Is the combination of linagliptin and allopurinol better prophylaxis against post-contrast acute kidney injury? A multicenter prospective randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with diabetic kidney disease (DKD) are at increased risk to develop post-contrast acute kidney injury (AKI). Diabetic patients under dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP4Is) experience a lower propensity to develop AKI. We speculated that linagliptin as a single agent or in combination with allopurinol may reduce the incidence of post-contrast AKI in stage 3-5 chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients with underlying DKD. METHODS: Out of 951 DKD patients eligible for this study, 800 accepted to sign informed consent. They were randomly allocated to 4 equal groups that received their prophylaxis for 2 days before and after radiocontrast. The first control group received N-acetyl cysteine and saline, the 2nd received allopurinol, the 3rd group received linagliptin, and the 4th received both allopurinol and linagliptin. Post-procedure follow-up for kidney functions was conducted for 2 weeks in all patients. RESULTS: 20, 19, 14, and 8 patients developed post-contrast AKI in groups 1 through 4, respectively. Neither linagliptin nor allopurinol was superior to N-acetyl cysteine and saline alone. However, the combination of the two agents provided statistically significant renal protection: post-contrast AKI in group 4 was significantly lower than in groups 1 and 2 (p < 0.02 and <0.03, respectively). None of the post-contrast AKI cases required dialysis. CONCLUSION: Linagliptin and allopurinol in combination may offer protection against post-contrast AKI in DKD exposed to radiocontrast. Further studies are needed to support this view. TRIAL REGISTRATION CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT03470454.

Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Critical Review of Estimate-Based Predictions of Individual Outcomes in Kidney Disease.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is generally regarded as a final common pathway of several renal diseases, often leading to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) and a need for renal replacement therapy. Estimated GFR (eGFR) has been used to predict this outcome recognizing its robust association with renal disease progression and the eventual need for dialysis in large, mainly cross-sectional epidemiological studies. However, GFR is implicitly limited as follows: (1) GFR reflects only one of the many physiological functions of the kidney; (2) it is dependent on several non-renal factors; (3) it has intrinsic variability that is a function of dietary intake, fluid and cardiovascular status, and blood pressure especially with impaired autoregulation or medication use; (4) it has been shown to change with age with a unique non-linear pattern; and (5) eGFR may not correlate with GFR in certain conditions and disease states. Yet, many clinicians, especially our non-nephrologist colleagues, tend to regard eGFR obtained from a simple laboratory test as both a valid reflection of renal function and a reliable diagnostic tool in establishing the diagnosis of CKD. What is the validity of these beliefs? This review will critically reassess the limitations of such single-focused attention, with a particular focus on inter-individual variability. What does science actually tell us about the usefulness of eGFR in diagnosing CKD?

Retrospective analysis of nontraumatic subdural hematoma incidence and outcomes in Egyptian patients with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of subdural hematoma (SDH) in chronic maintenance hemodialysis (CMH) patients may change over time, along with the evolving characteristics of the underlying populations. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, single-center study at Cairo University hospitals, assessing the incidence, associated risk factors, and outcomes of nontraumatic SDH in CMH patients between January 2006 and January 2019. RESULTS: Out of 1217 CMH patients, nontraumatic SDH was diagnosed in 41 (3.37%) during the study, increasing with the enrollees' age but stable over the observation period and translating into an annual incidence rate of 28 per 1000 patients per year. SDH patients were likely to use central venous catheters, reported pruritis and history of bone fractures, and had higher phosphorus, parathyroid hormone, and alkaline phosphatase values (p < 0.001); however, there was no association with atrial fibrillation or use of anticoagulants. In the SDH cohort (n = 41), six patients did not need surgical intervention and 13 patients died before becoming surgically fit for intervention; mortality correlated with ischemic heart disease (p = 0.033) and the presence of atrial fibrillation or chronic anticoagulation with warfarin (p < 0.0001 for both), among others. Twenty-two patients received surgical operations and of these 2 died postoperatively; overall patient mortality was 12/41 (29.27%) at 30 days and 15/41 (36.59%) at 1 year. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated a striking enrichment for underlying comorbidities in those patients developing SDH and a high risk of immediate mortality. The benefit of chronic anticoagulation therapy should be carefully weighed against the risk of CNS bleed in MHD patients.

