Asunto(s)
Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Melanoma , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Humanos , Melanoma/cirugía , Melanoma/patología , Melanoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/cirugía , Tasa de Supervivencia , Pronóstico , AustraliaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) for patients with stage III melanoma achieves high major pathologic response rates and high recurrence-free survival rates. This study aimed to determine how NAST with targeted therapies (TTs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) influences surgical outcomes after lymph node dissection in terms of complications, morbidity, and textbook outcomes. METHODS: Patients who underwent a lymph node dissection after either NAST in a clinical trial or upfront surgery for stage III melanoma between 2014 and 2022 were identified from an institutional research database. RESULTS: The study included 89 NAST-treated patients and 79 upfront surgery-treated patients. The rate of postoperative complications did not differ between the NAST- and upfront surgery-treated patients (55% vs. 51%; p = 0.643), and steroid treatment for drug toxicity did not influence the complication rate (odds ratio [OR], 1.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.4-3; p = 0.826). No significant differences in postoperative morbidity were observed in terms of seroma (23% vs. 11%; p = 0.570) or lymphedema (36% vs. 51%; p = 0.550). The rate of achieving a textbook outcome was comparable for the two groups (61% vs. 57%; p = 0.641). CONCLUSIONS: The surgical outcomes after lymph node dissections were comparable between the patients who received NAST and those who had upfront surgery, indicating that surgery can be safely performed after NAST with TT or ICI for stage III melanoma.
Asunto(s)
Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Melanoma , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Humanos , Melanoma/cirugía , Melanoma/patología , Melanoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Melanoma/mortalidad , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios de Seguimiento , Tasa de Supervivencia , Anciano , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/cirugía , Neoplasias Cutáneas/tratamiento farmacológico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto , Australia , Pronóstico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: ILP has shown to achieve high response rates in patients with melanoma ITM. Possibly there is a synergistic mechanism of action of ILP and anti-PD1. The aim of this trial was to investigate the safety and efficacy of adding a single dose of systemic anti-PD1 to isolated limb perfusion (ILP) for patients with melanoma in-transit metastases (ITM). METHODS: In this placebo controlled double-blind phase Ib/II trial, patients with melanoma ITM were randomized 1:1 to either a single systemic dose of nivolumab or placebo one day prior to ILP. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR) rate at three months, and safety in terms of incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: A total of 20 patients were included. AEs of any grade occurred in 90% of patients in the nivolumab arm and in 80% in the placebo arm within three months after ILP. Grade 3 AEs were reported in 40% and 30% respectively, most commonly related to wound infection, wound dehiscence, or skin necrosis. There were no grade 4 or 5 AEs reported. The CR rate was 75% in the nivolumab arm and 60% in the placebo arm. The 1-year local progression-free rate was 86% in the nivolumab arm and 67% in the placebo arm. The 1-year OS was 100% in both arms. CONCLUSION: For patients with melanoma ITM, the addition of a single systemic dose of nivolumab the day before ILP is considered safe and feasible with promising efficacy. Accrual will continue in a phase 2 trial.
Asunto(s)
Quimioterapia del Cáncer por Perfusión Regional , Melanoma , Nivolumab , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Humanos , Melanoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Melanoma/secundario , Melanoma/patología , Nivolumab/administración & dosificación , Nivolumab/uso terapéutico , Método Doble Ciego , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Neoplasias Cutáneas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Quimioterapia del Cáncer por Perfusión Regional/métodos , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Extremidades , Anciano de 80 o más AñosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment of patients with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (mMCC) has shown high response rates, ranging from 33% to 73%. The ideal duration of treatment, however, is currently unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate if avelumab treatment for mMCC can be safely stopped after 1 year of treatment and a complete response (CR) confirmed by fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) imaging. METHODS: Patients who received more than one dose of avelumab treatment for mMCC between November 2017 and February 2022 were included in this study. Treatment was discontinued in case of a FDG-PET/CT confirmed CR after 1 year (26 cycles) of avelumab or a CR and unacceptable toxicity earlier. The primary end point was recurrence-free survival (RFS). RESULTS: Sixty-five patients were included: 25 (38%) had a FDG-PET/CT-confirmed CR at discontinuation of avelumab. In those 25 patients, reasons for discontinuation of treatment were completion of 1 year of treatment in 13 (52%), toxicity in five (20%), and patient preference in seven (28%). Median duration of treatment in this group was 11 months (interquartile range, 6.1-11.7). Median follow-up was 27 months (interquartile range, 15.8-33.8). The 12-month RFS was 88% (95% CI, 0.74-1) and median RFS was not reached. Two patients (8%) had a recurrence at 4 and 7 months after discontinuation of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with mMCC who acquire a CR on PET/CT imaging appear to have durable responses after discontinuation of treatment after 1 year.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Carcinoma de Células de Merkel , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células de Merkel/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma de Células de Merkel/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células de Merkel/inducido químicamente , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Neoplasias Cutáneas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Cutáneas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Cutáneas/inducido químicamente , Fluorodesoxiglucosa F18 , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversosRESUMEN
