Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 20(1): 234, 2020 Apr 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32316938

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is conflicting evidence about the role of oral magnesium supplementation in the prevention of preterm birth and related adverse outcomes. The objective of this study was to compare magnesium citrate with placebo in the prevention of adverse perinatal and maternal outcomes among women at higher risk. METHODS: This multicenter, double-masked, placebo-controlled randomized superiority clinical trial compared oral magnesium citrate 300 mg to matched placebo, from 12 to 20 weeks' gestation until delivery. This trial was completed in three centers in northeastern Brazil. Eligible women were those with a singleton pregnancy and ≥ 1 risk factor, such as prior preterm birth or preeclampsia, or current chronic hypertension or pre-pregnancy diabetes mellitus, age > 35 years or elevated body mass index. The primary perinatal composite outcome comprised preterm birth < 37 weeks' gestation, stillbirth > 20 weeks, neonatal death or NICU admission < 28 days after birth, or small for gestational age birthweight < 3rd percentile. The co-primary maternal composite outcome comprised preeclampsia or eclampsia < 37 weeks, severe gestational hypertension < 37 weeks, placental abruption, or maternal stroke or death during pregnancy or ≤ 7 days after delivery. RESULTS: Analyses comprised 407 women who received magnesium citrate and 422 who received placebo. The perinatal composite outcome occurred among 75 (18.4%) in the magnesium arm and 76 (18.0%) in the placebo group - an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 1.10 (95% CI 0.72-1.68). The maternal composite outcome occurred among 49 (12.0%) women in the magnesium arm and 41 women (9.7%) in the placebo group - an aOR of 1.29 (95% CI 0.83-2.00). CONCLUSIONS: Oral magnesium citrate supplementation did not appear to reduce adverse perinatal or maternal outcomes in high-risk singleton pregnancies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02032186, registered January 9, 2014.


Asunto(s)
Ácido Cítrico/administración & dosificación , Compuestos Organometálicos/administración & dosificación , Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiología , Desprendimiento Prematuro de la Placenta/epidemiología , Administración Oral , Adolescente , Adulto , Brasil/epidemiología , Suplementos Dietéticos , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Hipertensión Inducida en el Embarazo/epidemiología , Recién Nacido , Recién Nacido Pequeño para la Edad Gestacional , Magnesio , Persona de Mediana Edad , Preeclampsia/epidemiología , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Mortinato , Adulto Joven
2.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 20(1): 208, 2020 Apr 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32272914

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Preeclampsia is the major cause of maternal morbidity and mortality in developing countries. Magnesium sulfate is considered first-line therapy against eclampsia and magnesium deficiency in pregnancy has been associated with unfavourable perinatal outcomes. However there are doubts if magnesium supplementation during pregnancy can previne preeclampsia especially in population with high nutritional risk. This trial aims to verify the effect of oral magnesium supplmentation on preeclampsia incidence in low income pregnant women. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial investigated the effect of oral magnesium citrate supplementation for preeclampsia in low-income Brazilian pregnant women, i.e. annual per capita income of US$ 1025 or less. Participants were admitted to the study with gestational age between 12 and 20 weeks. Magnesium serum level was measured pre-randomization and participants with hypermagnesemia were excluded. After randomizationg participants received magnesium citrate capsule (300 mg magnesium citrate) or a daily placebo capsule, until delivery. Intent-to-treat analysis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 416 pregnant women were screened and 318 enrolled according to the inclusion criteria; 159 for each arm. Twenty-eight pregnant women were lost to follow-up. 55/290 (18.9%) of pregnant women developed preeclampsia; 26/143 (18.1%) in magnesium group and 29/147 (19.7%) in the control group; OR 0.90 (CI 95% 0.48-1.69), p = 0.747. No cases of eclampsia were registered. CONCLUSION: Oral magnesium supplementation did not reduce preeclampsia incidence in low-income and low-risk pregnant women. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier NCT02032186), December 19, 2013.


Asunto(s)
Deficiencia de Magnesio/tratamiento farmacológico , Sulfato de Magnesio/uso terapéutico , Preeclampsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Brasil , Suplementos Dietéticos , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Pobreza , Embarazo , Adulto Joven
3.
Sci Rep ; 10(1): 2032, 2020 02 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32029868

RESUMEN

Some studies have suggested that abdominal visceral adipose tissue depth (VAD) measured by ultrasound in early pregnancy, may predict the future onset of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Wheter this is true, independent of pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI), has been debated, leading the current study. A prospective cohort study was completed, in which VAD was measured at around 14 weeks' gestation. GDM was later assessed by an oral glucose tolerance test at 24 to 28 weeks, according to the IADPSG criteria. Logistic regression analysis and receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis were used to estimate the predictive value of VAD, above and beyond pre-pregnancy BMI. 627 pregnant women were enrolled, and 518 completed the study. VAD was measured at a mean of 14.4 weeks' gestation. 87 women (16.8%) subsequently developed GDM. The unadjusted odds ratio (OR) for developing GDM was 1.99 (95% CI 1.59-2.46) per 1-cm increase in VAD. After adjusting for maternal BMI and age, the OR was 2.00 (95% CI 1.61 to 2.50). The ROC under the curve for developing GDM was higher for VAD (0.70, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.75) than for pre-pregnancy BMI (0.57 95% CI 0.50 to 0.64) (p < 0.001). In conclusion, higher VAD may better predict GDM than pre-pregnancy BMI.


Asunto(s)
Adiposidad/fisiología , Diabetes Gestacional/epidemiología , Grasa Intraabdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Índice de Masa Corporal , Estudios de Cohortes , Diabetes Gestacional/sangre , Diabetes Gestacional/diagnóstico , Diabetes Gestacional/fisiopatología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Prueba de Tolerancia a la Glucosa , Humanos , Grasa Intraabdominal/fisiología , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Embarazo , Primer Trimestre del Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Ultrasonografía , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...