Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
BMJ Open Qual ; 13(2)2024 Jun 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38830729

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The demand for healthcare services during the COVID-19 pandemic was excessive for less-resourced settings, with intensive care units (ICUs) taking the heaviest toll. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to achieve adequate personal protective equipment (PPE) use in 90% of patient encounters, to reach 90% compliance with objectives of patient flow (OPF) and to provide emotional support tools to 90% of healthcare workers (HCWs). METHODS: We conducted a quasi-experimental study with an interrupted time-series design in 14 ICUs in Argentina. We randomly selected adult critically ill patients admitted from July 2020 to July 2021 and active HCWs in the same period. We implemented a quality improvement collaborative (QIC) with a baseline phase (BP) and an intervention phase (IP). The QIC included learning sessions, periods of action and improvement cycles (plan-do-study-act) virtually coached by experts via platform web-based activities. The main study outcomes encompassed the following elements: proper utilisation of PPE, compliance with nine specific OPF using daily goal sheets through direct observations and utilisation of a web-based tool for tracking emotional well-being among HCWs. RESULTS: We collected 7341 observations of PPE use (977 in BP and 6364 in IP) with an improvement in adequate use from 58.4% to 71.9% (RR 1.2, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.29, p<0.001). We observed 7428 patient encounters to evaluate compliance with 9 OPF (879 in BP and 6549 in IP) with an improvement in compliance from 53.9% to 67% (RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.32, p<0.001). The results showed that HCWs did not use the support tool for self-mental health evaluation as much as expected. CONCLUSION: A QIC was effective in improving healthcare processes and adequate PPE use, even in the context of a pandemic, indicating the possibility of expanding QIC networks nationwide to improve overall healthcare delivery. The limited reception of emotional support tools requires further analyses.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/epidemiología , Argentina , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/organización & administración , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Femenino , Equipo de Protección Personal/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias/prevención & control , Atención a la Salud/normas , Adulto , Salud Pública/métodos , Personal de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Personal de Salud/psicología , Análisis de Series de Tiempo Interrumpido/métodos
2.
J Crit Care ; 78: 154382, 2023 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37516091

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates in the intensive care unit (ICU). In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), epidemiological information about this condition is still scarce. Our main objective was to characterize its epidemiology, prognosis, and its treatment. METHODS: This multicenter prospective cohort study included 1466 patients from 35 ICUs during 6 months in Argentina in 2018. Risk factors and outcomes in patients with and without AKI, and between AKI on admission (AKIadm) and that developed during hospitalization (AKIhosp) were analyzed. RESULTS: AKI occurred in 61.3% of patients (900/1466); 72.6% were AKIadm and 27.3% AKIhosp. Risk factors were age, BMI, arterial hypertension, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, SOFA, APACHE II, dehydration, sepsis, vasopressor use, radiocontrast, diuresis/h and mechanical ventilation. Independent predictors for AKI were sepsis, diabetes, dehydration, vasopressors on admission, APACHE II and radiocontrast use. Renal replacement therapies (RRT) requirement in AKI patients was 14.8%. Hospital mortality in AKI vs. non-AKI was 38.7% and 23.3% (p < 0.001); and in AKIadm vs. AKIhosp, 41.2% and 37.8% (p = 0.53). CONCLUSIONS: ICU-acquired AKI has high incidence, complications and mortality. Risk factors for AKI and RRT utilization were similar to those described in other epidemiological studies. AKIadm was more frequent than AKIhosp, but had equal prognosis.


Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda , Sepsis , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Enfermedad Crítica/epidemiología , Argentina/epidemiología , Deshidratación/complicaciones , Pronóstico , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Factores de Riesgo , Lesión Renal Aguda/epidemiología , Lesión Renal Aguda/terapia , Lesión Renal Aguda/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos
3.
Hypertens Pregnancy ; 40(4): 279-287, 2021 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34587828

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To explore variables associated with adverse maternal/fetal/neonatal outcomes among pregnant/postpartum patients admitted to ICU for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP). METHODS: Multicenter, prospective, national cohort study. RESULTS: Variables independently associated with maternal/fetal/neonatal mortality among 172 patients were as follows: Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation-II (APACHE-II)(OR1.20[1.06-1.35]), gestational age (OR0.698[0.59-0.82]) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST)(OR1.004[1.001-1.006]). Positive likelihood ratio for headache, epigastric pain, and visual disturbances to predict composite adverse outcomes were 1.23(1.16-1.30), 0.76(0.59-1.02), and 1.1(0.98-1.2), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Maternal/fetal mortality due to HDP was independently associated with severity of illness on admission, gestational age, and elevated AST. Accuracy of clinical symptoms to predict composite adverse outcomes was low.


