Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Clin Microbiol ; 57(11)2019 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31413084

RESUMEN

The Staphylococcus intermedius group (SIG) is a collection of coagulase-positive staphylococci consisting of four distinct species, namely, Staphylococcus cornubiensis, Staphylococcus delphini, Staphylococcus intermedius, and Staphylococcus pseudintermedius SIG members are animal pathogens and rare causes of human infection. Accurate identification of S. pseudintermedius has important implications for interpretation of antimicrobial susceptibility testing data and may be important for other members of the group. Therefore, we sought to evaluate the performance of five commercially available identification platforms with 21 S. delphini isolates obtained from a variety of animal and geographic sources. Here, we show that automated biochemical platforms were unable to identify S. delphini to the species level, a function of its omission from their databases, but could identify isolates to the SIG level with various degrees of success. However, all automated systems misidentified at least one isolate as Staphylococcus aureus One matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) system was able to identify S. delphini to the species level, suggesting that MALDI-TOF MS is the best option for distinguishing members of the SIG. With the exception of S. pseudintermedius, it is unclear if other SIG members should be routinely identified to the species level; however, as our understanding of their role in animal and human diseases increases, it may be necessary and important to do so.


Asunto(s)
Automatización de Laboratorios/instrumentación , Automatización de Laboratorios/normas , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/veterinaria , Staphylococcus/química , Staphylococcus/aislamiento & purificación , Animales , Automatización de Laboratorios/métodos , Espectrometría de Masa por Láser de Matriz Asistida de Ionización Desorción , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Staphylococcus aureus/aislamiento & purificación , Staphylococcus hyicus/aislamiento & purificación , Staphylococcus intermedius/aislamiento & purificación
3.
J Clin Microbiol ; 56(3)2018 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29305540

RESUMEN

The performance of a disk diffusion test using broth from positive blood cultures as inoculum (direct disk diffusion [dDD]) was evaluated for a collection of 20 challenge isolates of Enterobacteriaceae, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates seeded into human blood were inoculated into Bactec Plus Aerobic/F, VersaTREK Redox 1, and BacT/Alert FA Plus bottles and incubated in the respective automated blood culture systems. Disk diffusion results were compared to reference disk diffusion results. Categorical agreement (CA) values for dDD, after removal of random errors due to natural MIC variation, were 87.8%, 88.4%, and 92.2% for the BacT/Alert, Bactec, and VersaTREK systems, respectively. No very major errors (VME) were observed, and major error (ME) rates were 3.0%, 2.3%, and 1.7%, respectively. Incubation of the dDD test samples for 6 h compared to incubation for 16 to 18 h resulted in 19.9% of tests having too light of growth to allow reading of zones of inhibition. Among the evaluable dDD tests, CA values were 58.9%, 76.6%, and 73.2% for the isolates seeded into the BacT/Alert, Bactec, and VersaTREK systems, respectively. VME rates for isolates seeded into these systems were 2.2%, 1.8%, and 3.0%, respectively, and ME rates were 25.4%, 6.1%, and 2.8%, respectively, at the 6-h reading. The best performance of dDD was found for blood cultures with bacterial concentrations in the range of 7.6 × 107 to 5.0 × 108 CFU/ml; CA values ranged from 94.7 to 96.2% for these concentrations after 18 h of incubation and from 76.9 to 84.1% after 6 h of incubation. These preliminary data demonstrate the potential accuracy of dDD testing by the clinical laboratory.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas Bacteriológicas/normas , Sangre/microbiología , Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico/normas , Pruebas Antimicrobianas de Difusión por Disco/normas , Bacterias Gramnegativas/efectos de los fármacos , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Medios de Cultivo , Enterobacteriaceae/efectos de los fármacos , Enterobacteriaceae/aislamiento & purificación , Bacterias Gramnegativas/aislamiento & purificación , Humanos , Factores de Tiempo
6.
J Mol Diagn ; 13(6): 583-604, 2011 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21871973

RESUMEN

The superior sensitivity and specificity associated with the use of molecular assays has greatly improved the field of infectious disease diagnostics by providing clinicians with results that are both accurate and rapidly obtained. Herein, we review molecularly based infectious disease diagnostic tests that are Food and Drug Administration approved or cleared and commercially available in the United States as of December 31, 2010. We describe specific assays and their performance, as stated in the Food and Drug Administration's Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data or the Office of In Vitro Diagnostic Device Evaluation and Safety's decision summaries, product inserts, or peer-reviewed literature. We summarize indications for testing, limitations, and challenges related to implementation in a clinical laboratory setting for a wide variety of common pathogens. The information presented in this review will be particularly useful for laboratories that plan to implement or expand their molecular offerings in the near term.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico , Enfermedades Transmisibles/diagnóstico , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/métodos , Enfermedades Transmisibles/genética , Aprobación de Pruebas de Diagnóstico , Humanos , Juego de Reactivos para Diagnóstico , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration
7.
Drug Resist Updat ; 14(2): 95-106, 2011 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21398170

