A randomized controlled trial of presatovir for respiratory syncytial virus after lung transplant.

BACKGROUND: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection in lung transplant recipients is associated with high morbidity. This study evaluated the RSV fusion inhibitor presatovir in RSV-infected lung transplant recipients. METHODS: In this international Phase 2b, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (NCT02534350), adult lung transplant recipients with symptomatic confirmed RSV infection for ≤7 days received oral presatovir 200 mg on day 1 and 100 mg daily on days 2 to 14, or placebo (2:1), with follow-up through day 28. There were 2 coprimary endpoints: time-weighted average change in nasal RSV load from day 1 to 7, calculated from nasal swabs, in the full analysis set ([FAS]; all patients who received study drug and had quantifiable baseline nasal RSV load) and time-weighted average change in nasal RSV load from day 1 to 7 in the subset of patients with pretreatment symptom duration at the median or shorter of the FAS. Secondary endpoints were changes in respiratory infection symptoms assessed using the Influenza Patient-Reported Outcomes questionnaire and lung function measured by spirometry. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients were randomized, 40 received presatovir, 20 placebo, and 54 were included in efficacy analyses. Presatovir did not significantly improve the primary endpoint in the FAS (treatment difference [95% CI], 0.10 [-0.43, 0.63] log10 copies/ml; p = 0.72) or the shorter symptom-duration subgroup (-0.12 [-0.94, 0.69] log10 copies/ml; p = 0.76). Secondary endpoints were not different between presatovir and placebo groups. Presatovir was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Presatovir treatment did not significantly improve change in nasal RSV load, symptoms, or lung function in lung transplant recipients.

Lung and liver transplantation in patients with alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency.

Alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT) augmentation is effective in slowing the progression of emphysema due to AAT deficiency (AATD) but cannot prevent eventual progression to end-stage lung disease and complete respiratory failure, which is the leading cause of death for individuals with severe AATD. When patients develop end-stage lung disease, lung transplantation is the only treatment option available, and this can improve lung physiology and patient health status. The available data suggest that survival rates for lung transplantation are significantly higher for patients with AATD-related chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) compared with non-AATD-related COPD, but, conversely, there is a higher risk of common post-lung transplant complications in patients with AATD versus non-AATD COPD. Nevertheless, lung transplantation (single and bilateral) is favorable for patients with AATD. After respiratory failure, the second leading cause of death in patients with AATD is liver disease, for example, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, caused by the accumulation of mutant forms of AAT retained within the liver. As with lung disease, the only treatment option for end-stage liver disease is liver transplantation. Survival rates for patients with AATD undergoing liver transplantation are also favorable, and patients, particularly pediatric patients, have benefitted from advancements in peri-/post-surgical care. As the majority of AAT is produced by the liver, the AAT phenotype of the recipient becomes that of the donor, meaning that AAT serum levels should be normalized (if the donor is AAT-replete), halting further lung and liver disease progression. However, post-liver transplant respiratory function may continue to decline in line with normal age-related lung function decline. In the most severe cases, where patients have simultaneous end-stage lung and liver disease, combined lung and liver transplantation is a treatment option with favorable outcomes. However, there is very little information available on this procedure in patients with AATD.

Ribavirin and cellular ribavirin-triphosphate concentrations in blood and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in two lung transplant patients with respiratory syncytial virus.

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is responsible for significant morbidity and mortality in the lung transplant population. Oral and aerosolized ribavirin may improve outcomes in lung transplant patients with RSV; however, data relating ribavirin concentrations in plasma and intracellular ribavirin triphosphate (iRTP) concentrations in blood and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid cells with efficacy and safety are lacking. We describe ribavirin and iRTP concentrations within various compartments in two adult lung transplant recipients with RSV who were sampled throughout successful treatment courses with oral and inhaled ribavirin. In patient 1, iRTP BAL concentrations decreased by 45% over 3 days after changing inhaled ribavirin to oral (6.32 to 3.43 pmol/106 cells). In patient 2, iRTP BAL concentrations were 103 pmol/106 cells after 5 days of oral followed by 5 days of inhaled ribavirin. Further study is needed to describe ribavirin pharmacokinetics in the respiratory compartment to inform clinical use of ribavirin for respiratory viruses.

