Increased Failure Rates After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair After Second Dislocation Compared to Primary Dislocation With Comparable Clinical Outcomes.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare rates of recurrent dislocation and postsurgical outcomes in patients undergoing arthroscopic Bankart repair for anterior shoulder instability immediately after a first-time traumatic anterior dislocation versus patients who sustained a second dislocation event after initial nonoperative management. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed of patients undergoing primary arthroscopic stabilization for anterior shoulder instability without concomitant procedures and minimum 2-year clinical follow-up. Primary outcome was documentation of a recurrent shoulder dislocation. Secondary clinical outcomes included range of motion, Visual Analog Scale (VAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score (ASES), and Shoulder Activity Scale (SAS). RESULTS: Seventy-seven patients (mean age 21.3 years ± 7.3 years) met inclusion criteria. Sixty-three shoulders underwent surgical stabilization after a single shoulder dislocation, and 14 underwent surgery after 2 dislocations. Average follow-up was 35.9 months. The rate of recurrent dislocation was significantly higher in the 2-dislocation group compared to single dislocations (42.8% vs 14.2%, P = .03). No significant difference was present in range of motion, VAS, ASES, and SAS scores. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was 1.4 for VAS and 1.8 for SAS scores. The MCID was met or exceeded in the primary dislocation group in 31/38 (81.6%) patients for VAS, 23/31 (74.1%) for ASES, and 24/31 for SES (77.4%) scores. For the second dislocation cohort, MCID was met or exceeded in 7/9 (77.8%) for VAS, 4/7 (57.1%) for ASES, and 5/7 for SES (71.4%) scores. CONCLUSION: Immediate arthroscopic surgical stabilization after a first-time anterior shoulder dislocation significantly decreases the risk of recurrent dislocation in comparison to those who undergo surgery after 2 dislocation events, with comparable clinical outcome scores. These findings suggest that patients who return to activities after a primary anterior shoulder dislocation and sustain just 1 additional dislocation event are at increased risk of a failing arthroscopic repair. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study; Level of evidence, 3.

Postoperative infection and bone sarcoma survival: systematic review of the role of infection in bone sarcoma prognosis.

Background: Osteosarcoma (OS) and chondrosarcoma (CS) are primary bone malignancies whose prognoses have stagnated despite advancements in surgical management, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and immunotherapy. The role of the immune system in generating anti-cancer physiologic responses is critical to prognosis. Prior studies have explored if immune system activation via infection enhances survival in bone sarcomas without a clear consensus. Methods: This study sought to (I) retrospectively examine the effect of postoperative infection on survival in OS and CS and (II) systematically review the effect of postoperative infection on survival in primary bone malignancies. We performed a retrospective case-control study of 192 patients treated between 1/2000-12/2015 at a single academic sarcoma referral center. Patients with OS or CS undergoing operative resection were included. Eligible patients were grouped by presence of metastasis, and survival was compared between patients with or without postoperative infection. Furthermore, we performed a systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines investigating the effect of infection on primary bone malignancy survival. Risk of bias assessment was performed utilizing the ROBINS-I (Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies-of Interventions) assessment tool. All presented studies included author information, study population, and overall or disease-free survival results. Results: One hundred and four patients were included, with 85 without infection (26 metastatic, 59 non-metastatic) and 19 with infection (10 metastatic, 9 non-metastatic). Five-year survival was greatest in patients without metastasis with a postoperative infection (100%), followed by patients without metastasis who were infection-free (80%). Five-year survival was comparatively lower in patients with metastasis who were infection-free (35%) and lowest in patients with metastasis with a postoperative infection (20%). No significant differences were present (P=0.17) on log-rank analysis. Our systematic review collected six studies exploring the impact of infection on primary bone malignancy survival, with two studies reporting significant findings of infection improving survival. Limitations of this review included risk of bias due to confounding, inconsistency comparing outcomes, and differences in patient populations. Conclusions: This retrospective study and systematic review suggests postoperative infection may play a role in modulating immune response to malignancy. Understanding the synergy between anti-pathogen and anti-cancer responses warrants further investigation as an alternative method of targeted cancer treatment.

The Effectiveness of Preoperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Ulnar Nerve Release at the Cubital Tunnel.

BACKGROUND: Although the literature supports not using preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis for clean soft tissue procedures around the hand, there is limited data for soft tissue procedures around the elbow, such as cubital tunnel release. Complications of postoperative infection include scarring, stiffness, and rarely, amputation. The purpose of this study is to determine if preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis decreases the risk of surgical site infection for cubital tunnel release. METHODS: A retrospective review of 919 in situ, subcutaneous transposition, and submuscular transposition cubital tunnel surgery at a tertiary care center was performed. Patient records were searched to determine preoperative antibiotic status and infection within 30 days of surgery. In addition, comorbidities and demographics such as age, race, sex, and past medical history were also identified. Comorbidities with qualitative variables were analyzed with odds ratio, Chi-squared, and Fisher's Exact test, linear variables analyzed with t-test. RESULTS: There were 5/296 (1.7%) infections in patients without preoperative antibiotics, and 17/623 (2.7%) infections in patients with preoperative antibiotics. Patients who had received preoperative antibiotics had no significant change in infection rate (95% odds ratio: 0.597-1.633). Other variables, such as age, body mass index, race, surgeon, insurance type, diabetes, depression, anxiety, arthritis, concurrent surgeries, and hyperlipidemia were also not significant for risk of infection. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative antibiotics do not demonstrate benefit for patients undergoing uncomplicated ulnar nerve releases at the elbow. Preoperative antibiotics do not significantly decrease the risk for postoperative infections in patients, regardless of patient comorbidities.Type of Evidence: Level 4-retrospective study.

Use of L5-S1 transdiscal screws in the treatment of isthmic spondylolisthesis: a technical note.

Surgical treatment of L5-S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis consists of a combination of decompression and fusion. One previously discussed mode of fusion is via transdiscal screws. Biomechanical studies of transdiscal screws have demonstrated greater rigidity than traditional pedicle screw fixation, which theoretically translates to a higher fusion rate. Furthermore, when compared to pedicle screw fixation, transdiscal screw fixation also demonstrates improved functional and radiographic outcomes. However, transdiscal screw placement can be technically difficult. At this time, a detailed surgical technique has yet to be reported in the literature. Our surgical technique for transdiscal screw placement using intraoperative C-arm at L5-S1 is described. We include considerations for preoperative planning including necessary imaging and appropriate patient selection. We also discuss intraoperative concerns such as setup, surgical approach, proper screw trajectory, and our method for achieving indirect decompression. The results of thirteen consecutive patients treated with transdiscal screw fixation are described. One patient had subcutaneous seroma requiring reoperation (7.7%), three patients had implant failure (23.1%), and one patient had nonunion (7.7%). Our results suggest that transdiscal screw fixation is a safe and acceptable alternative for stabilization and indirect decompression of L5-S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis. Recent innovation in intraoperative navigation and robotic surgery may lessen the technical difficulty of transdiscal screw placement and make it even more effective.