Management of antibody-mediated rejection after kidney transplantation in our clinical practice / Az antitestmediált rejekció diagnosztikája és kezelése gyakorlatunkban.

Összefoglaló. Bevezetés: Az antitest közvetítette kilökodés a graftvesztés gyakori oka a vesetranszplantáltak körében. Célkituzés: Célul tuztük ki, hogy ismertetjük a centrumunkban biopsziával igazolt humorális kilökodéssel rendelkezo betegeknek a kezelésre (standard kezelés: plazmaferézis, immunglobulin, rituximab) adott válaszát, valamint hogy vizsgáljuk a proteinuria grafttúlélésre kifejtett hatását és azt, hogy ezt a DSA-tól függetlenül teszi-e. Vizsgáltuk az eGFR-, a DSA-MFI-értéknek az antirejekciós terápia hatására bekövetkezo változásait is. Módszer: 85 beteg retrospektív analízisét végeztük el. A szövettani elemzésben a Banff-klasszifikációt vettük alapul. A csoportok összehasonlításához kategorikus változók esetén a Fisher-féle egzakt próbát, folyamatos változók esetén a Kruskal-Wallis-próbát használtuk. Eredmények: A biopsziával igazolt humorális rejekciós csoportba (ABMR-csoport) 19, a DSA-pozitív csoportba 14, a DSA-negatív csoportba 52 beteget választottunk be. A DSA-érték az ABMR-csoportban 61,16%-kal csökkent, a DSA-pozitív csoportban 42,86%-kal redukálódott (Fisher-féle egzakt: p = 0,1). Az ABMR-csoportban 9 betegnek a jelentos, 4-nek a nephroticus mértéku proteinuriája csökkentheto volt (az ABMR-csoport 68%-a). A legjobb grafttúlélés a legalacsonyabb fehérjeürítésnél adódott. Az antirejekciós terápiát követoen készült biopsziákban: a glomerulitis, az interstitialis gyulladás, az arteritis mértéke csökkent az antihumorális kezelés hatására, azonban krónikus elváltozások jelentek meg. Következtetés: Az ABMR-csoportban az antirejekciós terápiát követoen a fehérjeürítés monitorizálása javasolt, hiszen becsülheto vele a grafttúlélés. Orv Hetil. 2021; 162(26): 1029-1037. INTRODUCTION: Antibody-mediated rejection is a common cause of graft loss among kidney transplant recipients. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to describe the response of patients with biopsy-proven humoral rejection to treatment (standard treatment: plasmapheresis, immunoglobulin, rituximab) in our center. We also analyzed the effect of proteinuria on graft survival and whether this effect is independent of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs). Changes of eGFR and level of DSA following rejection treatment were examined. METHOD: In this study, laboratory data of 85 patients were analysed. Histological analysis was based on the Banff classification. Fisher's exact test was used for statistical analysis, and Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare patient groups per variable. RESULTS: Data from 85 patients were processed retrospectively. 19 patients were selected for the biopsy-confirmed humoral rejection group (ABMR group), 14 for the DSA-positive group, and 52 for the DSA-negative group. DSA titer decreased by 61.16% in the ABMR group after treatment and by 42.86% in the DSA-positive group (Fisher's exact test: p = 0.1). In the ABMR group, significant nephrotic proteinuria in 4 patients and severe proteinuria in 9 patients were reduced (68% of ABMR group). The patients with the lowest protein excretion had the best graft survival. In biopsies performed after antirejection therapy, the extent of glomerulitis, interstitial inflammation, arteritis decreased with antihumoral treatment, but chronic lesions appeared. CONCLUSION: Following treatment of biopsy-proven ABMR, reduction of proteinuria predicts graft survival and should be monitored as an important factor-predicting prognosis. Orv Hetil. 2021; 162(26): 1029-1037.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Antibiotic and Antimicrobial Lock Solutions for Prevention of Hemodialysis Catheter-Related Infections.

Catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) with hemodialysis catheters are associated with increased mortality, morbidity and pose significant financial burden on healthcare. Antibiotic and antimicrobial locking solutions are effective in reducing risk of CRBSI. From inception to April 2020, we looked for relevant clinical controlled trials throughout the following databases: EBSCO, PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, clinicaltrial.gov, and Google Scholar performing a metanalysis comparing antibiotic and antimicrobial lock solutions to heparin. Twenty-six studies with 4,967 patients reported the incidence of catheter-related bacteremia (CRB). The overall pooled risk ratio (RR) showed that the intervention group was associated with a significantly lower incidence of CRB by 30% compared with heparin (RR = 0.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.25, 0.36], p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that administration of antibiotic regimens led to a decreased risk of CRB episodes by 28% compared with the heparin group (RR = 0.28, 95% CI [0.21, 0.37], p < 0.0001). Antimicrobial solutions was associated with reduced risk of CRB by 32% compared with patients of the control group (RR = 0.32, 95% CI [0.25, 0.41], p < 0.0001). A test of subgroup differences was revealed no significant favoring of any of the two interventions. Both antibiotic and antimicrobial solutions are effective in reducing CRBSI.

Subjective global assessment of nutrition, dialysis quality, and the theory of the scientific method in Nephrology practice.

In an era of evidence-based medicine and dialysis performance measures, there is strong motivation to find specific, objective, quantifiable, and reproducible parameters to characterize the clinical condition of chronic kidney disease patients and to present population-wide statistics that may describe quality of care in dialysis centers. Yet, in the last three decades, several studies demonstrated that while parameters including Kt/V urea, serum phosphorus, parathyroid hormone, serum cholesterol fulfill all these criteria, efforts to optimize these lab parameters failed to improve survival on dialysis. However, subjective assessments of nutrition including subjective global assessment and malnutrition-inflammation score, while not ideally suited for statistical analysis and not optimal from the point of view of scientific methodology due to their general, semi-quantifiable, subjective nature have, nevertheless, proved themselves as some of the strongest predictors of clinical outcomes in the dialysis population. Where does this paradox leave us? We propose that a deeper understanding of relevance of these variables in the dialysis population may improve appreciation of the clinical situation of individual patients and may result in a paradigm shift from dialysis adequacy to quality dialysis.

The association of overhydration with megafistulas in hemodialysis patients.

Objectives: Diffuse enlargements of arteriovenous dialysis fistulas customarily attributed to either excessive arterial inflow or central outflow stenosis. The relationship between volume status and clinically enlarged (arteriovenous) fistula (CEF) formation in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients is not well understood. Methods: We assessed the pre-dialysis bioimpedance spectroscopy-measured percentage of overhydration (OH%) in 13 prevalent dialysis patients with CEF development and negative angiography and compared the results with those of 52 control dialysis patients (CONTR). All patients were prevalent ESRD patients receiving thrice-weekly maintenance hemodiafiltration at an academic outpatient dialysis unit. Results: 10/13 CEF patients had OH% ≥15% as compared to 20/52 control patients (Chi square p: .02). The degree of OH% was 20.2 ± 7.4% among the CEF vs. 14.4 ± 7.1% in the control group (Student's t-test p: .01), representing 4.2 ± 3.2 vs. 2.8 ± 1.6 L of excess fluid pre-dialysis (p: .03). Patients with CEF development took an average of 1.7 ± 1.4 vs. 0.8 ± 0.8 (p: .002) antihypertensive medications compared to the CONTR patients, yet their blood pressure was higher: 156/91 vs. 141/78 mmHg (systolic/diastolic p: .03<.0001). We found no difference in fistula vintage, body mass index, age, diabetes status, or diuretic use. The odds ratio of having a CEF in patients with ≥15% OH status was 5.3 (95% CI: 1.3-21.7; p: .01), the Number Needed to Harm with overhydration was 4. Conclusions: There is an association between bioimpedance spectroscopy-measured overhydrated clinical state and the presence of CEF; either as an increased volume capacitance or as a potential cause.

Correction to: Therapeutic hypernatremia management during continuous renal replacement therapy with elevated intracranial pressures and respiratory failure.

The authors would like to report an error in the formula describing the correction factor for the protein content in the serum/plasma.

The association of overhydration with chronic inflammation in chronic maintenance hemodiafiltration patients.