Anti-LFA-1 induces CD8 T-cell dependent allograft tolerance and augments suppressor phenotype CD8 cells.

The induction of tolerance to transplanted organs is a major objective in transplantation immunology research. Lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1 (LFA-1) interactions have been identified as a key component of the T-cell activation process that may be interrupted to lead to allograft tolerance. In mice, αLFA-1 mAb is a potent monotherapy that leads to the induction of donor-specific transferable tolerance. By interrogating important adaptive and innate immunity pathways, we demonstrate that the induction of tolerance relies on CD8+T-cells. We further demonstrate that αLFA-1 induced tolerance is associated with CD8+CD28-T-cells with a suppressor phenotype, and that while CD8 cells are present, the effector T-cell response is abrogated. A recent publication has shown that CD8+CD28- cells are not diminished by cyclosporine or rapamycin, therefore CD8+CD28- cells represent a clinically relevant population. To our knowledge, this is the first time that a mechanism for αLFA-1 induced tolerance has been described.

Pharmacologic Protection of Mitochondrial DNA Integrity May Afford a New Strategy for Suppressing Lung Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury.

Lung ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injury contributes to post-transplant complications, including primary graft dysfunction. Decades of reports show that reactive oxygen species generated during lung IR contribute to pulmonary vascular endothelial barrier disruption and edema formation, but the specific target molecule(s) that "sense" injury-inducing oxidant stress to activate signaling pathways culminating in pathophysiologic changes have not been established. This review discusses evidence that mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) may serve as a molecular sentinel wherein oxidative mtDNA damage functions as an upstream trigger for lung IR injury. First, the mitochondrial genome is considerably more sensitive than nuclear DNA to oxidant stress. Multiple studies suggest that oxidative mtDNA damage could be transduced to physiologic dysfunction by pathways that are either a direct consequence of mtDNA damage per se or involve formation of proinflammatory mtDNA damage-associated molecular patterns. Second, transgenic animals or cells overexpressing components of the base excision DNA repair pathway in mitochondria are resistant to oxidant stress-mediated pathophysiologic effects. Finally, published and preliminary studies show that pharmacologic enhancement of mtDNA repair or mtDNA damage-associated molecular pattern degradation suppresses reactive oxygen species-induced or IR injury in multiple organs, including preclinical models of lung procurement for transplant. Collectively, these findings point to the interesting prospect that pharmacologic enhancement of DNA repair during procurement or ex vivo lung perfusion may increase the availability of lungs for transplant and reduce the IR injury contributing to primary graft dysfunction.

ALN-RSV01 for prevention of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome after respiratory syncytial virus infection in lung transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection in lung transplant (LTx) patients is associated with an increased incidence of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS). ALN-RSV01 is a small interfering RNA targeting RSV replication that was shown in an earlier Phase 2a trial to be safe and to reduce the incidence of BOS when compared with placebo. METHODS: We performed a Phase 2b randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in RSV-infected LTx patients to examine the impact of ALN-RSV01 on the incidence of new or progressive BOS. Subjects were randomized (1:1) to receive aerosolized ALN-RSV01 or placebo daily for 5 days. RESULTS: Of 3,985 symptomatic patients screened, 218 were RSV-positive locally, of whom 87 were randomized to receive ALN-RSV01 or placebo (modified intention-to-treat [mITT] cohort). RSV infection was confirmed by central laboratory in 77 patients (ALN-RSV01, n = 44; placebo, n = 33), which comprised the primary analysis cohort (central mITT [mITTc]). ALN-RSV01 was found to be safe and well-tolerated. At Day 180, in ALN-RSV01-treated patients, compared with placebo, in the mITTc cohort there was a trend toward a decrease in new or progressive BOS (13.6% vs 30.3%, p = 0.058), which was significant in the per-protocol cohort (p = 0.025). Treatment effect was enhanced when ALN-RSV01 was started <5 days from symptom onset, and was observed even without ribavirin treatment. There was no significant impact on viral parameters or symptom scores. CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm findings of the earlier Phase 2a trial and provide further support that ALN-RSV01 reduces the risk of BOS after RSV in LTx recipients.

