Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 41
Filtrar
1.
JACC Heart Fail ; 2024 Jun 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38904644

RESUMEN

For adults with advanced heart failure, class II/III obesity (body mass index ≥35 kg/m2) represents major challenges, and it is even considered a contraindication for heart transplantation (HT) at many centers. This has led to growing interest in preventing and treating obesity to help patients with advanced heart failure become HT candidates. Among all weight-loss strategies, bariatric surgery (BSx) has the greatest weight loss efficacy and has shown value in enabling select patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) and obesity to lose sufficient weight to access HT. Nevertheless, both BSx and antiobesity medications warrant caution in the LVAD population. In this review, the authors describe and interpret the available published reports on the impact of obesity and weight-loss strategies for patients with LVADs from general and HT candidacy standpoints. The authors also provide an overview of the journey of LVAD recipients who undergo BSx and review major aspects of perioperative protocols.

2.
Prog Cardiovasc Dis ; 82: 34-42, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38199320

RESUMEN

Obesity is a major public health challenge worldwide. It is costly, predisposes to many cardiovascular (CV) diseases (CVD), is increasing at an alarming rate, and disproportionately affects people of low-socioeconomic status. It has a myriad of deleterious effects on the body, particularly on the CV system. Obesity is a major risk factor for heart failure (HF) and highly prevalent in this population, particularly in those with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), to the extent that an obesity HFpEF phenotype has been proposed in the literature. However, once HF is developed, an obesity paradox exists where those with obesity have better short- and mid-term survival than normal or underweight individuals, despite a greater risk for hospitalizations. It may be argued that excess energy reserve, younger patient population, higher tolerability of HF therapy and better nutritional status may account for at least part of the obesity paradox on survival. Furthermore, body mass index (BMI) may not be an accurate measure of body composition, especially in HF, where there is an excess volume status. BMI also fails to delineate fat-free mass and its components, which is a better predictor of functional capacity and cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), which particularly is increasingly being recognized as a risk modifier in both healthy individuals and in persons with comorbidities, particularly in HF. Notably, when CRF is accounted for, the obesity paradox disappears, suggesting that improving CRF might represent a therapeutic target with greater importance than changes in body weight in the setting of HF. In this narrative review, we discuss the current trends in obesity, the causal link between obesity and HF, an update on the obesity paradox, and a description of the major flaws of BMI in this population. We also present an overview of the latest in HF therapy, weight loss, CRF, and the application of these therapeutic approaches in patients with HF and concomitant obesity.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Manejo de la Obesidad , Humanos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Paradoja de la Obesidad , Volumen Sistólico , Obesidad/diagnóstico , Obesidad/epidemiología , Obesidad/terapia , Factores de Riesgo , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Índice de Masa Corporal , Pronóstico
4.
Curr Probl Cardiol ; 49(1 Pt C): 102090, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37734691

RESUMEN

Patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) who require intermittent hemodialysis (iHD) are considered to have a poor prognosis despite a paucity of supportive evidence, mostly from small single-center cohorts and extrapolations from studies of patients who received continuous renal replacement therapy but no iHD. We conducted a systematic review and individual-participant-data meta-analysis of the literature including our single-center cohort to examine the outcomes of patients initiated on iHD following LVAD implantation. Sixty-four patients from 5 cohorts met selection criteria (age 57.5 [46-64.5] years, 87% HeartMate II, mostly bridge to transplantation). Follow-up after iHD initiation was 87.5 (38.5-269.5) days, although it was considerably longer in our center than in other cohorts (601.5 [93-1559] days vs 65 [26-180] days, P = 0.0007). The estimated median survival was 308 (76-912.5) days and varied significantly among cohorts, ranging from 60 (57-65) to 838 (103-1872) days (P = 0.0096). Twelve (18.8%) patients achieved either heart transplantation (HT) or remission during follow-up. Patients who received HT had an 8-fold longer estimated median survival (1972 [799-1972] days vs 244 [64-838] days, P = 0.0112). Being from a more recent cohort was associated with better 1-year survival. Renal recovery occurred in eight patients (13.1%) at 30 days and its cumulative incidence increased to 73% (27/37 patients with available data) at 1 year. Most patients initiated on iHD after LVAD experienced renal recovery within the first year after implantation. Improved survival was observed for patients who received HT and in those from more recent cohorts. Some patients were able to survive on LVAD and iHD support for several years.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Trasplante de Corazón , Corazón Auxiliar , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Corazón Auxiliar/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Corazón/efectos adversos , Diálisis Renal , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
Curr Opin Cardiol ; 38(5): 447-455, 2023 09 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37522803

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To describe the relationship between three pandemics: hypertension, obesity, and heart failure. From pathophysiology to treatment, understanding how these disease entities are linked can lead to breakthroughs in their prevention and treatment. The relevance of this review lies in its discussion of novel pharmacological and surgical treatment strategies for obesity and hypertension, and their role in the prevention and treatment of heart failure. RECENT FINDINGS: Novel medications such as GLP-1 agonists have demonstrated sustained weight loss in patients with obesity, and concurrent improvements in their cardiometabolic profile, and possibly also reductions in hypertension-related comorbidities including heart failure. Surgical therapies including laparoscopic bariatric surgery represent an important treatment strategy in obese patients, and recent studies describe their use even in patients with advanced heart failure, including those with ventricular assist devices. SUMMARY: These developments have deep implications on our efforts to understand, mitigate, and ultimately prevent the three pandemics, and offer promising improvements to quality of life, survival, and the cost burden of these diseases.


