Effect of Laparoscopic and Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic or Periampullary Tumors: Three-year Follow-up of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to estimate whether the potential short-term advantages of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) could allow patients to recover in a more timely manner and achieve better long-term survival than with open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) in patients with pancreatic or periampullary tumors. BACKGROUND: LPD has been demonstrated to be feasible and may have several potential advantages over OPD in terms of shorter hospital stay and accelerated recovery than OPD. METHODS: This noninferiority, open-label, randomized clinical trial was conducted in 14 centers in China. The initial trial included 656 eligible patients with pancreatic or periampullary tumors enrolled from May 18, 2018, to December 19, 2019. The participants were randomized preoperatively in a 1:1 ratio to undergo either LPD (n=328) or OPD (n=328). The 3-year overall survival (OS), quality of life, which was assessed using the 3-level version of the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions, depression, and other outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Data from 656 patients [328 men (69.9%); mean (SD) age: 56.2 (10.7) years] who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy were analyzed. For malignancies, the 3-year OS rates were 59.1% and 54.3% in the LPD and OPD groups, respectively ( P =0.33, hazard ratio: 1.16, 95% CI: 0.86-1.56). The 3-year OS rates for others were 81.3% and 85.6% in the LPD and OPD groups, respectively ( P =0.40, hazard ratio: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.30-1.63). No significant differences were observed in quality of life, depression and other outcomes between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: In patients with pancreatic or periampullary tumors, LPD performed by experienced surgeons resulted in a similar 3-year OS compared with OPD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03138213.

Extracellular vesicle-packaged circBIRC6 from cancer-associated fibroblasts induce platinum resistance via SUMOylation modulation in pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) play pivotal roles in chemoresistance of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. Revealing the cross-talk network between tumor stroma and pancreatic cancer and developing effective strategies against oxaliplatin resistance are highly desired in the clinic. METHODS: High-throughput sequence was used to screened the key circRNAs transmitted by extracellular vesicles (EVs) from CAFs to pancreatic cancer cells. The associations between EV-packaged circBIRC6 and chemotherapy responsiveness were validated in a cohort of 82 cases of advanced PDAC patients. Then, the effects of EV-packaged circBIRC6 on CAF-induced oxaliplatin resistance were investigated by flow cytometry, colony formation, viability of pancreatic cancer organoids in vitro and by xenograft models in vivo. RNA pulldown, RNA immunoprecipitation, and sites mutation assays were used to reveal the underlying mechanism. RESULTS: We identified a circRNA, circBIRC6, is significantly upregulated in CAF-derived EVs and is positively associated with oxaliplatin-based chemoresistance. In vitro and in vivo functional assays showed that CAF-derived EV-packaged circBIRC6 enhance oxaliplatin resistance of pancreatic cancer cells and organoids via regulating the non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) dependent DNA repair. Mechanistically, circBIRC6 directly binds with XRCC4 and enhanced the interaction of XRCC4 with SUMO1 at the lysine 115 residue, which facilitated XRCC4 chromatin localization. XRCC4K115R mutation dramatically abrogated the EV-packaged circBIRC6 induced effect. Moreover, combination of antisense oligonucleotide inhibitors against circBIRC6 with Olaparib dramatically suppressed chemoresistance in patient-derived xenograft models. CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed that EV-packaged circBIRC6 confer oxaliplatin resistance in PDAC by mediating SUMOylation of XRCC4, introducing a promising predictive and therapeutic target for PDAC on oxaliplatin resistance.

Mutant KRAS Mediates circARFGEF2 Biogenesis to Promote Lymphatic Metastasis of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Circular RNAs (circRNA) contribute to cancer stemness, proliferation, and metastasis. The biogenesis of circRNAs can be impacted by the genetic landscape of tumors. Herein, we identified a novel circRNA, circARFGEF2 (hsa_circ_0060665), which was upregulated in KRASG12D pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and positively associated with KRASG12D PDAC lymph node (LN) metastasis. CircARFGEF2 overexpression significantly facilitated KRASG12D PDAC LN metastasis in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, circARFGEF2 biogenesis in KRASG12D PDAC was significantly activated by the alternative splicing factor QKI-5, which recruited U2AF35 to facilitate spliceosome assembly. QKI-5 bound the QKI binding motifs and neighboring reverse complement sequence in intron 3 and 6 of ARFGEF2 pre-mRNA to facilitate circARFGEF2 biogenesis. CircARFGEF2 sponged miR-1205 and promoted the activation of JAK2, which phosphorylated STAT3 to trigger KRASG12D PDAC lymphangiogenesis and LN metastasis. Importantly, circARFGEF2 silencing significantly inhibited LN metastasis in the KrasG12D/+Trp53R172H/+Pdx-1-Cre (KPC) mouse PDAC model. These findings provide insight into the mechanism and metastasis-promoting function of mutant KRAS-mediated circRNA biogenesis. SIGNIFICANCE: Increased splicing-mediated biogenesis of circARFGEF2 in KRAS-mutant pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma activates JAK2-STAT3 signaling and triggers lymph node metastasis, suggesting circARFGEF2 could be a therapeutic target to inhibit pancreatic cancer progression.

