Cortical Surface Area Rather Than Cortical Thickness Potentially Differentiates Radiation Encephalopathy at Early Stage in Patients With Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

Radiation encephalopathy (RE) is one of the most severe complications in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients after radiotherapy (RT). However, the morphological alteration of early RE is insufficiently investigated. We aimed to investigate the cortical thickness and surface area alterations in NPC patients with or without RE in the follow-up. A total of 168 NPC patients each underwent a single scan and analysis at various times either Pre-RT (n = 56) or Post-RT (n = 112). We further divided the Post-RT NPC patients into three groups based on the time of the analysis following RT (Post-RTwithin 6 months and Post-RT7-12 months) or whether RE signs were detected in the analysis (Post-RTRE proved in follow-up). We confined the vertex-wise analyses of the cortical thickness and surface area to the bilateral temporal lobes. Interestingly, we revealed a gradual increase in the cortical surface area of the temporal lobe with increasing time after RT within the Post-RTRE proved in follow-up group, consistent with the between-group findings, which showed a significant increase in cortical surface area in the Post-RTRE proved in follow-up group relative to the Pre-RT group and the Post-RTwithin 6 months group. By contrast, such a trend was not observed in the cortical thickness findings. We concluded that the cortical surface area, rather than cortical thickness, may serve as a potential biomarker for early diagnosis of RE.

Association of polymorphisms in SPARC and NLRP2 genes with rheumatoid arthritis in a Chinese Han population.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the association of the polymorphisms in SPARC and NLRP2 with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in a Chinese Han population. METHODS: Four single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) covering SPARC and three SNPs covering NLRP2 were investigated in 624 Chinese Han RA patients and 1920 healthy controls. RESULTS: The A allele at SPARC rs3210714, SPARC rs11950384, NLRP2 rs2217659, and NLRP2 rs703468 were linked to reduced risk of RA (p = 0.0016, p = 0.0051, p < 0.0001, and p = 0.0033, respectively). Under the recessive model, the A/A genotype of rs3210714, rs11950384, rs2217659, and rs703468 were relevant with RA (p = 0.0071, p = 0.017, p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0066, respectively). Haplotype analysis identified the SPARC GGCG haplotype, AAAA haplotype were associated with the risk for RA (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0015, respectively), while the risk of RA was lower for carriers of the GAAA haplotype (p < 0.0001), AACG haplotype (p < 0.0001), and the AGCG haplotype (p < 0.0001). The NLRP2 GG haplotype was a risk factor (p < 0.0001), while the GA haplotype and the AG haplotype were associated with lower risk of RA (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0017, respectively). There was no significant difference between the RA patients and the controls in polymorphisms of rs7719521, rs1978707, and rs269913. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that polymorphisms in SPARC and NLRP2 are related to RA susceptibility in a Chinese Han population.

Urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor as a predictor of poor outcome in patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) are known as important factors, which mediate a variety of functions in terms of vascular homeostasis, inflammation and tissue repair. However, their role in systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) has been less well studied. This study aimed to test the hypothesis that the abnormalities of fibrinolysis and degradation of extracellular matrix mediated by uPA and uPAR are directly related to the patients with SIRS. We therefore analyzed their role and clinicopathological significance in patients with SIRS. METHODS: A case-control study was conducted with 85 patients who were divided into two groups according to the diagnostic criteria of SIRS: SIRS group (n=50) and non-SIRS group (n=35). The SIRS group was divided into MODS group (n=26) and non-MODS group (n=24) by their severity, and survival group (n=35) and non-survival group (n=15) by their prognosis. Another 30 healthy adults served as normal controls. uPA and uPAR in plasma were detected by commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits. RESULTS: The plasma level of uPA was lower in the SIRS group than in the non-SIRS group and controls (P<0.001 and P<0.001). It was lower in sepsis patients and the MODS group than in the non-sepsis patients and the non-MODS patients (all P<0.05). However, there was no difference in uPA level between survivors and non-survivors (P>0.05). The plasma level of uPAR increased in the SIRS group compared with the non-SIRS group and controls (P<0.001 and P<0.001). There was a significant elevation of uPAR in sepsis patients, MODS patients and non-survivors as compared with non-sepsis patients, non-MODS patients and survivors respectively (all P<0.05). Plasma uPAR levels were positively correlated with APACHE II score (r=0.575, P<0.001) and SOFA score (r=0.349, P=0.013). AUCs for the prediction of SIRS mortality were 0.67 and 0.51, respectively, for uPA and uPAR. CONCLUSION: uPAR could be a predictor of poor outcome in patients with SIRS.

[Dynamic changes in plasma levels of urokinase type plasminogen activator and urokinase type plasminogen activator receptor in patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome].

