Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros













Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 30(8): 5252-5263, 2023 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37202570

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: For patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) who receive neoadjuvant therapy (NAT), reliable indicators that can early and accurately predict treatment response are lacking. This study was conducted to prospectively investigate the potential of early circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) dynamics as a precise predictor of NAT response and recurrence in CRLM. METHODS: This study prospectively enrolled 34 patients with CRLM who received NAT, with blood samples collected and subjected to deep targeted panel sequencing at two time points: 1 day before the first and the second cycles of NAT. Correlations of ctDNA mean variant allele frequency (mVAF) dynamics and treatment response were assessed. The performance of early ctDNA dynamics in predicting treatment response was assessed and compared with those of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cancer antigen 19-9 (CA19-9). RESULTS: The baseline ctDNA mVAF was significantly associated with pre-NAT tumor diameter (r = 0.65; P < 0.0001). After one cycle of NAT, the ctDNA mVAF declined remarkably (P < 0.0001). The dynamic change in ctDNA mVAF of 50% or more was significantly correlated with better NAT responses. The discriminatory capacity of ctDNA mVAF changes was superior to that of CEA or CA19-9 in predicting radiologic response (area under the curve [AUC], 0.90 vs 0.71 vs 0.61) and pathologic tumor regression grade (AUC, 0.83 vs 0.64 vs 0.67). The early changes in ctDNA mVAF but not CEA or CA19-9 were an independent indicator of recurrence-free survival (RFS) (hazard ratio, 4.0; P = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS: For CRLM patients receiving NAT, an early ctDNA change is a superior predictor of treatment response and recurrence compared with conventional tumor markers.


Asunto(s)
ADN Tumoral Circulante , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Humanos , ADN Tumoral Circulante/genética , Estudios Prospectivos , Antígeno CA-19-9 , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Pronóstico , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Neoplasias Colorrectales/genética , Neoplasias Colorrectales/terapia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/genética , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/genética , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/terapia
3.
J Cancer Res Ther ; 14(Supplement): S427-S432, 2018 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29970701

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Sunitinib/sorafenib (SU/SO), dendritic cells (DCs), or DC-cytokine-induced killer (CIK) could significantly prolong progression-free survival (PFS), 3-year overall survival (OS), or 5-year OS for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). We retrospectively analyzed the clinical efficacy between SU/SO combined with DC-CIK and SU/SO monotherapy in treating renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients with metastasis after radical nephrectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients (n = 34) with postoperative mRCC in our hospital from January 2009 to January 2014 were received either SU/SO monotherapy (Group 1, n = 15) or in combination with DC-CIK (Group 2, n = 19). A retrospective study was based on the primary endpoint (PFS) and secondary endpoint (OS). RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 19.5 months, in Group 2, as compared with in Group 1, the median PFS was significantly longer (28.0 vs. 11.0 months, P = 0.03). Moreover, the 3-year OS was higher (57.1% vs. 28.6%). The cases of progressive diseases (PDs) and deaths were less in Group 2 than that in Group 1 (PD: 8 vs. 9, deaths: 3 vs. 5); however, the cases of stable diseases were more (11 vs. 6). In addition, the 3-year OS was higher in SU + DC-CIK group than that in SO + DC-CIK group (63.36% vs. 50%). There was no significant difference for PFS between SO + DC-CIK group and SU single agent group. CONCLUSIONS: SU/SO with DC-CIK could significantly prolong the median PFS, improve the 3-year OS rate, prolong the 3-year OS. It is likely to be a new approach for mRCC after radical nephrectomy.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Vacunas contra el Cáncer , Carcinoma de Células Renales/inmunología , Carcinoma de Células Renales/terapia , Células Asesinas Inducidas por Citocinas/inmunología , Células Dendríticas/inmunología , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva , Neoplasias Renales/inmunología , Neoplasias Renales/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Carcinoma de Células Renales/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Células Renales/patología , Terapia Combinada , Células Asesinas Inducidas por Citocinas/metabolismo , Células Dendríticas/metabolismo , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/métodos , Indoles/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Renales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Niacinamida/administración & dosificación , Niacinamida/análogos & derivados , Compuestos de Fenilurea/administración & dosificación , Cuidados Posoperatorios , Pirroles/administración & dosificación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sorafenib , Sunitinib , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA