RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Patient anger because of a long wait is a common occurrence, but few studies have looked at how the anger should be addressed. This study determined patient levels of satisfaction, rating of importance, and preference for a variety of approaches for addressing anger being directed toward a physician. METHODS: A video trigger tape of an angry patient and 12 physician responses to the angry patient were shown to 130 participants who then rated the physician responses based on four approaches, alone or in combination (apology, explanation, self disclosure, and acknowledgment) for satisfaction and importance of the response. Participants also evaluated four physician follow-up questions. RESULTS: An apology combined with an explanation was rated highest in satisfaction and importance and individually ranked as the best approaches for physicians to use. "I apologize for your long wait" was rated significantly higher than "I am sorry you have been kept waiting." Although gender and prior high anger with clinicians affected the ratings of some responses, participants consistently preferred an apology and/or an apology combined with explanation as the best response. Participants also preferred physician follow-up questions that facilitated segue to the medical interview rather than questions that explored patient feelings. CONCLUSIONS: Participants clearly indicated that they would like a physician to apologize, explain the reason for the delay, and then quickly move along with the interview.
