Combined Use of Voltage Mapping and Speckle-tracking Analysis for the Characterization of Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy: A Case Report.

A 38-year-old man was admitted to our hospital after ventricular tachycardia. Endocardial bipolar and unipolar voltage mapping were performed and findings were integrated with data from intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) right ventricular (RV) speckle-tracking analysis. A reduction in the strain analysis was stored in correspondence of the fragmented electrogram area. The definitive diagnosis was arrhythmogenic RV cardiomyopathy (ARVC). The integration of ICE-derived RV strain and voltage mapping could represent a successful strategy to improve the results of ablation in ARVC.

Catheter inversion during cavotricuspid isthmus catheter ablation: The new shaft visualization catheter reduces fluoroscopy use.

AIMS: Catheter ablation (CA) is the choice therapy of cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) atrial flutter. The aim of this study was to describe our approach to improve the CTI ablation using a zero-fluoroscopy (ZF). The procedural difficulties could be related to anatomical characteristics of the CTI. METHODS: One hundred eighty-eight patients that performed CA of CTI were retrospectively and consecutively evaluated between 2017 and 2019. The studied population was divided into two groups. Eighty-eight patients who were undergone CA using ablation catheter without shaft visualization catheter (NSV) were Group 1. One hundred patients were undergone CA using ablation catheter with a shaft visualization (SV); they were Group 2. The catheter was looped at the Eustachian ridge after 200 seconds of radiofrequencies (RF) without elimination of local electrogram. RESULTS: A conduction line block of CTI was obtained in all patients of Group 2 using a ZF approach. In 16 patients of Group 1, the catheter inversion was obtained using fluoroscopy to avoid damages during its loop. In Group 2, a complete CTI block was obtained with a catheter inversion approach in ten patients without fluoroscopy, visualizing the shaft and the tip of the ablation catheter on the electroanatomic (EAM) map. In the overall population studied the use of SV had a linear correlation with the ZF approach (r = .629; P < .001). The duration of RF was lower in Group 2 than in Group 1 (Group 1: 27.8 ± 6.3 vs Group 2: 15.6 ± 7.2 minutes; P < .01). The procedure time between two groups was lower in Group 2 than in Group 1 (Group 1: 58.4 ± 22.4 vs Group 2: 42.2 ± 15.7 minutes; P < .01). No differences between two groups were documented regarding success and complications. CONCLUSIONS: The visualization of the shaft's catheter on the EAM permitted the catheter inversion safely in order to overcome some complex CTI anatomy and obtain bidirectional block. The SV reduced procedure time, RF applications and fluoroscopy exposition during CTI ablation.

Heart failure hospitalizations and costs in ICD/CRT-D recipients following replacement or upgrade: the DECODE registry.

AIMS: The aim of this study is to report heart failure hospitalization (HFH) rates and associated costs within 12 months following implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD)/cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) device replacement or upgrade from ICD to CRT-D. METHODS AND RESULTS: The DEtect long-term COmplications after icD rEplacement (DECODE) was a prospective, single-arm, multicentre cohort study that explored complications in ICD/CRT-D recipients. All clinical and survival data at 12 months were prospectively analysed. For each adjudicated HFH, admission and discharge dates and ICD-9-CM diagnosis and procedure codes were recorded. The reimbursement for each HFH was calculated for each diagnosis-related group code. Between 2013 and 2015, 983 patients (mean age 71 years, male 76%, mean left ventricular ejection fraction 35%, and New York Heart Association Class I/II 75.6%) were enrolled. Patients underwent device replacement (900; 91.6%, 446 ICD/454 CRT-D) or ICD upgrade to CRT-D (83; 8.4%). Post-replacement hospitalizations occurred in 220 patients, with the primary discharge diagnosis identifying cardiovascular causes in 175 patients (80%). Fifty-five (5.6%) patients experienced at least one HFH. Overall, 91 HFH events occurred (9.6% event rate, 95% confidence interval: 7.7-11.7) in 70 patients; 66 (6.7%) patients died, 40 (60.6%) of cardiovascular causes. The HFH rate was significantly higher following upgrades, and the occurrence of HFH was associated with an 11-fold increased mortality risk (95% confidence interval: 5.9-20.5, P < 0.0001). Medical diagnosis-related group accounted for 91.2% of HFH; the mean cost per HFH was €5662 ± 9497, and the mean cost per patient was €9369 ± 12 687. On multivariate analysis, predictors of HFH were atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease, and all-cause hospitalization within 30 days prior to the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: In the DECODE registry, HFH and mortality rates in the year following ICD/CRT-D replacement or upgrade were low. In this particular subset, underlying cardiac disease was the main driver of HFH, mortality, and higher healthcare expenditures.