Asunto(s)
Cirugía Bariátrica , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Hipertensión , Humanos , Calidad de Vida , Obesidad/terapia , Obesidad/cirugía , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Hipertensión/complicaciones , Hipertensión/terapia , Pérdida de Peso
7.
Am J Surg ; 226(3): 340-349, 2023 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37355375

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The role of metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS), in synergy with left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation, in the scope of end-stage heart failure management for patients with severe obesity is not well elucidated. METHODS: We conducted a meta-analysis using Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, and Scopus databases to include articles from their inception to November 2022. RESULTS: A total of 271 patients who underwent MBS during or after the LVAD implantation were included from eleven separate studies. After surgery, 67.4% of patients were listed on the heart transplant waitlist with 32.5% undergoing a successful transplant. We reported a mean listing time of 13.8 months. Finally, the pooled postoperative complication rate, 30-day readmission rate, and one-year mortality rate were 47.6%, 23.6% and 10.2% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: MBS and LVAD is a safe and effective approach to bridge patients with severe obesity and end-stage heart failure for definitive heart transplantation.


Asunto(s)
Cirugía Bariátrica , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Trasplante de Corazón , Corazón Auxiliar , Obesidad Mórbida , Humanos , Obesidad Mórbida/complicaciones , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios Retrospectivos
9.
Curr Probl Cardiol ; 48(5): 101106, 2023 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35007639

RESUMEN

Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is a complex disease considered to be the most common underdiagnosed form of restrictive cardiomyopathy. Accumulation of misfolded proteins called amyloid fibrils in the extracellular space results in clinical deterioration and late diagnosis is associated with morbidity and mortality. Both types of this disease, light chain CA and transthyretin-related CA share many cardiac and extracardiac features that compromise multiple organs such as kidneys, musculoskeletal system, autonomic nervous system, and gastrointestinal tract. Early diagnosis and detection of CA are imperative. Clinicians should maintain a high degree of suspicion among patients with unexplained diastolic heart failure to implement different disease-altering therapies at the early stages of the disease. In this article, we provided a comprehensive review of multiple invasive and non-invasive cardiac imaging modalities with their respective degrees of sensitivities and specificity.


Asunto(s)
Amiloidosis , Cardiomiopatías , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Humanos , Laboratorios , Amiloidosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Diagnóstico por Imagen , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Amiloide/metabolismo , Cardiomiopatías/diagnóstico por imagen
15.
Curr Probl Cardiol ; 47(8): 100935, 2022 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34384620

RESUMEN

Coronary angiography remains the gold standard post-transplant screening test for cardiac allograft vasculopathy. This procedure has traditionally been performed via femoral approach. Data on safety and efficacy of radial approach in cardiac transplant patients remains scarce. Single center retrospective study including all cardiac transplant patients who underwent coronary angiography via transradial approach (TRA) or transfemoral approach (TFA). Safety and efficacy outcomes were compared between the 2 groups. Primary end points included major bleeding, vascular complications, crossover to femoral approach, contrast use and radiation exposure. A total of 201 patients were included. 96 patients (47.8%) underwent angiography via TRA. At baseline, no significant differences with regards to age, gender, or traditional risk factors such as HTN, DM, hyperlipidemia were noted between the 2 groups. Most patients underwent intravascular ultrasound (n = 179, 89%) with no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups (TRA: 90.6% vs TFA: 87.6%, P = 0.5). Additionally, there were no statistically significant differences in radiation exposure, amount of contrast use and fluoroscopy time between the 2 groups. Although there were trends toward increased bleeding among TFA group, these were not statistically significant and were mostly driven by access site hematomas. Use of TRA increased over time and Conversion from TRA to TFA was low (n = 4, 4.2%). Coronary angiography via the radial approach in cardiac transplant recipients is feasible, safe and is associated with low a risk of bleeding with no significant increase in radiation exposure when compared to the traditional femoral approach.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Corazón , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Angiografía Coronaria/efectos adversos , Angiografía Coronaria/métodos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Arteria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Trasplante de Corazón/efectos adversos , Humanos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Arteria Radial , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
20.
Curr Probl Cardiol ; 46(10): 100849, 2021 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33994026

RESUMEN

We present 2 relevant cases of eosinophilic myocarditis (EM) in patients that presented with cardiogenic shock, one of whom received a durable ventricular assist device followed by heart transplantation, with the diagnosis of EM being made based on analysis of the excisional biopsy obtained during implantation of the ventricular assist device. The second patient was initially misdiagnosed with peripartum cardiomyopathy and underwent abortion, to later being diagnosed with EM through endomyocardial biopsy. These two cases highlight the importance of high clinical suspicion for EM based on eosinophilia, comorbidities, and presentation, as well as the value of early diagnosis and therapeutic interventions, including corticosteroids, and advanced heart failure therapies, such as mechanical circulatory support and heart transplantation.


Asunto(s)
Cardiomiopatías , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Corazón Auxiliar , Miocarditis , Femenino , Humanos , Miocarditis/diagnóstico , Miocarditis/terapia , Embarazo , Choque Cardiogénico/diagnóstico , Choque Cardiogénico/etiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...