A review of the pharmacokinetics, tolerability and pharmacodynamics of amisulpride in healthy volunteers.

Amisulpride binds selectively to dopamine D(2) and D(3) receptors in the limbic system. Low doses of amisulpride preferentially block presynaptic D(2)/D(3)-dopamine autoreceptors, thereby enhancing dopaminergic transmission, whereas higher doses block postsynaptic receptors, thus inhibiting dopaminergic hyperactivity. Amisulpride is clinically effective on the negative symptoms of acute schizophrenia exacerbations at low dosages (50-300 mg/day), and also on the positive symptoms of the disease at high dosages (400-800 mg/day). Nineteen clinical studies involving 358 volunteers have investigated the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and tolerability of amisulpride. Amisulpride shows linear pharmacokinetics, a bioavailability of 48%, low protein binding (17%) and an elimination half-life of approximately 12 h. It is predominantly eliminated in the urine as the parent compound. It exhibits no significant detrimental effects in psychometric or memory tests up to the dose of 400 mg/day, inducing only mild impairment at high doses, whereas EEG data suggest an alertness-enhancing effect at low doses (

Safety and pharmacokinetics of a single oral dose of amisulpride in healthy elderly volunteers.

OBJECTIVE: Amisulpride is a substituted benzamide neuroleptic, which binds selectively to dopamine D2 and D3 receptors, mainly in the limbic structures. States of delusion and agitation occur frequently in the population aged more than 65 years, especially in demented patients and this sometimes requires the use of neuroleptics. The objectives of this study were to determine the safety and the pharmacokinetic profile of 50 mg of amisulpride administered orally as a single dose to elderly volunteers. METHODS: Twenty healthy volunteers (10 men and 10 women) aged 65 79 years were included in this open trial. Frequent measurements of blood pressure and heart rate were made and ECG and blood samples were performed up to 72 h after drug intake. RESULTS: The overall clinical and cardiovascular safety was satisfactory. The mean Cmax of the racemate amisulpride in elderly people was 64.1+/-6.7 ng ml(-1), and was not different from the value of 56+/-4.1 ng ml(-1) in young subjects. As with the Cmax, the mean values of t1/2 and AUC in elderly people (15.6+/-1.3 h and 667+/-51 ng. ml(-1).h, respectively) were not different to values observed in young subject (respectively 11.7+/-0.5 h and 603+/-25 ng m1(-1) h). CONCLUSION: A single oral dose of amisulpride was well tolerated and showed a similar pharmacokinetic profile in healthy elderly and young subjects. However, these findings should be confirmed after multiple dosing in a larger population in order to establish the lack of need of dosage adjustment in this elderly population.

Cognitive performance in elderly subjects after a single dose of befloxatone, a new reversible selective monoamine oxidase A inhibitor.

BACKGROUND: Patients with depression often have cognitive and psychomotor performance impairments. Antidepressive treatments can correct these deficits, provided sedative and anticholinergic adverse effects do not add to the preexisting condition, particularly in elderly patients. Newly developed antidepressants therefore should be without deleterious effects on cognitive functions, including memory. Befloxatone is a new antidepressant with a potent, selective, competitive, and reversible inhibitory activity on the A isoform of monoamine oxidase (MAO-A). METHODS: The effects on cognition and psychomotor performance of single oral doses of befloxatone (10 mg) and amitriptyline (50 mg) were compared in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-way crossover design trial in 12 healthy elderly (65 to 85 years) volunteers. The performances of the subjects were evaluated by a comprehensive battery of validated psychometric tests that explored alertness, psychomotor performance, information processing, and memory. Subjective feelings on mood and sleep were rated on visual analog scales. MAO-A inhibition was estimated by multiple titrations of 3,4-dihydrophenylglycol (DHPG) in plasma. RESULTS: Amitriptyline displayed the expected deleterious effects on performance tasks, critical flicker fusion threshold, digit symbol substitution, and body sway, and it deteriorated memory (immediate and delayed free recall of words). In contrast, befloxatone did not impair cognition or psychomotor performance but instead significantly improved the delayed free recall. Amitriptyline adversely affected subjective feelings of alertness and contentedness, but befloxatone permitted sustained alertness and did not alter other subjective feelings or sleep. Concurrently, a single dose of 10 mg befloxatone markedly decreased the DHPG concentration in plasma. CONCLUSION: Contrary to tricyclic antidepressants, whose deleterious effects are greater in elderly subjects, this study demonstrated the safety of befloxatone on cognition and psychomotor performance in elderly subjects.