OBJECTIVE: To study the dynamic changes in plasma levels of urokinase type plasminogen activator (uPA) and urokinase type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) and their influence on prognosis in patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). METHODS: In this study, a prospective clinical case control study was adopted. Eighty-five patients were divided into two groups according to diagnostic criteria of SIRS: SIRS patients (n=50) and non-SIRS patients (n=35). SIRS patients were again divided into SIRS group (n=26) and SIRS complicated by multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) group (n=24) by their severity, and survival group (n=35) and non-survival group (n=15) by their outcome . The control group comprised of 30 healthy blood donors. Venous blood samples of about 2 ml were collected at the time when non-SIRS patients were admitted, and blood samples were collected in SIRS patients on 1,3, 5 and 7 days when SIRS was diagnosed, and in the healthy control group blood samples were collected when they visited the General Health Check-up Division at our hospital. Plasma levels of uPA and uPAR were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and relationship between plasma level of uPAR and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II(APACHEII) score was analyzed using Pearson correlation. RESULTS: The plasma levels of uPA and uPAR in patients of SIRS and MODS were obviously higher compared with non-SIRS and healthy controls [uPA (µg/L): 1.208±0.264, 1.120±0.276 vs. 0.744±0.190, 0.782±0.257; uPAR (µg/L): 3.704±1.018, 4.970±1.284 vs. 1.892±0.476, 1.823± 0.797, all P<0.01]. The plasma level of uPAR in MODS group was obviously higher than that of SIRS group (P<0.01). The plasma level of uPA (µg/L) in non-survival group was markedly elevated on 5 days and 7 days compared to survival group (5 days: 1.177±0.185 vs. 0.856±0.223, 7 days: 1.377±0.185 vs. 0.836±0.223, both P<0.01). The plasma level of uPAR (µg/L) in patients of non-survival group was obviously higher compared with survival group on 1, 3, 5 and 7 days (1 day: 5.301±1.410 vs. 3.888±1.015, 3 days: 4.017±0.898 vs. 2.994±0.638, 5 days: 5.032±1.238 vs. 2.536±1.017, 7 days: 5.232±1.238 vs. 3.536±1.017, all P<0.01). Correlation analysis showed that there was positive correlation between uPAR level and APACHEII score (r=0.640, P<0.01). CONCLUSION: Coagulopathy is present in SIRS patients, the plasma levels of uPA and uPAR are high in patients with SIRS, and the increase of uPAR in patients with SIRS indicates a poor prognosis.

[Clinical observation of rheumatoid arthritis associated interstitial lung disease patients and changes of serum cytokines thereof].

OBJECTIVE: To observe the clinical feature of rheumatoid arthritis associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) patients and changes of serum cytokines tumor growth factor (TGF)-beta 1, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1, and platelet derived growth factor (PDGF)-AB. METHODS: The clinical manifestations, lung high resolution CT (HRCT), lung functions, blood gas and other relative laboratory findings of 30 RA-ILD patients and 35 RA patients were observed. ELISA was used to detect the levels of TGF-beta 1, TNF-alpha, IGF-1, and PDGF-AB. Thirty healthy volunteers were observed too as controls. RESULTS: The clinical manifestations of RA-ILD patients were more serious than those of the RA patients. The ESR was faster, the serum C-reactive protein, rheumatoid factor (RF), and globulin levels higher, and pulmonary arterial pressure higher too in the RA-ILD patients than in the RA patients (all P<0.01). The main respiratory manifestations of the RA-ILD patients were cough, expectoration, chest distress, short breath, chest pain, change of breath sounds, Velcro râles, and dyspnea. The main lung HRCT findings included thickening of interlobular septum and bronchial wall, pachynsis pleurae, mosaic sign, bronchiectasis, emphysema, patching shadow, honeycombing, fibrous scar, etc. Pulmonary function test showed that the levels of vital capacity, forced vital capacity, maximum midexpiratory flow, and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide of the RA-ILD patients were all significantly lower than those of the RA patients (all P<0.01). Arterial gas test showed that the PO2 of the RA-ILD patients was significantly lower than that of the RA patients (P<0.01). The TGF-beta 1; TNF-alpha, IGF-1, and PDGF-AB of both the RA-ILD and RA patients were all significantly higher than those of the healthy volunteers (all P<0.01), and the levels of these cytokines of the RA-ILD patients were all higher than those of the RA patients (all P<0.01). CONCLUSION: The symptoms and signs of the RA-ILD patients are more serious, the lung HRCT changes more obvious, lung function decreases, and the levels of TGF-beta 1, TNF-alpha, IGF-1, and PDGF-AB increase.

[Analysis of false-positive associated with antibody tests for SARS-CoV in SLE patients].

To discuss the false-positive of serological diagnostic testing for coronavirus antibody in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus(SLE), 66 normal individual and 31 SLE with non-SARS patients were detected for SARS-associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV) antibody and RNA by enzymelinked immunosorbent assays(ELISA) and reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction(RT-PCR). The result showed 2/66 cases(3.0%) were positive of SARS-CoV-IgG antibody and 66 cases were negative of SARS-CoV-IgM antibody in the 66 cases healthy controls; in 31 cases with SLE, positive rates of SARS-CoV-IgG and IgM antibody were 58.1% (18/31) and 29% (9/31), respectively, in which 7 cases(22.6%) were positive of both SARS-CoV-IgG and IgM antibody. All samples of positive SARS-CoV-IgG and IgM antibody were negative by RT-PCR. The ELISA kit coated by non-purification antigen may induce the false-positive of SARS-CoV antibody in patients with SLE. This result suggested that the specificity of ELISA tests for SARS was excellent and has low false-positive rates when using SARS-CoV-IgG and IgM antibody tests. A possible cause of false-positive of SARS-CoV-IgG and IgM antibody in SLE patients is coated antigens with SARS-CoV and Vero-E6 cells in ELISA methods.