Effect of Intraoperative High Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) With Recruitment Maneuvers vs Low PEEP on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Obese Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: An intraoperative higher level of positive end-expiratory positive pressure (PEEP) with alveolar recruitment maneuvers improves respiratory function in obese patients undergoing surgery, but the effect on clinical outcomes is uncertain. Objective: To determine whether a higher level of PEEP with alveolar recruitment maneuvers decreases postoperative pulmonary complications in obese patients undergoing surgery compared with a lower level of PEEP. Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized clinical trial of 2013 adults with body mass indices of 35 or greater and substantial risk for postoperative pulmonary complications who were undergoing noncardiac, nonneurological surgery under general anesthesia. The trial was conducted at 77 sites in 23 countries from July 2014-February 2018; final follow-up: May 2018. Interventions: Patients were randomized to the high level of PEEP group (n = 989), consisting of a PEEP level of 12 cm H2O with alveolar recruitment maneuvers (a stepwise increase of tidal volume and eventually PEEP) or to the low level of PEEP group (n = 987), consisting of a PEEP level of 4 cm H2O. All patients received volume-controlled ventilation with a tidal volume of 7 mL/kg of predicted body weight. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was a composite of pulmonary complications within the first 5 postoperative days, including respiratory failure, acute respiratory distress syndrome, bronchospasm, new pulmonary infiltrates, pulmonary infection, aspiration pneumonitis, pleural effusion, atelectasis, cardiopulmonary edema, and pneumothorax. Among the 9 prespecified secondary outcomes, 3 were intraoperative complications, including hypoxemia (oxygen desaturation with Spo2 ≤92% for >1 minute). Results: Among 2013 adults who were randomized, 1976 (98.2%) completed the trial (mean age, 48.8 years; 1381 [69.9%] women; 1778 [90.1%] underwent abdominal operations). In the intention-to-treat analysis, the primary outcome occurred in 211 of 989 patients (21.3%) in the high level of PEEP group compared with 233 of 987 patients (23.6%) in the low level of PEEP group (difference, -2.3% [95% CI, -5.9% to 1.4%]; risk ratio, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.83 to 1.04]; P = .23). Among the 9 prespecified secondary outcomes, 6 were not significantly different between the high and low level of PEEP groups, and 3 were significantly different, including fewer patients with hypoxemia (5.0% in the high level of PEEP group vs 13.6% in the low level of PEEP group; difference, -8.6% [95% CI, -11.1% to 6.1%]; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: Among obese patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia, an intraoperative mechanical ventilation strategy with a higher level of PEEP and alveolar recruitment maneuvers, compared with a strategy with a lower level of PEEP, did not reduce postoperative pulmonary complications. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02148692.

Protective intraoperative ventilation with higher versus lower levels of positive end-expiratory pressure in obese patients (PROBESE): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) increase the morbidity and mortality of surgery in obese patients. High levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) with lung recruitment maneuvers may improve intraoperative respiratory function, but they can also compromise hemodynamics, and the effects on PPCs are uncertain. We hypothesized that intraoperative mechanical ventilation using high PEEP with periodic recruitment maneuvers, as compared with low PEEP without recruitment maneuvers, prevents PPCs in obese patients. METHODS/DESIGN: The PRotective Ventilation with Higher versus Lower PEEP during General Anesthesia for Surgery in OBESE Patients (PROBESE) study is a multicenter, two-arm, international randomized controlled trial. In total, 2013 obese patients with body mass index ≥35 kg/m2 scheduled for at least 2 h of surgery under general anesthesia and at intermediate to high risk for PPCs will be included. Patients are ventilated intraoperatively with a low tidal volume of 7 ml/kg (predicted body weight) and randomly assigned to PEEP of 12 cmH2O with lung recruitment maneuvers (high PEEP) or PEEP of 4 cmH2O without recruitment maneuvers (low PEEP). The occurrence of PPCs will be recorded as collapsed composite of single adverse pulmonary events and represents the primary endpoint. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, the PROBESE trial is the first multicenter, international randomized controlled trial to compare the effects of two different levels of intraoperative PEEP during protective low tidal volume ventilation on PPCs in obese patients. The results of the PROBESE trial will support anesthesiologists in their decision to choose a certain PEEP level during general anesthesia for surgery in obese patients in an attempt to prevent PPCs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02148692. Registered on 23 May 2014; last updated 7 June 2016.

Differential effects of sevoflurane and propofol anesthesia on left ventricular-arterial coupling in dogs.

