Evaluation of Drug-Drug Interaction Liability for Buprenorphine Extended-Release Monthly Injection Administered by Subcutaneous Route.

Buprenorphine extended-release (BUP-XR) formulation is a once-monthly subcutaneous injection for the treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD). Buprenorphine undergoes extensive cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 metabolism, leading to potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) as reported for sublingual buprenorphine. Sublingual buprenorphine is subject to first-pass extraction, as a significant proportion of the dose is swallowed. Because subcutaneous administration avoids first-pass extraction, the DDI with CYP3A4 inhibitors is expected to be less than the 2-fold increase reported for the sublingual route. The objective of this analysis was to predict the magnitude of DDI following coadministration of BUP-XR with a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor or inducer using physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling. Models were developed and verified by comparing predicted and observed data for buprenorphine following intravenous and sublingual dosing. Comparison of predicted and observed pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles and PK parameters demonstrated acceptable predictive performance of the models (within 1.5-fold). Buprenorphine plasma concentrations following administration of a single dose of BUP-XR (300 mg) were simulated using a series of intravenous infusions. Daily coadministration of strong CYP3A4 inhibitors with BUP-XR predicted mild increases in buprenorphine exposures (AUC, 33%-44%; Cmax , 17-28%). Daily coadministration of a strong CYP3A4 inducer was also associated with mild decreases in buprenorphine AUC (28%) and Cmax (22%). In addition, the model predicted minimal increases in buprenorphine AUC (8%-11%) under clinical conditions of 2 weeks' treatment with CYP3A4 inhibitors administered after initiation of BUP-XR. In conclusion, the PBPK predictions indicate that coadministration of BUP-XR with strong CYP3A4 inhibitors or inducers would not result in clinically meaningful interactions.

Population Pharmacokinetics of a Monthly Buprenorphine Depot Injection for the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder: A Combined Analysis of Phase II and Phase III Trials.

BACKGROUND: BUP-XR (a.k.a. RBP-6000 or SUBLOCADE™) is an extended-release subcutaneous buprenorphine formulation for the treatment of opioid use disorder. BUP-XR was designed to provide sustained buprenorphine exposure throughout the monthly dosing interval, at concentrations sufficient to control all aspects of the disease (withdrawal, craving, and blockade of opioid subjective effects). OBJECTIVES: To characterize the population pharmacokinetics of BUP-XR based on phase II and phase III data and to evaluate whether target therapeutic concentrations were reached with the dosing regimens evaluated in the phase III program. METHODS: The population pharmacokinetic analysis included 570 subjects with opioid use disorder who received up to 12 monthly BUP-XR injections following induction with sublingual buprenorphine. RESULTS: In phase III studies, target therapeutic concentrations of buprenorphine were achieved from the first injection and maintained over the entire treatment duration. Buprenorphine plasma concentration-time profiles were well described by a two-compartment model, with first-order absorption for sublingual buprenorphine and a dual absorption submodel for BUP-XR. A covariate analysis evaluated the effects of subjects' demographic characteristics, laboratory data, and genetic status regarding buprenorphine-metabolizing enzymes. Only two covariates, body mass index and body weight, were retained in the final model. Overall, their effects were not of sufficient magnitude to justify a dose adjustment. Finally, pharmacokinetic simulations showed that buprenorphine plasma concentrations decreased slowly after discontinuation of treatment and that a 2-week occasional delay in dosing would not impact efficacy, which translated into labeling claims. DISCUSSION: In conclusion, the present analysis led to the development of a robust population pharmacokinetic model and confirms the ability of BUP-XR to deliver and maintain therapeutic plasma concentrations over the entire treatment duration.

Evaluation of the Effects of a Monthly Buprenorphine Depot Subcutaneous Injection on QT Interval During Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder.

Extensive 12-lead electrocardiogram monitoring and drug concentrations were obtained during development of BUP-XR, a monthly subcutaneous injection for the treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD). Matched QT and plasma drug concentrations (11,925) from 1,114 subjects were pooled from 5 studies in OUD. A concentration-QT model was developed, which accounted for confounding factors (e.g., comedications) affecting heart rate and heart rate-corrected QT interval (QTc). Bias-corrected nonparametric two-sided 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were derived for the mean predicted effect of BUP-XR on QTc (ΔQTc) at therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses. Changes in QTc were associated with age, central vs. noncentral reading, sex, methadone, and barbiturates. The upper 90% CI of ΔQTc was 0.29, 0.67, and 1.34 ms at the steady-state peak concentration (Cmax ) for 100, 300, and 2 × 300 mg doses, respectively. An effect of BUP-XR on QT can be ruled out at therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses of BUP-XR, after accounting for covariates that may influence heart rate and QT interval in OUD.