Characterization of heterogeneous metabolism in hepatocellular carcinoma identifies new therapeutic target and treatment strategy.

Background: Metabolic reprogramming is a well-known hallmark of cancer. Systematical identification of clinically relevant metabolic subtypes of Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is critical to understand tumor heterogeneity and develop efficient treatment strategies. Methods: We performed an integrative analysis of genomic, transcriptomic, and clinical data from an HCC patient cohort in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Results: Four metabolic subtypes were defined: mHCC1, mHHC2, mHCC3, and mHCC4. These subtypes had distinct differences in mutations profiles, activities of metabolic pathways, prognostic metabolism genes, and immune features. The mHCC1 was associated with poorest outcome and was characterized by extensive metabolic alterations, abundant immune infiltration, and increased expression of immunosuppressive checkpoints. The mHHC2 displayed lowest metabolic alteration level and was associated with most significant improvement in overall survival in response to high CD8+ T cell infiltration. The mHHC3 was a "cold-tumor" with low immune infiltration and few metabolic alterations. The mHCC4 presented a medium degree of metabolic alteration and high CTNNB1 mutation rate. Based on our HCC classification and in vitro study, we identified palmitoyl-protein thioesterase 1 (PPT1) was a specific prognostic gene and therapeutic target for mHCC1. Conclusion: Our study highlighted mechanistic differences among metabolic subtypes and identified potential therapeutic targets for subtype-specific treatment strategies targeting unique metabolic vulnerabilities. The immune heterogeneities across metabolic subtypes may help further clarify the association between metabolism and immune environment and guide the development of novel strategies through targeting both unique metabolic vulnerabilities and immunosuppressive triggers.

HNF1A regulates oxaliplatin resistance in pancreatic cancer by targeting 53BP1.

DNA double­strand break repair is critically involved in oxaliplatin resistance in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Hepatocyte nuclear factor 1 homeobox A (HNF1A) has received increased attention regarding its role in cancer progression. The present study explored the role of HNF1A in oxaliplatin resistance in PDAC. The results revealed that HNF1A expression was negatively associated with oxaliplatin chemoresistance in PDAC tissues and cell lines. HNF1A inhibition promoted the proliferation, colony formation and stemness of PDAC cells, and suppressed their apoptosis. Furthermore, HNF1A inhibition switched nonhomologous end joining to homologous recombination, thereby enhancing genomic stability and oxaliplatin resistance. Mechanistically, HNF1A transcriptionally activates p53­binding protein 1 (53BP1) expression by directly interacting with the 53BP1 promoter region. Upregulation of HNF1A and 53BP1 induced significant inhibition of PDAC growth and oxaliplatin resistance in patient­derived PDAC xenograft models and orthotopic models. In conclusion, the findings of the present study suggested that HNF1A/53BP1 may be a promising PDAC therapeutic target for overcoming oxaliplatin resistance.