Asunto(s)
Hipertensión Inducida en el Embarazo/epidemiología , Preeclampsia/epidemiología , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
4.
Ann Intensive Care ; 10(1): 40, 2020 Apr 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32297028

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Resuscitation of septic patients regarding goals, monitoring aspects and therapy is highly variable. Our aim was to characterize cardiovascular and fluid management of sepsis in Argentina, a low and middle-income country (LMIC). Furthermore, we sought to test whether the utilization of dynamic tests of fluid responsiveness, as a guide for fluid therapy after initial resuscitation in patients with persistent or recurrent hypoperfusion, was associated with decreased mortality. METHODS: Secondary analysis of a national, multicenter prospective cohort study (n = 787) fulfilling Sepsis-3 definitions. Epidemiological characteristics, hemodynamic management data, type of fluids and vasopressors administered, physiological variables denoting hypoperfusion, use of tests of fluid responsiveness, and outcomes, were registered. Independent predictors of mortality were identified with logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Initially, 584 of 787 patients (74%) had mean arterial pressure (MAP) < 65 mm Hg and/or signs of hypoperfusion and received 30 mL/kg of fluids, mostly normal saline (53%) and Ringer lactate (35%). Vasopressors and/or inotropes were administered in 514 (65%) patients, mainly norepinephrine (100%) and dobutamine (9%); in 22%, vasopressors were administered before ending the fluid load. After this, 413 patients (53%) presented persisting or recurrent hypotension and/or hypoperfusion, which prompted administration of additional fluid, based on: lactate levels (66%), urine output (62%), heart rate (54%), central venous O2 saturation (39%), central venous-arterial PCO2 difference (38%), MAP (31%), dynamic tests of fluid responsiveness (30%), capillary-refill time (28%), mottling (26%), central venous pressure (24%), cardiac index (13%) and/or pulmonary wedge pressure (3%). Independent predictors of mortality were SOFA and Charlson scores, lactate, requirement of mechanical ventilation, and utilization of dynamic tests of fluid responsiveness. CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective observational study assessing the characteristics of resuscitation of septic patients in Argentina, a LMIC, the prevalent use of initial fluid bolus with normal saline and Ringer lactate and the use of norepinephrine as the most frequent vasopressor, reflect current worldwide practices. After initial resuscitation with 30 mL/kg of fluids and vasopressors, 413 patients developed persistent or recurrent hypoperfusion, which required further volume expansion. In this setting, the assessment of fluid responsiveness with dynamic tests to guide fluid resuscitation was independently associated with decreased mortality.