INTRODUCTION: Achieving euvolemia is one of the major challenges when treating end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients receiving maintenance renal replacement therapy. Fluid overload is recognized as an independent predictor of mortality in ESRD, but its association with chronic inflammation is less well explored especially in chronic maintenance hemodiafiltration. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study of 87 prevalent ESRD patients receiving chronic maintenance hemodiafiltration (vintage 66.5 ± 57.1 months) with bioimpedance analysis to characterize the degree of percent overhydration (OH%). We also compared the levels of inflammatory markers, including C-reactive protein (CRP), serum albumin, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and hemoglobin red cell distribution width (RDW) for the overhydrated (OH% ≥ 15%) versus euvolemic (OH% < 15%) groups. Linear regression analysis was performed to explore relationships between the degree of OH and inflammatory indicators. FINDINGS: The cohort represented an all-European population with a mean age of 60.9 ± 14.7 years and prevalence of diabetes mellitus of 27%. The entire cohort's OH% was 14.9% ± 5.1% (range -11.1% to 39.0%); further, the <15% group of patients' OH% was 8.0% ± 8.5% versus 20.9% ± 5.1% in the OH% ≥ 15% group (P < 0.0001). Forty-seven patients (53%) were overhydrated by traditional criteria (OH% ≥15%) and 20 patients (23%) were severely overhydrated (OH% > 20%). The euvolemic (OH% <15%) versus severely overhydrated (OH% > 20%) groups had significant differences in markers of inflammation: CRP (9.8 ± 10.6 vs. 21.5 ± 21.6 mg/L, P < 0.006), serum albumin (37.6 ± 02.9 vs. 34.5 ± 5.3 g/L, P < 0.004), and NLR (3.06 ± 1.25 vs. 3.92 ± 2.04; P < 0.004). On linear regression, significant correlations were found between OH% and CRP (r = 0.2899, P < 0.006), serum albumin (r = -0.3670; P < 0.0005), RDW (r = 0.2992; P < 0.005), and NLR (r = 0.2900; P < 0.006). DISCUSSION: In a prevalent hemodiafiltration cohort, OH was common and correlated with several inflammatory markers.

Therapeutic hypernatremia management during continuous renal replacement therapy with elevated intracranial pressures and respiratory failure.

Cerebral edema and elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) are common complications of acute brain injury. Hypertonic solutions are routinely used in acute brain injury as effective osmotic agents to lower ICP by increasing the extracellular fluid tonicity. Acute kidney injury in a patient with traumatic brain injury and elevated ICP requiring renal replacement therapy represents a significant therapeutic challenge due to an increased risk of cerebral edema associated with intermittent conventional hemodialysis. Therefore, continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) has emerged as the preferred modality of therapy in this patient population. We present our current treatment approach, with demonstrative case vignette illustrations, utilizing hypertonic saline protocols (3% sodium-chloride or, with coexisting severe combined metabolic and respiratory acidosis, with 4.2% sodium-bicarbonate) in conjunction with the CRRT platform, to induce controlled hypernatremia of approximately 155 mEq/L in hemodynamically unstable patients with acute kidney injury and elevated ICP due to acute brain injury. Rationale, mechanism of activation, benefits and potential pitfalls of the therapy are reviewed. The impact of hypertonic citrate solution during regional citrate anticoagulation is specifically discussed. Maintaining plasma hypertonicity in the setting of increased ICP and acute kidney injury could prevent the worsening of ICP during renal replacement therapy by minimizing the osmotic gradient across the blood-brain barrier and maximizing cardiovascular stability.

