RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pharmacological sedation is a necessary tool in the management of critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients. The intensive care unit (ICU) sedation strategy is to use the least amount of medication to meet safety and comfort goals. Titration of pharmacological agents is currently guided by clinical assessment tools. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the addition of a neurophysiological monitor, bispectral index (BIS), aided the ICU nurse in reducing the amount of drug used, compared to a clinical tool alone, in a general critical care population. METHODS: In this prospective clinical trial, mechanically ventilated adults (N=300) were randomised to sedation assessment using only the observational assessment tool (RASS) or a combination of observational and physiologic measures (RASS+BIS). Subjects were enrolled from a medical ICU (N=154), a trauma ICU (N=72) and a general mixed-use ICU (N=74). RESULTS: BIS-augmented sedation was only associated with the reduction of drug use when patients were sedated with propofol or narcotic agents (propofol [1.61 mg/kg/h vs. 1.77 mg/kg/h; p<0.0001], fentanyl [54.73 mcg/h vs. 66.81 mcg/h; p<0.0001], and hydromorphone [0.97 mg/h vs. 4.00 mg/h: p<0.0001] compared to RASS alone. In contrast, patients sedated with dexmedetomidine or benzodiazepines were given higher doses under the BIS-augmented dexmedetomidine [0.46 mcg/kg/h vs. 0.33 mcg/kg/h; p<0.0001], lorazepam [4.13 mg/h vs. 3.29 mg/h p<0.0001], and midazolam [3.73 mg/h vs 2.86 mg/h; p<0.0001]) protocol compared to clinical assessment alone. CONCLUSION: The clinical evaluation of depth of sedation remains the most reliable method for the titration of pharmacological sedation in the critical care unit. However, BIS-augmented assessment is helpful in reducing the amount of propofol and narcotic medication used and may be considered an adjunct when these agents are utilised.
Asunto(s)
Sedación Consciente/métodos , Sedación Consciente/enfermería , Cuidados Críticos , Monitoreo Fisiológico/instrumentación , Evaluación en Enfermería , Respiración Artificial/enfermería , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
Nurses in acute care hospitals are like the canaries used to test for lethal gases in mines--if they remain, the conditions must not be extreme. Staff nurses from 8 states responded to a questionnaire giving reasons why someone should and should not be a nurse. The almost 700 nurses responding reported that many of the reasons one should be a nurse are also the reasons one should not be one (eg, pay/benefits, respect for nursing). Extrinsic factors dominated the reasons to be a nurse, with both intrinsic and extrinsic factors being the reasons not to do so.