Variation in Androgen Deprivation Therapy Use Among Men With Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: Results From a Statewide Radiation Oncology Quality Consortium.

PURPOSE: For men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated with definitive therapy, the addition of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) reduces the risk of distant metastasis and cancer-related mortality. However, the absolute benefit of ADT varies by baseline cancer risk. Estimates of prognosis have improved over time, and little is known about ADT decision making in the modern era. We sought to characterize variability and identify factors associated with intended ADT use within the Michigan Radiation Oncology Quality Consoritum (MROQC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with localized prostate cancer undergoing definitive radiation therapy were enrolled from June 9, 2020, to June 26, 2023 (n = 815). Prospective data were collected using standardized patient, physician, and physicist forms. Intended ADT use was prospectively defined and was the primary outcome. Associations with patient, tumor, and practice-related factors were tested with multivariable analyses. Random intercept modeling was used to estimate facility-level variability. RESULTS: Five hundred seventy patients across 26 facilities were enrolled with intermediate-risk disease. ADT was intended for 46% of men (n = 262/570), which differed by National Comprehensive Cancer Network favorable intermediate-risk (23.5%, n = 38/172) versus unfavorable intermediate-risk disease (56.3%, n = 224/398; P < .001). After adjusting for the statewide case mix, the predicted probability of intended ADT use varied significantly across facilities, ranging from 15.4% (95% CI, 5.4%-37.0%) to 71.7% (95% CI, 57.0%-82.9%), with P < .01. Multivariable analyses showed that grade group 3 (OR, 4.60 [3.20-6.67]), ≥50% positive cores (OR, 2.15 [1.43-3.25]), and prostate-specific antigen 10 to 20 (OR, 1.87 [1.24-2.84]) were associated with ADT use. Area under the curve was improved when incorporating MRI adverse features (0.76) or radiation treatment variables (0.76), but there remained significant facility-level heterogeneity in all models evaluated (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Within a state-wide consortium, there is substantial facility-level heterogeneity in intended ADT use for men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Future efforts are necessary to identify patients who will benefit most from ADT and to develop strategies to standardize appropriate use.

Computed tomography assessment of robotic versus fluoroscopic implant accuracy in sacroiliac joint fusion.

OBJECTIVE: Computed tomography is considered the gold-standard imaging tool to evaluate spinal implant accuracy. However, there are no studies that evaluate the accuracy of robotic sacroiliac joint (SIJ) implant placement using CT to date. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of implant placement on CT between robotic and fluoroscopic navigation for SIJ fusion and the subsequent complications and clinical outcomes of suboptimally placed screws. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of SIJ fusions utilizing either robotic or fluoroscopic guidance at a single institution was conducted from 2014 to 2023. Implant placement accuracy was evaluated on intra- or postoperative CT. Primary endpoints were SIJ screw placement accuracy and complications. Secondary endpoints were pain status at the first and second follow-ups and rates of 2-year revision surgery. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square tests. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients who underwent 78 SIJ fusions were included, of which 63 were robotic and 15 were fluoroscopic. The mean age of the cohort at the time of surgery was 55.9 ± 14.2 years, and 35 patients (50.7%) were female. There were 135 robotically placed and 34 fluoroscopically placed implants. A significant difference was found in implant placement accuracy between robotic and fluoroscopic fusion (97.8% vs 76.5%, p < 0.001). When comparing optimal versus suboptimal implant placement, no difference was found in the presence of 30-day complications (p = 0.98). No intraoperative complications were present in this cohort. No difference was found in subjective pain status at the first (p = 0.69) and second (p = 0.45) follow-ups between optimal and suboptimal implant placement. No patients underwent 2-year revision surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Use of robotic navigation was significantly more accurate than the use of fluoroscopic navigation for SIJ implant placement. Complications overall were low and not different between optimally and suboptimally placed implants. Suboptimally placed implants did not differ in degree of subjective pain improvement or rates of revision surgery postoperatively.

Development and validation of an artificial intelligence model to accurately predict spinopelvic parameters.