Celiac plexus block increases quality of life in patients with pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer is a malignant disease with a high mortality rate and severe pain that is challenging to manage. To reduce the excruciating abdominal pain, opioids and adjuvant agents are conventionally used. OBJECTIVES: PRNCPB is a treatment of neural therapy. The number of studies assessing the effect on patients' QoL is limited and inconsistent. With this study, we intended to address this issue. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective nonrandomized study with a series of cases of unresectable pancreatic cancer was conducted. SETTING: The study was performed at our pain clinic under real life conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total number of 16 patients with severe abdominal pain were enrolled in the study all of whom had responded to combined systemic analgesic therapy inadequately and had intolerable side effects contraindicating further increase in dose. The efficacy of this invasive, palliative analgesic procedure was evaluated 35 days after PRNCPB was performed. Primary outcomes were changed in pain intensity using the VAS questionnaire. Secondary outcomes were improved in QoL using the SF-36 questionnaire. Changes in pain medications and adverse reactions were monitored. RESULTS: After PRNCPB patients experienced a significant decrease (P=0.002) in pain intensity as shown by the VAS score, and a decreased opiate demand. Their QoL scores considering effect sizes also improved (P<0.001). No complications attributable to PRNCPB were observed during the study period. Additionally, no adverse drug reactions were observed. LIMITATIONS: Detection, observation, and reporting bias can be estimated as moderate. Selection bias was not detected. CONCLUSION: Our results give preliminary evidence that PRNCPB might be helpful as an additional treatment to conventional pain management in end-stage pancreatic cancer patients. PRNCPB seems to improve QoL in these patients in a time frame of at least 5 weeks after intervention.

Benefits, challenges, and opportunities using home hemodialysis with a focus on Mississippi, a rural southern state.

The prevalence of end-stage renal disease continues to increase in the United States with commensurate need for renal replacement therapies. Hemodialysis continues to be the predominant modality, though less than 2% of these patients will receive hemodialysis in their own home. While home modalities utilizing peritoneal dialysis have been growing, home hemodialysis (HHD) remains underutilized despite studies showing regression in left ventricular mass, improved quality of life, reduced depressive symptoms, and decreased postdialysis recovery time. To increase penetration of HHD will require a proactive approach from both physicians and dialysis networks to address barriers both in the system and on the level of the patients and families. We are reviewing these issues with a focus on the state of Mississippi.

Successful Practice Transitioning Between Hemodialysis and Hemodiafiltration in Outpatient Units: Ten Key Issues for Physicians to Remember.

Hemodiafiltration (HDF) during chronic renal replacement therapy (RRT) is a relatively new practice phenomenon, emerging over the last two decades. While the technological platforms utilized during chronic RRT are in many cases similar or effectively identical to conventional hemodialysis (HD), significant differences may emerge in daily practice. Several authors of this review moved practice site between the United States and the European Union and transitioned from an HD-based practice to predominantly HDF-practicing networks. In doing so, we became keenly aware of the potential pitfalls nephrologists may be facing during such transitions. This brief review is intended to provide a succinct overview of several practical concerns and complications nephrologists may encounter in daily practice of end-stage renal disease care, including but not limited to management of electrolytes, renal anemia and treatment goals and settings during HDF.

Peritoneal dialysis: The unique features by compartmental delivery of renal replacement therapy.

Despite decades of research, the clinical efficacy of peritoneal dialysis (PD) remains enigmatic. We may wonder why the modality fail in some patients but perhaps the more proper question would be, why it works in so many? We know that the contribution of residual renal function (RRF), more so than in hemodialysis, is critically important to the well-being of many of the patients. Unique features of the modality include the relatively low volume of dialysate fluid needed to provide effective uremic control and the disproportionate tendency for both hypokalemia and hypoalbuminemia, when compared to hemodialysis. It is currently believed that most uremic toxins are generated on the interface of human and bacterial structures in the gastrointestinal tract, the intestinal biota. PD offers disproportionate removal of these toxins upon "first-pass", i.e., via PD fluid exchanges before reaching the systemic circulation beyond the gastrointestinal compartment. Studies examining the net removal gradient of protein-bound uremic toxins during PD are scarce, whereas RRF receives considerably more attention without effective interventions being developed to preserve it. We propose an alternative view on PD, emphasizing the modality's compartmental nature, both for its benefits and the limitations.

Volume-related weight gain as an independent indication for renal replacement therapy in the intensive care units.

