RESUMEN
Background: The presence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in myocardial autopsy tissues has been observed in certain individuals with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, the duration of cardiac involvement remains uncertain among recovered COVID-19 patients. Our study aims to evaluate the long-term persistence of SARS-CoV-2 within cardiac tissue. Methods: We prospectively and consecutively evaluated the patients undergoing mitral valve replacement (MVR) and left atrial (LA) volume reduction surgery from May 25 to June 10, 2023 at our center, who had been approximately 6 months of recovery after Omicron wave. Patients tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 upon admission were excluded. The surgical LA tissue was collected in RNA preservation solution and stored at -80 â immediately. Then SARS-CoV-2, interleukin-6 (IL-6) and interleukin-1ß (IL-1ß) RNA expression in LA tissues were assessed through thrice-repeated reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) analyses. Categorical variables were assessed using the Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests, and continuous variables was analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Results: Nine of 41 patients were enrolled, all of whom tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 upon admission (two antigen and PCR tests). In four of nine patients, SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in their LA tissue, indicating viral colonization. Among the four positive cases, the IL-6 and IL-1ß relative expression levels in the LA tissue of one patient were increased approximately 55- and 110-fold, respectively, compared to those of SARS-CoV-2 (-) patients. Increased expression of IL-6 and IL-1ß were observed in the myocardium of this patient. Another patient demonstrated a remarkable 7-fold increase in both IL-6 and IL-1ß expression, surpassing that of SARS-CoV-2 (-) patients. Additionally, no other cardiac inflammation-related diseases or conditions were presented in these two patients. The IL-6 and IL-1ß expression levels of the remaining two patients were not significantly different from those of SARS-CoV-2 (-) patients. The relative expression levels of IL-6 and IL-1ß in cardiac tissues of all SARS-CoV-2 (-) patients were relatively low. Interestingly, despite abnormally elevated levels of IL-6 and IL-1ß within their cardiac tissue, two patients did not show a significant increase in serum IL-6 and IL-1ß levels when compared to other patients. Conclusions: Our research suggests that certain COVID-19-recovered patients have persistent colonization of SARS-CoV-2 in their cardiac tissue, accompanied by a local increase in inflammatory factors.
RESUMEN
Background: Aortic surgery successfully improves the prognosis of patients with type A aortic dissection. However, total arch replacement and reconstruction remain challenging. This study presents a new surgical modality, the in-situ stent-graft fenestration (ISSF) technique, for simplifying aortic arch reconstruction and assesses its short-term efficacy and safety in patients with type A aortic dissection. Methods: Data from 177 patients with type A aortic dissection who underwent aortic arch reconstruction were retrospectively analyzed. Sun's procedure was performed in 90 patients and ISSF was performed in the other 87. Results: The in-hospital mortality rate was 7.8% in the Sun's procedure group and 3.4% in the ISSF group (p = 0.357). Compared to the Sun's procedure group, the ISSF group had significantly shorter surgical duration, cardiopulmonary bypass time, circulatory arrest time, mechanical ventilation time, and aortic cross-clamp time (p < 0.05). Additionally, intraoperative blood loss was lower in the ISSF group than in the Sun's procedure group (p < 0.05). Patients who underwent ISSF also had a lower incidence of postoperative complications, including lung injury, renal failure, peripheral nerve injury, and chylothorax, than those who underwent Sun's procedure (p < 0.05). During the 6-month follow-up period after surgery, both groups showed significant improvements in the true lumen diameter of the descending thoracic aorta post-operation compared with the pre-operation measurements; meanwhile, the false lumen diameter decreased (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The ISSF technique appears to be an effective and safe alternative to conventional surgical procedures for patients with type A aortic dissection, with the potential to simplify the procedure, shorten the operation time, and yield satisfactory operative results. However, further investigation is needed to determine its long-term benefits.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We designed a simplified total arch reconstruction (s-TAR) technique which could be performed under mild hypothermia (30-32 °C) with distal aortic perfusion. This study aimed to compare its efficacy of organ protection with the conventional total arch reconstruction (c-TAR). METHODS: We reviewed the clinical data of 195 patients who had ascending aortic aneurysm with extended aortic arch dilation and underwent simultaneous ascending aorta replacement and TAR procedure between January 2018 and December 2022 in our center. 105 received c-TAR under moderate hypothermia (25-28 °C) with circulatory arrest (c-TAR group); rest 90 received s-TAR under mild hypothermia (30-32 °C) with distal aortic perfusion (s-TAR group). RESULTS: The s-TAR group demonstrated shorter CPB time, cross-clamp time and lower body circulatory arrest time compared with the c-TAR group. The 30-day mortality was 2.9% for the c-TAR group and 1.1% for the s-TAR group (P = 0.043). The mean duration of mechanical ventilation was shorter in the s-TAR group. Paraplegia was observed in 4 of 105 patients (3.8%) in the c-TAR group, while no such events were observed in the s-TAR group. The incidence of temporary neurologic dysfunction was significantly higher in the c-TAR group. The incidence of permanent neurologic dysfunction also showed a tendency to be higher in the c-TAR group, without statistical significance. Furthermore, the incidence of reoperation for bleeding were significantly lower in the s-TAR group. The rate of postoperative hepatic dysfunction and all grades of AKI was remarkably lower in the s-TAR group. The 3-year survival rate was 95.6% in the s-TAR group and 91.4% in the c-TAR group. CONCLUSIONS: s-TAR under mild hypothermia (30-32â) with distal aortic perfusion is associated with lower mortality and morbidity, offering better neurological and visceral organ protection compared with c-TAR.