Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Chiropr Educ ; 2024 May 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38761077

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated patient satisfaction with care provided by chiropractic students under supervision vs supervisors in a Danish hospital setting. METHODS: A cross-sectional observational study of patient satisfaction was conducted at the Spine Center of Southern Denmark, where chiropractic students from the University of Southern Denmark complete an 8-week internship in their final year of pregraduate training. Patients were assigned to students or supervisors based on administrative convenience (ie, natural allocation). Blinded from the aim of the study, all patients seen by a chiropractor (with or without a student) were invited to answer a questionnaire rating satisfaction with the clinical encounter. Results were analyzed using ordinal logistic regression with group allocation blinded by the investigators. RESULTS: Results from 438 participants (response rate = 88%) showed no significant difference in patient satisfaction between the student and supervisor groups. Although a small difference favored the supervisor group, the student group had a higher proportion of high and very high satisfaction combined. CONCLUSION: Satisfaction differed minimally whether patient care was administered by students under the supervision of a licensed chiropractor or by licensed chiropractors alone. Our findings suggest that patients do not negatively view student involvement in clinical consultations at a Danish hospital.

2.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 23(1): 665, 2023 Jun 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37340411

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is the most common reason for spine surgery in older people. However, surgery rates vary widely both internationally and nationally. This study compared patient and sociodemographic characteristics, geographical location and comorbidity between surgically and non-surgically treated Danish patients diagnosed with LSS from 2002 to 2018 and described variations over time. METHODS: Diagnostic ICD-10 codes identifying patients with LSS and surgical procedure codes for decompression with or without fusion were retrieved from the Danish National Patient Register. Patients ≥ 18 years who had been admitted to private or public hospitals in Denmark between 2002 and 2018 were included. Data on age, sex, income, retirement status, geographical region and comorbidity were extracted. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to calculate the relative risk for surgically versus non-surgically treated LSS patients using the total population and subsequently divided into three time periods. Variations over time were displayed graphically. RESULTS: A total of 83,783 unique patients with an LSS diagnosis were identified, and of these, 38,362 (46%) underwent decompression surgery. Compared to those who did not receive surgery, the surgically treated patients were more likely to be aged 65-74 years, were less likely to have comorbidities, had higher income and were more likely to reside in the northern part of Denmark. Patients aged 65-74 years remained more likely to receive surgery over time, although the difference between age groups eventually diminished, as older patients (aged ≥ 75) were increasingly more likely to undergo surgery. Large variations and differences in the relative risk of surgery were observed within and between the geographical regions. The likelihood of receiving surgery varied up to threefold between regions. CONCLUSION: Danish patients with LSS who receive surgery differ in a number of respects from those not receiving surgery. Patients aged 65 to 74 years were more likely to receive surgery than other age groups, and LSS surgical patients were healthier, more often retired and had higher incomes than those not undergoing surgery. There were considerable variations in the relative risk of surgery between and within geographical regions.


Asunto(s)
Fusión Vertebral , Estenosis Espinal , Humanos , Anciano , Descompresión Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Descompresión Quirúrgica/métodos , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Estenosis Espinal/epidemiología , Estenosis Espinal/cirugía , Estenosis Espinal/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil ; 36(4): 979-991, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37092217

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Persistent and severe low back pain is challenging to treat. Multidisciplinary care with systematic follow-up may be more effective than usual care. However, such a model has yet to be developed and tested. OBJECTIVE: Our objectives were to develop and test the feasibility of a three-month multidisciplinary intervention with systematic follow-up in a specialized hospital spine center for patients with severe and persistent low back pain. METHODS: Using the Medical Research Council and National Institute for Health and Care Research framework for the development and testing of complex interventions, we developed a multidisciplinary intervention with systematic follow-up and tested its feasibility, using a-priori-determined outcomes during three months for 24 patients seen at a regional diagnostic spine center unit. As part of the evaluation, we conducted semi-structured interviews with participants and a focus-group interview with clinicians. RESULTS: Of the 24 patients included, only 17 completed the course of care and provided complete data for feasibility assessment. We failed to reach our a-priori feasibility outcomes, had difficulty with inclusion, and participants did not find the intervention effective or satisfactory. CONCLUSIONS: The intervention was not feasible as barriers existed on multiple levels (e.g., clinical, administrative, and patient). Excessive study moderations must be made before the intervention is feasible in a randomized trial.