5.
Crit Care ; 23(1): 250, 2019 Jul 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31288865

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Socioeconomic variables impact health outcomes but have rarely been evaluated in critical illness. Low- and middle-income countries bear the highest burden of sepsis and also have significant health inequities. In Argentina, public hospitals serve the poorest segment of the population, while private institutions serve patients with health coverage. Our objective was to analyze differences in mortality between public and private hospitals, using Sepsis-3 definitions. METHODS: This is a multicenter, prospective cohort study including patients with sepsis admitted to 49 Argentine ICUs lasting 3 months, beginning on July 1, 2016. Epidemiological, clinical, and socioeconomic status variables and hospital characteristics were compared between patients admitted to both types of institutions. RESULTS: Of the 809 patients included, 367 (45%) and 442 (55%) were admitted to public and private hospitals, respectively. Those in public institutions were younger (56 ± 18 vs. 64 ± 18; p < 0.01), with more comorbidities (Charlson score 2 [0-4] vs. 1 [0-3]; p < 0.01), fewer education years (7 [7-12] vs. 12 [10-16]; p < 0.01), more frequently unemployed/informally employed (30% vs. 7%; p < 0.01), had similar previous self-rated health status (70 [50-90] vs. 70 [50-90] points; p = 0.30), longer pre-admission symptoms (48 [24-96] vs. 24 [12-48] h; p < 0.01), had been previously evaluated more frequently in any healthcare venue (28 vs. 20%; p < 0.01), and had higher APACHE II, SOFA, lactate levels, and mechanical ventilation utilization. ICU admission as septic shock was more frequent in patients admitted to public hospitals (47 vs. 35%; p < 0.01), as were infections caused by multiresistant microorganisms. Sepsis management in the ICU showed no differences. Twenty-eight-day mortality was higher in public hospitals (42% vs. 24%; p < 0.01) as was hospital mortality (47% vs. 30%; p < 0.01). Admission to a public hospital was an independent predictor of mortality together with comorbidities, lactate, SOFA, and mechanical ventilation; in an alternative prediction model, it acted as a correlate of pre-hospital symptom duration and infections caused by multiresistant microorganisms. CONCLUSIONS: Patients in public hospitals belonged to a socially disadvantaged group and were sicker at admission, had septic shock more frequently, and had higher mortality. Unawareness of disease severity and delays in the health system might be associated with late admission. This marked difference in outcome between patients served by public and private institutions constitutes a state of health inequity.


Asunto(s)
Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Sepsis/diagnóstico , APACHE , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Argentina , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/organización & administración , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Sepsis/complicaciones , Sepsis/epidemiología , Clase Social
6.
Crit Care Med ; 46(8): 1276-1283, 2018 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29742584

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The new Sepsis-3 definitions have been scarcely assessed in low- and middle-income countries; besides, regional information of sepsis outcomes is sparse. Our objective was to evaluate Sepsis-3 definition performance in Argentina. DESIGN: Cohort study of 3-month duration beginning on July 1, 2016. SETTINGS: Forty-nine ICUs. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients admitted to the ICU with suspected infection that triggered blood cultures and antibiotic administration. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients were classified as having infection, sepsis (infection + change in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment ≥ 2 points), and septic shock (vasopressors + lactate > 2 mmol/L). Patients on vasopressors and lactate less than or equal to 2 mmol/L (cardiovascular dysfunction) were analyzed separately, as those on vasopressors without serum lactate measurement. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome was also recorded. Main outcome was hospital mortality. Of 809 patients, 6% had infection, 29% sepsis, 20% cardiovascular dysfunction, 40% septic shock, and 3% received vasopressors with lactate unmeasured. Hospital mortality was 13%, 20%, 39%, 51%, and 41%, respectively (p = 0.000). Independent predictors of outcome were lactate, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, comorbidities, prior duration of symptoms (hr), mechanical ventilation requirement, and infection by highly resistant microorganisms. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curves for mortality for systemic inflammatory response syndrome and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment were 0.53 (0.48-0.55) and 0.74 (0.69-0.77), respectively (p = 0.000). CONCLUSIONS: Increasing severity of Sepsis-3 categories adequately tracks mortality; cardiovascular dysfunction subgroup, not included in Sepsis-3, has distinct characteristics. Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score shows adequate prognosis accuracy-contrary to systemic inflammatory response syndrome. This study supports the predictive validity of Sepsis-3 definitions.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crítica , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Sepsis/mortalidad , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Adulto , Anciano , Argentina , Estudios de Cohortes , Comorbilidad , Farmacorresistencia Microbiana , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Ácido Láctico/sangre , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Puntuaciones en la Disfunción de Órganos , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Curva ROC , Respiración Artificial/estadística & datos numéricos , Sepsis/terapia , Choque Séptico/mortalidad , Síndrome de Respuesta Inflamatoria Sistémica/mortalidad , Vasoconstrictores/administración & dosificación
7.
Crit Care Med ; 43(9): 1887-97, 2015 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26121075

