Comprehensive assessment of ocular parameters for identifying diagnostic indicators of diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

PURPOSE: To explore variations in systemic and ocular parameters among patients with diabetes, both with and without diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) and to identify sensitive indicators for DPN diagnosis. METHODS: Ninty-five patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) were involved in this cross-sectional study, including 49 without DPN and 46 with DPN. Ocular parameters were obtained using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) and corneal confocal microscopy (CCM). RESULT: Patients with DPN presented with significantly higher HbA1c (p < 0.05) and glycated albumin (GA, p < 0.01) levels, increased prevalence of diabetic retinopathy (DR, p < 0.05), and lower serum albumin (ALB, p < 0.01) and red blood cell (RBC, p < 0.05) levels. Ocular assessments revealed reduced corneal nerve fiber length (CNFL, p < 0.001) and enlarged foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area (p < 0.05) in DPN group. Logistic regression analysis indicated a significant association of presence of DR, RBC, GA, ALB, CNFL and DPN (p < 0.05, respectively). In the binary logistic regression for DPN risk, all three models including the presence of DR and CNFL exhibited the area under the curve (AUC) exceeding 0.8. CONCLUSION: The study establishes a strong correlation between ocular parameters and DPN, highlighting CCM's role in early diagnosis. Combining systemic and ocular indicators improves DPN risk assessment and early management.

Multimodal imaging analysis for the impact of retinal peripheral lesions on central neurovascular structure and retinal function in type 2 diabetes with diabetic retinopathy.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the possible role of peripheral lesions (PLs) detected by ultrawide field (UWF) imaging system on central neurovascular structure and retinal function. METHODS: Ninety-seven diabetic patients were included in this cross-sectional study using UWF pseudocolour colour imaging with Optos Daytona (Optos, PLC). UWF images were graded as with predominantly peripheral lesions (PPLs) and without PPL. Macular neurovascular alterations and retinal function were measured by optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) and RETeval device, respectively. Central microcirculation and retinal function were compared between eyes with and without PPL. RESULTS: The study evaluated 186 eyes (97 patients; 43 females (44.3%)), including 92 eyes without PPL and 94 eyes with PPL. Central retinal vessel density was comparable between eyes with and without PPL. Delayed implicit time and decreased pupil area ratio were found in the PPL group compared with eyes without PPL, and this difference remained unchanged after adjusting for systemic factors (all p＜0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that retinal function is worse in diabetic eyes with PPL. These findings challenged the conventional ETDRS protocols which ignored peripheral retina in determining DR severity. Furthermore, combining UWF imaging with RETeval system to detect more retinal abnormalities may be helpful in DR management.

Diabetic Retinopathy May Be a Predictor of Stroke in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus.

Background: It is unclear whether diabetic retinopathy (DR) can be a predictor of stroke. In this research context, the objective of our study was to investigate whether there is a significant association between DR and stroke in diabetic patients by meta-analysis. Methods: After a systematic search of studies in electronic databases, we screened all studies reporting the risk of DR status and stroke incidence and calculated their odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs). The effects of type of diabetes and severity of DR were also considered for subgroup analysis. Results: We included 19 studies involving 45 495 patients. A pooled HR = 1.62 (1.28-2.06) were found for the risk of DR and stroke in diabetic patients. In a subgroup analysis performed on the type of diabetes, the results showed a significant association between stroke incidence and DR status in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) (OR: 1.78; 95% CI, 1.53-2.08), but this association was not conclusive in type 1 diabetes (T1D) (OR: 1.77; 95% CI, 0.48-6.61). The results of the subgroup analysis with diabetes severity showed that both mild and moderate nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) status and severe NPDR and worse status significantly increased the risk of stroke with HRs of 2.01 (1.45-2.78) and 2.27 (1.52-3.39), respectively. Conclusion: DR status in diabetic patients is associated with an increased risk of stroke. This correlation was robust in patients with T2D, but uncertain in T1D. Based on this result, we have perhaps found the new factor for stroke management, so we analyzed the necessity and advantages of considering DR as a factor for stroke screening and risk management in our studies.