Detection of oesophageal course during left atrial catheter ablation.

BACKGROUND: Oesophageal changes and injuries were recorded after atrial fibrillation(AF) ablation procedures. The reduction of power in the posterior left atrial(LA) wall(closest to the oesophagus) and the monitoring of temperature in the oesophagus(OE) reduced oesophageal injuries. The intracardiac-echocardiography(ICE) with a Cartosound module provides two-dimensional imaging (2D) to assess detailed cardiac anatomy and its relationship with the OE. The aim of this study was to highlight the safety and feasibility of 3D-reconstruction of the oesophageal course in left atrial catheter ablation(CA) procedures without OE temperature probe or quadripolar catheter to guide ICE OE reconstruction. METHODS: 180 patients(PT) underwent left atrial ablation. AF ablation were 125(69.5%); incisional left atrial tachycardias(IAFL) were 37(20.6%); left atrial tachycardias(LAT) were 19(10.6%). The LA and pulmonary vein anatomies were rendered by traditional electroanatomic mapping(EAM) and merged with an ICE anatomic map. In 109 PT ICE imaging was used to create a geometry of the OE(group A). A quadripolar catheter was used in 71 PT to show OE course associated to ICE(group B). RESULTS: Ablation energy delivery was performed outside the broadest OE anatomy borders. The duration of procedures was longer in group B vs group A Fluoroscopy time was lower in Group A than Group B(Group A 7 ± 3.2 vs 19.2 ± 2.4 min; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: OE monitoring with ICE is safe and feasible. Oesophageal anatomy is complex and variable. Many PT will have a broad oesophageal boundary, which increases the risk of untoward thermal injury during posterior LA ablation. ICE with 3D construction of the OE enhances border detection of the OE, and as such, should decrease the risk of oesophageal injury by improving avoidance strategies without intra-oesophageal catheter visualization.

Risk factors for primary ventricular fibrillation during a first myocardial infarction: Clinical findings from PREDESTINATION (PRimary vEntricular fibrillation and suDden dEath during firST myocardIal iNfArcTION).

BACKGROUND: Few studies prospectively assessed risk factors for ventricular fibrillation (VF) during a first myocardial infarction (MI). We designed a nation-wide study aiming to identify clinical and genetic characteristics associated with primary VF; and report here about clinical features. METHODS: PREDESTINATION (PRimary vEntricular fibrillation and suDden dEath during a firST myocardIal iNfArcTION) is an Italian case-control, prospective multicentre study. Cases are patients aged 18-80 years with a first MI and at least one VF episodes occurring within 24 h of symptoms onset, before reperfusion. Cases and controls are paired 1: 2 by gender and age (±5 years). RESULTS: Among 1026 patients enrolled between 2007 and 2017, 970 entered the primary analysis: 375 cases and 595 controls (mean age 59 years, 85% males). Multivariable analysis identified 5 independent predictors of primary VF: systolic blood pressure (OR 0.982, 95% CI: 0.98-0.99 for each mm Hg) and K+ levels <3.5 mEq/L at presentation (OR 2.28, 95% CI: 1.6-3.3), family history of sudden death (OR 1.80, 95% CI: 1.1-3.0), physical inactivity (OR 1.73, 95% CI: 1.1-2.8) and anterior MI (OR 1.52, 95% CI: 1.1-2.1). Excluding K+ levels obtained after VF, the OR associated with K+ levels <3.5 mEq/L was1.99 (95 CI 1.22-3.21). CONCLUSIONS: The present study identified 5 independent predictors of primary VF: familiarity, anterior MI, low systolic blood pressure, physical inactivity and hypokalaemia. Importantly, the last two risk factors are modifiable and, especially in the presence of a family history of sudden death, they should be avoided as much as possible.

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to idiopathic ventricular fibrillation in patients with normal electrocardiograms: results from a multicentre long-term registry.

