RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Women positive for thyroid peroxidase antibodies (TPO-Ab) have a higher risk of recurrent pregnancy loss. Evidence on whether levothyroxine treatment improves pregnancy outcomes in women who are TPO-Ab positive women with recurrent pregnancy loss is scarce. The aim of this study was to determine if levothyroxine increases live birth rates in women who were TPO-Ab positive with recurrent pregnancy loss and normal thyroid function. METHODS: The T4LIFE trial was an international, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study done in 13 secondary and tertiary hospitals in the Netherlands, one tertiary hospital in Belgium, and one tertiary hospital in Denmark. Women (18-42 years) who were TPO-Ab positive, had two or more pregnancy losses, and had a thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) concentration within the institutional reference range were eligible for inclusion. Women were excluded if they had antiphospholipid syndrome (lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin IgG or IgM antibodies, or ß2-glycoprotein-I IgG or IgM antibodies), other autoimmune diseases, thyroid disease, previous enrolment in this trial, or contraindications for levothyroxine use. Before conception, women were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either levothyroxine or placebo orally once daily. The daily dose of levothyroxine was based on preconception TSH concentration and ranged from 0·5-1·0 µg/kg bodyweight. Levothyroxine or placebo was continued until the end of pregnancy. The primary outcome was live birth, defined as the birth of a living child beyond 24 weeks of gestation measured in the intention-to-treat population. The trial was registered within the Netherlands Trial Register, NTR3364 and with EudraCT, 2011-001820-39. RESULTS: Between Jan 1, 2013, and Sept 19, 2019, 187 women were included in the study: 94 (50%) were assigned to the levothyroxine group and 93 (50%) were assigned to the placebo group. The trial was prematurely stopped when 187 (78%) of the 240 predefined patients had been included because of slow recruitment. 47 (50%) women in the levothyroxine group and 45 (48%) women in the placebo group had live births (risk ratio 1·03 [95% CI 0·77 to 1·38]; absolute risk difference 1·6% [95% CI -12·7 to 15·9]). Seven (7%) women in the levothyroxine group and seven (8%) in the placebo group reported adverse events, none of them were directly related to the study procedure. INTERPRETATION: Compared with placebo, levothyroxine treatment did not result in higher live birth rates in euthyroid women with recurrent pregnancy loss who were positive for TPO-Ab. On the basis of our findings, we do not advise routine use of levothyroxine in women who are TPO-Ab positive with recurrent pregnancy loss and normal thyroid function. FUNDING: Dutch Organization for Health Research and Development, Fonds NutsOhra, Dutch Patient Organization of Thyroid Disorders, the Jan Dekkerstichting and Dr Ludgardine Bouwmanstichting, and a personal donation through the Dutch Patient Organization of Thyroid Disorders.
Asunto(s)
Aborto Habitual , Enfermedades de la Tiroides , Aborto Habitual/inducido químicamente , Aborto Habitual/tratamiento farmacológico , Aborto Habitual/prevención & control , Adolescente , Adulto , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina G , Inmunoglobulina M , Yoduro Peroxidasa , Embarazo , Enfermedades de la Tiroides/tratamiento farmacológico , Tirotropina , Tiroxina/uso terapéutico , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The perforation of the device through the myometrium of the uterus is a well-known complication after the placement of an intra-uterine device (IUD). A laparoscopy is often performed to remove the IUD. The omentum or the recto-uterine pouch, also known as the pouch of Douglas, are the most likely locations of the IUD when this is dislocated. CASE DESCRIPTION: This case reports describes the case of a 36-year-old woman, where three months after giving birth an IUD was placed and the uterine wall was perforated. The patient came to the outpatient clinic because of an unwanted pregnancy. The IUD was eventually laparoscopic found in the retropubic space, the cavum Retzii CONCLUSION: After placement of an IUD, especially placed after the first months of giving birth, additional examination is recommended to check the placement. Besides the pouch of Douglas and the omentum, the IUD can be dislocated in the cavum Retzii.