We aimed to compare the relapse-free survival (RFS) in patients treated with adjuvant anti-programmed cell death-1 (anti-PD-1) therapy for a first diagnosis of stage III melanoma to patients treated after resection of the recurrences. Patients treated with adjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy after complete resection of stage III melanoma between September 2018 and January 2021, were included. Depending on when adjuvant anti-PD-1 treatment was initiated, patients were divided over 2 cohorts: for the first diagnosis (cohort A) or for a second or subsequent diagnosis (cohort B) of stage III melanoma. Clinical data and RFS were compared between cohorts. 66 patients were included: 37 in cohort A, 29 in cohort B. Median follow-up time from the start of adjuvant therapy was 21 months and 17 months in cohorts A and B, respectively. Significant differences in ulceration of the primary tumor ( P â =â 0.032), stage according to the 7th AJCC (American Joint Committee on Cancer , P â =â 0.026) and type of metastatic involvement ( P â =â 0.005) were found between cohorts. In cohorts A and B, 18 (49%) and 8 (28%) patients developed a recurrence and the 1-year RFS was 51% and 72%, respectively. In cohort B, RFS remained longer in the patients of which the interval between first diagnosis of stage III melanoma and start of adjuvant therapy was >48 months compared to ≤48 months (83% vs. 65%, P â =â 0.253). This study demonstrates that patients with recurrent stage III disease, not previously treated with adjuvant systemic therapy, may derive similar benefit to a first diagnosis of stage III patients if access to adjuvant therapy changes.
Asunto(s)
Melanoma , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Humanos , Melanoma/patología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Terapia Combinada , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant systemic therapy has shown promising results in the treatment of high-risk stage III melanoma; however, the effects on surgery are currently unknown. This study aims to compare the surgical outcomes, in terms of postoperative complications, postoperative morbidity, duration of surgery and textbook outcomes, of patients with high-risk stage III melanoma who received neoadjuvant systemic therapy followed by lymph node dissection with patients who received an upfront lymph node dissection. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, patients with high-risk stage III melanoma treated with neoadjuvant anti-PD1 and anti-CTLA4 in the OpACIN (NCT02437279) and OpACIN-neo (NCT02977052) trial between October 2014 and August 2018 were included and compared to patients who received upfront surgery in the same time period. RESULTS: A total of 120 patients were included in this study, of whom 44 received neoadjuvant systemic therapy and 76 underwent upfront surgery. There was no significant difference in the overall rate of postoperative complications between the neoadjuvant group and the upfront surgery group (31.8% versus 36.8%, p = 0.578) and neither in rate of postoperative morbidity (seroma 56.8% versus 57.9%, p = 0.908) (lymphedema 22.7% versus 13.2%, p = 0.175). There was a non-significant difference towards a slightly longer duration of surgery after neoadjuvant immunotherapy (105 versus 90 min, p = 0.077). There were no differences in textbook outcomes (50% versus 49%, p = 0.889). CONCLUSION: This study shows that the surgical outcomes for patients who underwent a lymph node dissection after neoadjuvant systemic immunotherapy or underwent upfront lymph node dissection for high-risk stage III melanoma are comparable.
Asunto(s)
Melanoma , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Humanos , Terapia Neoadyuvante/efectos adversos , Terapia Neoadyuvante/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Melanoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Melanoma/cirugía , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Melanoma Cutáneo MalignoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a cutaneous tumor with a high tendency to metastasize, and a significant proportion of patients have metastases at first presentation. This study aims to determine the value of baseline ultrasound (US) and 18 fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18 FDG-PET/CT) imaging in both patients with clinically localized MCC (Stage I/II) and patients who present with palpable lymph nodes (Stage III). METHODS: This retrospective cohort included 135 MCC patients who underwent baseline US (with fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC)) and/or FDG-PET/CT imaging between 2015 and 2021. RESULTS: Of the 104 patients with clinically localized disease, 48% were upstaged to Stage III and 3% to Stage IV by imaging or sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). FDG-PET/CT imaging identified regional metastases in 23%, while US with FNAC identified regional metastases in 19%. SLNB was performed in 56 patients, of whom 57% were upstaged to Stage III. Of the 31 patients who presented with palpable lymph nodes, 16% were upstaged to Stage IV by FDG-PET/CT imaging. CONCLUSION: Baseline imaging frequently upstages Stage I/II MCC patients to Stage III, both by US and FDG-PET/CT, Stage IV disease is rarely identified. Patients who present with palpable nodes are frequently upstaged to Stage IV by FDG-PET/CT imaging.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células de Merkel , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Humanos , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Fluorodesoxiglucosa F18 , Carcinoma de Células de Merkel/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma de Células de Merkel/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Biopsia del Ganglio Linfático Centinela , RadiofármacosRESUMEN
CLINICAL QUESTION: Is there nowadays any benefit of continuing the practice of routine wide local excision (WLE) for primary stage I/II cutaneous melanoma? BACKGROUND: WLE aims to eradicate potential microsatellites around melanomas and thereby reduce local recurrence rates and improve overall survival. Six large prospective randomised trials investigated WLE versus wider WLE, they all failed to show any effect on overall survival (OS). METHODS: A literature search was performed to identify data on outcome after omitting WLE. Additionally circumstantial evidence was gathered from pathology studies and outcomes of modified surgical techniques, as well as publications on morbidity. RESULTS: No prospective and one retrospective study was found. The retrospective study showed no difference in OS after correction for confounding factors. Pathology studies showed a low incidence of residual melanoma in WLE specimen (0-4.2%). Mohs surgery does not show a difference in recurrence rates or OS. WLE is associated with considerable postoperative morbidity, which increases with wider excision margins. CONCLUSION: There is no solid prospective evidence to support the classic dogma of a 2-step approach with the use of WLE for primary cutaneous melanoma that has been completely excised on diagnostic excision biopsy. We recommend to setup and conduct a prospective randomised trial to compare the classical 2-step approach with WLE to a complete diagnostic excision only to abolish the routine practice of WLE in the future.
