Azimuthal and radial variations in sap flow and its effects on the estimation of transpiration for Picea mongolica.

In this study, we applied thermal dissipation probe technology to examine sap flow in various directions (east, south, west, and north) and at different depths (0-2, 2-4, 4-6 cm) within the stem of natural Picea mongolica trees in the eastern of Otindag Sandy Land to provide a scientific basis for accurately quantifying water consumption of P. mongolica forests through transpiration and to enhance the understanding of water relations. The results showed that the diurnal variation of sap flow in different directions displayed a unimodal curve, with the sap flow sequence being south>east>west>north. The sap flow at different sapwood depths exhibited an obvious unimodal curve, with a significant decrease as sapwood depth increased. Compared with that calculated from the mean sap flux density in four directions (23.57 kg·d-1), water consumption calculated using the mean value in south-east, east-west, south-west, north-east, north-south, and north-west was overestimated by 10.2%, 5.5%, 14.5%, and underestimated by 12.3%, 8.2%, 9.8%, respectively. The water consumption calculated using the values from the east, south, and west was overestimated by 6.1%, 14.4%, and 15.4%, respectively, and underestimated by 30.7% in the north. In addition, compared with the water consumption calculated from the mean value in three sapwood depths (48.51 kg·d-1), that calculated using sap flux density at sapwood depths of 0-2, 2-4, and 4-6 cm were overestimated by 18.8%, underestimated by 1.7%, and underestimated by 62.9%, respectively. These results indicated that sap flow of P. mongolica had significant azimuthal and radial variations, which considerably influence the estimation of tree water consumption. Installing probes at 0-2 cm simultaneously in both the north and east of the trunk could effectively reduce the estimation error of whole-tree water consumption by 4.2%. This approach enabled the accurate quantification of water consumption of individual P. mongolica trees in sandy areas, thereby improving the precision of transpiration water consumption estimates scaling up from individual level to stand level.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Xeligekimab: An Anti-IL-17A Monoclonal Antibody, in Patients with Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis.

Xeligekimab, a recombinant fully human IgG4 monoclonal antibody, has been strategically developed to target IL-17A and is presently in the developmental phase for treating moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. This study aims to investigate the pharmacokinetic profile of Xeligekimab, utilizing data derived from clinical trials specifically conducted in Chinese patients. The study conducted a population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) analysis involving 614 patients with plaque psoriasis. Examined covariates encompassed demographics, baseline laboratory tests, anti-drug antibodies (ADA), injection site, and disease-related baseline characteristics. Model evaluation utilized goodness-of-fit, prediction-corrected visual prediction check, and bootstrap methods. The clinical significance of covariates statistically associated with Xeligekimab was assessed through simulation analysis. The PopPK model of Xeligekimab demonstrated characteristics of a two-compartment model with first-order absorption and linear elimination. Inter-individual variability (IIV) was estimated for clearance and volume of distribution. For a typical plaque psoriasis patient, the estimated values for absorption rate constant (Ka), apparent clearance (CL/F), central compartment volume (Vc/F), peripheral compartment volume (Vp/F), and inter-compartmental clearance (Q/F) was 0.225 per day, 2.223 L/day, 4.02 L, 4.13 L, and 1.11 L/day, respectively. The estimated IIV for CL/F and Vc/F was 25.8% and 49.8%, respectively. The elimination half-life (t1/2) was approximately 28.5 days. CL/F was significantly influenced by factors such as body weight, age, gender, and baseline total protein. Vc/F was significantly influenced by body weight, age, gender, and baseline albumin. However, the clinical relevance of these covariate effects on exposure parameters was determined to be limited.