Clinical pharmacology of befloxatone: a brief review.

Clinical pharmacology studies of befloxatone, a new selective reversible inhibitor of monoamine oxidase-A (MAO-A), have addressed safety, with special emphasis on tyramine interactions, and have also investigated pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics in terms of both MAO-A inhibition (using 3,4-dihydroxyphenylglycol, DHPG, as a pharmacological activity marker) and effects on psychomotor and cognitive function, in young and elderly healthy volunteers. Clinical and laboratory safety data were satisfactory in healthy volunteers given single doses of up to 160 mg or repeated doses of up to 80 mg/day for 7 days. Tyramine interaction studies showed that the expected potentiation of the tyramine pressor effect occurred with a safety margin that was so wide as to make dietary restrictions unnecessary with dosages of up to 20 mg once daily in clinical settings. Absorption was rapid (tmax = 2 h), terminal halflife was about 11 h, and PK parameters increased linearly with the dose. Befloxatone induced a dose-dependent decrease in plasma DHPG levels from 2.5 mg upwards, and a 10-mg dose provided sub-maximal activity (80% DHPG decrease) of 24 h duration. No sedative or stimulant effects were detected using several batteries of psychometric tests. Befloxatone was devoid of deleterious effects on memory in young volunteers, and exhibited the EEG profile of a non-sedative antidepressant. In summary, available clinical pharmacology studies confirm that befloxatone is a safe and potent RIMA with no potential for inducing deleterious CNS effects.

Effects of befloxatone, a reversible selective monoamine oxidase-A inhibitor, on psychomotor function and memory in healthy subjects.

Befloxatone is a new reversible and selective monoamine oxidase (MAO-A) inhibitor that has been shown to have antidepressant activity in various animal models. To assess the effects of single oral doses of befloxatone (5, 10, and 20 mg) on psychomotor performance and memory, a randomized, double-blind, five-way, crossover study with both placebo and amitriptyline (50 mg) was carried out in 15 healthy male volunteers. Psychomotor and cognitive functions were evaluated using both objective measures, including Critical Flicker Frequency (CFF), Choice Reaction Time (CRT), Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), and a picture memory test and subjective measures, including Visual Analog Scales (VAS) and Addiction Research Center Inventory (ARCI), before and 2, 4, and 8 hours after administration. Pupil diameter was recorded by videopupillography. Single doses of befloxatone from 5 to 20 mg did not result in any detrimental effects on skilled performance and memory. In contrast, amitriptyline significantly impaired arousal (CFF), speed of reaction (CRT), information processing (DSST) and long-term memory (delayed free recall of pictures) and produced subjective sedation from 2 to 8 hours after administration. At the doses studied amitriptyline induced miosis but befloxatone did not modify pupil diameter. There was no evidence in this study to suggest that befloxatone, at the doses studied, has any sedative or amnesic effects in healthy subjects.

Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of two dose regimens of befloxatone, a new reversible and selective monoamine oxidase inhibitor, at steady state in healthy volunteers.