OBJECTIVE: Achieving appropriate spinopelvic alignment has been shown to be associated with improved clinical symptoms. However, measurement of spinopelvic radiographic parameters is time-intensive and interobserver reliability is a concern. Automated measurement tools have the promise of rapid and consistent measurements, but existing tools are still limited to some degree by manual user-entry requirements. This study presents a novel artificial intelligence (AI) tool called SpinePose that automatically predicts spinopelvic parameters with high accuracy without the need for manual entry. METHODS: SpinePose was trained and validated on 761 sagittal whole-spine radiographs to predict the sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis (LL), T1 pelvic angle (T1PA), and L1 pelvic angle (L1PA). A separate test set of 40 radiographs was labeled by four reviewers, including fellowship-trained spine surgeons and a fellowship-trained radiologist with neuroradiology subspecialty certification. Median errors relative to the most senior reviewer were calculated to determine model accuracy on test images. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to assess interrater reliability. RESULTS: SpinePose exhibited the following median (interquartile range) parameter errors: SVA 2.2 mm (2.3 mm) (p = 0.93), PT 1.3° (1.2°) (p = 0.48), SS 1.7° (2.2°) (p = 0.64), PI 2.2° (2.1°) (p = 0.24), LL 2.6° (4.0°) (p = 0.89), T1PA 1.1° (0.9°) (p = 0.42), and L1PA 1.4° (1.6°) (p = 0.49). Model predictions also exhibited excellent reliability at all parameters (ICC 0.91-1.0). CONCLUSIONS: SpinePose accurately predicted spinopelvic parameters with excellent reliability comparable to that of fellowship-trained spine surgeons and neuroradiologists. Utilization of predictive AI tools in spinal imaging can substantially aid in patient selection and surgical planning.

Risk factors of emergency department visits following elective cervical and lumbar surgical procedures: a multi-institution analysis from the Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative.

OBJECTIVE: Emergency department visits 90 days after elective spinal surgery are relatively common, with rates ranging from 9% to 29%. Emergency visits are very costly, so their reduction is of importance. This study's objective was to evaluate the reasons for emergency department visits and determine potentially modifiable risk factors. METHODS: This study retrospectively reviewed data queried from the Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative (MSSIC) registry from July 2020 to November 2021. MSSIC is a multicenter (28-hospital) registry of patients undergoing cervical and lumbar degenerative spinal surgery. Adult patients treated for elective cervical and/or lumbar spine surgery for degenerative pathology (spondylosis, intervertebral disc disease, low-grade spondylolisthesis) were included. Emergency department visits within 90 days of surgery (outcome measure) were analyzed utilizing univariate and multivariate regression analyses. RESULTS: Of 16,224 patients, 2024 (12.5%) presented to the emergency department during the study period, most commonly for pain related to spinal surgery (31.5%), abdominal problems (15.8%), and pain unrelated to the spinal surgery (12.8%). On multivariate analysis, age (per 5-year increase) (relative risk [RR] 0.94, 95% CI 0.92-0.95), college education (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.69-0.96), private insurance (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.70-0.89), and preoperative ambulation status (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.79-0.97) were associated with decreased emergency visits. Conversely, Black race (RR 1.30, 95% CI 1.13-1.51), current diabetes (RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.01-1.26), history of deep venous thromboembolism (RR 1.28, 95% CI 1.16-1.43), history of depression (RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.03-1.25), history of anxiety (RR 1.32, 95% CI 1.19-1.46), history of osteoporosis (RR 1.21, 95% CI 1.09-1.34), history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (RR 1.19, 95% CI 1.06-1.34), American Society of Anesthesiologists class > II (RR 1.18, 95% CI 1.08-1.29), and length of stay > 3 days (RR 1.29, 95% CI 1.16-1.44) were associated with increased emergency visits. CONCLUSIONS: The most common reasons for emergency department visits were surgical pain, abdominal dysfunction, and pain unrelated to index spinal surgery. Increased focus on postoperative pain management and bowel regimen can potentially reduce emergency visits. The risks of diabetes, history of osteoporosis, depression, and anxiety are areas for additional preoperative screening.

