RESUMEN
The feasibility for nitrogen removal in a two-stage ANAMMOX biofilm reactor promoted by Fe2+ under low nitrogen concentration was investigated. The results showed that the ANAMMOX reaction could be effectively promoted by a ρ(Fe2+) of 5, 10, and 15 mg·L-1. A ρ(Fe2+) of 10 mg·L-1 presented the highest promotion for the ANAMMOX reaction, with the highest nitrogen removal efficiency (NRE) of 81.71% under a ρ(TN) of 150 mg·L-1and a nitrogen loading rate (NLR) of 0.62 kg·(m3·d)-1. Fe2+ promoted the secretion of extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) and the synthesis of heme c in the ANAMMOX system. Batch test results further verified the positive effects by Fe2+on the activity of anaerobic ammonium oxidizing bacteria (AnAOB). The specific ANAMMOX activity (SAA) of 10 mg·L-1 ρ(Fe2+) was 3.6 times as high as that of the control group[ρ(Fe2+)=0 mg·L-1], whereas the activity of AnAOB was significantly inhibited with ρ(Fe2+) increased to 20 mg·L-1. High-throughput sequencing results showed that the addition of Fe2+ increased the abundance of Candidatus_Kuenenia. When ρ(Fe2+) was 10 mg·L-1, the relative abundance of Candidatus_Kuenenia in reactor 1 and reactor 2 increased to 16.18% and 4.22%, respectively. The stable operation of the two-stage ANAMMOX biofilm process promoted by Fe2+provides an alternative technology for low-strength nitrogen wastewater.
Asunto(s)
Compuestos de Amonio , Nitrógeno , Oxidación Anaeróbica del Amoníaco , Anaerobiosis , Biopelículas , Reactores Biológicos/microbiología , Desnitrificación , Matriz Extracelular de Sustancias Poliméricas/química , Nitrógeno/análisis , Oxidación-Reducción , Aguas del Alcantarillado , Aguas ResidualesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of sotagliflozin (SOTA) adjuvant therapy for type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). METHODS: Through April 2019, the Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases were electronically searched to identify randomized controlled trials exploring SOTA adjuvant therapy for T1DM. Strict screening and quality evaluations of the obtained literature were performed independently by 2 researchers. Outcome indexes were extracted, and a meta-analysis of the data was performed using Revman 5.3 software. RESULTS: A total of 7 randomized controlled trials were included. The meta-analysis results showed that compared with the patients in the placebo group, the patients in the SOTA group had a lower hemoglobin A1c (mean difference [MD]â=â-0.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] [-0.34, -0.22], Pâ<â.01), lower total daily insulin use (MDâ=â-8.89, 95% CI [-11.64, -6.13], Pâ<â.01), faster weight loss (MDâ=â-3.03, 95% CI [-3.79, -2.26], Pâ<â.01), better fasting blood glucose and 2-hour postprandial blood glucose control (MDâ=â-0.75, 95% CI [-1.04, -0.45], Pâ<â.01; MDâ=â-2.42, 95% CI [-3.17, -1.67], Pâ<â.01), and a higher rate of well-controlled glucose levels (relative riskâ=â1.75, 95% CI [1.55, 1.99], Pâ<â.01), while no significant difference in the incidence of severe hypoglycemic events was found between the SOTA and placebo groups (risk difference [RD]â=â-0.01, 95% CI [-0.02, 0.00], Pâ=â.13). The incidence of diabetic ketoacidosis was higher in the SOTA group than in the placebo group (RDâ=â0.03, 95% CI [0.02, 0.04], Pâ<â.01). The incidence of genital mycotic infection was higher in the SOTA group than in the placebo group (RDâ=â0.06, 95% CI [0.05, 0.08], Pâ<â.01). No significant difference in the incidence of urinary tract infections was detected between the SOTA group and the placebo group (RDâ=â0.00, 95% CI [-0.01, 0.01], Pâ=â0.97). CONCLUSIONS: SOTA is a potential drug for the treatment of T1DM and is effective for controlling blood sugar. The main adverse reactions to SOTA are genital mycotic infections and diabetic ketoacidosis. We must further assess the severity of diabetic ketoacidosis caused by SOTA.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/tratamiento farmacológico , Glicósidos/efectos adversos , Glicósidos/uso terapéutico , Transportador 1 de Sodio-Glucosa/efectos adversos , Transportador 1 de Sodio-Glucosa/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoAsunto(s)
Antivirales , Guanina/análogos & derivados , Virus de la Hepatitis B , Hepatitis B/tratamiento farmacológico , Metaanálisis como Asunto , Revisiones Sistemáticas como Asunto , Tenofovir , Antivirales/administración & dosificación , Antivirales/efectos adversos , Guanina/administración & dosificación , Guanina/efectos adversos , Humanos , Selección de Paciente , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Tenofovir/administración & dosificación , Tenofovir/efectos adversosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of tenofovir and entecavir in nucleos(t)ide analogue-naive chronic hepatitis B. METHODS: The Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Clinical Trials and China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI) databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding the comparison between tenofovir and entecavir in nucleos(t)ide analogue-naive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) since the date of database inception to July 2019. Two researchers independently screened and evaluated the obtained studies and extracted the outcome indexes. RevMan 5.3 software was used for the meta-analysis. RESULTS: Early on, tenofovir had a greater ability to inhibit the hepatitis B virus, I2 = 0% [RR = 1.08, 95% CI (1.03, 1.13), P<0.01] (96 weeks). Entecavir can normalize the ALT levels earlier, I2 = 0% [RR = 0.87, 95% CI (0.77, 0.98), P = 0.02] (48 weeks). However, there was no statistically significant difference between TDF and ETV at 144 weeks. Tenofovir was as effective as entecavir in terms of HBeAg clearance and HBeAg seroconversion, I2 = 0% [RR = 1.05, 95% CI (0.68, 1.62), P = 0.82]; I2 = 69% [RR = 0.93, 95% CI (0.54, 1.61), P = 0.80]. The difference in the incidence of elevated creatine kinase levels was not statistically significant I2 = 0% [RR = 0.66, 95% CI (0.27, 1.60), P = 0.35]. CONCLUSIONS: Tenofovir and entecavir were equally effective in the treatment of patients with nucleos(t)ide analogue-naive chronic hepatitis B. In addition, TDF has an advantage in the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma. Additional RCTs and a large-sample prospective cohort study should be performed.
