Stabilization and remediation of heavy metal-contaminated soils in China: insights from a decade-long national survey.

Recently, enterprises and industries associated with intense pollution have been relocated in China, leaving behind abandoned polluted sites. Consequently, stabilization has attracted unprecedented attention and rapid development. However, too much focus has been placed on practicality and short-term effectiveness, whereas long-term effectiveness and sustainability concerns have been overlooked. The present study reports the findings of a national survey administered to stakeholders involved in soil stabilization projects over a decade to determine the pollution characteristics of industrial sites and current utilization status of stabilization technologies in China. One-hundred and fifty soil stabilization projects surveyed revealed that among 29% of chemical industry remained sites, 96.7% of the sites were heavily polluted with heavy metals and metalloids, mainly in the forms of lead, arsenic, and chromium. Our analyses of soil reuse methods revealed that landfilling was the primary strategy of soil disposal following stabilization and remediation. In addition, the reuse of treated soils is preferred to landfill waste treatment. Therefore, from the perspective of economy and reducing landfill loads, environmental management measures should be adopted based on the development objectives of different regions to avoid the failure of stabilization treatments and reapplication and over-repair problems, with the aim of establishing an evaluation method of "site-specific, analysis-specific" evaluation method.

Stabilization of Pb, Cd, and Zn in soil by modified-zeolite: Mechanisms and evaluation of effectiveness.

As a type of soil stabilization material, zeolite has good cation exchange ability and synchronous stabilization potential for multiple active heavy metal cations in soil. However, natural zeolite contains relatively high amounts of impurities, and has a single heavy metal stabilization mechanism, which limits its capacity to stabilize heavy metals in soil. To develop a stabilization material that could efficiently stabilize several heavy metals simultaneously, in the present study, modified zeolite (MZEO) was prepared via NaCl pretreatment, chitosan modification, modified chitosan loading, and CaSiO3 modification to enable Pb, Cd, and Zn stabilization in soil. The aim of the present study was to explore zeolite modification technologies, reveal the stabilization mechanism of polymetallic contaminated soil and evaluate the stabilization effects of MZEO. According to the results, the modification treatment increased the cation exchange capacity of MZEO nearly 8-fold, the specific surface area 3.4-fold, and its internal pore structure was richer, with more adsorption sites. The appearance of a -NH2 absorption bands confirmed the loading of chitosan successfully, and the modification enhanced the heavy metal stabilization mechanism. Upon the addition of MZEO to Baiyin soil, the chemical morphologies of heavy metals changed, which reduced the weak acid extracted forms of Pb, Cd, and Zn in the soil by 21%, 10%, and 19%, respectively. The potential mechanisms of free heavy metal reduction were ion exchange with Na in MZEO, heavy metal mineral formation by Al replacement in the crystal lattice, and bonding with SiO32- formed by the hydrolysis of MZEO-loaded synaptic CaSiO3 particles, to form silicate precipitation. MZEO application minimized heavy metal leaching risk in the soil and heavy metal biological/plant accessibility, with potential economic benefits. MZEO has promising applications in polluted soil remediation.

Immobilization of Cr(VI) in Soil Using a Montmorillonite-Supported Carboxymethyl Cellulose-Stabilized Iron Sulfide Composite: Effectiveness and Biotoxicity Assessment.

A novel composite of montmorillonite-supported carboxymethyl cellulose-stabilized nanoscale iron sulfide (CMC@MMT-FeS), prepared using the co-precipitation method, was applied to remediate hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI))-contaminated soil. Cr(VI)-removal capacity increased with increasing FeS-particle loading. We tested the efficacy of CMC@MMT-FeS at three concentrations of FeS: 0.2, 0.5, and 1 mmol/g, hereafter referred to as 0.2 CMC@MMT-FeS, 0.5 CMC@MMT-FeS, and 1.0 CMC@MMT-FeS, respectively. The soil Cr(VI) concentration decreased by 90.7% (from an initial concentration of 424.6 mg/kg to 39.4 mg/kg) after 30 days, following addition of 5% (composite-soil mass proportion) 1.0 CMC@MMT-FeS. When 2% 0.5 CMC@MMT-FeS was added to Cr(VI)-contaminated soil, the Cr(VI) removal efficiency, as measured in the leaching solution using the toxicity characteristic leaching procedure, was 90.3%, meeting the environmental protection standard for hazardous waste (5 mg/kg). The European Community Bureau of Reference (BCR) test confirmed that the main Cr fractions in the soil samples changed from acid-exchangeable fractions to oxidable fractions and residual fractions after 30 days of soil remediation by the composite. Moreover, the main complex formed during remediation was Fe(III)-Cr(III), based on BCR and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analyses. Biotoxicity of the remediated soils, using Vicia faba and Eisenia foetida, was analyzed and evaluated. Our results indicate that CMC@MMT-FeS effectively immobilizes Cr(VI), with widespread potential application in Cr(VI)-contaminated soil remediation.

The Immobilization Effect of Natural Mineral Materials on Cr(VI) Remediation in Water and Soil.

The effects of sepiolite, montmorillonite, and attapulgite on the removal and immobilization of Cr(VI) in water and soil were studied. X-ray diffraction (XRD) characterizations showed that the purities of these three mineral materials decreased in the following order: montmorillonite > attapulgite > sepiolite, and that their surface molecular bond types were similar. The adsorption potential of Cr(VI) in aqueous solutions of the three mineral materials was in the following order: sepiolite > attapulgite > montmorillonite. The adsorption mechanism for attapulgite was consistent with the Freundlich isotherm adsorption model, whereas that for montmorillonite was more consistent with the Langmuir model. Sepiolite had a good fitting effect for both isothermal adsorption models. For montmorillonite and attapulgite, a lower pH corresponded to a higher removal of Cr(VI). For sepiolite, however, the removal efficiency of Cr(VI) from an aqueous solution was the lowest at a pH of approximately 5.0. The results of the soil toxicity characteristic leaching procedure showed that, following the addition of 15% sepiolite, attapulgite, or montmorillonite to the contaminated soil, Cr(VI) concentrations in the leachates decreased by 16.8%, 18.9%, and 15.9%, respectively, and the total Cr concentrations in the leachates were reduced by 21.2%, 29.2%, and 17.6%. Of the three mineral materials, attapulgite demonstrated the highest Cr(VI) immobilization efficiency in soil. This study emphasizes the effect of attapulgite on the immobilization of Cr(VI) in soil and aqueous solutions, thus providing a theoretical basis for the potential application of natural mineral material remediation of Cr(VI)-contaminated aqueous solutions and soils.