Jinlida for Diabetes Prevention in Impaired Glucose Tolerance and Multiple Metabolic Abnormalities: The FOCUS Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Previous studies have shown that Jinlida (JLD) granules, an approved treatment for type 2 diabetes in China, can reduce blood glucose level, reduce glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and improve insulin resistance in people with type 2 diabetes. Objective: To evaluate the effect of long-term administration of JLD vs placebo on the incidence of diabetes in participants with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and multiple metabolic abnormalities. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial (FOCUS) was conducted across 35 centers in 21 cities in China from June 2019 to February 2023. Individuals aged 18 to 70 years with IGT and multiple metabolic abnormalities were enrolled. Intervention: Participants were randomly allocated 1:1 to receive JLD or placebo (9 g, 3 times per day, orally). They continued this regimen until they developed diabetes, withdrew from the study, were lost to follow-up, or died. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the occurrence of diabetes, which was determined by 2 consecutive oral glucose tolerance tests. Secondary outcomes included waist circumference; fasting and 2-hour postprandial plasma glucose levels; HbA1c; fasting insulin level; homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR); total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglyceride levels; ankle-brachial index; and carotid intima-media thickness. Results: A total of 889 participants were randomized, of whom 885 were in the full analysis set (442 in the JLD group; 443 in the placebo group; mean [SD] age, 52.57 [10.33] years; 463 [52.32%] female). Following a median observation period of 2.20 years (IQR, 1.27-2.64 years), participants in the JLD group had a lower risk of developing diabetes compared with those in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.46-0.74; P < .001). During the follow-up period, the JLD group had a between-group difference of 0.95 cm (95% CI, 0.36-1.55 cm) in waist circumference, 9.2 mg/dL (95% CI, 5.4-13.0 mg/dL) in 2-hour postprandial blood glucose level, 3.8 mg/dL (95% CI, 2.2-5.6 mg/dL) in fasting blood glucose level, 0.20% (95% CI, 0.13%-0.27%) in HbA1c, 6.6 mg/dL (95% CI, 1.9-11.2) in total cholesterol level, 4.3 mg/dL (95% CI, 0.8-7.7 mg/dL) in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level, 25.7 mg/dL (95% CI, 15.9-35.4 mg/dL) in triglyceride levels, and 0.47 (95% CI, 0.12-0.83) in HOMA-IR compared with the placebo group. After 24 months of follow-up, the JLD group had a significant improvement in ankle-brachial index and waist circumference compared with the placebo group. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings suggest that JLD can reduce the risk of diabetes in participants with IGT and multiple metabolic abnormalities. Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Register: ChiCTR1900023241.

Population pharmacokinetics of Ainuovirine and exposure-response analysis in human immunodeficiency virus-infected individuals.

BACKGROUND: Ainuovirine (ANV) is a new generation of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 infection. This study aimed to evaluate the population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) profile and exposure-response relationship of ANV among people living with HIV. METHODS: Plasma concentration-time data from phase 1 and phase 3 clinical trials of ANV were pooled for developing the PopPK model. Exposure estimates obtained from the final model were used in exposure-response analysis for virologic responses and safety responses. RESULTS: ANV exhibited a nonlinear pharmacokinetic profile, which was best described by a two-compartment model with first-order elimination. There were no significant covariates correlated to the pharmacokinetic parameters of ANV. The PopPK parameter estimate (relative standard error [%]) for clearance adjusted for bioavailability (CL/F) was 6.46 (15.00) L/h, and the clearance of ANV increased after multiple doses. The exposure-response model revealed no significant correlation between the virologic response (HIV-RNA <50 copies/mL) at 48 weeks and the exposure, but the incidence of adverse events increased with the increasing exposure ( P value of steady-state trough concentration and area under the steady-state curve were 0.0177 and 0.0141, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our PopPK model supported ANV 150 mg once daily as the recommended dose for people living with HIV, requiring no dose adjustment for the studied factors. Optimization of ANV dose may be warranted in clinical practice due to an increasing trend in adverse reactions with increasing exposure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry https://www.chictr.org.cn (Nos. ChiCTR1800018022 and ChiCTR1800019041).