Asunto(s)
Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Guanina/análogos & derivados , Hepatitis B Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Tenofovir/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/epidemiología , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/prevención & control , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/virología , Guanina/uso terapéutico , Hepatitis B Crónica/patología , Hepatitis B Crónica/virología , Humanos , Incidencia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/prevención & control , Neoplasias Hepáticas/virología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hypotensive resuscitation is an old study. But its benefits and losses are still controversial. In clinic, the method of fluid resuscitation needs more reliable experimental evidence. This study's objective is to systematically evaluate the efficacy of hypotensive resuscitation in patients with traumatic hemorrhagic shock. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Through October 2019, Web of Science, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Clinical Trials will be systematically searched to identify randomized controlled trials exploring the efficacy of hypotensive resuscitation in traumatic hemorrhagic shock. Strict screening and quality evaluation will be independently performed on the obtained literature by 2 researchers; outcome indexes will be extracted, and a meta-analysis will be performed on the data using Revman 5.3 software. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The stronger evidence about the efficacy of hypotensive resuscitation in traumatic hemorrhagic shock will be provided for clinicians. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42019133169. STRENGTHS OF THIS STUDY: This study is not only a simple combination of data, but also to verify and discuss the reliability of the results, and provide more convincing evidence for clinicians. LIMITATIONS OF THIS STUDY: Firstly, according to the previous literature researching, it is found that the number of relevant randomized controlled trials is small and the quality level of the literature is uneven. Secondly, the efficacy of hypotensive resuscitation is discussed for a long time, different trials may take place at different times. Comparability between different trials is reduced.
Asunto(s)
Fluidoterapia/métodos , Resucitación , Choque Hemorrágico , Heridas y Lesiones/complicaciones , Protocolos Clínicos , Humanos , Hipotensión Controlada/métodos , Metaanálisis como Asunto , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Resucitación/efectos adversos , Resucitación/métodos , Choque Hemorrágico/complicaciones , Choque Hemorrágico/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM) has long required insulin treatment. Sotagliflflozin (SOTA), as a dual SGLT-1/2 inhibitor, has the potential to be the first oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) to be approved for T1DM in the US market. It is important to evaluate the effectiveness of SOTA for T1DM. METHODS: Web of Science, PubMed datebase, Cochrane Library, Embase, Clinical Trials, and CNKI will be searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) exploring SOTA adjuvant therapy for T1DM. Strict screening and quality evaluation will be performed on the obtained literature independently by 2 researchers; outcome indexes will be extracted. The bias risk of the included studies will be evaluated based on Cochrane assessment tool. Meta-analysis will be performed on the data using Revman 5.3 software. RESULT: We will provide practical and targeted results assessing the efficacy and safety of SOTA for T1DM patients, to provide reference for clinical use of SOTA. CONCLUSION: The stronger evidence about the efficacy and safety of SOTA for T1DM patients will be provided for clinicians. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42019133099.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/tratamiento farmacológico , Glicósidos/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores del Cotransportador de Sodio-Glucosa 2/administración & dosificación , Administración Oral , Terapia Combinada , Hemoglobina Glucada/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Metaanálisis como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Revisiones Sistemáticas como AsuntoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Chronic hepatitis b (CHB) is a serious problem worldwide. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and entecavir (ETV) both are first-line drugs for CHB, but there is debate about which is more appropriate in nucleos(t)ide analogue-naive CHB. OBJECTIVE: To systematically evaluate the effectiveness and safety of tenofovir and ETV in nucleos(t)ide analogue-naive CHB. METHODS: The Web of Science, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Clinical Trials, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases will be electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials regarding the comparison between tenofovir and ETV in nucleos(t)ide analogue-naive CHB since the date of database inception to July 2019. Two researchers independently screened and evaluated the obtained studies and extracted the outcome indexes. RevMan 5.3 software will be used for the meta-analysis. RESULT: We will provide practical and targeted results assessing the effectiveness and safety of TDF and ETV for nucleos(t)ide analogue-naive CHB patients, try to compare the advantages of TDF and ETV. CONCLUSION: The stronger evidence about the effectiveness and safety of TDF and ETV for nucleos(t)ide analogue-naive CHB patients will be provided for clinicians. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42019134194.