indomethacin submicron particle capsules are a potentially promising treatment option for patients with acute pain.

A phase 2 study of naproxen submicron particle capsules in patients with post-surgical dental pain.

BACKGROUND: Naproxen is an NSAID with documented efficacy in pain management; however, it is associated with serious dose-related adverse events. A lower-dose naproxen drug product with comparable efficacy to commercially available naproxen could address these concerns. We studied the efficacy and safety of naproxen submicron particle capsules in patients with acute post-surgical dental pain. METHODS: A phase 2, multicenter, randomized, single-dose study (NCT01229228) enrolled 254 patients (18-34 years old) undergoing third molar extraction. Patients who experienced moderate-to-severe pain ≤6 h following surgery received naproxen submicron particle capsules 200 or 400 mg, naproxen tablets 250 or 500 mg, or placebo. The primary efficacy parameter was patient-reported total pain relief over 0-12 h following administration of study medication. Secondary efficacy parameters included patient-reported total pain relief over 0-4 and 0-8 h; pain intensity assessments from 0 to 4, 0 to 8, and 0 to 12 h; and time to onset of analgesia. Safety and tolerability were also assessed. RESULTS: Naproxen submicron particle capsules 200 mg (25.9 ± 2.0; 95% CI 21.9-29.8), naproxen tablets 250 mg (24.4 ± 2.0; 95% CI 20.4-28.3), naproxen submicron particle capsules 400 mg (31.9 ± 2.0; 95% CI 28.1-35.8), and naproxen tablets 500 mg (28.5 ± 2.0; 95% CI 24.7-32.4) groups experienced greater pain relief over 12 h compared with placebo (P < 0.001). Similar trends were observed for secondary outcomes of total pain relief over 0-4, 0-8 h, and time to onset of analgesia. Adverse events were generally similar across all treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Lower-dose naproxen submicron particle capsules provided effective analgesia in acute post-surgical dental pain and warrant further evaluation as a potentially promising treatment for acute pain conditions.

Lower-dose diclofenac submicron particle capsules provide early and sustained acute patient pain relief in a phase 3 study.

BACKGROUND: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are prescribed for the treatment of patients with acute pain but use of such analgesics is associated with dose-dependent adverse events (AEs). Diclofenac submicron particle capsules have been developed using SoluMatrix technology to provide analgesia at lower doses than available solid oral dosing forms. Our study evaluated the analgesic efficacy and safety of lower-dose diclofenac submicron particle capsules in patients with acute pain following elective surgery. METHODS: A phase 3, multicenter, double-blind study enrolled 428 patients, aged 18 to 65 years, with moderate-to-severe pain following bunionectomy under regional anesthesia. Patients experiencing a pain intensity rating of ≥ 40 mm on a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale were randomized to receive lower-dose diclofenac submicron particle capsules (35 or 18 mg, 3 times daily [TID]), celecoxib (200 mg, twice daily [BID], 400-mg loading dose), or placebo. The primary efficacy parameter was the overall (summed) pain intensity difference measured over 0 to 48 hours (SPID-48). Secondary efficacy parameters included pain intensity difference (PID) at scheduled assessments. RESULTS: Lower-dose diclofenac submicron particle capsules 35 mg TID (524.05; P < 0.001), 18 mg TID (393.25; P = 0.010), and celecoxib 200 mg BID (390.22; P = 0.011) demonstrated significant pain control compared with placebo (77.10) for the primary efficacy parameter, mean SPID-48. Diclofenac submicron particle capsules 35 mg TID (4.52) provided some pain control (higher mean PID) at 30 minutes following administration, in contrast to celecoxib 200 mg BID (0.80), diclofenac submicron particle capsules 18 mg TID (0.31), and placebo (0.12). Better pain control (PID) was noted across all active treatment groups at 5 hours compared with placebo (P ≤ 0.03), and pain relief was sustained throughout the treatment period. The most frequent non-procedure-related AEs were nausea, headache, dizziness, and vomiting. CONCLUSION: Lower-dose diclofenac submicron particle capsules provided effective analgesia in this phase 3 clinical study in patients with acute pain and are a potentially promising option for the treatment of patients with acute pain.

Oral famciclovir for the suppression of recurrent genital herpes: the combined data from two randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Genital herpes is a very common sexually transmitted disease. Safe and effective therapies are needed for patients with frequent recurrences. OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to determine the efficacy and safety of famciclovir for suppression of herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection in patients with history of clinically diagnosed recurrent genital HSV infection. METHOD: An analysis was conducted of the combined data from two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of 52 weeks' duration involving a total of 469 patients (201 men, 268 women) from 47 university, hospital, or private referral centers in Europe and North America. The patients were 18 years or older with a history of six or more episodes of genital herpes during 12 of the 14-months prior to study entry and were not receiving suppressive therapy. They were randomized to receive oral famciclovir 250 mg twice daily or placebo for 52 weeks. The primary outcome measures were (1) the proportion of patients who remained free from clinical HSV recurrences, confirmed by viral culture, for at least 6 months after the start of study medication; (2) the time to first clinically confirmed lesional episode; and (3) the frequency of adverse events. RESULTS: A significantly greater proportion of famciclovir-treated patients (151/191, 79%) were free from HSV recurrences at 6 months compared with placebo recipients (48/184, 26%) (p<0.001); efficacy was maintained at 12 months. The median time for the first clinically confirmed lesional episode was significantly prolonged for famciclovir recipients (more than one year) compared with placebo recipients (59 days; p<0.0001). Famciclovir was well tolerated, with an adverse-experience profile comparable with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Oral famciclovir 250 mg twice daily is an effective, well-tolerated treatment for the suppression of genital HSV infection in patients with frequent recurrences.