Comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy plus immunotherapy for locally resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus immunotherapy (nCT + ICIs) and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus immunotherapy (nCRT + ICIs) both induced favorable pathological response and tolerant toxicities for locally resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, few studies compared safety and efficacy between the two treatment strategies. Methods: This retrospective study collected clinical data of locally resectable ESCC patients who underwent nCT + ICIs or nCRT + ICIs followed by esophagectomy from November 2019 to December 2022. The incidence of adverse events, surgical outcomes, short and long-term efficacy, and treatment costs were compared. Results: A total of 206 patients were included, with a ratio of 158:48 between nCT + ICIs group and nCRT + ICIs group. The two groups exhibited well-balanced baseline characteristics. Most adverse events were grade 1-2 in both groups. The nCT + ICIs group had a longer operative time (334.00 ± 170.2 min vs 279.60 ± 88.31 min, P=0.020) than nCRT + ICIs group, but there were no differences in surgical complications. Although nCT + ICIs group had a lower pCR rate (32.3% vs 52.1%, P=0.004), the 2-year overall survival (84.42% vs 81.70%, P=0.860), 2-year disease-free survival (83.21% vs 80.47%, P=0.839), and recurrence patterns were similar to nCRT + ICIs group. In addition, nCT + ICIs group had significantly lower expenses (188796.00 ± 107704.00 RMB vs 231808.00 ± 48067.00 RMB, P=0.045). Conclusion: Overall, nCT + ICIs have comparable safety and efficacy compared to nCRT + ICIs for locally resectable ESCC, but with lower hospitalization costs.

Are more courses of immunochemotherapy beneficial for the short-term outcome of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma?

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy and neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy have shown promising results in esophageal carcinoma. However, it is still unclear whether more courses of immunochemotherapy are therapeutically better. We aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of three courses of neoadjuvant treatment for patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). METHODS: Patients with locally advanced ESCC received three courses of camrelizumab plus nab-paclitaxel and capecitabine before undergoing surgery. Additionally, patients received safety, computed tomography (CT), and endoscopy (with endoscopic ultrasonography and mucosal biopsy) assessments before and in the second and third courses of treatment. We used the CT and endoscopic assessment results from the second and third courses for comparison. RESULTS: From May 2020 to December 2021, 47 patients were enrolled at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. In our study, 43 patients completed three courses of preoperative chemotherapy combined with anti-Programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) therapy and radical surgical resection. The toxicity of the third course of immunochemotherapy was mild and well tolerated without increased treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and mortality compared with that of the second course of treatment. In terms of efficacy, an additional course of treatment after the second course of treatment was effective, with increased CT and endoscopy T (clinical T stage) downstaging rates by 16.3% and 25.9%, N (clincial N stage) downstaging rates by 7.0% and 11.1%, and objective response rates (ORRs) by 13.6% and 22.0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of downstaging or ORR, three courses of immunochemotherapy appear to be superior to two courses of treatment without increasing TRAEs.