A Phase I Clinical Study Comparing the Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Immunogenicity of GB221 Injection and Trastuzumab (Herceptin®) in Healthy Chinese Adults.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: GB221 is a recombinant humanized anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic, safety, and immunogenicity of GB221 in healthy Chinese adults in comparison to trastuzumab (Herceptin®). METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, parallel-group phase I clinical trial, 88 subjects were randomized 1:1 to receive a single intravenous infusion (90-100 min) of GB221 or trastuzumab (6 mg/kg). The primary pharmacokinetic parameters-maximum observed serum concentration (Cmax), area under the serum concentration-time curve from zero to the last quantifiable concentration at time t (AUC0-t), and area under the serum concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-∞)-of GB221 and trastuzumab were compared to establish whether the 90% confidence interval (CI) attained the 80-125% bioequivalence standard. Safety and immunogenicity were also evaluated. RESULTS: The GB221 group (n = 43) and the trastuzumab group (n = 44) showed similar pharmacokinetic characteristics. The geometric mean ratios (90% CI) of Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ between the two groups were 107.53% (102.25-113.07%), 108.31% (103.57-113.26%), and 108.34% (103.57-113.33%), respectively. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was 83.7% (36/43) of the subjects in the GB221 group and 95.5% (42/44) of the subjects in the trastuzumab group. No subjects withdrew from the trial due to TEAEs, and there were no occurrences of serious adverse events. All subjects tested negative for antidrug antibodies (ADA). CONCLUSION: GB221 demonstrated similar pharmacokinetics to trastuzumab and comparable safety and immunogenicity in healthy Chinese adults.

Accelerating drug development for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: construction and application of a disease course model using historical placebo group data.

BACKGROUND: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is an irreversible degenerative disease. Placebo-controlled randomized trials are currently the main trial design to assess the clinical efficacy of drugs for ALS treatment. The aim of this study was to establish models to quantitatively describe the course of ALS, explore influencing factors, and provide the necessary information for ALS drug development. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed and the Cochrane Library Central Register for placebo-controlled trials that evaluated treatments for ALS. From these trials, we extracted the clinical and demographic characteristics of participants in the placebo group, as well as outcome data, which encompassed overall survival (OS) and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) scores, at various time points. RESULTS: In total, 47 studies involving 6118 participants were included. Disease duration and the proportion of patients receiving riluzole were identified as significant factors influencing OS in the placebo group. Specifically, the median OS was 35.5 months for a disease duration of 9 months, whereas it was 20.0 months for a disease duration of 36 months. Furthermore, for every 10% increase in the proportion of patients treated with riluzole (100 mg daily), there was an association with a median OS extension of approximately 0.4 months. The estimated time for the ALSFRS-R score in the placebo group to decrease to 50% of its maximum effect from baseline level was approximately 17.5 months, and the time to reach a plateau was about 40 months. CONCLUSIONS: The established disease course model of the historical placebo group is valuable in the decision-making process for the clinical development of ALS drugs. It serves not only as an external control to evaluate the efficacy of the tested drug in single-arm trials but also as prior information that aids in accurately estimating the posterior distribution of the disease course in the placebo group during small-sample clinical trials.

First-in-human trial of SAR107375E, a novel small molecule anticoagulant with dual inhibition of factor Xa and factor IIa.

BACKGROUND: SAR107375E is a direct dual inhibitor of both Factor Xa and Factor IIa and has shown potent anticoagulation activity in vitro and animals. This study evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of single ascending intravenous doses of SAR107375E in healthy Chinese adult subjects. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 60 healthy Chinese adult subjects were administered intravenously single ascending doses (0.5, 1.5, 3.0, 5.0, 7.5, 10.0, 15.0, or 20.0 mg) of SAR107375E (N = 44) or placebo (N = 16). Plasma and urine concentrations of SAR107375E were measured and used to calculate pharmacokinetic parameters. Coagulation functions were measured and compared with baseline values. Treatment-emergent adverse events were recorded to evaluate safety. RESULTS: In plasma, from the 0.5 to 20.0 mg dose group, t1/2 is 1.51-4.00 h, Cmax is 59.05-1360 ug/L, and AUC0-t is 25.01-528.45 h*ug/L. And it shows dose proportionality in the 5.0-20.0 mg range. Activated partial thromboplastin time and Ecarin clotting time correlated linearly with drug plasma concentration. No serious adverse events were reported during the study. CONCLUSION: SAR107375E exhibits good safety and tolerability, predictable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn, identifier is CTR20211082.

