Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost ; 29: 10760296231200851, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37691283

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of percutaneous thrombectomy for treating postpartum iliofemoral vein thrombosis. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on patients with continuous postpartum acute symptomatic iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis who were treated in our center, including all patients who underwent pharmacomechanical thrombolysis (PMT) or only catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) (study group), and patients that received simple anticoagulation treatment (control group). We evaluated the incidence of lower extremity postthrombotic syndrome, recanalization rate of lower extremity veins, and complications in the study and control groups. RESULTS: Overall, 72 postpartum women were included in this study, including the PMT combined with CDT group (14 cases, 15 limbs), CDT alone group (26 cases, 27 limbs), and anticoagulant therapy alone group (32 cases, 34 limbs). The thrombectomy group completed the treatment with a technical success rate of 100%, and no serious bleeding complications occurred. The patency rate of lower limb veins in the thrombectomy group was 85.09 ± 16.51% after treatment and 82.60 ± 21.45% after 1 year. At the 1-year follow-up, the Villalta score in the study group was lower (1.90 ± 2.45 vs 8.50 ± 5.33, P < .001), and the incidence of postthrombotic syndrome was significantly different between the groups (17.50% in the study group vs 68.75% in the anticoagulant group, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Lower extremity venous thrombectomy is a safe and effective treatment for postpartum iliofemoral venous thrombosis. It can improve the patency rate of lower extremity veins and reduce the incidence of postthrombotic syndrome compared with anticoagulation alone.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome Postrombótico , Trombosis de la Vena , Humanos , Femenino , Síndrome Postrombótico/etiología , Terapia Trombolítica/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trombosis de la Vena/cirugía , Trombosis de la Vena/complicaciones , Trombectomía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Periodo Posparto , Anticoagulantes , Fibrinolíticos
2.
Phlebology ; 38(7): 445-450, 2023 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37345252

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Whether iliac vein stents affect pregnancy or whether they will be affected by pregnancy was rarely reported in the literature. The aim of this study was to report our experience of pregnancy in women who received thrombolysis and stenting for a previous deep vein thrombosis (DVT). METHODS: 16 patients with previous stenting for treatment of acute left iliofemoral DVT who had subsequent pregnancies were identified. Patient demographic information and outcomes were recorded. Duplex scanning and venography were performed as scheduled to evaluate the patency of stents in perinatal period and at 12 months after delivery. RESULTS: None of the patients had a hemorrhagic complication and recurrent venous thromboembolism during their pregnancies and postpartum. No stent compression/occlusion and structural damage occurrence in all patients during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Pregnancy managed with prophylactic dalteparin resulted in no re-thrombotic events or structural damage to the iliac stents and did not appear to negatively affect pregnancy outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Terapia Trombolítica , Trombosis de la Vena , Embarazo , Humanos , Femenino , Terapia Trombolítica/efectos adversos , Resultado del Embarazo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Trombosis de la Vena/terapia , Trombosis de la Vena/tratamiento farmacológico , Catéteres , Vena Ilíaca/diagnóstico por imagen , Stents , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular , Estudios Retrospectivos
3.
Asian J Surg ; 45(1): 226-231, 2022 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34049791

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: We investigated the efficacy of combined pigtail catheter crushing and AngioJet mechanical aspiration of thrombi in the treatment of acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis (DVT). METHODS: Eighty-two patients with acute iliofemoral DVT were retrospectively divided into a pigtail catheter + AngioJet group (group A, 42 cases) and an AngioJet-only group (group B, 40 cases). The difference in the circumference of the healthy limbs before and after treatment, immediate thrombus clearance rate in the lower limbs, recannalization percentage of venous lumen, and duration of postoperative hematuria were compared to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the combination method. RESULTS: The technical success rate was 100%, no serious bleeding complications occurred, lower extremity symptoms were effectively alleviated, and post-treatment recannalization percentage of venous lumen were similarly high in both groups. Group A fared significantly better than group B in immediate thrombus clearance (P < 0.05), intraoperative aspiration time (199.38 ± 68.55 vs. 295.30 ± 76.02 s), postoperative CDT urokinase dosage (2.10 ± 0.94 vs. 3.07 ± 0.94 million units), and duration of postoperative hematuria (13.23 ± 2.96 vs. 16.75 ± 3.11 h) (all P < 0.001). At 6 months, the recannalization percentage of venous lumen of group A and group B was 89.71 ± 16.02% and 88.64 ± 16.68%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The combination of pigtail catheter crushing and AngioJet mechanical aspiration of thrombi for acute left iliofemoral vein thrombosis is safe, easy, and effective, with a satisfactory short-term outcome.