Asunto(s)
Melanoma , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Humanos , Márgenes de Escisión , Melanoma/patología , Cirugía de Mohs/métodos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Melanoma Cutáneo MalignoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Trials investigating neoadjuvant treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in patients with melanoma have shown high clinical and pathologic response rates. Treatment with talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC), a modified herpes simplex virus type-1 (HSV-1), is approved for patients with unresectable stage IIIB-IVM1a melanoma and has the potential to make tumors more susceptible for ICI. Combination ICI and intralesional T-VEC has already been investigated in patients with unresectable stage IIIB-IV disease, however, no data is available yet on the potential benefit of this combination therapy in neoadjuvant setting. METHODS: This single center, single arm, phase II study aims to show an improved major pathologic complete response (pCR) rate, either pCR or near-pCR, up to 45% in 24 patients with resectable stage IIIB-IVM1a melanoma upon neoadjuvant combination treatment with intralesional T-VEC and systemic nivolumab (anti-PD-1 antibody). Patients will receive four courses of T-VEC up to 4 mL (first dose as seroconversion dose) and three doses of nivolumab (240 mg flatdose) every 2 weeks, followed by surgical resection in week nine. The primary endpoint of this trial is pathologic response rate. Secondary endpoints are safety, the rate of delay of surgery and event-free survival. Additionally, prognostic and predictive biomarker research and health-related quality of life evaluation will be performed. DISCUSSION: Intralesional T-VEC has the capacity to heighten the immune response and to elicit an abscopal effect in melanoma in combination with ICI. However, the potential clinical benefit of T-VEC plus ICI in the neoadjuvant setting remains unknown. This is the first trial investigating the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant treatment of T-VEC and nivolumab followed by surgical resection in patients with stage IIIB-IVM1a melanoma, with the potential of high pathologic response rates and acceptable toxicity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered in the European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT- number: 2019-001911-22 ) and the Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects (NL71866.000.19) on 4th June 2020. Secondary identifying number: NCT04330430 .
Asunto(s)
Productos Biológicos , Melanoma , Nivolumab , Viroterapia Oncolítica , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Ensayos Clínicos Fase II como Asunto , Herpesvirus Humano 1 , Humanos , Melanoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Nivolumab/uso terapéutico , Viroterapia Oncolítica/métodos , Calidad de Vida , Neoplasias Cutáneas/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
The introduction of effective systemic therapies has significantly changed the treatment of stage III and IV melanoma. Both immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies have improved recurrence-free survival in the adjuvant setting. Recent interest has sparked for neoadjuvant systemic therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors. The intended benefit of pre-operative treatment with immunotherapy is amongst others to enable tailoring of the surgery and adjuvant systemic therapy according to the treatment response. Most importantly, recurrence-free survival might be improved by neoadjuvant systemic therapy over the current standard of care of surgery followed by adjuvant systemic therapy. The first phase I and II trials investigating anti-PD1 inhibitors, both as a single agent and in combination with anti-CTLA-4 inhibitors or other therapeutic agents, have shown promising results. Pathological complete response on neoadjuvant systemic therapy seems a valid surrogate endpoint for relapse-free and overall survival. Pathological complete response rates in these trials vary between 30 and 70%. The optimal dose with respect to efficacy and toxicity and the interval between systemic and surgical treatment remain important issues to address. Accumulating follow-up data and ongoing phase III studies must prove if neoadjuvant systemic therapy is superior to surgery followed by standard-of-care adjuvant therapy.