Optimization of secukinumab dose regimens in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis via exposure-response modeling.

BACKGROUND: Further dose optimization is required for patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who do not benefit from the approved secukinumab dose regimen. This study aimed to develop an exposure-response model for secukinumab to recommend dose regimens for patients of different body weights. METHODS: We searched the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases for randomized controlled trials using PASI 75 and PASI 90 response rates as primary outcomes. A model-based meta-analysis was developed to quantitatively analyze the distribution of six secukinumab dose regimens in patients weighing 50-120 kg. RESULTS: Sixteen trials involving 6,197 subjects were included in the analysis. The established model accurately described the time-course characteristics of PASI 75 and PASI 90 response rates over 52 weeks. Simulations indicated that maintenance doses could be reduced to 150 mg every 4 weeks and to 150 mg every 3 weeks for patients weighing 50 and 60 kg, respectively. In contrast, maintenance doses of 300 mg every 3 weeks should be selected for patients weighing 120 kg. Patients weighing 70-110 kg remained on approved maintenance doses of 300 mg every 4 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Based on patient body weights, the exposure-response model recommends efficacious and economical dose regimens for patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

Nimotuzumab Plus Gemcitabine for K-Ras Wild-Type Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer.

PURPOSE: In a phase IIb trial of nimotuzumab plus gemcitabine, substantial clinical benefits were observed in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC). Therefore, we conducted a phase III clinical study to verify the efficacy and safety of this combination regimen in patients with K-Ras wild-type tumors (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02395016). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive nimotuzumab (400 mg once per week) or placebo followed by gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15, once every 4 weeks) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was overall survival (OS) and the secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS), response rates, and safety. RESULTS: A total of 480 patients were screened; 92 patients were enrolled and 82 patients with K-Ras wild-type tumors were eligible. In the full analysis set, the median OS was 10.9 versus 8.5 months, while the restricted mean survival time (RMST) was 18.05 versus 11.14 months for the investigational versus control arm (ratio of control v investigation = 0.62 [0.40-0.97]; P = .036). Median PFS was 4.2 versus 3.6 months in the investigational versus control arm (log-rank P = .04; hazard ratio, 0.60 [0.37-0.99]) and the restricted mean PFS time was 8.08 versus 4.76 months (RMST ratio, 0.58 [0.38-0.90]; P = .036). Both OS and PFS were longer in the nimotuzumab group than in the placebo group. The objective response rates and disease control rates were 7% versus 10% and 68% versus 63% for the investigational and control groups, respectively. The incidence of adverse events were comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSION: In patients with locally advanced or metastatic K-Ras wild-type PC, nimotuzumab plus gemcitabine significantly improved OS and PFS with a good safety profile.

A Synthetic External Control Study Comparing the Clinical Efficacy of Wendan Decoction and 19 Antidepressants.

BACKGROUND: Wendan decoction (WDD) has been used as a treatment for depression in China since the Tang Dynasty. However, high-quality evidence for this is lacking. This study proposed a novel synthetic external control method to evaluate its clinical efficacy. METHODS: We searched public databases for clinical trials of WDD for major depression. The rate of change of the Hamilton Depression Scale score from baseline was used as an efficacy indicator, and a model-based meta-analysis was performed to analyze the clinical efficacy of WDD. To establish a reference standard for efficacy, the antidepressant efficacy distributions of a placebo and 19 antidepressants were virtually synthesized based on the same conditions as the clinical trial characteristics of WDD. RESULTS: This study included 5 clinical trials with 177 participants. WDD showed a slow onset, with a time to reach the maximum effect of 9.71 weeks. At 8 weeks, the rate of change in the Hamilton Depression Scale score from baseline was 66.4% (95% CI = 62.3%-70.3%) in the WDD group. The pure effect value of WDD, after deducting the placebo effect, was 26.9% (95%CI = 23.0%-30.9%), which was comparable with 5 types of antidepressants and significantly higher than the others. CONCLUSION: The proposed external synthetic control method provides a solution to the bottleneck problem of clinical efficacy evaluation in real-world research on traditional Chinese medicine. WDD has high clinical development value for the treatment of depression, and large-scale randomized controlled trials are recommended to confirm its antidepressant effect.