The short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy combining with different type of mesentericoportal vein resection and reconstruction for pancreatic head adenocarcinoma: a Chinese multicenter retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The results of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy combining with mesentericoportal vein resection and reconstruction (LPD-MPVRs) for pancreatic head adenocarcinoma are rarely reported. The aim of present study was to explore the short- and long-term outcomes of different type of LPD-MPVRs. METHODS: Patients who underwent LPD-MPVRs in 14 Chinese high-volume pancreatic centers between June 2014 and December 2020 were selected and compared. RESULTS: In total, 142 patients were included and were divided into primary closure (n = 56), end-end anastomosis (n = 43), or interposition graft (n = 43). Median overall survival (OS) and median progress-free survival (PFS) between primary closure and end-end anastomosis had no difference (both P > 0.05). As compared to primary closure and end-end anastomosis, interposition graft had the worst median OS (12 months versus 19 months versus 17 months, P = 0.001) and the worst median PFS (6 months versus 15 months versus 12 months, P < 0.000). As compared to primary closure, interposition graft had almost double risk in major morbidity (16.3 percent versus 8.9 percent) and about triple risk (10 percent versus 3.6 percent) in 90-day mortality, while End-end anastomosis had only one fourth major morbidity (2.3 percent versus 8.9 percent). Multivariate analysis revealed postoperation hospital stay, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, number of positive lymph nodes had negative impact on OS, while R0, R1 surgical margin had protective effect on OS. Postoperative hospital stay had negative impact on PFS, while primary closure, end-end anastomosis, short-term vascular patency, and short-term vascular stenosis positively related to PFS. CONCLUSIONS: In LPD-MPVRs, interposition graft had the worst OS, the worst PFS, the highest rate of major morbidity, and the highest rate of 90-day mortality. While there were no differences in OS and PFS between primary closure and end-end anastomosis.

Standard pancreatoduodenectomy versus extended pancreatoduodenectomy with modified retroperitoneal nerve resection in patients with pancreatic head cancer: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The extent of pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic head cancer remains controversial, and more high-level clinical evidence is needed. This study aimed to evaluate the outcome of extended pancreatoduodenectomy (EPD) with retroperitoneal nerve resection in pancreatic head cancer. METHODS: This multicenter randomized trial was performed at 6 Chinese high-volume hospitals that enrolled patients between October 3, 2012, and September 21, 2017. Four hundred patients with stage I or II pancreatic head cancer and without specific pancreatic cancer treatments (preoperative chemotherapy or chemoradiation) within three months were randomly assigned to undergo standard pancreatoduodenectomy (SPD) or EPD, with the latter followed by dissection of additional lymph nodes (LNs), nerves and soft tissues 270° on the right side surrounding the superior mesenteric artery and celiac axis. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) by intention-to-treat (ITT). The secondary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS), mortality, morbidity, and postoperative pain intensity. RESULTS: The R1 rate was slightly lower with EPD (8.46%) than with SPD (12.56%). The morbidity and mortality rates were similar between the two groups. The median OS was similar in the EPD and SPD groups by ITT in the whole study cohort (23.0 vs. 20.2 months, P = 0.100), while the median DFS was superior in the EPD group (16.1 vs. 13.2 months, P = 0.031). Patients with preoperative CA19-9 < 200.0 U/mL had significantly improved OS and DFS with EPD (EPD vs. SPD, 30.8 vs. 20.9 months, P = 0.009; 23.4 vs. 13.5 months, P < 0.001). The EPD group exhibited significantly lower locoregional (16.48% vs. 35.20%, P < 0.001) and mesenteric LN recurrence rates (3.98% vs. 10.06%, P = 0.022). The EPD group exhibited less back pain 6 months postoperation than the SPD group. CONCLUSIONS: EPD for pancreatic head cancer did not significantly improve OS, but patients with EPD treatment had significantly improved DFS. In the subgroup analysis, improvements in both OS and DFS in the EPD arm were observed in patients with preoperative CA19-9 < 200.0 U/mL. EPD could be used as an effective surgical procedure for patients with pancreatic head cancer, especially those with preoperative CA19-9 < 200.0 U/mL.

Cancer-associated fibroblast-induced lncRNA UPK1A-AS1 confers platinum resistance in pancreatic cancer via efficient double-strand break repair.

The tumor stroma of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is characterized by an abundant and heterogeneous population of cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), which are critically involved in chemoresistance. However, the underlying mechanism of CAFs in chemoresistance is unclear. Here, we show that CAFR, a CAF subset derived from platinum-resistant PDAC patients, assumes an iCAF phenotype and produces more IL8 than CAFS isolated from platinum-sensitive PDAC patients. CAFR-derived IL8 promotes oxaliplatin chemoresistance in PDAC. Based on long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) profiling in tumor cells incubated with CAF-CM, we found that UPK1A-AS1, whose expression is directly induced by IL8/NF-kappa B signaling, functions as a chemoresistance-promoting lncRNA and is critical for active IL8-induced oxaliplatin resistance. Impressively, blocking the activation of UPK1A-AS1 expression increases the oxaliplatin sensitivity of tumor cells in vivo. Mechanistically, UPK1A-AS1 strengthens the interaction between Ku70 and Ku80 to facilitate nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ), thereby enhancing DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair. Clinically, UPK1A-AS1 expression is positively correlated with IL8 expression, a poor chemotherapeutic response and a shorter progression-free survival (PFS) time in advanced PDAC patients. Collectively, our study reveals a lncRNA-mediated mechanism of CAF-derived paracrine IL8-dependent oxaliplatin resistance and highlights UPK1A-AS1 as a potential therapeutic target.