Invasive Microascus trigonosporus Species Complex Pulmonary Infection in a Lung Transplant Recipient.

Because of the high incidence of morbidity and mortality associated with invasive fungal infections, antifungal prophylaxis is often used in solid organ transplant recipients. However, this prophylaxis is not universally effective and may contribute to the selection of emerging, resistant pathogens. Here we present a rare case of invasive infection caused by Microascus trigonosporus species complex in a human, which developed during voriconazole prophylaxis in a lung transplant recipient. Nebulized liposomal amphotericin B was used in addition to systemic therapy in order to optimize antifungal drug exposure; this regimen appeared to reduce the patient's fungal burden. Despite this apparent improvement, the patient's pulmonary status progressively declined in the setting of multiple comorbidities, ultimately leading to respiratory failure and death.

A consensus document for the selection of lung transplant candidates: 2014--an update from the Pulmonary Transplantation Council of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation.

The appropriate selection of lung transplant recipients is an important determinant of outcomes. This consensus document is an update of the recipient selection guidelines published in 2006. The Pulmonary Council of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) organized a Writing Committee of international experts to provide consensus opinion regarding the appropriate timing of referral and listing of candidates for lung transplantation. A comprehensive search of the medical literature was conducted with the assistance of a medical librarian. Writing Committee members were assigned specific topics to research and discuss. The Chairs of the Writing Committee were responsible for evaluating the completeness of the literature search, providing editorial support for the manuscript, and organizing group discussions regarding its content. The consensus document makes specific recommendations regarding the timing of referral and of listing for lung transplantation. These recommendations include discussions not present in previous ISHLT guidelines, including lung allocation scores, bridging to transplant with mechanical circulatory and ventilator support, and expanded indications for lung transplantation. In the absence of high-grade evidence to support decision making, these consensus guidelines remain part of a continuum of expert opinion based on available studies and personal experience. Some positions are immutable. Although transplant is rightly a treatment of last resort for end-stage lung disease, early referral allows proper evaluation and thorough patient education. Subsequent waiting list activation implies a tacit agreement that transplant offers a significant individual survival advantage. It is both the challenge and the responsibility of the transplant community globally to ensure organ allocation maximizes the potential benefits of a scarce resource, thereby achieving that advantage.

Increased resource use in lung transplant admissions in the lung allocation score era.

RATIONALE: In 2005, the lung allocation score (LAS) was implemented to prioritize organ allocation to minimize waiting-list mortality and maximize 1-year survival. It resulted in transplantation of older and sicker patients without changing 1-year survival. Its effect on resource use is unknown. OBJECTIVES: To determine changes in resource use over time in lung transplant admissions. METHODS: Solid organ transplant recipients were identified within the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) data from 2000 to 2011. Joinpoint regression methodology was performed to identify a time point of change in mean total hospital charges among lung transplant and other solid-organ transplant recipients. Two temporal lung transplant recipient cohorts identified by joinpoint regression were compared for baseline characteristics and resource use, including total charges for index hospitalization, charges per day, length of stay, discharge disposition, tracheostomy, and need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A significant point of increased total hospital charges occurred for lung transplant recipients in 2005, corresponding to LAS implementation, which was not seen in other solid-organ transplant recipients. Total transplant hospital charges increased by 40% in the post-LAS cohort ($569,942 [$53,229] vs. $407,489 [$28,360]) along with an increased median length of stay, daily charges, and discharge disposition other than to home. Post-LAS recipients also had higher post-transplant use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (odds ratio, 2.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.56-3.55) and higher incidence of tracheostomy (odds ratio, 1.52; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-1.89). CONCLUSIONS: LAS implementation is associated with a significant increase in resource use during index hospitalization for lung transplant.

Ectopic expression of Fas Ligand on cardiomyocytes renders cardiac allografts resistant to CD4(+) T-cell mediated rejection.