Virtual Reality-Enabled Resident Education of Lateral-Access Spine Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Lateral-access spine surgery has many benefits, but adoption has been limited by a steep learning curve. Virtual reality (VR) is gaining popularity and lends itself as a useful tool in enhancing neurosurgical resident education. We thus sought to assess whether VR-based simulation could enhance the training of neurosurgery residents in lateral spine surgery. METHODS: Neurosurgery residents completed a VR-based lateral spine module on lateral patient positioning and performing lateral lumbar interbody fusion using the PrecisionOS VR system on the Meta Quest 2 headset. Simulation occurred 1×/week every other week for a total of 3 simulations over 6 weeks. Pre- and postintervention surveys as well as intrasimulation performance metrics were assessed over time. RESULTS: The majority of resident participants showed improvement in performance scores, including an automated PrecisionOS precision score, number of radiographs used within the simulation, and time to completion. All participants showed improvement in comfort with anatomic landmarks for lateral access surgery, confidence performing lateral surgery without direct supervision, and assessing fluoroscopy in spine surgery for hardware placement and image interpretation. Participant perception on the utility of VR as an educational tool also improved. CONCLUSIONS: VR-based simulation enhanced neurosurgical residents' ability to understand lateral access surgery. Immersive surgical simulation resulted in improved resident confidence with surgical technique and workflow, perceived improvement in anatomical knowledge, and simulation performance scores. Trainee perceptions on virtual simulation and training as a curriculum supplement also improved following completion of VR training.

Emergent radiotherapy for spinal cord compression/impingement-a narrative review.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Malignant epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC), often presenting with back pain and motor/sensory deficits, is associated with poor survival, particularly when there is loss of ambulation. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the literature and discuss appropriate workup and management of MESCC, specifically in the emergent setting. METHODS: A PubMed search was conducted on "spinal cord compression" and "radiation therapy." Articles were analyzed for the purpose of this narrative review. KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS: If MESCC is suspected, neurologic examination and complete spine imaging are recommended. Emergent treatment is indicated if there is radiographic evidence of high-grade compression and/or clinically significant motor deficits. Treatment involves a combination of medical management, surgical decompression, radiation therapy (RT), and rehabilitation. For motor deficits, emergent initiation of high dose steroids is recommended. Circumferential surgical decompression ± stabilization followed by RT provides superior clinical outcomes than RT alone. For patients whom surgery is not reasonable, RT alone may provide significant treatment response which depends on radioresponsiveness of the pathology. Systemic therapy, if indicated, is typically reserved till after primary treatment of MESCC, but patients with chemoresponsive tumors may receive primary chemotherapy. The selected RT schedule should be personalized to each patient and commonly is 30 Gy in 10 fractions (fx), 20 Gy in 5 fx, or 8 Gy in 1 fx. MESCC recurrence may be treated with additional RT, if within the spinal cord tolerance, or surgery. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has been used for high grade MESCC in patients with relatively intact neurologic function at a few centers with a very robust infrastructure to support rapid initiation of treatment within a short period of time, but is generally not feasible for most clinical practices. SBRT may be advantageous for low grade MESCC, recurrence, or in the post-operative setting. Detection of MESCC prior to development of high-grade compression or deterioration of neurologic function may allow patients to benefit more from advanced therapies and improve prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: MESCC is a devastating condition; optimal treatment should be personalized to each patient and approached collaboratively by a multidisciplinary team.

Patients with progression of spinal metastases who present to the clinic have better outcomes compared to those who present to the emergency department.