Asunto(s)
Vena Ilíaca , Trombosis de la Vena , Catéteres , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Succión , Trombectomía , Terapia Trombolítica , Resultado del Tratamiento , Trombosis de la Vena/terapia
4.
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost ; 27: 10760296211041169, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34605704

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to compare the procedure and treatment outcomes of using either direct stenting alone following pharmacomechanical thrombectomy or continued catheter-directed thrombolysis after stenting for treatment of acute left iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis while clot removal degree achieved grade III. METHODS: From March 2018 to May 2019, 82 patients who underwent iliac venous stenting for treatment of acute left iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis with iliac vein stenosis after pharmacomechanical thrombectomy therapy using the AngioJet system while Clot removal degree achieved grade III were divided into two groups: Direct stenting alone group (n = 39) and continued catheter-directed thrombolysis after stenting group (n = 43). Comparisons were made regarding the treatment outcomes, stent patency rate, and Villalta scale between these two groups. RESULTS: No serious perioperative complications occurred. The mean urokinase dose and hospitalization time in the stenting alone group and continued catheter-directed thrombolysis after the stenting group were 0.30 million U versus 1.76 ± 0.54 million U and 4.85 ± 0.93 days versus 6.33 ± 1.02 days, (P < .001). In the first 30 days after the operation, there were 3 recurrent episodes of deep vein thrombosis in the stenting alone group (P = 0.064). Each patient has completed at least one year of follow-up, the mean follow-up was 15.95 ± 3.44 months. Overall cumulative stent patency rates were 87.2% in stenting alone group and 97.7% in continued catheter-directed thrombolysis after stenting group at 12months (P = 0.037). The Villalta scores at 12 months had a significant difference between the two groups. The mean Villalta scores in the stenting alone group and continued catheter-directed thrombolysis after the stenting group were 4.44 ± 1.63 and 1.63 ± 1.29, respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: When the clot removal degree of pharmacomechanical thrombectomy thrombectomy reaches grade III, both stenting alone and continued catheter-directed thrombolysis after stenting are effective treatment modalities. For young patients with low bleeding risk, continued catheter-directed thrombolysis after stenting has a better patency rate and a lower 1-year post-thrombotic syndrome risk and does not increase major bleeding events. However, it may increase the time and costs of hospitalization accordingly.


Asunto(s)
Vena Ilíaca/cirugía , Stents/efectos adversos , Trombectomía/métodos , Trombosis de la Vena/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 75: 259-266, 2021 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33823261

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic iliofemoral venous obstructive lesions that often require stenting extending below the inguinal ligament. However, the issue of stents crossing the inguinal ligament is currently controversial. Some guidelines suggest that it should be avoided, and some guidelines suggest that in order to ensure adequate flow, the inguinal ligament can be crossed if necessary. The aim of this study was to evaluate the technical aspects and examine patency rates of stent placement across the inguinal ligament for managing iliofemoral venous obstruction. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 127 patients with chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction were treated with interventional surgery in a single institution from January 2012 to January 2018 was conducted. All patients underwent balloon dilatation and placement of at least 2 stents extending below inguinal ligament. Inflow condition, technical success, operation duration, stent patency rates, anticoagulant selection and duration, and complications were recorded after the interventions. RESULTS: The technical success rate was 100%. No major perioperative complications occurred. The mean number of stents was 2.14 ± 0.37. Follow up periods ranged from 12 to 60 months (28.79 ± 10.90 months). Overall cumulative primary, assisted primary, and secondary stent patency rates were 81.9%, 90.5%, and 92.9% at 12 months and 70.4%, 80.9%, and 86.0% at 24 months, and 64.2%, 72.3%, and 74.3% at 36months, respectively. Cumulative patency rates at 12 months, 24 months and 36 months were significantly greater in the patients with "good" inflow as compared to "fair" inflow. The symptoms of all patients improved. None of the stents were compressed, fractured or migrated. CONCLUSIONS: Stenting across the inguinal ligament for treatment of the patients with chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction was a feasible and safe treatment with good patency and clinical results in short and midterm follow up, and stents with good inflow have better patency.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Vena Femoral , Vena Ilíaca , Enfermedades Vasculares Periféricas/terapia , Stents , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedad Crónica , Constricción Patológica , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Vena Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Vena Femoral/fisiopatología , Humanos , Vena Ilíaca/diagnóstico por imagen , Vena Ilíaca/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Vasculares Periféricas/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades Vasculares Periféricas/fisiopatología , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular
6.
Asian J Surg ; 44(1): 235-240, 2021 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32698961

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This retrospective nonrandomized study investigated the outcomes of endovascular therapy for long-segment iliac artery occlusion involving the iliac artery opening. METHODS: During a 5-year period (from Mar 2012 to Mar 2017), 32 patients (two women and 30 men; mean age, 69.0 years; range, 51-90 years) received endovascular therapy, with or without catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT), for long-segment iliac artery occlusion (mean lesion length, 129.8 mm; range, 74.7-189.3 mm). RESULTS: The technical success rate was 90.6% (29 of 32). The major complication rate was 3.5%, but no in-hospital mortality was recorded. The access site complication rate was 10.3%. The clinical symptoms of 29 patients were significantly improved. All 29 patients were followed up for 6-40 months, with an average of 16.7 ± 10.9 months. The primary patency rates were 96.6 ± 3.4% at 6 months, 86.6 ± 7.3% at 12 months, 79.4 ± 9.6% at 24 months, and 66.2 ± 14.5% at 36 months. CONCLUSIONS: Depending on the characteristics of the disease, endovascular treatment with an individualized, rational choice of approach and with fine-tuning of the operation is a safe and effective treatment for long-term iliac artery occlusion involving the opening of the iliac arteries. Customization of the treatment is also the key to a successful operation and to ensuring good postoperative efficacy.


Asunto(s)
Arteriopatías Oclusivas/cirugía , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Arteria Ilíaca/cirugía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...