Fas Ligand limits inflammatory injury and permits allograft survival by inducing apoptosis of Fas-bearing lymphocytes. Previous studies have shown that the CD4(+) T-cell is both sufficient and required for murine cardiac allograft rejection. Here, utilizing a transgenic mouse that over-expresses Fas Ligand specifically on cardiomyocytes as heart donors, we sought to determine if Fas Ligand on graft parenchymal cells could resist CD4(+) T-cell mediated rejection. When transplanted into fully immunocompetent BALB/c recipients Fas Ligand transgenic hearts were acutely rejected. However, when transplanted into CD4(+) T-cell reconstituted BALB/c-rag(-/-) recipients, Fas Ligand hearts demonstrated long-term survival. These results indicate that Fas Ligand over-expression on cardiomyocytes can indeed resist CD4(+) T-cell mediated cardiac rejection and suggests contact dependence between Fas Ligand expressing graft parenchymal cells and the effector CD4(+) T-cells.

Ex vivo lung perfusion allows successful transplantation of donor lungs from hanging victims.

BACKGROUND: Donor lungs acquired from victims of asphyxiation by hanging are not routinely used for lung transplantation because of the associated lung injury. Ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) is a technique to evaluate marginal donor lungs before transplantation. We report here our experience with the use of EVLP in donor lungs procured from victims of asphyxia by hanging. METHODS: Lungs from 5 donors who became brain dead secondary to hanging were evaluated by EVLP. Donor organs were perfused according to trial protocol. Donor lungs were accepted for transplantation if they maintained a PaO2 greater than or equal to 350 mm Hg, had a clear roentgenogram, and had no significant worsening of physiologic metrics. RESULTS: Perfused organs included single and double lung blocs, and all were perfused without technical incident. Three of the 5 donor organs evaluated met criteria for transplantation after 3 hours of EVLP and were transplanted. Donor organs rejected for transplantation showed either signs of worsening PaO2 or deterioration of physiologic metrics. There were no intraoperative complications in the patients who underwent transplantation, and all were alive at 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: We report here the successful use of EVLP to assess donor lungs acquired from victims of asphyxiation by hanging. The use of EVLP in this particular group of donors has the potential to expand the available donor pool. We demonstrate that EVLP is a viable option for evaluating the function of lung allografts before transplantation and would recommend that all donor lungs obtained from hanging victims undergo EVLP to assess their suitability for transplantation.

Mechanical ventilation after lung transplantation. An international survey of practices and preferences.

RATIONALE: Between 10% and 57% of lung transplant (LTx) recipients develop primary graft dysfunction (PGD) within 72 hours of LTx. PGD is clinically and histologically analogous to the acute respiratory distress syndrome. In patients at risk for or with acute respiratory distress syndrome, lung-protective ventilation strategies (low tidal volume and positive end-expiratory pressure) improve outcomes. There is, however, little information available on mechanical ventilation strategies after LTx. OBJECTIVES: Our aim in this international survey was to describe the current practices of mechanical ventilation immediately after LTx. METHODS: An electronic survey was sent to the medical and surgical directors of U.S. LTx programs (n = 111) and to members of the Pulmonary Council of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (n = 470). RESULTS: A total of 149 individuals from 18 countries responded to the questionnaire. The most common modes of ventilation were pressure assist/control (37%) and volume assist/control (35%). Tidal volumes were most often determined by recipient characteristics. Donor characteristics were rarely considered (35%) and were infrequently known by the team managing the ventilator (42%). When presented with a choice of ideal tidal volumes, a majority of respondents selected 6 ml/kg recipient predicted body weight (58%), fewer selected 10 ml/kg (21%), and none selected 15 ml/kg. A majority preferred limiting the fraction of inspired oxygen rather than positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) (69% versus 31%, P = 0.006). The median minimum PEEP was 5 cm H2O, and the median maximum PEEP was 11.5 cm H2O. The presence of PGD increased the perceived importance of monitoring plateau pressure to adjust tidal volumes. The median plateau pressure limit perceived as a threshold triggering reduction in tidal volume was 30 cm H2O. CONCLUSIONS: Most respondents reported using lung-protective approaches to mechanical ventilation after lung transplantation. Low tidal volumes based on recipient characteristics were frequently chosen. Donor characteristics often were not considered and frequently were not known by the team managing mechanical ventilation after LTx.

The impact of genetic polymorphisms, diltiazem, and demographic variables on everolimus trough concentrations in lung transplant recipients.