LABA/LAMA versus LABA/ICS fixed-dose combinations in the prevention of COPD exacerbations: a modeling analysis of literature aggregate data.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to quantitatively compare the efficacy and safety of long-acting ß2-agonist (LABA)/long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) and LABA/inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) in preventing moderate or severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations. METHODS: A literature search was performed using public databases. The time course characteristics of the probability of a moderate or severe exacerbation in stable COPD patients treated with LABA/LAMA and LABA/ICS FDCs were described by the parametric survival function. A random-effects model in a single-arm meta-analysis was used to analyze the incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs) and pneumonia. RESULTS: Twenty studies including 23,955 participants were included. The proportion of participants with a history of COPD exacerbation (%) in the previous year and the postbronchodilator forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) (%predicted) were important factors affecting drug efficacy. After adjusting the above factors to median levels of 100% and 45.5%, respectively, the moderate or severe exacerbation rates at 52 weeks for olodaterol/tiotropium, formoterol/budesonide, indacaterol/glycopyrronium, formoterol/glycopyrronium, vilanterol/fluticasone, salmeterol/fluticasone, and vilanterol/umeclidinium were 38.3%, 41.0%, 42.6%, 47.0%, 47.5%, 47.9%, and 53.0%, respectively. In terms of safety, significant differences were observed among drugs containing different LABA/LAMA FDCs. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that not all LABA/LAMA FDCs were superior to LABA/ICS FDCs in safety and in preventing moderate or severe exacerbations in patients with stable COPD, providing important quantitative information for COPD-related guidelines.

Phase I, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Escalation Study of GB223, a Fully-Humanized Monoclonal Antibody to RANKL, in Healthy Chinese Adults.

BACKGROUND: GB223 is a novel, fully-humanized monoclonal antibody against the receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand (RANKL). In this phase I study, the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity of GB223 were investigated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, single-dose escalation study conducted in 44 healthy Chinese adults. Participants were randomly assigned to receive a single subcutaneous injection dose of 7, 21, 63, 119, or 140 mg of GB223 (n = 34) or placebo (n = 10) and were followed up for 140-252 days. RESULTS: The results of noncompartmental analysis showed that GB223 was slowly absorbed after dosing, with a time to reach maximum concentration (Tmax) ranging from 5 to 11 days. Serum GB223 concentrations decreased slowly, with a long half-life ranging from 7.91 to 19.60 days. A two-compartment Michaelis-Menten model was found to best describe the pharmacokinetics of GB223, and the absorption rate of GB223 differed between males (0.0146 h-1) and females (0.0081 h-1). Serum C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen decreased significantly postdose, and the inhibition lasted 42-168 days. No deaths or drug-related serious adverse events occurred. The most frequent adverse events were blood parathyroid hormone increased (94.1%), blood phosphorus decreased (67.6%) and blood calcium decreased (58.8%). In the GB223 group, 44.1% (15/34) of subjects were antidrug antibody positive after dosing. CONCLUSION: In this study, we demonstrated for the first time that a single subcutaneous injection of GB223, from 7 to 140 mg, is safe and well tolerated in healthy Chinese subjects. GB223 has a nonlinear pharmacokinetic profile, and sex was a potential covariate that may affect the absorption rate of GB223. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04178044 and ChiCTR1800020338.