AIMS: To define the clinical characteristics and long-term clinical outcomes of a large cohort of patients with idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (IVF) and normal 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs). METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with ventricular fibrillation as the presenting rhythm, normal baseline, and follow-up ECGs with no signs of cardiac channelopathy including early repolarization or atrioventricular conduction abnormalities, and without structural heart disease were included in a registry. A total of 245 patients (median age: 38 years; males 59%) were recruited from 25 centres. An implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) was implanted in 226 patients (92%), while 18 patients (8%) were treated with drug therapy only. Over a median follow-up of 63 months (interquartile range: 25-110 months), 12 patients died (5%); in four of them (1.6%) the lethal event was of cardiac origin. Patients treated with antiarrhythmic drugs only had a higher rate of cardiovascular death compared to patients who received an ICD (16% vs. 0.4%, P = 0.001). Fifty-two patients (21%) experienced an arrhythmic recurrence. Age ≤16 years at the time of the first ventricular arrhythmia was the only predictor of arrhythmic recurrence on multivariable analysis [hazard ratio (HR) 0.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.18-0.92; P = 0.03]. CONCLUSION: Patients with IVF and persistently normal ECGs frequently have arrhythmic recurrences, but a good prognosis when treated with an ICD. Children are a category of IVF patients at higher risk of arrhythmic recurrences.

From near-zero to zero fluoroscopy catheter ablation procedures.

AIMS: The use of electroanatomical mapping (EAM) systems can reduce radiation exposure (RX) and it can also completely eliminate the use of RX. Radiation exposure related to conventional radiofrequency ablation procedures can have a stochastic and deterministic effect on health. The main aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of an entirely nonfluoroscopic approach to catheter ablation (CA) using EAM CARTO3. METHODS: In 2011 we started an RX-minimization programme in all procedures using the CARTO system with the deliberate intention to not resort to the aid of RX unless strictly necessary. We divided procedures into two groups (group 1: from 2011 to 2013; group 2: from 2014 to 2017). The only exclusion criteria were the need for transseptal puncture, and nonidiopathic ventricular tachycardia (VT). RESULTS: From a total of 525 procedures, we performed CA entirely without RX in 78.5% of cases. From 2011 to 2013, we performed CA without RX in 38.5% of cases; from 2014 to 2017, we performed 96.2% of cases with zero RX. The use of RX was significantly reduced in group 2 (group 2: 1.4 ± 19.6 seconds vs group 1: 556.92 ± 520.76 seconds; P < .001). These differences were irrespective of arrhythmia treatment. There were no differences between the two groups in acute success, complications, or duration of procedures. CONCLUSION: CA of supraventricular tachycardia and VT entirely without RX, guided by the CARTO system, is safe, feasible, and effective. After an adequate learning curve, CA can be performed entirely without RX.

Real-life outcome of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and cardiac resynchronization defibrillator replacement/upgrade in a contemporary population: observations from the multicentre DECODE registry.

AIMS: The benefit of prolonged implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD)/cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) therapy following device replacement is hindered by clinical and procedure-related adverse events (AEs). Adverse events rate is highest in more complex devices and at upgrades, as per the REPLACE registry experience, but is changing owing to the improvement in device technology and medical care. We aimed at understanding the extent and type of AEs in a contemporary Italian population. METHODS AND RESULTS: Detect long-term complications after ICD replacement (DECODE) was a prospective, single-arm, multicentre cohort study aimed at estimating medium- to long-term AEs in a large population of patients undergoing ICD/cardiac resynchronization defibrillator replacement/upgrade from 2013 to 2015. We prospectively analysed all clinical and device-related AEs at 12-month follow-up (FU) of 983 consecutive patients (median age 71 years, 76% male, 55% ischaemic, 47% CRT-D) followed for 353 ± 49 days. Seven percent of the patients died (60.6% for cardiovascular reasons), whereas 104 AEs occurred; 43 (4.4%) patients needed at least one surgical action to treat the AE. Adverse events rates were 3.3/100 years lead-related, 3.4/100 years bleedings, and 1.6/100 years infective. The primary endpoint was predicted by hospitalization in the month prior to the procedure [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.23, 1.16-4.29; 0.0169] and by upgrade (HR = 1.75, 1.02-2.99, 0.0441). One hundred and twelve (11.4%) patients met the combined endpoint of death from any cause, cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED)-related infection, and surgical action/hospitalization required to treat the AE. Hospitalization within 30 days prior to the procedure (HR = 2.07, 1.13-3.81; 0.0199), anticoagulation (HR = 1.97, 1.26-3.07; 0.003), and ischaemic cardiomyopathy (HR = 1.67, 95% confidence interval 1.06-2.63; P = 0.0276) were associated with the combined endpoint during FU. CONCLUSIONS: Adverse events following CIED replacement/upgrade are lower than previously reported, possibly owing to improved patients care. Hospitalization in the month prior to the procedure, upgrade, and clinical profile (anticoagulation, ischaemic cardiomyopathy) hint to increased risk, suggesting an individualized planning of the procedure to minimize overall AEs. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ Identifier: NCT02076789.