Everolimus (EVR) has inter-individual pharmacokinetic (PK) variability and a narrow therapeutic index. The study objective was to determine whether genetic polymorphisms, co-medications, and/or demographic variables accounted for inter-individual variability in EVR PK in lung transplant recipients (LTxR). LTxR were genotyped for ABCB1 c.1236C>T, ABCB1 c.2677G>T/A, ABCB1 c.3435C>T, CYP3A4*1B, CYP3A5*3, CYP2C8*2/*3/*4, and pregnane X receptor (NR1I2) c.44477T>C, c.63396C>T, c.69789A>G polymorphisms. The primary outcome was the difference in dose-adjusted EVR levels (EVR L/D) between ABCB1 diplotype groups (2 vs. 1 vs. 0 copies of the 1236C/2677G/3435C haplotype). Sixty-five LTxR were included. There was no significant difference in EVR L/D between ABCB1 CGC diplotype groups (CGC/CGC = 2.4 ± 1.1 [n = 9] vs. CGC/XXX = 2.5 ± 1.7 [n = 36] vs. XXX/XXX = 2.7 ± 1.7 ng/mL per mg/d [n = 20]; p = 0.9). CYP3A5*3, CYP3A4*1B, CYP2C8*3/*4, and NR1I2 polymorphisms were not associated with EVR L/D. EVR L/D was 3.4 ± 1.7 in LTxR receiving diltiazem (DILT) vs. 1.8 ± 1.1 ng/mL per mg/d in LTxR not receiving DILT (p <0.001). Demographic variables, including cystic fibrosis, were not associated with EVR PK. DILT use increased EVR L/D, but selected polymorphisms in ABCB1, CYP3A5, CYP3A4, CYP2C8, and NR1I2 did not affect EVR L/D in LTxR. Genotyping LTxR for these polymorphisms is unlikely to aid clinicians in optimizing EVR therapy.

Update on Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome in Lung Transplantation.

Lung transplantation has become an important therapeutic option for patients with end-stage organ dysfunction; however, its clinical usefulness has been limited by the relatively early onset of chronic allograft dysfunction and progressive clinical decline. Obliterative bronchiolitis is characterized histologically by luminal fibrosis of the respiratory bronchioles and clinically by bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) which is defined by a measured decline in lung function based on forced expiratory volume (FEV1). Since its earliest description, a number of risk factors have been associated with the development of BOS, including acute rejection, lymphocytic bronchiolitis, primary graft dysfunction, infection, donor specific antibodies, and gastroesophageal reflux disease. However, despite this broadened understanding, the pathogenesis underlying BOS remains poorly understood and once begun, there are relatively few treatment options to battle the progressive deterioration in lung function.

Recipient risk factors and lung transplant outcomes.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Scientific and technical developments in the field of lung transplantation have allowed it to become a successful treatment option for various end-stage lung diseases. As the demand for lung allografts increases and waitlists expand, it is vital that lung transplant centers optimize use of this limited resource by selecting recipients who have the best prospects of positive long-term outcomes. Recipient selection criteria vary across transplant selection committees. We review the most recent body of literature for recipient consideration and describe potential effects on morbidity and mortality posttransplantation. RECENT FINDINGS: Although prior guidelines for contraindications to lung transplantation have been described, the benchmarks for recipient selection are constantly being challenged. Age, weight, and psychologic condition of recipients pretransplant have more recently been shown to have significant influence on posttransplant outcomes. Advancements in human leukocyte antigen antibody testing and use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to lung transplantation have additionally impacted recipient selection standards. SUMMARY: Recipient selection criteria continue to evolve because of advances in mechanical bridging to transplant and postoperative management. This review will cover some of the new concepts in lung transplant recipient selection and their potential effect on posttransplant outcomes.

Four decades of vascularized heterotopic cardiac transplantation in the mouse.