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de la Aorta , Hipotermia Inducida , Hipotermia , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso , Humanos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Hipotermia Inducida/métodos , Perfusión/métodos , Enfermedades de la Aorta/cirugía , Circulación Cerebrovascular , Paro Circulatorio Inducido por Hipotermia Profunda , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Background: One of the crucial aspects of ascending aorta replacement is to achieve hemostasis of the proximal anastomosis. This study aimed to describe a modified prosthesis eversion technique for proximal anastomosis in ascending aorta replacement and compare its operative outcomes with the conventional prosthesis eversion technique. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients who had ascending aortic aneurysm and underwent ascending aorta replacement with the modified or conventional prosthesis eversion technique between January 2019 and December 2022 in our center. Results: A total of 108 patients were included: 55 in the modified group and 53 in the conventional group. The durations of cardiopulmonary bypass, aortic cross-clamping and total operation in the conventional group were longer than those in the modified group. Furthermore, perioperative blood loss and the incidence of re-exploration for bleeding were significantly lower in the modified group. Accordingly, patients in the conventional group accepted more blood transfusion. The modified group had a shorter duration in intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital, and lower total hospitalization costs than those in the conventional group. Conclusions: The modified prosthesis eversion technique is an effective alternative for proximal anastomosis in ascending aorta replacement, with less blood loss, shorter operation time, and lower rate of postoperative complications compared with the conventional technique.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Conduction disturbances requiring permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) are common following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). There were conflicting data regarding the impact of new PPI on clinical outcomes after TAVR. OBJECTIVES: The study sought to evaluate the impact of new PPI on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing TAVR. METHODS: This study was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. Data were from 210 consecutive patients without prior PPI who underwent TAVR due to severe symptomatic aortic stenosis at our center between June 2018 and July 2020. Clinical, echocardiographic, and pacing data were assessed at 30-day, 1- and 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: New PPI was required in 35 (16.7%) patients within 30 days after TAVR. The median time from TAVR to PPI was 3 days. The most common indication for PPI was high-degree or complete atrioventricular block. The median follow-up was 798.0 (interquartile range, 669.0-1115.0) days. There were no differences in all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.85-2.36; p = 0.415) and cardiovascular mortality (adjusted HR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.57-1.89; p = 0.609) between groups. However, PPI group had a higher risk of heart failure (HF) rehospitalization (adjusted HR: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.26-2.28; p = 0.027). Echocardiography showed no significant improvement of LVEF over time in patients with PPI. At the latest follow-up, 31.3% of patients exhibited low (≤10%) pacing burdens, whereas 28.1% of patients had near constant (>90%) right ventricular pacing. CONCLUSIONS: New PPI within 30 days following TAVR was not associated with an increased risk of all-cause or cardiovascular mortality. However, patients with PPI had a higher risk of HF rehospitalization and lack of LVEF improvement.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica , Marcapaso Artificial , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter , Humanos , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/efectos adversos , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Estimulación Cardíaca Artificial/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factores de Riesgo , Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Válvula Aórtica/cirugíaRESUMEN
Background: Reconstruction of the aortic arch and its three supra-aortic vessels remains a great surgical challenge with postoperative complications. We present a simplified total arch reconstruction with a modified stent graft (s-TAR) and compared its operative outcomes with conventional total arch replacement (c-TAR). Methods: This retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from all consecutive patients who had ascending aortic aneurysm with extended aortic arch dilation and underwent simultaneous ascending aorta replacement and aortic arch reconstruction with the s-TAR or c-TAR between 2018 and 2021. The indication for intervention was maximum diameter of ascending aorta >55 mm and aortic arch in zone II >35 mm. Results: A total of 84 patients were analyzed: 43 in the s-TAR group and 41 in the c-TAR group. No inter-group differences were found for sex, age, comorbidities, or EuroSCORE II results. All patients were successfully treated with s-TAR or c-TAR, and none died intraoperatively. Cardiopulmonary bypass, selective cerebral perfusion, and lower-body circulatory arrest time were significantly shorter in the s-TAR group, which also had a lower incidence of prolonged ventilation and transient neurologic dysfunction. No patient in either group experienced permanent neurologic dysfunction. The incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury and paraplegia was markedly increased in the c-TAR group; however, no such events were observed in the s-TAR group. Both perioperative blood loss and the incidence of reoperation for bleeding were significantly lower in the s-TAR group. The in-hospital mortality rate was 0% in the s-TAR group and 4.9% in the c-TAR group. The s-TAR group had significantly shorter intensive care unit (ICU) stay and lower total hospitalization costs. Conclusions: The s-TAR technique is a safe and effective alternative for total arch reconstruction with shorter operation time, lower rate of postoperative complications and lower total hospitalization costs compared with c-TAR.