Attempts to identify specific therapies to reverse acute kidney injury (AKI) have been unsuccessful in the past; only modifying risk profile or addressing the underlying disease processes leading to AKI proved efficacious. The current thinking on recognizing AKI is compromised by a "kidney function percent-centered" viewpoint, a paradigm further reinforced by the emergence of serum creatinine-based automated glomerular filtration reporting over the last two decades. Such thinking is, however, grossly corrupted for AKI and poorly applicable in critically ill patients in general. Conventional indications for renal replacement therapy (RRT) may have limited applicability in critically ill patients and there has been a relative lack of progress on RRT modalities in these patients. AKI in critically ill patients is a highly complex syndrome and it may be counterproductive to produce complex clinical practice guidelines, which are labor and resource-intensive to maintain, difficult to memorize or may not be immediately available in all settings all over the world. Additionally, despite attempts to develop reliable and reproducible biomarkers to replace serum creatinine as a guide to therapy such biomarkers failed to materialize. Under such circumstances, there is an ongoing need to reassess the practical value of simple measures, such as volume-related weight gain (VRWG) and urine output, both for prognostic markers and clinical indicators for the need for RRT. This current paper reviews the practical utility of VRWG as an independent indication for RRT in face of reduced urine output and hemodynamic instability.

Clinical Utility of Potassium-Sparing Diuretics to Maintain Normal Serum Potassium in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients.

♦ BACKGROUND: Hypokalemia is a vexing problem in end-stage renal disease patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD), and oral potassium supplements (OPS) have limited palatability. Potassium-sparing diuretics (KSD) (spironolactone, amiloride) may be effective in these patients. ♦ METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional review of 75 current or past (vintage > 6 months) PD patients with regard to serum potassium (K+), OPS, and KSD utilization. We reviewed charts for multiple clinical and laboratory variables, including dialysis adequacy, residual renal function, nutritional status and co-existing medical therapy. ♦ RESULTS: The cohort was middle-aged with a mean age of 49.2 years (standard deviation [SD] = 14.7) and overweight with a body mass index of 29.5 (6.7) kg/m2. Of all the participants, 57.3% were female, 73.3% African-American, and 48% diabetic with an overall PD vintage of 28.2 (24.3) months at the time of enrollment. Weekly Kt/V was 2.12 (0.43), creatinine clearance was 73.5 (33.6) L/week/1.73 m2 with total daily exchange volume of 10.8 (2.7) L. Residual urine output (RUO) measured at 440 (494) mL (anuric 30.6%). Three-month averaged serum K+ measured at 4 (0.5) mmol/L with 36% of the participants receiving K+ supplements (median: 20 [0;20] mmol/day) and 41.3% KSD (spironolactone dose: 25 - 200 mg/day; amiloride dose: 5 - 10 mg/day). Serum K+ correlated positively with weekly Kt/V (r = 0.239; p = 0.039), PD vintage (r = 0.272; p = 0.018) but not with PD modality, daily exchange volume, RUO, or KSD use. However, KSD use was associated with decreased use of OPS (r = -0.646; p < 0.0001). ♦ CONCLUSIONS: Potassium-sparing diuretics were effective in this cohort of PD patients and decreased the need for OPS utilization.

[First outcomes, since being full member of Eurotransplant. A single center experience of cadaveric kidney transplantation]. / Eredményeink a teljes jogú Eurotransplant-tagság óta. A Debreceni Vesetranszplantációs Központ tapasztalatai.

INTRODUCTION: The first renal transplantation was completed in 1991 at the University of Debrecen. In 2013 Hungary joined Eurotransplant. AIM: The authors retrospectively compared the trends. METHOD: Comparison between Period A (from January 1, 2008 to August 31, 2013) and Period B (from September 1, 2013 to October 22, 2015). RESULTS: The proportion of living transplants rose from 3.5% to 9.1 %. During period B over 25% of utilized donors were over 60 years of age. Recipients with body mass index above 30 kg/m(2) increased from 12% to 31%. Prevalence of diabetes among recipients rose twofold. Uretero-neocystostomy was used during period A (99%) while in period B end to side uretero-ureteral anastomosis has also gained popularity (68%). In 2013 the authors introduced routine use of induction treatment. Acute rejection rate decreased from 34% to 8%. The rate of surgical complications did not change. Acute bacterial infections decreased from 41% to 33%. Cumulative renal allograft 1, 3 and 5 year survival rates were 86.6%, 85% and 82.7% in group A vs. projected rates 88%, 84% and 84% in group B, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the growing proportion of expanded criteria donors, the authors were able to maintain a low incidence of delayed graft function and a favorable graft survival. Since 2013 the authors introduced treatments for acute humoral rejection according to international standards.

[Analysis of donor scoring systems in a single Hungarian transplant centre]. / Donorszelekciós kritériumok vizsgálata a debreceni veseátültetési programban.