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate pregnant/postpartum patients requiring ICUs admission in Argentina, describe characteristics of mothers and outcomes for mothers/babies, evaluate risk factors for maternal-fetal-neonatal mortality; and compare outcomes between patients admitted to public and private health sectors. DESIGN: Multicenter, prospective, national cohort study. SETTING: Twenty ICUs in Argentina (public, 8 and private, 12). PATIENTS: Pregnant/postpartum (< 42 d) patients admitted to ICU. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Three hundred sixty-two patients were recruited, 51% from the public health sector and 49% from the private. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II was 8 (4-12); predicted/observed mortality, 7.6%/3.6%; hospital length of stay, 7 days (5-13 d); and fetal-neonatal losses, 17%. Public versus private health sector patients: years of education, 9 ± 3 versus 15 ± 3; transferred from another hospital, 43% versus 12%; Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, 9 (5-13.75) versus 7 (4-9); hospital length of stay, 10 days (6-17 d) versus 6 days (4-9 d); prenatal care, 75% versus 99.4%; fetal-neonatal losses, 25% versus 9% (p = 0.000 for all); and mortality, 5.4% versus 1.7% (p = 0.09). Complications in ICU were multiple-organ dysfunction syndrome (34%), shock (28%), renal dysfunction (25%), and acute respiratory distress syndrome (20%); all predominated in the public sector. Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (during first 24 hr of admission) score of at least 6.5 presented the best discriminative power for maternal mortality. Independent predictors of maternal-fetal-neonatal mortality were Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, education level, prenatal care, and admission to tertiary hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Patients spent a median of 7 days in hospital; 3.6% died. Maternal-fetal-neonatal mortality was determined not only by acuteness of illness but to social and healthcare aspects like education, prenatal control, and being cared in specialized hospitals. Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (during first 24 hr of admission), easier to calculate than Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, was a better predictor of maternal outcome. Evident health disparities existed between patients admitted to public versus private hospitals: the former received less prenatal care, were less educated, were more frequently transferred from other hospitals, were sicker at admission, and developed more complications; maternal and fetal-neonatal mortality were higher. These findings point to the need of redesigning healthcare services to account for these inequities.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crítica/mortalidad , Hospitales Privados/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Públicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Periodo Posparto , APACHE , Adulto , Argentina/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Tiempo de Internación , Mortalidad Materna , Puntuaciones en la Disfunción de Órganos , Mortalidad Perinatal , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Socioeconómicos
8.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 28(16): 1989-95, 2015 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25316558

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To describe characteristics, outcomes and clinical presentations for hypertensive disease of pregnancy (HDP) in patients admitted to three ICUs in Argentina. METHODS: Case-series multicenter study. RESULTS: There were 184 patients with HDP. Mean age 26 ± 8; 90% did not present comorbidity; APACHEII 9[6-14]; SOFA24 2[1-4]; ICU-LOS 3[2-6] days and hospital-LOS 8[5-12] days. Gestational age 34 ± 5 weeks; 46% (85) nulliparous and 71% received routine prenatal care. Maternal mortality 3.3% (6) - 50% attributed to intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Neonatal mortality 13.6%. Diagnostic categories: eclampsia (64; 35%), severe preeclampsia (60; 32.6%), HELLP (33; 17.9%), eclampsia-HELLP (18; 9.8%) and other (chronic/gestational-hypertension) (9: 4.7%). Severe hypertension in 46%, multiple organ dysfunction in 23%, acute respiratory distress in 8.7% and acute renal failure in 8%. Variables independently associated with eclampsia: maternal age (OR 1.07 [1.02-1.13], gestational age (OR 1.14 [1.04-1.24]) and nulliparity (OR 2.40 [1.19-4.85]). CONCLUSIONS: Although patients were young and the majority received appropriate prenatal care, they spent considerable time in hospital and presented severe morbidity. Maternal mortality was 3.3% and in half of these cases it was attributed to ICH. Eclampsia and severe preeclampsia represented two thirds of the diagnostic categories. Variables independently associated with eclampsia were maternal and gestational ages and nulliparity.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos , Hipertensión Inducida en el Embarazo/diagnóstico , Hipertensión Inducida en el Embarazo/terapia , Adulto , Argentina , Cuidados Críticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Hipertensión Inducida en el Embarazo/mortalidad , Hipertensión Inducida en el Embarazo/fisiopatología , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...