Electrical manipulation of the failing heart.

Chronic heart failure with reduced (≤ 40%) ejection fraction (HFrEF) poses a significant residual mortality risk despite modern optimal medical therapy. In the last decades, we have witnessed the introduction of breakthrough cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) aimed at addressing sudden cardiac death and HF progression in patients with HFrEF, leading to improved survival and functional capacity. Following their introduction, implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) have undergone substantial technological improvements and have been investigated in different settings of HFrEF, some of which yielded controversial results. In this review, we provide a comprehensive, yet pragmatic, approach to the individual key points in the electrical manipulation of the failing heart with ICD and CRT including patient selection, technological advances in the implant technique, follow-up, and long-term management. The aim of the review is to provide real-life-oriented advices to maximize the desired outcomes of CIED-based therapy of HFrEF. Accordingly, a framework to inform the decision-making process in candidates to ICD and/or CRT has been developed reflective of a critical appraisal of the most recently available evidence reappraising some domains beyond the classic views.

Sacubitril/valsartan or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patients: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

AIMS: The availability of novel drugs might affect the modern interplay between pharmacological and device therapy of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of sacubitril/valsartan as compared with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) on top of optimal medical therapy in patients with HFrEF. METHODS: Data from 2000 adults with demographic and clinical characteristics similar to those in the PARADIGM-HF were derived as inputs for a four-state Markov model simulated HFrEF. Probabilities of all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalization and ICD-related complications along with quality of life data and costs, discounted at 3%, from an Italian healthcare payer perspective were projected over a 10-year time horizon. Sensitivity analyses on key inputs were performed. RESULTS: According to the model, sacubitril/valsartan would lead to 5.85 life years saved, whilst reducing by more than 20% the risk of heart failure hospitalizations for 1000 patients with HFrEF over 10 years. Estimated incremental costs with sacubitril/valsartan were -&OV0556;13 302 associated with incremental 0.14 quality-adjusted life years gained, yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of -&OV0556;98 500 per quality-adjusted life year gained for the base-case consistent with a dominant, cost-saving and clinically superior treatment strategy. Sacubitril/valsartan was dominant in more than 80% of the scenarios explored with sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: The findings of this model suggest that in patients with HFrEF sacubitril/valsartan would be cost-effective by increasing survival at lower costs compared with an ICD. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the cost-effectiveness of sacubitril/valsartan that remained dominant across most of the ranges of the variables tested.

Predictors of Zero X-Ray Ablation for Supraventricular Tachycardias in a Nationwide Multicenter Experience.

BACKGROUND: This multicenter, prospective study evaluated the determinants of zero-fluoroscopy (ZFL) ablation of supraventricular tachycardias. METHODS AND RESULTS: Four hundred thirty patients (215 male, 55.4±22.1 years) with indication to electrophysiological study or ablation of supraventricular tachycardias were enrolled. All participating physicians agreed to follow the as low as reasonably achievable policy. A procedure was defined as ZFL when no fluoroscopy was used. The total fluoroscopy time inversely correlated to the number of procedures previously performed by each operator since study start (r=-0.112; P=0.02). Two hundred eighty-nine procedures (67.2%) were ZFL; multivariable analysis identified as predictors of ZFL: procedure after the 30th for each operator, compared with procedures up to the ninth (P=0.011; hazard ratio, 3.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.79-6.80); the type of arrhythmia (P=0.031; electrophysiological study and atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia ablation having the highest probability of ZFL; hazard ratio, 6.87; 95% CI, 2.08-22.7 and hazard ratio, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.04-3.91, respectively); the operator's (P=0.002) and patient's age (P=0.009). Among operators, achievement of ZFL varied from 0% to 100%; 8 (22.8%) operators achieved ZFL in <25% of their procedures; 17 (48.6%) operators achieved ZFL in >75% of their procedures. The probability of ZFL increased by 2.8% (hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97-0.99) as patient's age decreased by 1 year. Acute procedural success was obtained in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: The use of 3-dimensional mapping system completely avoided the use of fluoroscopy in most cases, with very low fluoroscopy time in the remaining and high safety and effectiveness profiles. Achievement of ZFL was predicted by the type of arrhythmia, operator's experience, and patient's age.