RESUMEN

Antibacterial drugs are overused and often inappropriately selected. This exacerbates drug resistance and exacts a high burden from acute respiratory tract, bloodstream, sexually-transmitted, diarrheal and other infections. Appropriate use of existing diagnostic tests, and developing better ones, could avert these costs and would avoid selective pressure from unnecessary antibacterial use. Product profiles of resistance-averting tests would specify WHO 'ASSURED' (Affordable, Sensitive, Specific, User-friendly, Rapid and Robust, Equipment-free and Deliverable) criteria and request susceptibility as well as etiological information. Advances in genomics, nanoscience, microfluidics and bioengineering, as well as innovative funding paradigms can help to overcome research and development barriers for such diagnostics if they are deliberately and forcefully applied. Rapid uptake of new tests requires timely translation of research on cost-benefit analyses into policy, value-based subsidies and reimbursements, as well as behavioral change of health care providers and users.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Bacterianas/diagnóstico , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular , Antibacterianos/síntesis química , Bacterias/patogenicidad , Infecciones Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Bacterianas/microbiología , Bioensayo , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Países en Desarrollo , Descubrimiento de Drogas , Genómica/métodos , Ensayos Analíticos de Alto Rendimiento , Humanos , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/psicología , Microfluídica/métodos
8.
J Clin Microbiol ; 47(6): 1902-5, 2009 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19357210

RESUMEN

This report describes the results of an 11-laboratory study to determine if a cefoxitin broth microdilution MIC test could predict the presence of mecA in staphylococci. Using breakpoints of < or = 4 microg/ml for mecA-negative and > or = 6 or 8 microg/ml for mecA-positive isolates, sensitivity and specificity based on mecA or presumed mecA for Staphylococcus aureus at 18 h of incubation were 99.7 to 100% in three cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broths tested. For coagulase-negative strains at 24 h of incubation, breakpoints of < or = 2 microg/ml for mecA-negative and > or = 4 microg/ml for mecA-positive isolates gave sensitivity and specificity of 94 to 99% and 69 to 80%, respectively.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Proteínas Bacterianas/genética , Cefoxitina/farmacología , Staphylococcus/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Proteínas de Unión a las Penicilinas , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Staphylococcus/genética
9.
J Clin Microbiol ; 45(12): 3954-7, 2007 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17942655

RESUMEN

A study conducted by 11 laboratories investigated the ability of four combinations of erythromycin (ERY) and clindamycin (CC) (ERY and CC at 4 and 0.5, 6 and 1, 8 and 1.5, and 0.5 and 2 microg/ml) in a single well of a broth microdilution panel to predict the presence of inducible CC resistance. Each laboratory tested approximately 30 Staphylococcus aureus isolates and 20 coagulase-negative staphylococcus (CoNS) isolates in a panel using cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth from three different manufacturers. Only the strains resistant to ERY and those susceptible or intermediate to CC were included in the analysis (S. aureus, n = 333; CoNS, n = 97). Results of the D-zone test were used as the gold standard. After an 18-h incubation, the combination of 4 microg/ml ERY and 0.5 microg/ml CC performed the best, with 98 to 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity for both organism groups. After a 24-h incubation, the ERY-CC combinations of 4 and 0.5, 6 and 1, and 8 and 1.5 microg/ml correlated well with the D-zone test.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Clindamicina/farmacología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Eritromicina/farmacología , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana/métodos , Staphylococcus/efectos de los fármacos , Medios de Cultivo/química , Regulación de la Expresión Génica/efectos de los fármacos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
10.
J Clin Microbiol ; 41(10): 4852-4, 2003 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14532241

RESUMEN

Five strains of a newly described Escherichia species, Escherichia albertii, were extensively characterized by conventional biochemical methods and by commercial identification panels. E. albertii is an indole-negative species that ferments D-mannitol but not D-xylose. Because these strains are not included in the databases of commercial systems at present, they were most often identified as Hafnia, Salmonella, Escherichia coli, or, on one system (MicroScan dried overnight panels), Yersinia ruckeri.


Asunto(s)
Escherichia/clasificación , Escherichia/metabolismo , Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/microbiología , Humanos , Manitol/metabolismo , Juego de Reactivos para Diagnóstico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...