INTRODUCTION: To ease organ shortage many transplant centres developed different donor scoring systems, however, a general consensus among clinicians on the use of these systems does not still exist. AIM: The aim of the authors was to analyse the effect of expanded criteria donor, deceased donor score and kidney donor risk index on postoperative kidney function and graft survival. METHOD: Analysis of the characteristics of 138 kidney transplantations and 205 donors in a retrospective study of a five-year period. RESULTS: There was a trend towards rejecting donors in higher risk groups; 22.7% of standard criteria donors belonged to the high risk group of deceased donor score. Graft function was worse in high risk patients. High risk donors can be divided due to the use of deceased donor score. Patients with the highest risk had worse graft function and survival. CONCLUSIONS: With the use of these scoring systems grafts with favourable outcome can be selected more precisely.

Successful Peritoneal Dialysis in Large-Weight Subjects: Clinical Features and Comparisons with Normal-Weight Subjects.

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) obviates the need for temporary vascular access in end-stage renal disease; however, extremely heavy weight has been viewed as a relative contraindication to PD.We performed a cross-sectional review of multiple clinical and laboratory variables for 75 current or past PD patients (vintage > 6 months), comparing dialysis adequacy parameters for those with a large body weight (>100 kg, LWS group) and with a normal body weight (<75 kg, NWS group).In the LWS group (n = 17), mean weight was 117.2 ± 15.7 kg, and mean body mass index (BMI) was 37.2 ± 6.3 kg/m2; in the NWS group (n = 33), mean weight was 63.2 ± 9.2 kg, and mean BMI was 25.3 ± 4.5 kg/m2. Despite the marked differences in weight and BMI between the groups (both p < 0.0001), achieved Kt/V was adequate, although marginally less, in large subjects (1.96 ± 0.29 for the LWS group vs. 2.22 ± 0.47 for the NWS group, p = 0.022), and weekly global creatinine clearance was significantly better in the LWS group (92.5 ± 43.5 L/1.73 m2 vs. 62.2 ± 27.5 L/1.73 m2, p = 0.016). The total daily exchange volume was approximately 30% higher in the LWS group (12.8 ± 2.5 L vs. 9.9 ± 2.2 L, p < 0.0001). Residual creatinine clearance (p = 0.224) and residual urine output (p = 0.125) were similar and did not seem to influence the results. Compared with their LWS counterparts, members of the NWS group were more likely to have higher iron saturation (p = 0.053) and serum ferritin (p = 0.004), but lower achieved hemoglobin (p = 0.055).Successful PD is feasible in larger-weight individuals; however, given the retrospective nature of the present study, prospective trials are needed to confirm that observation.

Minimization vs tailoring: Where do we stand with personalized immunosuppression during renal transplantation in 2015?

The introduction of novel immunosuppressive agents over the last two decades and the improvement of our diagnostic tools for early detection of antibody-mediated injury offer us an opportunity, if not a mandate, to better match the immunosuppression needs of the individual patients with side effects of the therapy. However, immunosuppressive regimens in the majority of programs remain mostly protocol-driven, with relatively little inter-program heterogeneity in certain areas of the world. Emerging data showing different outcomes with a particular immunosuppressive strategy in populations with varying immunological risks underscore a real potential for "personalized medicine" in renal transplantation. Studies demonstrating marked differences in the adverse-effect profiles of individual drugs including the risk for viral infections, malignancy and renal toxicity call for a paradigm shift away from a "one size fits all" approach to an individually tailored immunosuppressive therapy for renal transplant recipients, assisted by both screening for predictors of graft loss and paying close attention to dose or class-related adverse effects. Our paper explores some of the opportunities during the care of these patients. Potential areas of improvements may include: (1) a thorough assessment of immunological and metabolic risk profile of each renal transplant recipient; (2) screening for predictors of graft loss and early signs of antibody-mediated rejection with donor-specific antibodies, protocol biopsies and proteinuria (including close follow up of adverse effects with dose adjustments or conversions as necessary); and (3) increased awareness of the possible link between poor tolerance of a given drug at a given dose and non-adherence with the prescribed regimen. Altogether, these considerations may enable the most effective use of the drugs we already have.