Asunto(s)
Dolor de la Región Lumbar , Humanos , Dolor de Espalda , Estudios de Factibilidad , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/terapia , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Columna Vertebral
4.
Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl ; 2(2): 100044, 2020 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33543073

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the interexaminer reproducibility for judging the presence, number, and location of leg-pain referring myofascial trigger points, and their prevalence in patients with low back pain with and without concomitant leg pain referral. DESIGN: An interexaminer reproducibility study. SETTING: An outpatient public Hospital Spine Centre in Southern Denmark. PARTICIPANTS: Examiners: experienced examiners (N=2), a chiropractor and a physiotherapist, respectively. Subjects: a case mix of patients with low back pain (N=32) with and without leg pain referral. INTERVENTIONS: A standardized palpation examination protocol of 4 bilateral lumbosacral muscles performed by each examiner. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Reproducibility on presence (measured in Cohen's κ), number (difference and limits of agreement), location (distance between matching marks placed by examiners), and prevalence of myofascial trigger points. RESULTS: Kappa values of the examined muscles were as follows: quadratus lumborum (κ=0.42), gluteus medius (κ=0.83), gluteus minimus (κ=0.74), and piriformis (κ=0.62), with a mean of all examined muscles of kappa=0.66, assessed as substantial agreement. The mean difference in number of trigger points was 0.8, with limits of agreement ranging from -6.4 to 4.9. Mean distance between trigger point locations was 12.9 mm, with 57% only being identified by a single examiner. The prevalence of trigger points was 82.7%, highest in the gluteal region of the painful side. CONCLUSIONS: Inadequate standardization and multiple trigger point sites complicate interexaminer reproducibility on location and number of patients with low back pain and leg pain referral. Nevertheless, substantial interexaminer reproducibility for the trigger point presence appears achievable. Implemented routinely, this relatively simple clinical evaluation procedure could meaningfully enhance diagnostic triage and eventual management.

5.
Dan Med J ; 65(10)2018 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30269751

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: In cancer patients with painful vertebral fractures due to spinal metastasis, traditional pain-relieving therapies include analgesics, bed rest, steroids, radio-ther-apy, etc. These treatment modalities are often ineffective. Traditional spinal surgery in general anaesthesia is usually not an option in patients with advanced cancer and in a poor general condition. Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) has been reported as a minimally invasive treatment option with apparent rapid pain relief compared with other conventional treatment options. The objective of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of PVP in patients with malignant spinal lesions. METHODS: From the National Danish Surgical Spine Database, DaneSpine, 30 consecutive cancer patients with vertebral fractures who underwent PVP from 2013 to 2017 were identified. From DaneSpine, the European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were collected pre- and post-operatively. Data on the incidence of complications and poly-methyl methacrylate leaks were obtained by review of medical records and plain post-operative X-rays. RESULTS: The mean improvement in EQ-5D scores from baseline was 0.30 (p < 0.01) after three months, and 0.25 (p = 0.01) after one year. The ODI improved from 44.1 to 23.3 (p < 0.01). Despite a cement leakage rate of 14.8%, no patients presented with any clinically significant symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: PVP is a safe procedure providing a statistically significant and clinically relevant improvement in quality of life and function of patients with cancer-related vertebral compression fractures. Our findings may provide useful information to healthcare professionals who are treating cancer. FUNDING: none. TRIAL REGISTRATION: not relevant.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas por Compresión/cirugía , Calidad de Vida , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/secundario , Vertebroplastia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Femenino , Fracturas por Compresión/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/etiología , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/complicaciones , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...