Correlation Between Hemoglobin Glycation Index Measured by Continuous Glucose Monitoring With Complications in Type 1 Diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: HbA1C is the "gold standard" parameter to evaluate glycemic control in diabetes; however, its correlation with mean glucose is not always perfect. The objective of this study was to correlate continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)-derived hemoglobin glycation index (HGI) with microvascular complications. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study including permanent users of CGM with type 1 diabetes mellitus or latent autoimmune diabetes of the adult. HGI was estimated, and presence of microvascular complications was compared in subgroups with high or low HGI. A logistic regression analysis to assess the contribution of high HGI to chronic kidney disease (CKD) was performed. RESULTS: In total, 52 participants who were aged 39.7 ± 14.7 years, with 73.1% women and 15.5 years (IQR, 7.5-29 years) since diagnosis, were included; 32.7% recorded diabetic retinopathy, 25% CKD, and 19.2% neuropathy. The median HbA1C was 7.6% (60 mmol/mol) and glucose management indicator (GMI) 7.0% (53 mmol/mol). The average HGI was 0.55% ± 0.66%. The measured HbA1C was higher in the group with high HGI (8.1% [65 mmol/mol] vs 6.9% [52 mmol/mol]; P < .001), whereas GMI (7.0% [53 mmol/mol] vs 7.0% [53 mmol/mol]; P = .495) and mean glucose were similar in both groups (153 mg/dL vs 153 mg/dL; P = .564). In the high HGI group, higher occurrence of CKD (P = .016) and neuropathy were observed (P = .025). High HGI was associated with increased risk of CKD (odds ratio [OR]: 5.05; 95% CI: 1.02-24.8; P = .04) after adjusting for time since diagnosis (OR: 1.09; 95% CI: 1.02-1.16; P = .008). CONCLUSION: High HGI measured by CGM may be a useful marker for increased risk of microvascular diabetic complications.

Association of estimated glucose disposal rate and chronic diabetic complications in patients with type 1 diabetes.

INTRODUCTION: The role of insulin resistance in diabetic chronic complications among individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D) has not been clearly defined. The aim of this study was to examine the performance of insulin resistance, evaluated using the estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR) for the identification of metabolic syndrome (MS) and diabetic chronic complications. METHODS: Cross-sectional study in a tertiary care centre. We included patients of 18 years and older, with at least 6 months of T1D duration. Anthropometric, clinical and biochemical data were collected. RESULTS: Seventy patients, 41 (58.6%) women, with a median age of 36.6 years (range 18-65). Mean age of onset and duration of diabetes was 13.5 ± 6.5 and 23.6 ± 12.2 years, respectively. Twenty-one (30%) patients met the metabolic syndrome (MS) criteria. Patients with MS had lower eGDR compared to patients without (5.17 [3.10-8.65] vs. 8.86 [6.82-9.85] mg/kg/min, respectively, p = .003). Median eGDR in patients with nephropathy, retinopathy and neuropathy compared with those without was 6.75 (4.60-8.20) versus 9.53 (8.57-10.3); p < .001, 6.45 (4.60-7.09) versus 9.50 (8.60-10.14); p < .001, 5.56 (4.51-6.81) versus 9.49 [8.19-10.26] mg/kg/min; p < .001, respectively. The eGDR showed an area under the curve of 0.909, 0.879, 0.897 and 0.836 for the discrimination of MS, retinopathy, neuropathy and nephropathy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with T1D diabetic complications have higher insulin resistance. The eGDR discriminates patients with chronic diabetic complications and MS. While more ethnic-specific studies are required, this study suggests the possibility to incorporate eGDR into routine diabetes care.

Sulodexide in the Treatment of Patients with Early Stages of COVID-19: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) may induce several vascular endothelial-dependent systemic complications, and sulodexide has pleiotropic actions on the vascular endothelium, which may prove beneficial. We aimed to assess the effect of sulodexide when used within 3 days of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) clinical onset. We conducted a randomized placebo-controlled outpatient trial. To be included, patients must have been at high risk for severe clinical progression. Participants received sulodexide (oral 1,000 LRU/d) or placebo for 21 days. The primary endpoint was the need for hospital care. Also assessed were patients' need for supplemental oxygen as well as D-dimer and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, thromboembolic events, major bleeding, and mortality. A total of 243 patients were included in the per-protocol analysis from June 5 to August 30, 2020. Of these, 124 received sulodexide and 119 received a placebo. Only 17.7% of the patients in the sulodexide group required hospitalization, compared with 29.4% in the placebo group (p = 0.03). This benefit persisted in the intention-to-treat analysis (15% in sulodexide group vs. 24% with placebo [p = 0.04]). With sulodexide, fewer patients required supplemental oxygen (30 vs. 42% [p = 0.05]). After 2 weeks, fewer patients had D-dimer levels >500 ng/dL (22 vs. 47% [p < 0.01]), and patients also had lower mean CRP levels (12.5 vs. 17.8 mg/dL [p < 0.01]). There were no between-group differences in thromboembolic events, major bleeding, or mortality. Treatment of COVID-19 patients with sulodexide, when provided within 3 days of clinical onset, improved their clinical outcomes. Although the results should be confirmed, sulodexide could be valuable in an outpatient setting.

Vitamin D deficiency in Mexicans have a high prevalence: a cross-sectional analysis of the patients from the Centro Médico Nacional 20 de Noviembre.

Disorders of vitamin D concentration (deficiency or insufficiency) are a global health problem, which are associated with various chronic diseases. In Latin America, alterations in vitamin D prevalence are different from those shown in previous studies and may be due to differences in geographic location, skin color, and diet type. PURPOSE: To know the prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency (21-29 ng/mL) and deficiency (< 20 ng/mL) in Mexican patients; although it is a risk factor for developing multiple complex diseases, its prevalence in the population is still unknown. METHODS: Cross-sectional study carried out at the endocrinology service of the highly specialized national center November 20. Data on cardiovascular risk factors were obtained and 25-hydroxy vitamin D was measured by chemiluminescence. Prevalence was calculated, and the results were analyzed to categorize the patients according to 25-hydroxy vitamin D deficient or insufficient levels. RESULTS: The mean value of the serum vitamin D concentration was 18.37 ng/mL. Of the 117 patients, 93.2% (n = 109) have decreased vitamin D values; 62.4% (n = 73) of the patients had vitamin D deficiency and 30.8% (n = 36) vitamin D insufficiency. The prevalence of vitamin D deficiency was 62.4% and 30.8% for vitamin D insufficiency. The total prevalence of alterations in vitamin D levels in this population was 93.2%. CONCLUSIONS: This study reports a prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency much higher than those described by previous studies, which is of utmost importance for the population due to the morbidities associated with these alterations.