Since the first clinical heart transplant in 1967, there has been a heightened need to understand immune and inflammatory responses to "foreign" tissues. Research efforts in those early days were based on species that would now be considered "large" and were typically out-bred individuals. While this closely mirrors the clinical scenario, where genetic mismatches of donors and recipients can only be minimized in the selection process, these were not ideal models for studying the complexities and nuances of the immune system. Even when the rat was considered the standard model those early endeavors were limited by a small number of rat strains. The mouse model has provided us with an overwhelming array of strains, knockouts, knockins and transgenics that allow us to investigate the many layers of the innate and adaptive immune systems leading to a much greater understanding of immune responses. Fully vascularized heterotopic cardiac transplantation in the mouse has now been with us for four decades; the original papers describing this technique being published by Corry in 1973. In the subsequent 40 years, this technique has been used by many laboratories, including our own, and has become a powerful tool for the investigation of transplant immunity and ischemia reperfusion injury. Given the modern availability of mouse strains and mouse-related reagents, our current understanding of transplant immunity undoubtedly would not exist without such a technique.

Evaluation of valganciclovir pharmacokinetics in lung transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Valganciclovir is commonly used for cytomegalovirus prevention after lung transplantation. The pharmacokinetic profile of valganciclovir in lung transplant patients has not been well described or linked to efficacy and safety. METHODS: This prospective, randomized, crossover study determined the steady-state pharmacokinetic profile of 2 different doses of valganciclovir in lung transplant recipients and compared these profiles with intravenous ganciclovir. RESULTS: Ten patients were evaluated. Patients were 56.8 ± 3.4 years old and had a mean creatinine clearance of 69 ± 9 ml/min. Oral bioavailability of ganciclovir after administration of valganciclovir was 59%, and mean half-life was 3.73 ± 1.15 hours. The maximal concentration after intravenous 5 mg/kg ganciclovir was significantly higher than after 450 mg valganciclovir (8.37 ± 3.03 mg/liter vs. 5.3 ± 2.09 mg/liter, respectively; p = 0.02) and similar to 900 mg valganciclovir (7.93 ± 3.97 mg/liter; p = 0.78). A higher area under the curve at 0-24 hours (AUC(0-24)) was found with 900 mg valganciclovir compared with intravenous 5 mg/kg/day ganciclovir (47.8 ± 19.7 vs 32.9 ± 10.8 mg · hour/liter, respectively; p = 0.049). The AUC(0-24) for 450 mg valganciclovir twice daily was 45.5 ± 22.9 mg · hour/liter. CONCLUSION: Valganciclovir at 900 mg/day resulted in the equivalent of a mean daily dose of 7.7 mg/kg intravenous ganciclovir. Higher systemic ganciclovir exposures occurred after 900 mg/day valganciclovir compared with intravenous 5 mg/kg/day ganciclovir. Valganciclovir therapeutic drug monitoring may be warranted in select lung transplant patients to avoid increased toxicity.

Respiratory viral infections post-lung transplantation.

Community-acquired respiratory viruses (CARVs) are common pathogens in lung transplant recipients. Infection due to these viruses is associated with multiple complications including: rhinitis, pharyngitis, bronchitis, pneumonia, respiratory failure and even death. CARVs have also become increasingly recognized as a risk factor for acute rejection (AR) and bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS). Newer diagnostic techniques have enhanced the accuracy of diagnosis, but proven treatment options for CARVs are limited. Further insight into the immune response and allograft dysfunction associated with CARV infections is needed in order to develop novel management strategies which can reduce the morbidity and mortality caused by these infectious agents.

Updates in lung transplantation.

The past two years have seen major advances in the lung transplant (LTX) field. In 2010, for the first time, over 3500 lungs were reported to the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Registry. Widening application of extracorporeal life support as a bridge to transplant, or as intra- or postoperative support, has allowed transplantation of critically ill candidates with end-stage pulmonary parenchymal or vascular disease. Ex-vivo lung perfusion expanded the donor pool, allowing transplant teams time to evaluate non-ideal lungs or those from donation after cardiac death donors. While increased activity involving higher risk recipients and donors has resulted in acceptable survival, chronic rejection, or bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome, still limits long-term survival. Emerging histopathologic, radiographic, and physiologic evidence has led to the recognition that BOS is not the only form of chronic lung failure and to the development of a new classification system: chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). Both allo- and autoimmune mechanisms, as well as nonimmune mechanisms, have been identified in CLAD development. Immunosuppressive and immune modulating agents, recently evaluated in randomized controlled trials, have shown promise in CLAD therapy. This review will outline some of the key advances in LTX in the past year.