The move-C cervical artificial disc can restore intact range of motion and 3-D kinematics.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: In contrast to cervical discectomy and fusion, total disc replacement (TDR) aims at preserving the motion at the treated vertebral level. Spinal motion is commonly evaluated with the range of motion (ROM). However, more qualitative information about cervical kinematics before and after TDR is still lacking. PURPOSE: The aim of this in vitro study was to investigate the influence of cervical TDR on ROM, instantaneous centers of rotation (ICR) and three-dimensional helical axes. STUDY DESIGN: An in vitro study with human spine specimens under pure moment loading was conducted to evaluate the kinematics of the intact cervical spine and compare it to cervical TDR. METHODS: Six fresh frozen human cervical specimens (C4-5, median age 28 years, range 19-47 years, two female and four male) were biomechanically characterized in the intact state and after implantation of a cervical disc prosthesis (MOVE-C, NGMedical, Germany). To mimic in vivo conditions regarding temperature and humidity, water steam was used to create a warm and humid test environment with 37°C. Each specimen was quasistatically loaded with pure moments up to ±2.5 Nm in flexion/extension (FE), lateral bending (LB) and axial rotation (AR) in a universal spine tester for 3.5 cycles at 1 °/s. For each third cycle of motion the ROM was evaluated and an established method was used to determine the helical axis and COR and to project them into three planar X-rays. Statistical analysis was conducted using a Friedman-test and post hoc correction with Dunn-Bonferroni-tests (p<.05). RESULTS: After TDR, total ROM was increased in FE from 19.1° to 20.1°, decreased in LB from 14.6° to 12.6° and decreased in AR from 17.7° to 15.5°. No statistical differences between the primary ROM in the intact condition and ROM after TDR were detected. Coupled rotation between LB and AR were also maintained. The position and orientation of the helical axes after cervical TDR was in good agreement with the results of the intact specimens in all three motion directions. The ICR in FE and AR before and after TDR closely matched, while in LB the ICR after TDR were more caudal. The intact in vitro kinematics we found also resembled in vivo results of healthy individuals. CONCLUSION: The results of this in vitro study highlight the potential of artificial cervical disc implants to replicate the quantity as well as the quality of motion of the intact cervical spine. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Physiological motion preservation was a driving factor in the development of cervical TDR. Our results demonstrate the potential of cervical TDR to replicate in vivo kinematics in all three motion directions.

Metal Artifact Reduction With Tin Prefiltration in Computed Tomography: A Cadaver Study for Comparison With Other Novel Techniques.

OBJECTIVES: With the aging population and thus rising numbers of orthopedic implants (OIs), metal artifacts (MAs) increasingly pose a problem for computed tomography (CT) examinations. In the study presented here, different MA reduction techniques (iterative metal artifact reduction software [iMAR], tin prefilter technique, and dual-energy CT [DECT]) were compared. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four human cadaver pelvises with OIs were scanned on a third-generation DECT scanner using tin prefilter (Sn), dual-energy (DE), and conventional protocols. Virtual monoenergetic CT images were generated from DE data sets. Postprocessing of CT images was performed using iMAR. Qualitative (bony structures, MA, image noise) image analysis using a 6-point Likert scale and quantitative image analysis (contrast-to-noise ratio, standard deviation of background noise) were performed by 2 observers. Statistical testing was performed using Friedman test with Nemenyi test as a post hoc test. RESULTS: The iMAR Sn 150 kV protocol provided the best overall assessability of bony structures and the lowest subjective image noise. The iMAR DE protocol and virtual monochromatic image (VMI) ± iMAR achieved the most effective metal artifact reduction (MAR) (P < 0.05 compared with conventional protocols). Bony structures were rated worse in VMI ± iMAR (P < 0.05) than in tin prefilter protocols ± iMAR. The DE protocol ± iMAR had the lowest contrast-to-noise ratio (P < 0.05 compared with iMAR standard) and the highest image noise (P < 0.05 compared with iMAR VMI). The iMAR reduced MA very efficiently. CONCLUSIONS: When considering MAR and image quality, the iMAR Sn 150 kV protocol performed best overall in CT images with OI. The iMAR generated new artifacts that impaired image quality. The DECT/VMI reduced MA best, but experienced from a lack of resolution of bony fine structures.