Efficacy and safety of Lianhua Qingwen capsules combined with standard of care in the treatment of adult patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 (FLOSAN): protocol for a randomized, double-blind, international multicenter clinical trial.

Background: Effective anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) drugs are not only the next defense after vaccines but also the key part of establishing a multi-tiered coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) prevention and control system. Previous studies had indicated that Lianhua Qingwen (LHQW) capsules could be an efficacious Chinese patent drug for treating mild to moderate COVID-19. However, pharmacoeconomic evaluations are lacking, and few trials have been conducted in other countries or regions to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LHQW treatment. So, this study aims to explore the clinical efficacy, safety, and economy of LHQW for treating adult patients with mild to moderate COVID-19. Methods: This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, international multicenter clinical trial protocol. A total of 860 eligible subjects are randomized at a 1:1 ratio into the LHQW or placebo group to receive two-week treatment and follow-up visits on days 0, 3, 7, 10, and 14. Clinical symptoms, patient compliance, adverse effects, cost scale, and other indicators are recorded. The primary outcomes will be the measured median time to sustained improvement or resolution of the nine major symptoms during the 14-day observation period. Secondary outcomes regarding clinical efficacy will be evaluated in detail on the basis of clinical symptoms (especially body temperature, gastrointestinal symptoms, smell loss, and taste loss), viral nucleic acid, imaging (CT/chest X-ray), the incidence of severe/critical illness, mortality, and inflammatory factors. Moreover, we will assess health care cost, health utility, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for economic evaluation. Discussion: This is the first international multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) of Chinese patent medicine for the treatment of early COVID-19 in accordance with WHO guidelines on COVID-19 management. This study will help clarify the potential efficacy and cost-effectiveness of LHQW in the treatment of mild to moderate COVID-19, facilitating decision-making by healthcare workers. Registration: This study is registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, with registration number: ChiCTR2200056727 (date of first registration: 11/02/2022).

Difference in Efficacy and Safety of Anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy Containing 4-1BB and CD28 Co-Stimulatory Domains for B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

This study quantified the differences in the efficacy and safety of different stimulation domains of anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T therapy for B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). Clinical trials related to anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy for B-ALL were searched in public databases from database inception to 13 November 2021. The differences in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of B-ALL patients treated with anti-CAR T-cell therapy containing 4-1BB and CD28 co-stimulatory domains were compared by establishing a parametric survival function. The overall remission rate (ORR), the proportion of people with minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative complete remission (CR), the incidence of cytokine release syndrome (CRS), and the neurotoxicity across different co-stimulatory domains was assessed using a random-effects model. The correlation between the ORR, MRD-negative CR, PFS, and OS was tested. The results showed that the median OS of anti-CAR T-cell treatment containing 4-1BB and CD28 co-stimulatory domains was 15.0 months (95% CI: 11.0-20.0) and 8.5 months (95% CI: 5.0-14.0), and the median PFS was 7.0 months (95% CI: 4.0-11.5) and 3.0 months (95% CI: 1.5-7.0), respectively. Anti-CD19 CAR T-cells in the 4-1BB co-stimulatory domain showed superior benefits in patients who achieved ORR. The incidence of neurotoxicity was significantly higher in the CD28 co-stimulatory domain of anti-CD19 CAR T-cells than in the 4-1BB co-stimulatory domain. In addition, the ORR and MRD-negative CR were strongly correlated with OS and PFS, and PFS and OS were strongly correlated. The 4-1BB co-stimulatory domain suggested a better benefit-risk ratio than the CD28 co-stimulatory domain in B-ALL.

Quantitative comparison of the efficacy of clinical drug treatments for primary progressive multiple sclerosis.