BACKGROUND: As cancer therapies have improved, spinal metastases are increasingly common. Resulting complications have a significant impact on patient's quality of life. Optimal methods of surveillance and avoidance of neurologic deficits are understudied. This study compares the clinical course of patients who initially presented to the emergency department (ED) versus a multidisciplinary spine oncology clinic and who underwent stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) secondary to progression/presentation of metastatic spine disease. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of adult oncologic patients who underwent spinal SBRT at a single hospital from 2010 to 2021. Descriptive statistics and survival analyses were performed. RESULTS: We identified 498 spinal radiographic treatment sites in 390 patients. Of these patients, 118 (30.3%) presented to the ED. Patients presenting to the ED compared to the clinic had significantly more severe spinal compression (52.5% vs. 11.7%; p < 0.0001), severe pain (28.8% vs. 10.3%; p < 0.0001), weakness (24.5% vs. 4.5%; p < 0.0001), and difficulty walking (24.5% vs. 4.5%; p < 0.0001). Patients who presented to the ED compared to the clinic were significantly more likely to have surgical intervention followed by SBRT (55.4% vs. 15.3%; p < 0.0001) compared to SBRT alone. Patients who presented to the ED compared to the clinic had a significantly quicker interval to distant spine progression (5.1 ± 6.5 vs. 9.1 ± 10.2 months; p = 0.004), systemic progression (5.1 ± 7.2 vs. 9.2 ± 10.7 months; p < 0.0001), and worse overall survival (9.3 ± 10.0 vs. 14.3 ± 13.7 months; p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: The establishment of multidisciplinary spine oncology clinics is an opportunity to potentially allow for earlier, more data-driven treatment of their spinal metastatic disease.

Robotic versus nonrobotic sacroiliac joint fusion.

OBJECTIVE: Robot-assisted pedicle screw placement in spinal fusion has been well studied. However, few studies have evaluated robot-assisted sacroiliac joint (SIJ) fusion. The aim of this study was to compare surgical characteristics, accuracy, and complications between robot-assisted and fluoroscopically guided SIJ fusion. METHODS: A retrospective review of 110 patients with 121 SIJ fusions done at a single academic institution was conducted from 2014 to 2023. Inclusion criteria included adult age and a robot- or fluoroscopically guided approach to SIJ fusion. Patients were excluded if the SIJ fusion was part of a longer fusion construct, not minimally invasive, and/or had missing data. Demographics, approach type (robotic vs fluoroscopic), operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), number of screws, intraoperative complications, 30-day complications, number of intraoperative fluoroscopic images (as a surrogate for radiation exposure), implant placement accuracy, and pain status at the first follow-up were recorded. Primary endpoints were SIJ screw placement accuracy and complications. Secondary endpoints were operative time, radiation exposure, and pain status at the first follow-up. RESULTS: Ninety patients were included who underwent a total of 101 SIJ fusions, of which 78 were robotic and 23 were fluoroscopic. The mean age of the cohort at the time of surgery was 55.9 ± 13.8 years; 46 patients were females (51.1%). No difference was found in screw placement accuracy between robotic and fluoroscopic fusion (1.3% vs 8.7%, p = 0.06). Chi-square analysis of robotic versus fluoroscopic fusion found no difference in the presence of 30-day complications (p = 0.62). Mann-Whitney U-test analysis found that robotic fusion had a significantly longer operative time than fluoroscopic fusion (72.0 vs 61.0 minutes, p = 0.01); however, robot-assisted fusions involved significantly lower radiation exposure (26.7 vs 187.4 fluoroscopic images, p < 0.001). No difference in EBL was noted (p = 0.17). No intraoperative complications were present in this cohort. Subgroup analysis comparing the 23 most recent robotic cases against the 23 fluoroscopic cases found that robotic fusion still was associated with significantly longer operative times than fluoroscopic fusion (74.0 ± 26.4 vs 61.0 ± 14.9 minutes, respectively; p = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS: SIJ screw placement accuracy did not significantly differ between robot-assisted and fluoroscopic SIJ fusion. Complications overall were low and similar between the two groups. The operative time was longer with robotic assistance, but there was markedly less radiation exposure to the surgeon and staff.

Local Control in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma to the Spine: The Experience of an Institution with a Multidisciplinary Spine Oncology Program.

