RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Acute heart failure (AHF) is a leading cause of hospitalization and mortality - especially in patients aged≥65 years in high-income countries - and represents a high healthcare burden. In the past decade, the epidemiology and management of heart failure (HF) has changed, with the emergence of new medical and interventional therapeutics, but up-to-date real-life data are scarce. AIMS: The main objectives are to describe baseline characteristics (with an emphasis on lifestyle, cognitive status, HF knowledge and treatment adherence), management, and in-hospital and mid-term outcomes of AHF patients in France. Secondary objectives are to investigate determinants of prognosis, modalities of treatment and follow-up, and identify gaps between guidelines and real-life management. METHODS: OFICA2 is a prospective multicentre observational survey that enrolled 1513 patients hospitalized for AHF in 80 participating centres in France during March and April 2021. The diagnosis of AHF was made according to the European Society of Cardiology guidelines definition. Inclusion criteria were age≥18years, health coverage and consent to participate. Detailed information was collected prospectively starting at admission. Thanks to direct linking with the French National Health Database, the anteriority up to 2years before inclusion, as well as a 3-year follow-up is specified for each patient and includes individual information on death, hospital admissions, major clinical events, drug delivery and use of reimbursed health resources. CONCLUSION: This cohort provides a representative snapshot on contemporary AHF, with a particular focus on self-care determinants, and will improve knowledge about AHF presentation, management and outcomes.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Based on retrospective studies, the 2022 European guidelines changed the definition of post-capillary pulmonary hypertension (pcPH) in heart failure (HF) by lowering the level of mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR). However, the impact of this definition and its prognostic value has never been evaluated prospectively. METHODS: Stable left HF patients with the need for right heart catheterization were enrolled from 2010 to 2018 and prospectively followed up in this multicentre study. The impact of the successive pcPH definitions on pcPH prevalence and subgroup [i.e. isolated (IpcPH) vs. combined pcPH (CpcPH)] was evaluated. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to assess the prognostic value of mPAP and PVR on all-cause death or hospitalization for HF (primary outcome). RESULTS: Included were 662 HF patients were (median age 63 years, 60% male). Lowering mPAP from 25 to 20 mmHg resulted in +10% increase in pcPH prevalence, whereas lowering PVR from 3 to 2 resulted in +60% increase in CpcPH prevalence (with significant net reclassification improvement for the primary outcome). In multivariable analysis, both mPAP and PVR remained associated with the primary outcome [hazard ratio (HR) 1.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.00-1.03, P = .01; HR 1.07, 95% CI 1.00-1.14, P = .03]. The best PVR threshold associated with the primary outcome was around 2.2 WU. Using the 2022 definition, pcPH patients had worse survival compared with HF patients without pcPH (log-rank, P = .02) as well as CpcPH compared with IpcPH (log-rank, P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first emphasizing the impact of the new pcPH definition on CpcPH prevalence and validating the prognostic value of mPAP > 20 mmHg and PVR > 2 WU among HF patients.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Haemodynamic variables are prognostic factors in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). However, right heart catheterization (RHC) is not systematically recommended to assess the risk-status during follow-up. This study aimed to assess the added value of haemodynamic variables in prevalent patients to predict the risk of death or lung transplantation according to their risk status assessed by the non-invasive 4 strata model as recommended by the European guidelines. METHODS: We evaluated incident patients with PAH enrolled in the French PAH Registry between 2009 and 2020 who had a first follow-up RHC. Cox regression identified, in each follow-up risk status, haemodynamic variables significantly associated with transplant-free survival (TFS). Optimal thresholds were determined by time-dependent Receiver-Operating Characteristics. Several multivariable Cox regression models were performed to identify the haemodynamic variables improving the non-invasive risk stratification model. RESULTS: We analysed 1240 incident patients reassessed within a year by RHC. None of haemodynamic variable were significantly associated with TFS among low-risk (n=386) or high-risk (n=71) patients. Among patients at intermediate (-low, n=483, -high, n=300) risk at first follow-up, multivariable models including either stroke volume index (SVi) or mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO2) were the best. The prognostic performance of refined 6 strata risk stratification model including the non-invasive 4 strata model and SVi>37â mL·m-2 and/or SvO2>65% for patients at intermediate-risk (Area Under the Curve 0.81, c-index 0.74), was better than that of 4 strata model (0.79, p=0.009; c-index 0.72). CONCLUSIONS: Cardiopulmonary haemodynamics may improve risk stratification at follow-up in patients at intermediate-risk.