OBJECTIVE: This study proposes a comprehensive quantitative evaluation of the efficacy of drugs and placebo in clinical trials for primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS). METHODS: A literature search was conducted using the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library databases and the clinical studies reporting drug efficacy in the treatment of PPMS were included in the analyses. The cumulative proportion of patients without confirmed disability progression (wCDP%) was used as the main efficacy endpoint. The model-based meta-analysis method was used to describe the time course of each drug (as well as placebo) in order to rank the drug efficacy for the treatment of PPMS. RESULTS: Fifteen studies involving 3779 patients were included, of which, nine were placebo-controlled and six were single-arm trials. Twelve drugs were included in the study. The results showed that, except for biotin, interferon ß-1a, and interferon ß-1b, whose efficacy was comparable to the placebo, the efficacy of the other 9 drugs were significantly better than placebo. Among these, ocrelizumab showed outstanding performance, with wCDP% of 72.6 at 96 weeks, while the proportions of rest of the drugs ranged between approximately 55-70%. CONCLUSION: The results of this study provide the necessary quantitative information for both the rational clinical use of drugs and future clinical trials in primary progressive multiple sclerosis.

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and immunogenicity of Gerilimzumab (GB224), a recombinant humanized interleukin-6 monoclonal antibody, in healthy Chinese adults: A randomized controlled dose-escalation study.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and immunogenicity of Gerilimzumab (GB224), a recombinant humanized IgG1λ monoclonal antibody against interleukin-6, in healthy Chinese adults. METHODS: Fifty-eight subjects were randomly assigned to receive a single subcutaneous dose of 2, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30 mg GB224 or placebo. Safety assessments were performed, and blood samples were collected for PK, PD, and immunogenicity analyses during a follow-up of 112 days. RESULTS: The most frequent adverse event was decreased fibrinogen (43.1%). GB224 was absorbed relatively fast with a median Tmax of 48 h (24-168 h) but eliminated slowly with a long mean half-life (839.38-981.63 h). Dose proportionality was shown to be in the dose range of 10-30 mg. A dose-dependent increase in serum interleukin-6 concentration from baseline was observed in the subjects receiving GB224. Only two subjects tested positive for antidrug antibodies after administration of GB224. CONCLUSION: GB224 had a well-tolerated safety profile, desirable PK, and a low immunogenicity following a single-dose subcutaneous administration in healthy Chinese subjects. These findings warrant further investigation.

Quantitative evaluation of therapy options for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A model-based meta-analysis.

New therapies for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (r/rDLBCL) have emerged in recent years, but there have been no comprehensive quantitative comparisons of the efficacy of these therapies. In this study, the efficacy characteristics of 11 types of treatment strategy and 63 treatment regimens were compared by model based meta-analysis. We found that compared with monotherapy, association therapy had significant benefits in terms of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR). However, whereas treatment regimens involving chemotherapy contributed to significant improvements in ORR and PFS, OS was not improved. In terms of treatment strategy, we identified chemotherapy in association with immunotherapy sequential autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), the association of two different types of immunotherapies, chemotherapy sequential ASCT, chemotherapy in association with immunotherapy, and chemotherapy in association with two types of immunotherapies as showing better efficacy. With respect to specific treatment regimens, we found that the following had better efficacy: rituximab in association with inotuzumab ozogamicin; rituximab in association with carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan sequential ASCT (R-BEAM+ASCT); lenalidomide in association with rituximab, etoposide, cisplatin, cytarabine, and methylprednisolone; iodine-131 tositumomab in association with BEAM sequential ASCT; and chemotherapy sequential chimeric antigen receptor T-cell immunotherapy, with median OS of 48.2, 34.2, 27.8, 25.8, and 25 months, respectively. Moreover, with respect to association therapy, there was a strong correlation between the 6-month PFS and 2-year OS. The findings of this study provide the necessary quantitative information for clinical practice and clinical trial design for the treatment of r/rDLBCL.

Quantitative comparison of different inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of asthma in children.

