RESUMEN
Background: Early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) is crucial to the treatment and prognosis of patients. Traditional screening methods have disadvantages. Methods: 231 blood samples were collected from 86 CRC, 56 colorectal adenoma (CRA), and 89 healthy individuals, from which extracellular vesicle long RNAs (exLRs) were isolated and sequenced. An CRC diagnostic signature (d-signature) was established, and prognosis-associated cell components were evaluated. Results: The exLR d-signature for CRC was established based on 17 of the differentially expressed exLRs. The d-signature showed high diagnostic efficiency of CRC and control (CRA and healthy) samples with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.938 in the training cohort, 0.943 in the validation cohort, and 0.947 in an independent cohort. The d-signature could effectively differentiate early-stage (stage I-II) CRC from healthy individuals (AUC 0.990), as well as differentiating CEA-negative CRC from healthy individuals (AUC 0.988). A CRA d-signature was also generated and could differentiate CRA from healthy individuals both in the training (AUC 0.993) and validation (AUC 0.978) cohorts. The enrichment of class-switched memory B-cells, B-cells, naive B-cells, and mast cells showed increasing trends between CRC, CRA, and healthy cohorts. Class-switched memory B-cells, mast cells, and basophils were positively associated with CRC prognosis while natural killer T-cells, naive B-cells, immature dendritic cells, and lymphatic endothelial cells were negatively associated with prognosis. Conclusions: Our study identified that the exLR d-signature could differentiate CRC from CRA and healthy individuals with high efficiency and exLR profiling also has potential in CRA screening and CRC prognosis prediction.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Presently, both the accuracy and sensitivity for distinguishing biliary stenosis from benign to malignant are low. In recent articles, the probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) showed a better sensitivity than traditional methods in diagnosing malignant biliary stenosis. Here, we conducted a meta-analysis to summarise the published literature. METHODS: A systematic search for literature was conducted in the Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library databases published until November 2015. Further publications were found in the reference lists of the relevant articles. A quality assessment and data extraction were performed by two reviewers independently. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic efficiency of a pCLE for discriminating benign and malignant biliary stenoses. RESULTS: Eight studies involving 280 patients were included in the analysis. Significant heterogeneity in specificity was observed among the studies (Cochran's Q test=15.89, degrees of freedom [df]=7, P=0.0261 and I2=55.9%), while the heterogeneity in sensitivity was not obvious (Cochran's Q test=7.99, df=7, P=0.3334 and I2=12.4%). The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was 0.8968. The meta-regression and subgroup analysis indicated that the outlier was the source of heterogeneity. When analysed in the random-effects model, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR) and negative LR were 0.90 (0.84-0.94), 0.75 (0.66-0.83), 3.17 (2.18-4.61) and 0.17 (0.11-0.26), respectively. No significant publication bias was found in our research. CONCLUSION: A pCLE is a valuable method for the differential diagnosis between malignant and benign biliary stenoses. However, a preferable diagnostic standard should be explored and improvements in specificity are required.
Asunto(s)
Colestasis/diagnóstico , Endoscopía del Sistema Digestivo/métodos , Microscopía Confocal/métodos , Neoplasias del Sistema Biliar/complicaciones , Neoplasias del Sistema Biliar/diagnóstico por imagen , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica , Colestasis/etiología , Humanos , Funciones de Verosimilitud , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of three localization methods, including methylene blue, metal clips and intraoperative colonoscopy in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed to review the clinical data of 64 patients who underwent the laparoscopic colorectal operations in Cancer Hospital of Fudan University from December 2009 to June 2012. Three methods of tumor localization were used perioperatively, including 23 cases of methylene blue, 20 of metal clips and 21 of colonoscopy. RESULTS: Operations were successfully performed in this cohort and there were no deaths or complications. In methylene blue group, intraoperative colonoscopy was performed in two cases because of the inability to visualize blue dye on the serosal surface of the intestinal wall, another 2 cases were converted to open operation because of methylene blue diffusion and inability to identify resection margin. Intraoperative colonoscopic localization was required for 3 cases of sigmoid colon or upper rectal tumor because of inaccurate tumor localization by metal clips. Poor operative exposure due to obvious bowel distension prompted the conversion to open surgery in 2 cases of colonoscopy localization group, and the accurate position of the lesion was not found in another 2 cases due to long pedunculated adenoma. CONCLUSIONS: Colorectal tumor can be localized effectively by endoscopic methylene blue tattooing at a maximum of 2 tumors before operation and the method of 4-point positioning can significantly improve the accuracy of colorectal tumor localization. Tumor localization preoperatively on the day of surgery by metal clip is accurate for the right or left colon cancer. Intraoperative colonoscopy can localize tumor accurately and rapidly for rectosigmoid or descending tumor, and the incidence of bowel distension can be significantly reduced. Localization method should be considered according to the tumor location and surgical procedure.