BACKGROUND: General anesthetics interfere with arterial and ventricular mechanical properties, often altering left ventricular-arterial (LVA) coupling. We hypothesized that sevoflurane and propofol alter LVA coupling by different effects on arterial and ventricular properties. METHODS: Experiments were conducted in six anesthetized open-chest dogs for the measurement of left ventricular pressure and aortic pressure and flow. Measurements were performed during anesthesia with 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 minimum alveolar concentration sevoflurane and 12, 24 and 36 mg/kg/h propofol. LVA coupling was assessed as the ratio of ventricular end-systolic elastance (E(es), measuring ventricular contractility) to effective arterial elastance (E(a), measuring ventricular afterload). The steady component of afterload, arterial tone, was assessed by systemic vascular resistance and arterial pressure-flow curves. The pulsatile component of afterload was assessed by aortic impedance and compliance. RESULTS: Sevoflurane decreased aortic pressure and cardiac output more than propofol. Sevoflurane reduced arterial tone, increased arterial stiffness and did not affect wave reflections. It increased E(a), decreased E(es) and reduced LVA coupling. Propofol reduced arterial tone, did not affect arterial stiffness and decreased wave reflections. It did not affect E(a), E(es) or LVA coupling. CONCLUSIONS: Sevoflurane increased ventricular afterload and decreased ventricular performance, thereby altering LVA coupling. Propofol did not affect ventricular afterload or ventricular performance, thereby preserving LVA coupling. Thus, propofol preserves LVA coupling in dogs better, and might be a better choice for patients with compromised left ventricular function.

Necrotizing fasciitis complicated by fatal multiple organ dysfunction due to Pasteurella multocida infection: a case report.

Necrotizing fasciitis is rarely caused by Pasteurella multocida, a facultative anaerobic gram-negative coccobacillus found in the flora of the oro-gastrointestinal tract of many animals. We describe a rare case with overwhelming septicaemia resulting in multiple organ failure.

Comparison of volume-controlled and pressure-controlled ventilation during laparoscopic gastric banding in morbidly obese patients.

BACKGROUND: There are no guidelines on ventilation modes in morbidly obese patients. We investigated the effects of volume-controlled (VCV) and pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) on gas exchange, respiratory mechanics, and cardiovascular responses in laparoscopic gastric banding procedures. METHODS: After Institutional Review Board approval, 24 adult consenting patients scheduled for laparoscopic gastric banding were studied. Anesthesia was standardized using remifentanil, propofol, rocuronium, and sevoflurane. All patients started with VCV with a tidal volume of 10 ml kg(-1) ideal body weight, respiratory rate adjusted to obtain an end-tidal carbon dioxide of 35-40 mmHg, positive end-expiratory pressure of 5 cmH2O, an inspiratory pause of 10% and an inspiratory/expiratory ratio of 1:2. Fifteen minutes after pneumoperitoneum, the patients were randomly allocated to two groups. In Group VCV (n = 12), ventilation was with the same parameters. In Group PCV (n = 12), the airway pressure was set to provide a tidal volume of 10 ml kg(-1) ideal body weight without exceeding 35 cm H2O. Respiratory rate was adjusted to keep an end-tidal carbon dioxide of 35-40 mmHg. Arterial blood samples were drawn after surgical positioning and 15 min after allocation. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: With constant minute ventilation, VCV generates equal airway pressures and cardiovascular effects with a lower PaCO2 as compared to PCV (42.5 (5.2) mmHg versus 48.9 (4.3) mmHg, p < 0.01 ANOVA). Arterial oxygenation remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: VCV and PCV appear to be an equally suited ventilatory technique for laparoscopic procedures in morbidly obese patients. Carbon dioxide elimination is more efficient when using VCV.

Influence of intraoperative opioid on postoperative pain and pulmonary function after laparoscopic gastric banding: remifentanil TCI vs sufentanil TCI in morbid obesity.

BACKGROUND: Choice of opioid may influence postoperative pain, recovery, and respiratory homeostasis in morbid obesity. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of target-controlled infusions (TCIs) of remifentanil or sufentanil on postoperative analgesia, recovery, and pulmonary function after laparoscopic gastric banding. METHODS: Forty morbidly obese patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric banding received BIS-guided desflurane anaesthesia combined with remifentanil TCI (Group R) or sufentanil TCI (Group S). Intraoperative haemodynamic stability, BIS controllability, and immediate recovery in the operating room were measured. Pulmonary function, modified Aldrete score, modified Observers Assessment of Alertness and Sedation score, blood gas analysis, and visual analogue score for pain and postoperative nausea and vomiting were measured on admission to the post-anaesthesia care unit and 30, 60, 120 min afterwards. After operation, patients received patient-controlled analgesia with morphine. RESULTS: During the first two postoperative hours, cumulative morphine consumption was higher in the remifentanil group compared with the sufentanil group, but was equal values after that time. Recovery profiles and spirometry showed no significant differences. During maintenance, remifentanil gave a better haemodynamic stability. CONCLUSIONS: As few differences occurred in the postoperative period, the theoretical advantage of remifentanil over the longer acting sufentanil can be questioned when using TCI technology.