circCUL2 induces an inflammatory CAF phenotype in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma via the activation of the MyD88-dependent NF-κB signaling pathway.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is characterized by clusters of cancer cells surrounded by a dense desmoplastic stroma. However, little is known about stromal cell heterogeneity in the pancreatic tumor microenvironment. METHODS: We conducted circRNA profiling in primary fibroblasts by high-throughput sequencing and detected circCUL2 levels in PDAC tissues by qRT-PCR. We subsequently investigated the effect of circCUL2 on inflammatory cancer-associated fibroblast (iCAF) activation, heterogeneity and protumor activity by ELISA, flow cytometry, colony formation and transwell assays in vitro and by xenograft models in vivo. The regulatory effect of circCUL2 on miR-203a-3p/MyD88/IL6 was examined by RNA pulldown, FISH, and luciferase reporter assays. RESULTS: We identified that circCUL2 was specifically expressed in cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) but not in cancer cells. Moreover, the enrichment of circCUL2 in tumor tissues was significantly correlated with the poor prognosis of PDAC patients. Upregulation of circCUL2 expression in normal fibroblasts (NFs) induced the iCAF phenotype, and then iCAFs promoted PDAC progression through IL6 secretion in vitro. Furthermore, circCUL2-transduced NFs promoted tumorigenesis and metastasis of PDAC cells in vivo, which was blocked by an anti-IL6 antibody. Mechanistically, circCUL2 functioned as a ceRNA and modulated the miR-203a-3p/MyD88/NF-κB/IL6 axis, thereby further activating the STAT3 signaling pathway in pancreatic cancer cells to induce PDAC progression. CONCLUSIONS: We showed that the circCUL2/miR-203a-5p/MyD88/NF-κB/IL6 axis contributes to the induction of iCAFs and established a distinct fibroblast niche for PDAC progression, which could help the development of strategies that selectively target tumor-promoting CAFs in PDAC.

circFARP1 enables cancer-associated fibroblasts to promote gemcitabine resistance in pancreatic cancer via the LIF/STAT3 axis.

BACKGROUND: Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are critically involved in gemcitabine (GEM) resistance in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, the underlying mechanism by which CAFs promote chemotherapy resistance remains unexplored. Here, we explored the role of circRNAs in CAF-induced GEM resistance in PDAC. METHODS: circRNA sequencing and quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) were utilized to screen CAF-specific circRNAs. The effects of CAF circFARP1 expression on GEM resistance in tumor cells were assessed in vitro and in vivo. RNA-seq, RNA pulldown, RNA immunoprecipitation, and luciferase reporter assays were used to screen the downstream target and underlying mechanism of circFARP1. RESULTS: circFARP1 (hsa_circ_0002557), a CAF-specific circRNA, was positively correlated with GEM chemoresistance and poor survival in an advanced PDAC cohort. Silencing or overexpressing circFARP1 in CAFs altered the ability of CAFs to induce tumor cell stemness and GEM resistance via leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF). Mechanistically, we found that circFARP1 directly binds with caveolin 1 (CAV1) and blocks the interaction of CAV1 and the E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase zinc and ring finger 1 (ZNRF1) to inhibit CAV1 degradation, which enhances LIF secretion. In addition, circFARP1 upregulated LIF expression by sponging miR-660-3p. Moreover, high circFARP1 levels were positively correlated with elevated serum LIF levels in PDAC and poor patient survival. Decreasing circFARP1 levels and neutralizing LIF significantly suppressed PDAC growth and GEM resistance in patient-derived xenograft models. CONCLUSIONS: The circFARP1/CAV1/miR-660-3p/LIF axis is critical for CAF-induced GEM resistance in PDAC. Hence, circFARP1 may be a potential therapeutic target for PDAC.

Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals spatiotemporal heterogeneity and malignant progression in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor.

Aims: Using Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq), we explored the spatiotemporal heterogeneity of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) and the underlying mechanism for malignant progression. Methods: scRNA-seq was conducted on three tumor tissues (two primary tissues from different sites, one liver metastatic lesion), one normal liver tissue, and peripheral blood mononuclear cells from one patient with a metastatic G2 pNET, followed by bioinformatics analysis and validation in a pNETs cohort. Results: The transcriptome data of 24.544 cells were obtained. We identified subpopulations of functional heterogeneity within malignant cells, immune cells, and fibroblasts. There were intra- and inter-heterogeneities of cell subpopulations for malignant cells, macrophages, T cells, and fibroblasts among all tumor sites. Cell trajectory analysis revealed several hallmarks of carcinogenesis, including the hypoxia pathway, metabolism reprogramming, and aggressive proliferation, which were activated at different stages of tumor progression. Evolutionary analysis based on mitochondrial mutations defined two dominant clones with metastatic capacity. Finally, we developed a gene signature (PCSK1 and SMOC1) defining the metastatic potential of the tumor and its prognostic value was validated in a cohort of thirty G1/G2 patients underwent surgical resection. Conclusions: Our scRNA-seq analysis revealed intra- and intertumor heterogeneities in cell populations, transcriptional states, and intercellular communications among primary and metastatic lesions of pNETs. The single-cell level characterization of the spatiotemporal dynamics of malignant cell progression provided new insights into the search for potential novel prognostic biomarkers of pNETs.

A novel anastomosis technique facilitates pancreaticojejunostomy in total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (with video).

BACKGROUND: While the best technique for pancreatic anastomosis during Whipple's procedure remains controversial, laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) has been rapidly increasing in popularity. Because of their feasibility and reliability, new pancreatic anastomosis techniques may have vital roles when adapted for LPD. Here, we describe a new pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) technique using three sutures (termed the "three sutures" PJ technique), which facilitates pancreatic anastomosis during total LPD. METHODS: A total of 149 patients who underwent LPD using the "three sutures" PJ technique at three hospitals were included in this study (81 patients at Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital [GDPH], 60 patients at Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital [SMH], and 8 patients at Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University [AHGMU]). Data on the demographic characteristics, operative outcomes, and postoperative results (pancreatic fistula rate, mortality rate, and length of hospital stay) of these patients were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: A surgical video showing the details of the "three sutures" PJ method was included. The mean operation times at GDPH, SMH, and AHGMU were 4.08 ± 0.99 h, 4.65 ± 1.53 h, and 4.67 ± 0.64 h, respectively, and the average PJ times were 17.96 ± 3.49 min, 18.19 ± 2.63 min, and 22.5 ± 3.96 min, respectively. The numbers of grade B pancreatic fistulas were 9 (11.11%), 2 (3.33%), and 1 (12.50%), respectively, and two patients had grade C fistulas, one each at GDPH and SMH. The numbers of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) were 10 (12.35%), 3 (5.00%), and 1 (12.50%) in each center, respectively. The overall rate of CR-POPF was 9.40% (14/149) among patients of all three centers. The perioperative mortality rate was 0%. CONCLUSIONS: The "three sutures" PJ technique for total LPD is a safe and reliable method, with a low risk of pancreatic fistula, short anastomosis time, and steep learning curve.

A randomised, multicentre trial of somatostatin to prevent clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula in intermediate-risk patients after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic somatostatin to reduce the incidence of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy remains controversial. We assessed the preventive efficacy of somatostatin on clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula in intermediate-risk patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy at pancreatic centres in China. METHODS: In this multicentre, prospective, randomised controlled trial, we used the updated postoperative pancreatic fistula classification criteria and cases were confirmed by an independent data monitoring committee to improve comparability between centres. The primary endpoint was the rate of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula within 30 days after pancreaticoduodenectomy. RESULTS: Eligible patients (randomised, n = 205; final analysis, n = 199) were randomised to receive postoperative intravenous somatostatin (250 µg/h over 120 h; n = 99) or conventional therapy (n = 100). The primary endpoint was significantly lower in the somatostatin vs control group (n = 13 vs n = 25; 13% vs 25%, P = 0.032). There were no significant differences for biochemical leak (P = 0.289), biliary fistula (P = 0.986), abdominal infection (P = 0.829), chylous fistula (P = 0.748), late postoperative haemorrhage (P = 0.237), mean length of hospital stay (P = 0.512), medical costs (P = 0.917), reoperation rate (P > 0.99), or 30 days' readmission rate (P = 0.361). The somatostatin group had a higher rate of delayed gastric emptying vs control (n = 33 vs n = 21; 33% vs 21%, P = 0.050). CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic somatostatin treatment reduced clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula in intermediate-risk patients after pancreaticoduodenectomy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03349424.

Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The benefit and safety of laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (LPD) for the treatment of pancreatic or periampullary tumours remain controversial. Studies have shown that the learning curve plays an important role in LPD, yet there are no randomised studies on LPD after the surgeons have surmounted the learning curve. The aim of this trial was to compare the outcomes of open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) with those of LPD, when performed by experienced surgeons. METHODS: In this multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial done in 14 Chinese medical centres, we recruited patients aged 18-75 years with a benign, premalignant, or malignant indication for pancreatoduodenectomy. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to undergo either LPD or OPD. Randomisation was centralised via a computer-generated system that used a block size of four. The patients and surgeons were unmasked to study group, whereas the data collectors, outcome assessors, and data analysts were masked. LPD and OPD were performed by experienced surgeons who had already done at least 104 LPD operations. The primary outcome was the postoperative length of stay. The criteria for discharge were based on functional recovery, and analyses were done on a modified intention-to-treat basis (ie, including patients who had a pancreatoduodenectomy regardless of whether the operation was the one they were assigned to). This trial is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT03138213. FINDINGS: Between May 18, 2018, and Dec 19, 2019, we assessed 762 patients for eligibility, of whom 656 were randomly assigned to either the LPD group (n=328) or the OPD group (n=328). 31 patients in each group were excluded and 80 patients crossed over (33 from LPD to OPD, 47 from OPD to LPD). In the modified intention-to-treat analysis (297 patients in the LPD group and 297 patients in the OPD group), the postoperative length of stay was significantly shorter for patients in the LPD group than for patients in the OPD group (median 15·0 days [95% CI 14·0-16·0] vs 16·0 days [15·0-17·0]; p=0·02). 90-day mortality was similar in both groups (five [2%] of 297 patients in the LPD group vs six [2%] of 297 in the OPD group, risk ratio [RR] 0·83 [95% CI 0·26-2·70]; p=0·76). The incidence rate of serious postoperative morbidities (Clavien-Dindo grade of at least 3) was not significantly different in the two groups (85 [29%] of 297 patients in the LPD group vs 69 [23%] of 297 patients in OPD group, RR 1·23 [95% CI 0·94-1·62]; p=0·13). The comprehensive complication index score was not significantly different between the two groups (median score 8·7 [IQR 0·0-26·2] vs 0·0 [0·0-20·9]; p=0·06). INTERPRETATION: In highly experienced hands, LPD is a safe and feasible procedure. It was associated with a shorter length of stay and similar short-term morbidity and mortality rates to OPD. Nonetheless, the clinical benefit of LPD compared with OPD was marginal despite extensive procedural expertise. Future research should focus on identifying the populations that will benefit from LPD. FUNDING: National Natural Science Foundation of China and Tongji Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, China.

A novel gene signature for prognosis prediction and chemotherapy response in patients with pancreatic cancer.

Pancreatic cancer is a lethal disease. Chemoresistance is one of the characteristics of pancreatic cancer and leads to a poor prognosis. This study built an effective predictive model for personalized treatment and explored the molecular mechanism of chemoresistance. A four-gene signature, including serine peptidase inhibitor Kazal type 1 (SPINK1), anoctamin 1 (ANO1), desmoglein 3 (DSG3) and GTPase, IMAP family member 1 (GIMAP1) was identified and associated with prognosis and chemoresistance in the training group. An internal testing dataset and the external dataset, GSE57495, were used for validation and showed a good performance of the gene signature. The high-risk group was enriched with multiple oncological pathways related to immunosuppression and was correlated with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression, a target molecule of Erlotinib. In conclusion, this study identified a four-gene signature and established two nomograms for predicting prognosis and chemotherapy responses in patients with pancreatic cancer. The clinical value of the nomogram was evaluated by decision curve analysis (DCA). It showed that these may be helpful for clinical treatment decision-making and the discovery of the potential molecular mechanism and therapy targets for pancreatic cancer.