The pharmacodynamic equipotency of 2 dose regimens (5 mg twice daily versus 10 mg once daily) of befloxatone, a new reversible and selective monoamine oxidase A (MAO-A) inhibitor, after single and multiple doses for 6 days was examined in a randomized, double-blind, three-way crossover, placebo-controlled trial of 12 healthy volunteers. Plasma levels of the deaminated metabolite 3-4 dihydroxyphenylglycol (DHPG), as measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with coulometric electrochemical detection, were used as an index of MAO inhibition. A single dose of befloxatone produced a significant dose-related reduction in plasma DHPG levels, as shown by the decrease in the 24-hour area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-24) of DHPG, which peaked 2 hours after administration and persisted over 24 hours. Both dose regimens provided equipotent extent and duration of MAO-A inhibition at steady state, suggesting a once daily dosage should be sufficient for most patients. The pharmacokinetic bioavailability at steady state of both dose regimens was also similar. The concentration-time effect curve after a single dose revealed a hysteresis corresponding to the delay necessary to elicit MAO inhibition and/or elimination of DHPG. The relationship between plasma levels of DHPG and/or elimination of plasma concentrations of DHPG and befloxatone after a single dose can be modeled using the Emax model with a mean EC50 of 4.75 ng/mL, and suggests the presence of a maximal response from the single dose. This model permits prediction of steady-state levels of DHPG.

Lack of interaction between a new antihistamine, mizolastine, and lorazepam on psychomotor performance and memory in healthy volunteers.

1. The possible interaction between a new H1 antihistamine, mizolastine, and lorazepam was assessed in a randomised, double-blind, cross-over, placebo-controlled study involving 16 healthy young male volunteers who received mizolastine 10 mg or placebo once daily for 8 days with a 1 week wash-out interval. The interaction of mizolastine, at steady-state, with a single oral dose of lorazepam or placebo was assessed on days 6 or 8 of each treatment period. 2. Psychomotor performance and cognitive function were evaluated using objective tests (critical flicker fusion threshold, choice reaction time, tapping, arithmetic calculation, body sway) and self-ratings (visual analogue scale, ARCI) before and at 2, 4, 6 and 8 h after dosing. Short-term memory (Sternberg memory scanning immediate free recall of a word list) and long-term memory (delayed free recall and recognition of words and pictures) were assessed before and at 3 h after dosing. Pharmacodynamic interactions were evaluated by repeated measures ANOVA in a 2 x 2 factorial interaction model. 3. Mizolastine, 10 mg once daily, at steady-state, was devoid of sedation and detrimental effect on skilled performance and memory. 4. In contrast, a single 2 mg dose of lorazepam produced marked impairment of psychomotor performance, cognitive functions (significant reduction in flicker fusion threshold, tapping and arithmetic calculation and increase in reaction times and body sway) and subjective sedation from 2 to 8 h after dosing. In addition, lorazepam induced an anterograde amnesia, characterised by a decrease in delayed free recall and recognition, and a deficit in short term memory.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Lack of interaction between two antihistamines, mizolastine and cetirizine, and ethanol in psychomotor and driving performance in healthy subjects.

The pharmacodynamic interaction between mizolastine, a new H1 antihistamine, and ethanol was assessed in a randomized, double-blind, three-way crossover, placebo-controlled study. Eighteen healthy young male volunteers received mizolastine 10 mg, or cetirizine 10 mg or placebo once daily for 7 days with a 1-week wash-out interval. An oral dose of ethanol or ethanol placebo, given 2 h after dosing on days 5 or 7 of each treatment period, was administered to achieve a peak blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.7 g/l then maintained for 1 h by two further doses of ethanol. Driving ability and psychomotor performance were evaluated using actual and simulated driving tests, critical flicker fusion threshold (CFF), adaptive tracking and divided attention (DAT) tasks. Ethanol produced a significant decrement in all tasks up to 5.5 h after administration: an increase in steering movements of 4.6, in lateral deviation of 0.45 m, in braking reaction time of 80 ms, in driving test and DAT performance of + 3.2; and a decrease in CFF and in tracking speed of 2.6 m.s-1. Neither mizolastine nor cetirizine significantly impaired driving ability or arousal (CFF) compared with the placebo. However, both drugs significantly impaired DAT performance 6:00 h post-dose (increase of + 2.1 for mizolastine and + 2.4 for cetirizine). The tracking speed was significantly decreased 7:50 h after mizolastine administration (-1.3 m.s-1) and more consistently from 1:30 to 7:50 h after cetirizine administration (-1.4 m.s-1). No significant adverse interaction, i.e. potentiation, occurred between ethanol and either antihistamine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Assessment of the interaction between a partial agonist and a full agonist of benzodiazepine receptors, based on psychomotor performance and memory, in healthy volunteers.

