Microsurgical and Endovascular Treatments for Ruptured Paraclinoid Aneurysms.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of paraclinoid aneurysms can be challenging due to their relationship to the cavernous sinus, carotid siphon, and optic nerve. The goal of this retrospective analysis is to compare the efficacy and safety of microsurgical versus endovascular treatments for ruptured paraclinoid aneurysms. METHODS: Medical records were reviewed to collect information about patient demographics, risk factors, diagnosis (the position and size of aneurysms), Hunt and Hess grade, and surgical method and outcomes, including modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at the time of discharge and 6 months later, complications, and death. RESULTS: In total, 15 and 6 patients were recruited into the microsurgery and endovascular groups, respectively. No difference was detected regarding age, sex, risk factors, and Hunt and Hess grade. Most patients had ophthalmic segment aneurysms (87% versus 83%; p = 1.000) and small aneurysms (< 10 mm, 67% versus 100%; p = 0.102). In the microsurgical group, five patients (33%) had large aneurysms (10-25 mm); three patients (20%) had multiple aneurysms (all p > 0.05 compared with the endovascular group). The occlusion rate at 6 months was 93% in the microsurgical group and 100% in the endovascular group (p > 0.05). No difference was found regarding mRS or the complication and mortality rates between the two groups (all p > 0.05). The occurrence of complications was not related to the location and size of aneurysms (all p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our retrospective analysis indicates that good clinical outcomes can be achieved with both microsurgical and endovascular approaches. But further prospective randomized multicenter studies are needed to provide more evidence for clinical practice.

Lateral Craniopharyngeal Canal: An Anatomical Cause of Spontaneous Rhinorrhea.

The aim of this report is to investigate the pathogenesis and surgical treatment of encephalocele located in the sphenoid sinus and presented with spontaneous rhinorrhea. The data of a patient with sphenoid sinus encephalocele was analyzed in association with the review of literature. The patient admitted to our clinic with rhinorrhea from the left nasal cavity. Cranial magnetic resonance imaging revealed bone defects in the left sphenoid sinus wall, and the presence of brain tissue and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in the sphenoid sinus. The patient underwent dural repair via left pterional approach. Rhinorrhea disappeared after surgery. The pathogenesis of the encephalocele in the sphenoid sinus is not clear. It may be related to the presence of lateral craniopharyngeal canal, extra-gasification in the sphenoid sinus, high intracranial pressure or other factors. It is very important to diagnose accurately the source of CSF fistula in preoperative period, choose the specific operation technique, and follow-up the patient for a long time period.