BACKGROUND: The outcomes for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) to the spine who underwent stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) through a multidisciplinary spine oncology program are not well described. We sought to describe the clinical course and local control rates at 1 and 2 years for these patients. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of adult oncologic patients receiving SBRT to the spine through a multidisciplinary spine oncology program at a single institution from 2010 to 2021 was performed. Patients with a pathologic diagnosis of RCC were included. RESULTS: A total of 75 spinal sites were treated in 60 patients. Of the 60 patients, 75.0% were men, and the mean patient age was 59.2 ± 11.3 years. At 1 year after treatment, 6 of the 60 patients were lost to follow-up. Of the remaining 54 patients, 18 were censored by death and 7 treatment sites showed local recurrence, for 37 of 44 treatment sites with local control (87.8%). At 2 years, 1 additional local recurrence had developed, 15 patients were censored by death, and no additional patients had been lost to follow-up, resulting in 28 of 36 treatment sites with local control (83.2%). None of the patients who had undergone repeat SBRT had local recurrence at 1 or 2 years. For those with local recurrence, the average time from treatment to progression was 6.6 ± 6.5 months. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, one of the largest reported studies of spine SBRT for metastatic RCC, local control was high at 1 and 2 years. Our findings support the role of coordinated, algorithmic treatment for these patients.

How closely are outcome questionnaires correlated to patient satisfaction after cervical spine surgery for myelopathy?

OBJECTIVE: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have become the standard means to measure surgical outcomes. Insurers and policy makers are also increasingly utilizing PROs to assess the value of care and measure different aspects of a patient's condition. For cervical myelopathy, it is currently unclear which outcome measure best reflects patient satisfaction. In this investigation, the authors evaluated patients treated for cervical myelopathy to determine which outcome questionnaires best correlate with patient satisfaction. METHODS: The Quality Outcomes Database (QOD), a prospectively collected multi-institutional database, was used to retrospectively analyze patients undergoing surgery for cervical myelopathy. The North American Spine Society (NASS) satisfaction index, Neck Disability Index (NDI), numeric rating scales for neck pain (NP-NRS) and arm pain (AP-NRS), EQ-5D, and modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) scale were evaluated. RESULTS: The analysis included 1141 patients diagnosed with myelopathy, of whom 1099 had an NASS satisfaction index recorded at any of the follow-up time points. Concomitant radiculopathy was an indication for surgery in 368 (33.5%) patients, and severe neck pain (NP-NRS ≥ 7) was present in 471 (42.8%) patients. At the 3-month follow-up, NASS patient satisfaction index scores were positively correlated with scores for the NP-NRS (r = 0.30), AP-NRS (r = 0.32), and NDI (r = 0.36) and negatively correlated with EQ-5D (r = -0.38) and mJOA (r = -0.29) scores (all p < 0.001). At the 12-month follow-up, scores for the NASS index were positively correlated with scores for the NP-NRS (r = 0.44), AP-NRS (r = 0.38), and NDI (r = 0.46) and negatively correlated with scores for the EQ-5D (r = -0.40) and mJOA (r = -0.36) (all p < 0.001). At the 24-month follow-up, NASS index scores were positively correlated with NP-NRS (r = 0.49), AP-NRS (r = 0.36), and NDI (r = 0.49) scores and negatively correlated with EQ-5D (r = -0.44) and mJOA (r = -0.38) scores (all p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Neck pain was highly prevalent in patients with myelopathy. Notably, improvement in neck pain-associated disability rather than improvement in myelopathy was the most prominent PRO factor for patients. This finding may reflect greater patient concern for active pain symptoms than for neurological symptoms caused by myelopathy. As commercial payers begin to examine novel remuneration strategies for surgical interventions, thoughtful analysis of PRO measurements will have increasing relevance.

A Survey of Transcription Factors in Cell Fate Control.

Transcription factors (TFs) play a cardinal role in the development and maintenance of human physiology by acting as mediators of gene expression and cell state control. Recent advancements have broadened our knowledge on the potency of TFs in governing cell physiology and have deepened our understanding of the mechanisms through which they exert this control. The ability of TFs to program cell fates has gathered significant interest in recent decades, and high-throughput technologies now allow for the systematic discovery of forward programming factors to convert pluripotent stem cells into numerous differentiated cell types. The next generation of these technologies has the potential to improve our understanding and control of cell fates and states and provide advanced therapeutic modalities to address many medical conditions.

Navigated retrodiaphragmatic/retroperitoneal approach for the treatment of symptomatic kyphoscoliosis: an operative video.

Retropleural, retrodiaphragmatic, and retroperitoneal approaches are utilized to access difficult thoracolumbar junction (T10-L2) pathology. The authors present a 58-year-old man with chronic low-back pain who failed years of conservative therapy. Preoperative radiographs demonstrated significant levoconvex scoliosis with coronal and sagittal imbalance. He underwent a retrodiaphragmatic/retroperitoneal approach for T12-L1, L1-2, L2-3, and L3-4 interbody release and fusion in conjunction with second-stage facet osteotomies, L4-5 TLIF, and T10-iliac posterior instrumented fusion. This video focuses on the retrodiaphragmatic approach assisted by 3D navigation. The video can be found here: https://stream.cadmore.media/r10.3171/2022.3.FOCVID2215.

The impact of misplaced percutaneous iliac dynamic reference frame pins used during navigated spine surgery: incidence and outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Image guidance requires placement of a dynamic reference frame (DRF), often either onto local spinous process or by freehand intraosseous DRF placement into the ilium via the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS). There is a paucity of studies in the literature that describe the complications of intraosseous DRF placement. The aim of this study was to describe the radiographic location, prevalence and nature of complications, and long-term clinical outcomes of attempted DRF placement into the PSIS. METHODS: All lumbosacral spine surgical procedures performed between August 2019 and February 2021 at a single institution were queried, and operations in which a DRF was targeted to the PSIS were included. Patient demographic characteristics, indications for surgery, surgical outcomes, and complications were extracted. Intraoperative CT scans were reviewed by 2 independent researchers to determine the accuracy of DRF placement into the PSIS and to assess for DRF malposition. RESULTS: Of 497 lumbar spine operations performed between August 2019 and February 2021 by 4 surgeons, 85 utilized intraoperative navigation with a PSIS pin. Thirteen operations were excluded due to an inability to visualize the entirety of the pin on intraoperative CT. Of 72 DRFs evaluated, 77.8% had been correctly placed in the PSIS. Of the 22.2% of DRFs not placed into the PSIS, 11 entered the sacrum, 6 crossed the sacroiliac joint, and 2 were deep enough to enter the pelvis. Pain at the pin site was present in 4 patients, of whom 3 had resolution of pain at the last follow-up evaluation. There were no significant complications due to DRF placement: no sacral fractures, significant navigation errors, retroperitoneal hematomas, or neurological deficits. Over a mean ± SD follow-up period of 9 ± 5.2 months, there were no incidences of pin site infection. Interrater reliability between the reviewers was 95.8%. CONCLUSIONS: This was the first study to examine radiological and clinical outcomes after DRF placement in the PSIS. In this study, a majority of pins were correctly placed within the PSIS, although 22.2% of pins were malpositioned. There were no serious complications, and a majority of those patients with persistent pin site pain had resolution at last follow-up.

Spinal level and cord involvement in the prediction of sepsis development after vertebral fracture repair for traumatic spinal injury.