Time course of inhaled anaesthetic drug delivery using a new multifunctional closed-circuit anaesthesia ventilator. In vitro comparison with a classical anaesthesia machine.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to detail the time-course, defined as the changes in end-tidal drug concentration with time, and consumption of inhaled anaesthetics when using a multifunctional closed-circuit anaesthesia machine in various drug delivery modes, and to compare it with a classical anaesthesia machine using an out-of-circle vaporizer under high and low fresh gas flow conditions. METHODS: Using an artificial test lung, sevoflurane and desflurane time-course and consumption were compared when using the Zeus apparatus (Dräger, Lubeck, Germany) with direct injection of inhaled anaesthetics or the Primus apparatus (Dräger, Lubeck, Germany) using a classical out-of-circle vaporizer. Anaesthetics were targeted at 1 and 2 MAC end-tidal during 15 min. For both apparatus, out-of-circle high and low fresh gas control (FGC) and for Zeus, auto-control (AC) modes (fixed fresh gas flow at 6 and 1 litre min(-1) and uptake mode) were compared. Time to reach target, initial overshoot and stability at target, and wash-out times were compared. RESULTS: In FGC, an initial overshoot in end-tidal drug concentration is seen when using 6 litre min(-1) fresh gas flow and a slower time course is observed when using only 1 litre min(-1) in both apparatus. In auto-control mode, the time course of both sevoflurane and desflurane was very fast and not influenced by the changes in fresh gas flow. No overshoot at target was seen. At all settings, the wash-out times were faster when using Zeus than Primus. Inhaled anaesthetic consumption was lowest with the Zeus ventilator in uptake AC mode. CONCLUSION: A combination of the fastest time course and lowest consumption of sevoflurane and desflurane was found when using the Zeus apparatus in AC uptake mode.

Optimization of desflurane administration in morbidly obese patients: a comparison with sevoflurane using an 'inhalation bolus' technique.

BACKGROUND: The concept of an 'inhalation bolus' can be used to optimize inhaled drug administration. We investigated the depth of anaesthesia, haemodynamic stability, and recovery time in morbidly obese patients resulting from bispectral index (BIS)-guided sevoflurane or desflurane administration and BIS-triggered inhalation boluses of sevoflurane or desflurane combined with titration of remifentanil. METHODS: Fifty morbidly obese patients undergoing laparoscopic gastroplasty received either BIS-guided sevoflurane or desflurane anaesthesia in combination with a remifentanil target-controlled infusion. Intraoperative haemodynamic stability and BIS control were measured. Immediate recovery was recorded. RESULTS: Intraoperatively, the BIS was between 40 and 60 for a greater percentage of time in the sevoflurane (78 (13)% of case time) than in the desflurane patients (64 (14)% of case time), owing to too profound anaesthesia in the desflurane patients at the start of the procedure. However, fewer episodes of hypotension were found in the desflurane group, without the occurrence of more hypertensive episodes. During immediate recovery, eye opening, extubation, airway maintenance, and orientation occurred sooner in the desflurane group. CONCLUSIONS: Immediate recovery was significantly faster in the desflurane group. Overall hypnotic controllability measured by BIS was less accurate with desflurane. Overall haemodynamic controllability was better when using desflurane. Fewer episodes of hypotension were found in the desflurane group. The use of the inhalation bolus was found to be appropriate in both groups without causing severe haemodynamic side effects. Minimal BIS values were significantly lower after a desflurane bolus.

Cardiovascular changes during endoscopic third ventriculostomy.

During an endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) a sudden increase in intracranial pressure (ICP) may occur at any time. In the literature little attention has been paid to the early detection of such an increase. In particular the occurrence of a 'Cushing reflex' has not been discussed in this context. Therefore, we have now analysed retrospectively the anesthesia charts of 88 patients with obstructive hydrocephalus who had undergone ETV under general anesthesia. Monitoring included invasive blood pressure, electrocardiogram, end-expired carbon dioxide, pulse oximetry and heart rate. These variables were now evaluated before and after the introduction of the endoscope and during and after the occurrence of any change. In 67 patients the procedure had been uneventful. In 6 patients the occurrence of tachycardia and hypertension followed by bradycardia and hypertension was clearly the result of an increase in ICP, which we call a Cushing reflex. In his classical description of this pressure response Cushing reported the occurrence of hypertension, bradycardia and apnoea. However, many investigators have shown that beside systemic hypertension, both tachycardia and bradycardia are essential components of the Cushing reflex. Waiting for a persistent bradycardia to alert the surgeon during ETV can allow a fatal asystole.

