Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Injury ; 48(10): 2248-2252, 2017 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28712488

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Two-stage limb reconstruction is an option for patients with critical size segmental bone defects following acute trauma or non-union. Reconstruction is technically demanding and associated with a high complication rate. Current protocols for limb reconstruction have well-documented challenges, and no study has reported on patient outcomes using a validated questionnaire. In this study, we aimed to examine the clinical and patient-centered outcomes following our surgical protocol for two-stage limb reconstruction following critical size segmental defects. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A single surgeon performed reconstruction of long bone defects using antibiotic impregnated cement spacers and intramedullary cancellous bone autograft. A retrospective chart review was performed. Three reviewers independently measured time to union based on radiographs. The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) survey was administered to patients after most recent follow-up. RESULTS: Ten limbs representing nine patients were included. All patients sustained a lower extremity injury, and one patient had bilateral lower extremity injuries. Average clinical follow-up was 18.3 months (range 7-33) from final surgical intervention, and follow-up to questionnaire administration was 28 months (range 24-37). The mean time between stages was 3.1 months. Average time to unrestricted weight-bearing was 7.9 months from Stage 1 (range 3.4-15.9) and 4.5 months from Stage 2 (range 1.1-11.6). Average time to full union was 16.7 months from Stage 1 (range 6.4-28.6) and 13.5 months from Stage 2 (range 1.8-27). Eight patients (nine limbs) participated in the LEFS survey, the average score was 53.1 (range 30-67), equating to 66% of full functionality (range 38%-84%). Complications included 5 infections, 3 non-unions, and one amputation. There was a moderate positive correlation between infection at any time point and non-union (R=0.65, p=0.03). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes in this small patient cohort were good despite risks of complication. There is an association between infection and non-union. Further studies addressing clinical and functional outcomes will help to guide expectations for future surgeons and patients.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante Óseo , Diáfisis/cirugía , Fracturas del Fémur/cirugía , Fijación Interna de Fracturas , Fracturas Conminutas/cirugía , Fracturas no Consolidadas/cirugía , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/terapia , Fracturas de la Tibia/cirugía , Adulto , Antibacterianos , Cementos para Huesos , Protocolos Clínicos , Terapia Combinada , Diáfisis/patología , Femenino , Fracturas del Fémur/complicaciones , Fracturas del Fémur/fisiopatología , Estudios de Seguimiento , Curación de Fractura , Fracturas Conminutas/complicaciones , Fracturas Conminutas/fisiopatología , Fracturas no Consolidadas/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fracturas de la Tibia/complicaciones , Fracturas de la Tibia/fisiopatología , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...