Role of cardiac electronic implantable device in the stratification and management of embolic risk of silent atrial fibrillation: are all atrial fibrillations created equal?

INTRODUCTION: Ischemic strokes may be associated with atrial fibrillation (AF). AF detection is critical in ischemic stroke survivors, often recommending a switch from antiplatelet therapy to oral anticoagulants for secondary prevention. Areas covered: Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) with their long-term recording capability allows to document AF and to quantify the arrhythmia burden. Recent series in pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) recipients with no prior stroke showed that short episodes of AF increased stroke risk compared with those without AF recorded. Detection of AF by CIEDs represent a unique opportunity for promp prevention of embolic risk in silent AF. It will be attractive to identify AF before a stroke occurs. Expert commentary: The purpose of this article is to review the role of CIED to detect AF, to quantify the role of AF burden, and to guide primary and secondary stroke prevention.

Appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator interventions in cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D) patients undergoing device replacement: time to downgrade from CRT-D to CRT-pacemaker? Insights from real-world clinical practice in the DECODE CRT-D analysis.

Aim: Ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF) occurrence after cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D) replacement is unknown; hence, there is no practical guideline to recommend either CRT-D or CRT-pacemaker at the time of device replacement. We observed the 1-year VT/VF occurrence after CRT-D replacement in a subanalysis of the Detect Long-term Complications after ICD Replacement (DECODE) registry. Methods and results: A total of 332 consecutive patients who had undergone CRT-D replacement from 2013 to 2015 were enrolled in 36 Italian centres. The primary endpoint was the number of patients with any appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) interventions during 12-month follow-up. The secondary endpoint comprised death from any cause and appropriate ICD interventions. At replacement, 214 (64.5%) patients had a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 35% and 138 (41.6%) patients had a secondary prevention indication for ICD. Seventy (21.1%) patients had no longer indication to ICD therapy. During a median follow-up period of 406.5 (362-533) days, VT/VF requiring therapy delivery occurred in 57 (17%) patients, specifically in 7% of those who no longer had an ICD indication. On multivariate analysis, number of criteria for ICD replacement independently predicted appropriate ICD intervention during follow-up [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07-2.46; log-rank P = 0.02]. The combined endpoint of death from any cause or appropriate ICD therapy occurred in 76 (23%) patients. Only NYHA class remained associated with this combined endpoint (HR = 1.97, 95% CI 1.23-3.14; P = 0.005). Conclusions: The DECODE registry showed the 'real-world' experience of CRT-D recipients approaching device replacement, in which 7% of patients who no longer had an indication for ICD therapy experienced appropriate ICD interventions.

Rationale, study design, and pilot phase of tHE Management of AntiThrOMbotic therApy (HEMATOMA) in patients undergoing electrophysiological device surgery: Italian National Multicenter Observational REgistry.

AIMS: To investigate the different strategies adopted for the management of antithrombotic therapy and the related hemorrhagic and infective complication rates in patients undergoing cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) surgery in a real-world setting. METHODS: THE Management of AntiThrOMbotic therApy in patients undergoing electrophysiological device surgery: Italian NatiOnal Multicenter Observational REgistry (HEMATOMA NO MORE) is an observational, prospective, multicenter, national cohort study (with a retrospective, multicenter, regional pilot phase) designed to enroll patients with standard indications to CIED implantations/replacements receiving concomitant antithrombotic therapy. The primary outcome is clinically significant pocket hematoma defined as a postprocedural hematoma, resulting in prolonged hospitalization and/or requiring interruption of antithrombotic therapy and/or requiring further surgery and/or requiring transfusion. RESULTS: The pilot phase included 569 patients from 11 centers in Tuscany enrolled between September 2014 and May 2015 and followed up for 1 month. Patients were categorized according to the strategy of management of antithrombotic therapy, with heparin bridging being associated with the highest incidence of clinically significant pocket hematoma (12.3%). Overall nonpocket hemorrhagic events rate was quite low (0.52%) and thromboembolic complications were negligible (0.17%). CONCLUSION: Occurrence of pocket hematoma in patients undergoing CIED surgery is largely influenced by the strategy of management of antithrombotic therapy. The HEMATOMA NO MORE will assess the impact of different strategies on the risk of developing pocket hematoma and of subsequent CIED-related infections.