RESUMEN
Background: Patients with acute aortic dissection type A (AADA) often have hypoxemia (partial pressure of oxygen [PaO2]/fraction of inspired oxygen [FiO2] <300 mmHg) before weaning in the intensive care unit (ICU). This study compared the efficacy of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) with that of conventional oxygen therapy (COT) in patients with AADA following Sun's procedure. Methods: The medical records of 87 adult patients with AADA who underwent Sun's procedure and met the inclusion criteria (PaO2/FiO2 <300 mmHg before weaning) were retrospectively analyzed. After surgery, 41 patients were treated with HFNC and 46 were treated with COT. The oxygenation level, FiO2, partial pressure of carbon dioxide, heart rate, respiratory rate, subjective discomfort, and reintubation rate were recorded. The difference in lung volume loss between the HFNC and COT groups was assessed using the radiological atelectasis score (chest radiograph) or calculated from three-dimensional (3D) reconstructed computed tomography (CT) images. Results: From day 1 to day 5 after weaning, there was no significant difference in PaO2/FiO2 between the HFNC and COT groups, although the FiO2 was significantly lower in the HFNC group than in the COT group (P < 0.05). Further studies indicated that the percentage of lung volume loss (pleural effusion and/or pulmonary atelectasis) by 3D reconstruction of CT images at 4-8 days post-operation was significantly lower in the HFNC group (P < 0.05). The subjective experience of breathing discomfort, reintubation rate, and length of stay in the ICU were significantly reduced in the HFNC group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in readmission to the ICU and in-hospital mortality between the two groups. Conclusions: HFNC can be used as an effective oxygen therapy for AADA patients with hypoxemia after Sun's procedure.
RESUMEN
Treatment with doxorubicin (DOX), which is an effective anticancer agent, is limited by cardiotoxicity. CUE domaincontaining 2 (CUEDC2) serves a role in numerous cellular processes. The present study aimed to elucidate the potential function of CUEDC2 in DOXinduced cardiotoxicity. Cell Counting kit8 assay demonstrated that DOX induced cytotoxicity of H9c2 cells in a dosedependent manner. Flow cytometry demonstrated that downregulation of CUEDC2 reduced the levels of DOXinduced reactive oxygen species. Furthermore, compared with in the DOXtreated group, the activity of superoxide dismutase was increased in the DOX + small interfering RNA (si)CUEDC2 group; whereas, the malondialdehyde content was reduced in the DOX + siCUEDC2 group. In addition, flow cytometric analysis indicated that mitochondrial membrane potential was maintained following the depletion of CUEDC2. Furthermore, CUEDC2 downregulation significantly inhibited DOXinduced apoptosis. The expression levels of proapoptotic genes, including Bcell lymphoma 2 (Bcl2)associated X protein, cleaved caspase3 and cytochrome c were inhibited by the depletion of CUEDC2. Conversely, the expression levels of the antiapoptotic gene Bcl2 were elevated in the CUEDC2 knockdown group. Downregulation of CUEDC2 also increased phosphorylation of protein kinase B and forkhead box O3a, and decreased the expression of Bcl2like protein 11 according to western blot analysis. Taken together, the present study demonstrated that CUEDC2 downregulation prevented DOXinduced cardiotoxicity in H9c2 cells. Therefore, CUEDC2 may be a promising target for the prevention of DOXinduced cardiotoxicity.