Effect of Albiglutide on Cholecystokinin-Induced Gallbladder Emptying in Healthy Individuals: A Randomized Crossover Study.

The glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (RAs) exenatide and lixisenatide reduce cholecystokinin (CCK)-induced gallbladder emptying in healthy subjects. It is unknown if all GLP-1 RAs share this effect; therefore, the effect of the GLP-1 RA albiglutide on gallbladder function was assessed. In this randomized, double-blind, 2-way crossover study, a single dose of subcutaneous albiglutide 50 mg or placebo was administered to 17 healthy subjects, and CCK-induced gallbladder contractility was measured by ultrasonography. CCK (0.003 µg/kg) was infused intravenously over 50 minutes on study day 4 (3 days after dosing, to coincide with albiglutide's expected time to maximum concentration). Gallbladder volume, ejection fraction, and the main pancreatic and common bile-duct diameters were measured before, during, and following CCK infusion. Gallbladder volume was significantly greater in the albiglutide vs placebo groups before, during, and after CCK infusion, and the mean difference from placebo increased numerically during CCK infusion. The area under the volume-effect curve was significantly greater with albiglutide (P = .029). Starting at the 30-minute CCK infusion time point, the gallbladder ejection fraction was significantly lower with albiglutide than placebo. Changes in pancreatic duct diameter and common bile-duct diameter were not significantly different between albiglutide and placebo. Similar incidences of adverse events were observed between the albiglutide and placebo treatment periods. No new albiglutide safety signals were detected, and no serious adverse events were reported. In conclusion, similar to other GLP-1 RAs, albiglutide decreased CCK-induced gallbladder emptying compared with placebo in healthy individuals. Clinical implications of the gallbladder effects are unclear at this time.

Clinical pharmacology of albiglutide, a GLP-1 receptor agonist.

UNLABELLED: Albiglutide is a glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue composed of tandem copies of modified human glucagon-like peptide-1 (7-36) coupled to recombinant human albumin that is approved in adults for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. After subcutaneous administration, albiglutide is likely primarily absorbed via the lymphatic circulation, with maximum concentrations being reached in 3 to 5 days; steady-state exposures are achieved following approximately 4 to 5 weeks of once-weekly administration. The elimination half-life of albiglutide is approximately 5 days. Clearance of albiglutide is 67 mL/h with between-subject variability of 34.9%; no covariates have been identified that would require dose adjustment of albiglutide. Albiglutide lowers the fasting plasma glucose and reduces postprandial glucose excursions. In addition, ß-cell secretion is enhanced by albiglutide during hyperglycemia, whereas secretion is suppressed during hypoglycemia; α-cell response to hypoglycemia is not impaired by albiglutide. Albiglutide does not prolong the corrected QT interval but has a modest effect on heart rate in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Dose adjustment is not suggested in patients with renal impairment, but experience in patients with severe renal impairment is very limited, and it is recommended that albiglutide be used with care in such patients due to an increased frequency of diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting. No clinically relevant drug interactions have been observed in clinical trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00938158, NCT01406262, NCT00537719, NCT01077505, NCT01147731, NCT01147718, NCT01147692, NCT00354536, NCT00394030, NCT00530309, NCT01357889, NCT00518115, NCT01098461, NCT01475734, NCT00849017, NCT00838916, NCT00839527, NCT01098539.

Human absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion properties of drug molecules: a plethora of approaches.

Human radiolabel studies are traditionally conducted to provide a definitive understanding of the human absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion (ADME) properties of a drug. However, advances in technology over the past decade have allowed alternative methods to be employed to obtain both clinical ADME and pharmacokinetic (PK) information. These include microdose and microtracer approaches using accelerator mass spectrometry, and the identification and quantification of metabolites in samples from classical human PK studies using technologies suitable for non-radiolabelled drug molecules, namely liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. These recently developed approaches are described here together with relevant examples primarily from experiences gained in support of drug development projects at GlaxoSmithKline. The advantages of these study designs together with their limitations are described. We also discuss special considerations which should be made for a successful outcome to these new approaches and also to the more traditional human radiolabel study in order to maximize knowledge around the human ADME properties of drug molecules.

Effect of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of albiglutide.