BACKGROUND: The GINA recommends inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) for the treatment of steps 2-3 of childhood asthma. However, the difference in efficacy between these drugs remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of different ICS drugs in the treatment of childhood asthma. METHODS: We searched PubMed and EMBASE for randomized controlled trials of ICSs in the treatment of childhood asthma. Using forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) as the primary outcome, a time-course model of ICSs was constructed. In addition, the symptom-free days% were analyzed as a secondary outcome. RESULTS: Six studies involving 2237 children that reported FEV1 were included. The results showed that the ET50 of ciclesonide (CIC) and budesonide (BUD) was 1.23 and 2.97 weeks, respectively. Compared with them, FP had a higher efficacy. In terms of symptom-free days%, we found that the efficacy of beclometasone dipropionate was lower than that of CIC and fluticasone propionate. CONCLUSION: In this study, the efficacy of three ICS drugs was quantitatively compared, providing necessary information for the implementation of medication guidelines for steps 2-3 of asthma in children. IMPACT: This study analyzed the entire time-course of the drug efficacy of Inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of asthma in children aged 5-12, which found that although the maximum efficacy of both ciclesonide and budesonide was the same, the onset speed of ciclesonide was faster than that of budesonide. The above information provides the necessary quantitative information for the implementation of medication guidelines for steps 2-3 asthma in children.

Placebo Response to Oral Administration in Osteoarthritis Clinical Trials and Its Associated Factors: A Model-Based Meta-analysis.

Importance: In osteoarthritis (OA) clinical trials, a placebo is often used as control. Therefore, a thorough understanding of the placebo response is important for guiding drug development in OA. Objective: To develop an oral placebo response model for OA. Data Sources: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched systematically from January 1, 1991, to July 2, 2022. Study Selection: Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trials of patients with primary OA were included. The interventions and placebo were administered orally. A total of 3032 trials were identified; of these, 130 (4.3%) met the inclusion criteria. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores, dosage form of the placebo, sample size, proportion of patients who previously used nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, publication year, intervention categories, Kellgren-Lawrence grades, proportion of White patients, duration of pain, funding source, and risk of bias were extracted. A model-based meta-analysis was used to evaluate the time course of the placebo response in OA treatment and estimate the influencing factors. For subgroup analyses, a meta-analysis with a random-effects model was used to summarize the typical values of the model parameters and their SEs. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the time course of the oral placebo response on the WOMAC pain, stiffness, and function subscale scores. Results: The 130 trials selected for analysis included 12 673 participants (mean age, 59.9 years; 68.9% women). The baseline scores of WOMAC pain, stiffness, and function subscales were found to be significantly associated with the placebo response. The placebo response reached 90% of its maximum response between 5 and 7 weeks. The placebo responses on the WOMAC subscales were also associated with the sample size, proportion of patients who had previously used nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, intervention drugs, and publication year. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, an oral placebo response model of OA was developed that may quantitatively describe the placebo response at different baseline levels of symptoms. The findings may provide valuable references for future clinical trial design and decision-making.

Quantitative comparison of the efficacies and safety profiles of three first-line non-platinum chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to quantify the efficacies and safety profiles of the three first-line non-platinum chemotherapy regimens recommended in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Materials and Methods: The PubMed and Cochrane Library databases were searched comprehensively, and clinical trials involving patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with one of three first-line non-platinum regimens (gemcitabine combined with vinorelbine, gemcitabine combined with docetaxel, or gemcitabine alone) were included in the analysis. A parametric proportional hazard survival model was established to analyze the time course of overall survival (OS). The objective response rate (ORR) and incidence rates of grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) were summarized using a single-arm meta-analysis with a random-effects model. Results: Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria. Age and performance status (PS) scores were significant predictors of OS. For each 10-years increase in age, mortality risk increased by 18.5%, and the mortality risk increased by 4% for every 10% increase in the proportion of patients with a PS score of 2. After correcting for the above factors, we found that the three first-line non-platinum chemotherapy regimens did not differ based on OS or toxicity. Conclusion: There was no significant difference in OS or toxicity among the three first-line non-platinum chemotherapy regimens. Age and PS scores were significant predictors of OS, and their heterogeneity across different studies should be considered in cross-study comparisons and sample size estimations when designing clinical trials.