Ectopic cervical thymoma in myasthenia gravis: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Ectopic cervical thymoma (ECT) is an extremely rare tumor, especially in association with myasthenia gravis (MG). CASE PRESENTATION: We report a case of myasthenia gravis with an ectopic thymoma in the neck, whose myasthenic symptoms significantly improved after complete removal of the mass. A 55-year-old woman with generalized myasthenia gravis (MG) experienced worsening neuromuscular weakness after abruptly discontinuing pyridostigmine. Testing revealed acetylcholine receptor-antibody (AChR-Ab) positivity and a cervical mass initially thought to be thyroid or parathyroid was identified as a thymoma, type A. Post-surgery and radiation therapy, her myasthenic symptoms improved significantly with less prednisone and pyridostigmine requirements over time and no need for additional immunotherapies. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnosing ECTs is challenging due to rarity, atypical locations, and inconclusive fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) results, often misinterpreted as thyroid or parathyroid lesions. As proper management of patients with MG, including thymectomy, offers favorable clinical outcomes such as significant improvement in myasthenic complaints and reduced immunosuppressive medication requirements, clinicians should be vigilant of the ectopic locations of thymomas to ensure timely diagnosis and intervention.

Horner's Syndrome Following Dural Puncture Epidural Analgesia for Labor.

Horner's syndrome has been identified as an adverse outcome associated with the administration of epidural analgesia during labor. This syndrome is attributed to the upward spread of the local anesthetic, which may extend toward the superior cervical sympathetic chain. This process could disrupt the sympathetic pathways supplying the facial and ocular areas. We describe a case of a 26-year-old primigravid female with transient isolated Horner's syndrome following dural puncture epidural analgesia during labor.

Potential Application of Intranasal Insulin Delivery for Treatment of Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Review of The Literature.

Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a devastating subtype of stroke associated with high morbidity and mortality that is considered a medical emergency, mainly managed with adequate blood pressure control and creating a favorable hemostatic condition. However, to date, none of the randomized clinical trials have led to an effective treatment for ICH. It is vital to better understand the mechanisms underlying brain injury to effectively decrease ICH-associated morbidity and mortality. It is well known that initial hematoma formation and its expansion have detrimental consequences. The literature has recently focused on other pathological processes, including oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, blood-brain barrier disruption, edema formation, and neurotoxicity, that constitute secondary brain injury. Since conventional management has failed to improve clinical outcomes significantly, various neuroprotective therapies are tested in preclinical and clinical settings. Unlike intravenous administration, intranasal insulin can reach a higher concentration in the cerebrospinal fluid without causing systemic side effects. Intranasal insulin delivery has been introduced as a novel neuroprotective agent for certain neurological diseases, including ischemic stroke, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and traumatic brain injury. Since there is an overlap of mechanisms causing neuroinflammation in these neurological diseases and ICH, we believe that preclinical studies testing the role of intranasal insulin therapy in ICH are warranted.

Addition of dexmedetomidine and neostigmine to 1.5 % lidocaine and triamcinolone for epidural block to reduce the duration of analgesia in patients suffering from chronic low back pain.

Lower back pain is one of the leading causes of disability in the world. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of supplementation of dexmedetomidine and neostigmine with lidocaine 1.5% and triamcinolone for epidural block in increasing the duration of analgesia among patients suffering from chronic low back pain. In this double-blind, randomized clinical trial, 33 patients with chronic low back pain were included in three groups of 11 patients for epidural blockage. Triamcinolone (40 mg/ml) was added to lidocaine 1.5% solution (2 cc/segment) for all three groups. In group N, neostigmine was used at a dose of 1 mg (mg), followed by group D (dexmedetomidine 35 µg [0.5 µg/kg]), and grou [ND (neostigmine 0.5 mg, and 35 µg dexmedetomidine, all of which were added to the triamcinolone and lidocaine solution in each group. Medications were injected into the epidural space using an interlaminar approach. Subsequently, scores of pain and duration of analgesia were recorded in questionnaires and analysed using SPSS version 23. One month after the injections, pain scores recorded in the N group were 7.6±1.4, followed by 5.88±1.2 in group D and 5.42 ±1.1 in group ND. Therefore, the pain scores were significantly higher in the neostigmine group than the other two groups (p = 0.02), but no significant difference was found between the two groups that received dexmedetomidine and a combination of dexmedetomidine + neostigmine. Three months after the injections, there was a significant difference in pain scores between the two groups (P = 0.01). Both neostigmine and dexmedetomidine were capable of reducing the pain of patients with chronic low back pain after epidural block. However, neostigmine's impact is lower compared to dexmedetomidine. The combination of the two drugs also reduced the pain scores of the patients after the intervention.