OBJECTIVE: Despite understanding the associated adverse outcomes, identifying hospitalized patients at risk for sepsis is challenging. The authors aimed to characterize the epidemiology and clinical risk of sepsis in patients who underwent vertebral fracture repair for traumatic spinal injury (TSI). METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of adults undergoing vertebral fracture repair during initial hospitalization after TSI who were registered in the National Trauma Data Bank from 2011 to 2014. RESULTS: Of the 29,050 eligible patients undergoing vertebral fracture repair, 317 developed sepsis during initial hospitalization. Of these patients, most presented after a motor vehicle accident (63%) or fall (28%). Patients in whom sepsis developed had greater odds of being male (adjusted OR [aOR] 1.5, 95% CI 1.1-1.9), having diabetes mellitus (aOR 1.5, 95% CI 1.11-2.1), and being obese (aOR 1.9, 95% CI 1.4-2.5). Additionally, they had greater odds of presenting with moderate (aOR 2.7, 95% CI 1.8-4.2) or severe (aOR 3.9, 95% CI 2.9-5.2) Glasgow Coma Scale scores and of having concomitant abdominal injuries (aOR 1.9, 95% CI 1.5-2.5) but not cranial, thoracic, or lower-extremity injuries. Interestingly, cervical spine injury was significantly associated with developing sepsis (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.8), but thoracic and lumbar spine injuries were not. Spinal cord injury (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.5-2.5) was also associated with sepsis regardless of level. Patients with sepsis were hospitalized approximately 16 days longer. They had greater odds of being discharged to rehabilitative care or home with rehabilitative care (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.8-3.2) and greater odds of death or discharge to hospice (OR 6.0, 95% CI 4.4-8.1). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing vertebral fracture repair, those with cervical spine fractures, spinal cord injuries, preexisting comorbidities, and severe concomitant injuries are at highest risk for developing postoperative sepsis and experiencing adverse hospital disposition.

Predictors of thoracic and lumbar spine injuries in patients with TBI: A nationwide analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Cervical spine injury screening is common practice for traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients. However, risk factors for concomitant thoracolumbar trauma remain unknown. We characterized epidemiology and clinical risk for concomitant thoracolumbar trauma in TBI. METHODS: We conducted a multi-center, retrospective cohort analysis of TBI patients in the National Trauma Data Bank from 2011-2014 using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Out of 768,718 TBIs, 46,654 (6.1%) and 42,810 (5.6%) patients were diagnosed with thoracic and lumbar spine fractures, respectively. Only 11% of thoracic and 7% of lumbar spine fracture patients had an accompanying spinal cord injury at any level. The most common mechanism of injury was motor vehicle accident (67% of thoracic and 71% and lumbar fractures). Predictors for both thoracic and lumbar fractures included moderate (thoracic: OR 1.26, 95%CI 1.21-1.31; lumbar: OR 1.13, 95%CI 1.08-1.18) and severe Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score (OR 1.71, 95%CI 1.67-1.75; OR 1.17, 95%CI 1.13-1.20) compared to mild; epidural hematoma (OR 1.36, 95%CI 1.28-1.44; OR 1.1, 95%CI 1.04-1.19); lower extremity injury (OR 1.38, 95%CI 1.35-1.41; OR 2.50, 95%CI 2.45-2.55); upper extremity injury (OR 2.19, 95%CI 2.14-2.23; OR 1.15, 95%CI 1.13-1.18); smoking (OR 1.09, 95%CI 1.06-1.12; OR 1.12, 95%CI 1.09-1.15); and obesity (OR 1.39, 95%CI 1.34-1.45; OR 1.29, 95%CI 1.24-1.35). Thoracic injuries (OR 4.45; 95% CI 4.35-4.55) predicted lumbar fractures, while abdominal injuries (OR 2.02; 95% CI 1.97-2.07) predicted thoracic fractures. CONCLUSIONS: We identified GCS, smoking, upper and lower extremity injuries, and obesity as common risk factors for thoracic and lumbar spinal fractures in TBI.

Association of venous thromboembolism following pediatric traumatic spinal injuries with injury severity and longer hospital stays.