Georg Schmorl Prize of the German Spine Society (DWG) 2020: new biomechanical in vitro test method to determine subsidence risk of vertebral body replacements.

PURPOSE: Prevention of implant subsidence in osteoporotic (thoraco)lumbar spines is still a major challenge in spinal surgery. In this study, a new biomechanical in vitro test method was developed to simulate patient activities in order to determine the subsidence risk of vertebral body replacements during physiologic loading conditions. METHODS: The study included 12 (thoraco)lumbar (T11-L1, L2-L4) human specimens. After dorsal stabilisation and corpectomy, vertebral body replacements (VBR) with (a) round centrally located and (b) lateral end pieces with apophyseal support were implanted, equally distributed regarding segment, sex, mean BMD ((a) 64.2 mgCaHA/cm3, (b) 66.7 mgCaHA/cm3) and age ((a) 78 years, (b) 73.5 years). The specimens were then subjected to everyday activities (climbing stairs, tying shoes, lifting 20 kg) simulated by a custom-made dynamic loading simulator combining corresponding axial loads with flexion-extension and lateral bending movements. They were applied in oscillating waves at 0.5 Hz and raised every 100 cycles phase-shifted to each other by 50 N or 0.25°, respectively. The range of motion (ROM) of the specimens was determined in all three motion planes under pure moments of 3.75 Nm prior to and after implantation as well as subsequently following activities. Simultaneously, subsidence depth was quantified from fluoroscope films. A mixed model (significance level: 0.05) was established to relate subsidence risk to implant geometries and patients' activities. RESULTS: With this new test method, simulating everyday activities provoked clinically relevant subsidence schemes. Generally, severe everyday activities caused deeper subsidence which resulted in increased ROM. Subsidence of lateral end pieces was remarkably less pronounced which was accompanied by a smaller ROM in flexion-extension and higher motion possibilities in axial rotation (p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: In this study, a new biomechanical test method was developed that simulates physiologic activities to examine implant subsidence. It appears that the highest risk of subsidence occurs most when lifting heavy weights, and into the ventral part of the caudal vertebra. The results indicate that lateral end pieces may better prevent from implant subsidence because of the additional cortical support. Generally, patients that are treated with a VBR should avoid activities that create high loading on the spine.

Correction to: Nucleus replacement could get a new chance with annulus closure.

Unfortunately, Fig. 7 and last paragraph of the result section have been incorrectly published. The complete corrected Fig. 7 and last paragraph of the results part (IDP measurements) have been as follows.

Nucleus replacement could get a new chance with annulus closure.

PURPOSE: Disc herniations are usually treated by decompression of the spinal nerves via a partial nucleotomy. As a consequence of reduced disc height (DH), reduced intradiscal pressure (IDP) and increased range of motion (ROM), accelerated degeneration may occur. Nucleus replacement implants are intended to restore those values, but are associated with the risk of extrusion. METHODS: In six fresh frozen lumbar spinal segments (L2-3/L3-4/L4-5/L5-S1, age median 64.5 years (57-72), Pfirrmann grade 2-3), a prolapse was provoked through a box defect (6 × 10 mm) in the annulus. The herniated nucleus material was removed and replaced by a novel collagen-based nucleus implant. An annulus closure device sealed the defect. ROM, neutral zone (NZ) and IDP were measured in the (1) intact and (2) defect state, (3) postoperatively and (4) after cyclic loading (n = 100,000 cycles) applying pure moments (± 7.5 Nm) in flexion-extension, lateral bending and axial rotation. Additionally, the change in DH was determined. Extrusion of implants or nucleus material was evaluated macroscopically. RESULTS: In all specimens, a prolapse could be provoked which decreased DH. Subsequent nucleotomy changed ROM/NZ and IDP considerably. Initial values could be restored by the implantation. Macroscopically, none of the implants nor nucleus material did migrate after cyclic loading. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, a prolapse followed by a nucleotomy resulted in a biomechanical destabilisation. Implantation of the nucleus replacement combined with an annulus closure restored the intact condition without showing signs of extrusion nor migration after cyclic loading. Hence, nucleus replacements could have a new chance in combination with annulus closure devices.