Thromboembolic risk and effect of oral anticoagulation according to atrial fibrillation patterns: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Oral anticoagulation (OAC) is recommended in both paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (pxAF) and nonparoxysmal AF (non-pxAF), but disagreement exists in classes of recommendation. Data on incidence/rate of stroke in pxAF are conflicting, and OAC is often underused in this population. The objectives of the meta-analysis were to investigate different impact on outcomes of pxAF and non-pxAF, with and without OAC. Two reviewers searched for prospective studies on risk of stroke and systemic embolism (SE) in pxAF and non-pxAF, with and without OAC. Quality of evidence was assessed according to GRADE approach. Stroke combined with SE was the main outcome. Meta-regression was performed to evaluate OAC effect on stroke and SE incidence rate. We identified 18 studies. For a total of 239 528 patient-years of follow-up. The incidence rate of stroke/SE was 1.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3%-2.0%) in pxAF and 2.3% (95% CI: 2.0%-2.7%) in non-pxAF. Paroxysmal AF was associated with a lower risk of overall thromboembolic (TE) events (risk ratio: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.65-0.80, P < 0.00001) compared with non-pxAF. In both groups, the annual rate of TE events decreased as proportion of patients treated with OAC increased. Non-pxAF showed a reduction from 3.7% to 1.7% and pxAF from 2.5% to 1.2%. Major bleeding rates did not differ among groups. Stroke/SE risk is significantly lower, although clinically meaningful, in pxAF. OAC consistently reduces TE event rates across any AF pattern. As a whole, these data provide the evidence to warrant OAC irrespective of the AF pattern in most (virtually all) patients.

Management of antithrombotic therapy in patients undergoing electrophysiological device surgery.

The aim of this review is to formulate practical recommendations for the management of antithrombotic therapy in patients undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) surgery by providing indications for a systematic approach to the problem integrating general technical considerations with patient-specific elements based on a careful evaluation of the balance between haemorrhagic and thromboembolic risk. Hundreds of thousands patients undergo implantation or replacement of CIEDs annually in Europe, and up to 50% of these subjects receive antiplatelet agents or oral anticoagulants. The rate of CIED-related complications, mainly infective, has also significantly increased so that transvenous lead extraction procedures are, consequently, often required. Cardiac implantable electronic device surgery is peculiar and portends specific intrinsic risks of developing potentially fatal haemorrhagic complications; on the other hand, the periprocedural suspension of antithrombotic therapy in patients with high thromboembolic risk cardiac conditions may have catastrophic consequences. Accordingly, the management of the candidate to CIED surgery receiving concomitant antithrombotic therapy is a topic of great clinical relevance yet controversial and only partially, if at all, adequately addressed in evidence-based current guidelines. In spite of the fact that in many procedures it seems reasonably safe to proceed with aspirin only or without interruption of anticoagulants, restricting to selected cases the use of bridging therapy with parenteral heparins, there are lots of variables that may make the therapeutic choices challenging. The decision-making process applied in this document relies on the development of a stratification of the procedural haemorrhagic risk and of the risk deriving from the suspension of antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy combined to generate different clinical scenarios with specific indications for optimal management of periprocedural antithrombotic therapy.

Sleep-disordered breathing increases the risk of arrhythmias.

Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) has been consistently associated with increased risk for cardiovascular diseases, including arrhythmias. The purpose of this review is to elucidate the several pathophysiologic pathways such as repetitive hypoxia and reoxygenation, increased oxidative stress, inflammation and sympathetic activation that may underlie the increased incidence of arrhythmias in SDB patients. We discuss in particular the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias, atrial fibrillation and bradyarrhythmias in SDB patients. In addition, we discuss the electrocardiographic alteration such as ST-T changes during apneic events and QT dispersion induced by SDB that may trigger complex ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. Finally, we consider also the therapeutic interventions such as continuous positive airways pressure therapy, a standard treatment for SDB, that may reduce the incidence and recurrence of supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias in patients with SDB.