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease is frequently present in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). New therapeutic options in this patient subpopulation are needed. OBJECTIVES: Assess the effect of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics (PK), efficacy, and safety of albiglutide in single- and multiple-dose studies. METHODS: Pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of once weekly albiglutide in patients with T2DM was assessed from a single-dose (30 mg), nonrandomized, open-label study (N = 41) including subjects with normal and varying degrees of renal impairment, including hemodialysis, and a pooled analysis of 4 phase 3, randomized, double-blind (1 open-label), active or placebo-controlled multiple-dose studies. The pooled analysis of the latter 4 studies (N = 1113) was part of the population PK analysis, which included subjects with normal and varying degrees of renal impairment (mild, moderate, severe) treated with albiglutide (30 to 50 mg) to primary end points of 26 to 52 weeks. RESULTS: Single-dose PK showed area-under-the-curve ratios (and 90% CIs) of 1.32 (0.96-1.80), 1.39 (1.03-1.89), and 0.99 (0.63-1.57) for the moderate, severe, and hemodialysis groups, respectively, relative to the normal group. Results indicate that modest increases in plasma concentration of albiglutide were observed with the severity of renal impairment. There was a trend for more glycemic lowering as the estimated glomerular filtration rate decreased. The severe group had a higher frequency of gastrointestinal (eg, diarrhea, constipation, nausea, and vomiting) and hypoglycemic (with background sulfonylurea use) events compared with patients with mild or moderate renal impairment. CONCLUSION: The PK, efficacy, and safety data indicate that albiglutide has a favorable benefit/risk ratio in patients with T2DM and varying degrees of renal impairment, and the need for a dose adjustment is not suggested. Experience in patients with more severe renal impairment is very limited, so the recommendation is to use albiglutide carefully in this population. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: (ClinicalTrials.gov):NCT00938158, NCT00849017, NCT00838916, NCT00839527, NCT0198539.

Albiglutide Does Not Prolong QTc Interval in Healthy Subjects: A Thorough ECG Study.

INTRODUCTION: Albiglutide, a selective once-weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, is being developed for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Albiglutide's effect on cardiac repolarization (QTc interval) was assessed in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study in healthy subjects with a nested crossover comparison for moxifloxacin. METHODS: Subjects were randomized to albiglutide (n = 85) or placebo (n = 89) and received injections of 30 mg albiglutide or placebo on Days 1 and 8 and 50 mg albiglutide or placebo on Days 15, 22, 29, and 36. In the placebo group, moxifloxacin was administered on Day -1 in half the subjects and on Day 40 in the other half. Blood samples for albiglutide plasma concentration were drawn on Days 4 and 39 and serial ECGs were extracted from continuous recordings on Days -2 (baseline), -1, 4, 39, and 40. RESULTS: Demographics were generally similar between albiglutide and placebo subjects: mean age was 29 years and BMI 25 kg/m(2). Mean change-from-baseline QTcI (∆QTcI, which was corrected for individual heart rate) on Day 4 after a single dose of albiglutide 30 mg and on Day 39 after repeat dosing with albiglutide 50 mg once weekly was similar to the placebo response. The placebo-corrected ΔQTcI (ΔΔQTcI) on both albiglutide doses was small with the largest ΔΔQTcI of 1.1 ms (upper bound of 90% CI 3.8 ms) on Day 4 and -0.6 ms (upper bound of CI 1.8 ms) on Day 39. Moxifloxacin caused the largest mean effect on ΔΔQTcI of 10.9 ms and the lower bound of the CI was above 5 ms at all preselected timepoints, thereby demonstrating assay sensitivity. Albiglutide was well tolerated and there were no clinically relevant differences in safety data between albiglutide and placebo. CONCLUSION: Albiglutide at doses up to 50 mg in healthy subjects did not prolong the QTc interval.

The effects of a short course of antibiotics on alvimopan and metabolite pharmacokinetics.

Alvimopan is a novel, oral, peripherally acting mu-opioid receptor (PAM-OR) antagonist that blocks the effects of opioids on the gastrointestinal tract, without blocking opioid-induced analgesic effects. It is metabolized by gut microflora to an active amide-hydrolysis metabolite, which is equipotent to alvimopan. The objective of this study was to characterize the pharmacokinetics of alvimopan and metabolite before, during, and after administration of a short course of antibiotics in healthy adult participants. Simulations were conducted to determine the feasibility for this study. An open-label, sequential drug interaction study was conducted in 45 participants who received twice-daily dosing of alvimopan with and without ciprofloxacin. Metabolite concentrations were reduced by 99.2% (90% confidence interval: 98.8-99.5) in the presence of ciprofloxacin. The interaction occurred rapidly, and recovery was slow. The interaction may be of relevance for patients with relatively high metabolite plasma concentrations prior to antibiotic administration but of little relevance for patients with little or no plasma metabolite exposure initially. Administration of ciprofloxacin decreased alvimopan C(max) by 24%, which is of no clinical relevance. There was no effect of ciprofloxacin on alvimopan trough concentrations or AUC. Alvimopan was well tolerated.