OBJECTIVE: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) can cause significant morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients, and may disproportionately occur in patients with limited mobility following spinal trauma. The authors aimed to characterize the epidemiology and clinical predictors of VTE in pediatric patients following traumatic spinal injuries (TSIs). METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of children who experienced TSI, including spinal fractures and spinal cord injuries, encoded within the National Trauma Data Bank from 2011 to 2014. RESULTS: Of the 22,752 pediatric patients with TSI, 192 (0.8%) experienced VTE during initial hospitalization. Proportionally, more patients in the VTE group (77%) than in the non-VTE group (68%) presented following a motor vehicle accident. Patients developing VTE had greater odds of presenting with moderate (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4-4.8) or severe Glasgow Coma Scale scores (aOR 4.3, 95% CI 3.0-6.1), epidural hematoma (aOR 2.8, 95% CI 1.4-5.7), and concomitant abdominal (aOR 2.4, 95% CI 1.8-3.3) and/or lower extremity (aOR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1-2.0) injuries. They also had greater odds of being obese (aOR 2.9, 95% CI 1.6-5.5). Neither cervical, thoracic, nor lumbar spine injuries were significantly associated with VTE. However, involvement of more than one spinal level was predictive of VTE (aOR 1.3, 95% CI 1.0-1.7). Spinal cord injury at any level was also significantly associated with developing VTE (aOR 2.5, 95% CI 1.8-3.5). Patients with VTE stayed in the hospital an adjusted average of 19 days longer than non-VTE patients. They also had greater odds of discharge to a rehabilitative facility or home with rehabilitative services (aOR 2.6, 95% CI 1.8-3.6). CONCLUSIONS: VTE occurs in a low percentage of hospitalized pediatric patients with TSI. Injury severity is broadly associated with increased odds of developing VTE; specific risk factors include concomitant injuries such as cranial epidural hematoma, spinal cord injury, and lower extremity injury. Patients with VTE also require hospital-based and rehabilitative care at greater rates than other patients with TSI.

Genomic landscape of gliosarcoma: distinguishing features and targetable alterations.

Gliosarcoma is an aggressive brain tumor with histologic features of glioblastoma (GBM) and soft tissue sarcoma. Despite its poor prognosis, its rarity has precluded analysis of its underlying biology. We used a multi-center database to characterize the genomic landscape of gliosarcoma. Sequencing data was obtained from 35 gliosarcoma patients from Genomics Evidence Neoplasia Information Exchange (GENIE) 5.0, a database curated by the American Association of Cancer Research (AACR). We analyzed genomic alterations in gliosarcomas and compared them to GBM (n = 1,449) and soft tissue sarcoma (n = 1,042). 30 samples were included (37% female, median age 59 [IQR: 49-64]). Nineteen common genes were identified in gliosarcoma, defined as those altered in > 5% of samples, including TERT Promoter (92%), PTEN (66%), and TP53 (60%). Of the 19 common genes in gliosarcoma, 6 were also common in both GBM and soft tissue sarcoma, 4 in GBM alone, 0 in soft tissue sarcoma alone, and 9 were more distinct to gliosarcoma. Of these, BRAF harbored an OncoKB level 1 designation, indicating its status as a predictive biomarker of response to an FDA-approved drug in certain cancers. EGFR, CDKN2A, NF1, and PTEN harbored level 4 designations in solid tumors, indicating biological evidence of these biomarkers predicting a drug-response. Gliosarcoma contains molecular features that overlap GBM and soft tissue sarcoma, as well as its own distinct genomic signatures. This may play a role in disease classification and inclusion criteria for clinical trials. Gliosarcoma mutations with potential therapeutic indications include BRAF, EGFR, CDKN2A, NF1, and PTEN.

Cell therapy strategies for COVID-19: Current approaches and potential applications.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) continues to burden society worldwide. Despite most patients having a mild course, severe presentations have limited treatment options. COVID-19 manifestations extend beyond the lungs and may affect the cardiovascular, nervous, and other organ systems. Current treatments are nonspecific and do not address potential long-term consequences such as pulmonary fibrosis, demyelination, and ischemic organ damage. Cell therapies offer great potential in treating severe COVID-19 presentations due to their customizability and regenerative function. This review summarizes COVID-19 pathogenesis, respective areas where cell therapies have potential, and the ongoing 89 cell therapy trials in COVID-19 as of 1 January 2021.