Postoperative residual curarization with cisatracurium and rocuronium infusions.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Monitoring of neuromuscular blockade still often relies on clinical judgement. Moreover, there are substantial national differences in the use of agents to 'reverse' their effects. We investigated the recovery characteristics and incidence of postoperative residual curarization after cisatracurium and rocuronium infusions for long duration interventions without systematic antagonism. METHODS: In 30 patients undergoing major surgery, we measured infusion dose requirements for rocuronium and cisatracurium during propofol anaesthesia. Infusions were discontinued at the beginning of surgical closure; spontaneous recovery of neuromuscular function was awaited in both groups. Neostigmine (50 microg kg(-1)) was administered only when a patient started to wake without a train-of-four ratio (TOF) of 0.9. RESULTS: In the cisatracurium and rocuronium groups, four (27%) and one (7%) patients, respectively, had a TOF ratio > or = 0.9 at the end of surgery. The TOF ratio in each group at that time was 51 +/- 32% for cisatracurium and 47 +/- 31% for rocuronium (P = 0.78). Six patients (40%) in the cisatracurium group and seven (47%) in the rocuronium group required neostigmine. The TOF ratio at the time of reversal was 63 +/- 7% for cisatracurium and 40 +/- 19% for rocuronium (P = 0.01). The time interval between the end of surgery and a TOF ratio of 0.9 was 10 +/- 9 min for cisatracurium and 18 +/- 13 min for rocuronium (P = n.s.). CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving a cisatracurium or rocuronium infusion have a high incidence of postoperative residual curarization when the block is not antagonized. When 'reversal' is not attempted, cisatracurium seems to be safer than rocuronium.

A paravenous approach for the saphenous nerve block.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study assesses a paravenous approach for saphenous nerve block at approximately the level of the tibial tuberosity, and compares it with the conventional technique of blind subcutaneous infiltration between the tibial tuberosity and the gastrocnemius muscle. METHODS: In dissections of 5 cadavers, the saphenous nerve was found very close to the saphenous vein bilaterally. Subsequently, in 20 volunteers, a bilateral saphenous nerve block was performed with 5 mL mepivacaine on each side. Randomly assigned, the block was performed by blind subcutaneous injection using a 23-gauge needle of 2.5 cm on one side and by a paravenous subcutaneous approach on the other. RESULTS: The paravenous approach produced a saphenous nerve block in all 20 volunteers whereas the blind subcutaneous approach was successful in only 6 (33%) (P <.05). Seven volunteers had a painless minor hematoma at the paravenous site and 2 had a hematoma at the classical site. CONCLUSION: The saphenous nerve can be blocked effectively by a paravenous approach using only 5 mL of local anesthetic solution. This approach is advantageous because of its easily identifiable landmark.

The onset of neuromuscular block at the masseter muscle as a predictor of optimal intubating conditions with rocuronium.

After an intubating dose of rocuronium satisfactory intubating conditions are achieved before the onset time at the adductor pollicis. We examined the possibility that measurement of the relaxation of the masseter muscle is a more appropriate guide when determining the intubating time. Simultaneous accelerometry with a 0.1-Hz single twitch stimulation of the chin and thumb was performed in 20 patients after 0.6 mg kg-1 rocuronium. We observed a significantly more brief mean lag time and onset time at the masseter muscle (22.5 and 61 vs. 32.5 and 160 s). The corresponding mean relaxation at the onset time was also significantly more pronounced at the masseter muscle (99.6 vs. 97.6%). A mean onset time at the masseter muscle of 61 s as produced by rocuronium corresponds clinically with excellent or good intubating conditions. From these results, we suggest that measurement of the onset time of muscle relaxation at the masseter muscle appears to be a better predictor of good intubating conditions than measurements made using the adductor pollicis muscle after administration of rocuronium.

In vitro evaluation of the effect of profound haemodilution with hydroxyethyl starch 6%, modified fluid gelatin 4% and dextran 40 10% on coagulation profile measured by thromboelastography.

Synthetic colloids have been implicated as a cause of coagulopathy when administered in large quantities. The effect of profound haemodilution (50%) on coagulation profile was measured in vitro by thromboelastography. Blood samples were taken from 11 ASA grade 1 patients prior to induction of anaesthesia for elective surgery. Each sample was simultaneously tested in four different preparations: undiluted blood (control sample); blood diluted with hydroxyethyl starch 6%; blood diluted with modified fluid gelatin 4%; blood diluted with dextran 40 10%. There was a significant decrease in reaction time in the preparations treated with hydroxyethyl starch 6% and modified fluid gelatin 4%, reflecting activation of initial fibrin formation. A significant increase in clot formation time was noted in the hydroxyethyl starch 6%-treated preparations. There was also a significant decrease in clot formation rate and maximum amplitude in the hydroxyethyl starch 6% group. Clot formation time, clot formation rate and maximum amplitude did not change in the modified fluid gelatin 4% group. Profound haemodilution with dextran 40 10% exerted extreme effects on the measured variables, very often resulting in a straight line on the thromboelastography profile.