Potential interactions between the imidazopyridine anxiolytic alpidem and the full benzodiazepine agonist lorazepam were assessed in a randomized, double-blind, four-way cross-over, placebo-controlled study in 16 healthy young male volunteers. Each volunteer received alpidem, 50 mg, or a placebo twice daily for 8 days with a 1- week wash-out interval. The interaction between alpidem, at the steady state, and a single oral dose of lorazepam 2 mg or a placebo was assessed after concomitant administration on days 7 or 9 of each treatment period. Psycho motor performance and cognitive function were evaluated before and 2, 4, 6 and 8 h post-dose, using objective tests [critical flicker fusion threshold (CFF), choice reaction time (CRT), digit-symbol substitution (DSST), body sway and short-term memory (Sternberg memory scanning)] and self-ratings [line analogue rating scales: (LARS)]. Long-term memory (delayed free recall and recognition of pictures) was assessed before the dose and 2 and 4 h post-dose. Pharmacodynamic interactions were evaluated by applying repeated measures ANOVA to a 2 x 2 factorial interaction model. Alpidem, 50 mg twice daily at the steady state, was free of any clinically relevant detrimental effects on skilled performance, information processing or memory. In contrast, a single 2 mg dose of lorazepam induced marked impairment of psychomotor performance and cognitive function (significant reductions in CFF and DSST and increases in CRT and body sway), as well as subjective sedation from 2 to 8 h post-dose, depending on the test used. In addition, lorazepam induced anterograde amnesia, characterized by a decrease in delayed free recall and recognition, and a deficit in short-term memory. Finally, alpidem 50 mg did not potentiate the detrimental effects of lorazepam 2 mg. On the contrary, alpidem significantly antagonized the lorazepam-induced CRT increase and anterograde amnesia, and produced similar trends on most of the other cognitive parameters; thus, the results obtained with the combination of alpidem and lorazepam consistently indicated less impairment than those measured after lorazepam alone. These results are consistent with the suggested partial agonsist properties of alpidem at the benzodiazepine receptor and indicate that such properties can be assessed in humans based on antagonism of the effects of a full agonist.

Lack of amnestic, psychotomimetic or impairing effect on psychomotor performance of eliprodil, a new NMDA antagonist.

The possible effects on memory, psychomotor performance and mood of eliprodil, a new non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist acting through the polyamine modulatory site, was assessed in a randomized, double-blind, cross-over, placebo-controlled study involving 11 healthy young male volunteers. Eliprodil 30 mg, a placebo and midazolam 15 mg, a positive control, were administered as a single oral dose at 1 week wash-out intervals. Objective tests evaluated both memory (Sternberg memory scanning and paired words for short-term memory, delayed free recall of pictures for long-term memory) and psychomotor functions and arousal (critical flicker fusion threshold, choice reaction time, body sway). Mood was assessed using self-ratings (LARS, POMS, ARCI). Statistical analysis was performed using an ANOVA with pairwise comparisons using Tukey's method. A single dose of eliprodil 30 mg was free of any detrimental effect on memory and skilled performance and did not produce either subjective sedation or excitation or psychotomimetic effects in comparison with placebo. In contrast, a single dose of midazolam 15 mg induced a marked impairment in psychomotor performance and cognitive functions (significant reduction in CFF, increase in CRT and body sway, disruption of short- and long-term memory). The potent sedative activity of midazolam, peaking 1 to 3 h post-dose, was confirmed by subjective evaluation and had disappeared 8 h post-dose.