Evolving concepts in margin strategies and adaptive radiotherapy for glioblastoma: A new future is on the horizon.

Chemoradiotherapy is the standard treatment after maximal safe resection for glioblastoma (GBM). Despite advances in molecular profiling, surgical techniques, and neuro-imaging, there have been no major breakthroughs in radiotherapy (RT) volumes in decades. Although the majority of recurrences occur within the original gross tumor volume (GTV), treatment of a clinical target volume (CTV) ranging from 1.5 to 3.0 cm beyond the GTV remains the standard of care. Over the past 15 years, the incorporation of standard and functional MRI sequences into the treatment workflow has become a routine practice with increasing adoption of MR simulators, and new integrated MR-Linac technologies allowing for daily pre-, intra- and post-treatment MR imaging. There is now unprecedented ability to understand the tumor dynamics and biology of GBM during RT, and safe CTV margin reduction is being investigated with the goal of improving the therapeutic ratio. The purpose of this review is to discuss margin strategies and the potential for adaptive RT for GBM, with a focus on the challenges and opportunities associated with both online and offline adaptive workflows. Lastly, opportunities to biologically guide adaptive RT using non-invasive imaging biomarkers and the potential to define appropriate volumes for dose modification will be discussed.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Sacral Metastases: Deviation From Recommended Target Volume Delineation Increases the Risk of Local Failure.

PURPOSE: Although spine stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is considered a standard of care in the mobile spine, mature evidence reporting outcomes specific to sacral metastases is lacking. Furthermore, there is a need to validate the existing sacral SBRT international consensus contouring guidelines to define the optimal contouring approach. We report mature rates of local failure (LF), adverse events, and the effect of contouring deviations in the largest experience to date specific to sacrum SBRT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Consecutive patients who underwent sacral SBRT from 2010 to 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. The primary endpoint was magnetic resonance imaging-based LF with a focus on adherence to target volume contouring recommendations. Secondary endpoints included vertebral compression fracture and neural toxicity. RESULTS: Of the 215 sacrum segments treated in 112 patients, most received 30 Gy/4 fractions (51%), 24 Gy/2 fractions (31%), or 30 Gy/5 fractions (10%). Sixteen percent of segments were nonadherent to the consensus guideline with a more restricted target volume (undercontoured). The median follow-up was 21.4 months (range, 1.5-116.9 months). The cumulative incidence of LF at 1 and 2 years was 18.4% and 23.1%, respectively. In those with guideline adherent versus nonadherent contours, the LF rate at 1 year was 15.1% versus 31.4% and at 2 years 18.8% versus 40.0% (hazard ratio [HR], 2.5; 95% CI, 1.4-4.6; P = .003), respectively. On multivariable analysis, guideline nonadherence (HR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.3-4.7; P = .008), radioresistant histology (HR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.4-4.1; P < .001), and extraosseous extension (HR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.3-4.7; P = .005) predicted for an increased risk of LF. The cumulative incidence of vertebral compression fracture was 7.1% at 1 year and 12.3% at 2 years. Seven patients (6.3%) developed peripheral nerve toxicity, of whom 4 had been previously radiated. CONCLUSIONS: Sacral SBRT is associated with high efficacy rates and an acceptable toxicity profile. Adhering to consensus guidelines for target volume delineation is recommended to reduce the risk of LF.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Frequency After Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Spine Metastases.

PURPOSE: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is increasingly being used to treat spine metastases. Current post-SBRT imaging surveillance strategies in this patient population may benefit from a more data-driven and personalized approach. The objective of this study was to develop risk-stratified post-SBRT magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) surveillance strategies using quantitative methods. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Adult patients with bony spine metastases treated with SBRT between 2008 and 2021 and who had at least 2 follow-up spine MRIs were reviewed retrospectively. A recursive partitioning analysis model was developed to separate patients into different risk categories for post-SBRT progression anywhere within the spine. Imaging intervals were derived for each risk category using parametric survival regression based on multiple expected spine progression rates per scan. RESULTS: A total of 446 patients and 1039 vertebral segments were included. Cumulative incidence of spine progression was 19.2% at 1 year, 26.7% at 2 years, and 35.3% at 4 years. The internally validated risk stratification model was able to divide patients into 3 risk categories based on epidural disease, paraspinal disease, and Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score category. The 4-year risk of spine progression was 23.4%, 39.0%, and 51.8%, respectively, for the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups. Using an expected per-scan spine progression rate of 3.75%, the low-risk group would require follow-up scans every 6.0 months (95% CI, 4.9-7.6) and the intermediate-risk group would require surveillance every 3.1 months (95% CI, 2.6-3.7). At an expected spine progression rate of 5%, the high-risk group would require surveillance every 1.3 months (95% CI, 1.1-1.6) during the first 13.2 months after SBRT and every 5.9 months thereafter (95% CI, 2.8-12.3). CONCLUSIONS: Data-driven follow-up MRI surveillance intervals at a range of expected spine progression rates have been determined for patients at different risks of spine progression based on an internally validated, single-institution risk stratification model.