Asunto(s)
Dispositivos Intrauterinos , Laparoscopía , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Epiplón , Embarazo , ÚteroRESUMEN
STUDY QUESTION: Does a reduced FSH dose in women with a predicted hyper response, apparent from a high antral follicle count (AFC), who are scheduled for IVF/ICSI lead to a different outcome with respect to cumulative live birth rate and safety? SUMMARY ANSWER: Although in women with a predicted hyper response (AFC > 15) undergoing IVF/ICSI a reduced FSH dose (100 IU per day) results in similar cumulative live birth rates and a lower occurrence of any grade of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) as compared to a standard dose (150 IU/day), a higher first cycle cancellation rate and similar severe OHSS rate were observed. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Excessive ovarian response to controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) for IVF/ICSI may result in increased rates of cycle cancellation, the occurrence of OHSS and suboptimal live birth rates. In women scheduled for IVF/ICSI, an ovarian reserve test (ORT) can be used to predict response to COS. No consensus has been reached on whether ORT-based FSH dosing improves effectiveness and safety in women with a predicted hyper response. STUDY DESIGN SIZE, DURATION: Between May 2011 and May 2014, we performed an open-label, multicentre RCT in women with regular menstrual cycles and an AFC > 15. Women with polycystic ovary syndrome (Rotterdam criteria) were excluded. The primary outcome was ongoing pregnancy achieved within 18 months after randomization and resulting in a live birth. Secondary outcomes included the occurrence of OHSS and cost-effectiveness. Since this RCT was embedded in a cohort study assessing over 1500 women, we expected to randomize 300 predicted hyper responders. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Women with an AFC > 15 were randomized to an FSH dose of 100 IU or 150 IU/day. In both groups, dose adjustment was allowed in subsequent cycles (maximum 25 IU in the reduced and 50 IU in the standard group) based on pre-specified criteria. Both effectiveness and cost-effectiveness were evaluated from an intention-to-treat perspective. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: We randomized 255 women to a daily FSH dose of 100 IU and 266 women to a daily FSH dose of 150 IU. The cumulative live birth rate was 66.3% (169/255) in the reduced versus 69.5% (185/266) in the standard group (relative risk (RR) 0.95 [95%CI, 0.85-1.07], P = 0.423). The occurrence of any grade of OHSS was lower after a lower FSH dose (5.2% versus 11.8%, RR 0.44 [95%CI, 0.28-0.71], P = 0.001), but the occurrence of severe OHSS did not differ (1.3% versus 1.1%, RR 1.25 [95%CI, 0.38-4.07], P = 0.728). As dose reduction was not less expensive (4.622 versus 4.714, delta costs/woman 92 [95%CI, -479-325]), there was no dominant strategy in the economic analysis. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Despite our training programme, the AFC might have suffered from inter-observer variation. Although strict cancellation criteria were provided, selective cancelling in the reduced dose group (for poor response in particular) cannot be excluded as observers were not blinded for the FSH dose and small dose adjustments were allowed in subsequent cycles. However, as first cycle live birth rates did not differ from the cumulative results, the open design probably did not mask a potential benefit for the reduced dosing group. As this RCT was embedded in a larger cohort study, the power in this study was unavoidably lower than it should be. Participants had a relatively low BMI from an international perspective, which may limit generalization of the findings. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: In women with a predicted hyper response scheduled for IVF/ICSI, a reduced FSH dose does not affect live birth rates. A lower FSH dose did reduce the incidence of mild and moderate OHSS, but had no impact on severe OHSS. Future research into ORT-based dosing in women with a predicted hyper response should compare various safety management strategies and should be powered on a clinically relevant safety outcome while assessing non-inferiority towards live birth rates. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This trial was funded by The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMW, Project Number 171102020). SCO, TCvT and HLT received an unrestricted research grant from Merck Serono (the Netherlands). CBL receives grants from Merck, Ferring and Guerbet. BWJM is supported by a NHMRC Practitioner Fellowship (GNT1082548) and reports consultancy for OvsEva, Merck and Guerbet. FJMB receives monetary compensation as a member of the external advisory board for Ferring pharmaceutics BV and Merck Serono for consultancy work for Gedeon Richter (Belgium) and Roche Diagnostics (Switzerland) and for a research cooperation with Ansh Labs (USA). All other authors have nothing to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Registered at the ICMJE-recognized Dutch Trial Registry (www.trialregister.nl). Registration number: NTR2657. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE: 20 December 2010. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT'S ENROLMENT: 12 May 2011.
Asunto(s)
Fertilización In Vitro/métodos , Hormona Folículo Estimulante/administración & dosificación , Folículo Ovárico/fisiología , Ovario/fisiología , Inyecciones de Esperma Intracitoplasmáticas/métodos , Adulto , Tasa de Natalidad , Criopreservación , Femenino , Fertilización In Vitro/economía , Hormona Liberadora de Gonadotropina/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Infertilidad/terapia , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Síndrome de Hiperestimulación Ovárica , Reserva Ovárica/efectos de los fármacos , Inducción de la Ovulación/métodos , Seguridad del Paciente , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo , Índice de Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos , Inyecciones de Esperma Intracitoplasmáticas/economía , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hysteroscopy is often done in infertile women starting in-vitro fertilisation (IVF) to improve their chance of having a baby. However, no data are available from randomised controlled trials to support this practice. We aimed to assess whether routine hysteroscopy before the first IVF treatment cycle increases the rate of livebirths. METHODS: We did a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial in seven university hospitals and 15 large general hospitals in the Netherlands. Women with a normal transvaginal ultrasound of the uterine cavity and no previous hysteroscopy who were scheduled for their first IVF treatment were randomly assigned (1:1) to either hysteroscopy with treatment of detected intracavitary abnormalities before starting IVF (hysteroscopy group) or immediate start of the IVF treatment (immediate IVF group). Randomisation was done with web-based concealed allocation and was stratified by centre with variable block sizes. Participants, doctors, and outcome assessors were not masked to the assigned group. The primary outcome was ongoing pregnancy (detection of a fetal heartbeat at >12 weeks of gestation) within 18 months of randomisation and resulting in livebirth. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01242852. FINDINGS: Between May 25, 2011, and Aug 27, 2013, we randomly assigned 750 women to receive either hysteroscopy (n=373) or immediate IVF (n=377). 209 (57%) of 369 women eligible for assessment in the hysteroscopy group and 200 (54%) of 373 in the immediate IVF group had a livebirth from a pregnancy during the trial period (relative risk 1·06, 95% CI 0·93-1·20; p=0·41). One (<1%) woman in the hysteroscopy group developed endometritis after hysteroscopy. INTERPRETATION: Routine hysteroscopy does not improve livebirth rates in infertile women with a normal transvaginal ultrasound of the uterine cavity scheduled for a first IVF treatment. Women with a normal transvaginal ultrasound should not be offered routine hysteroscopy. FUNDING: The Dutch Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMW).
Asunto(s)
Fertilización In Vitro , Histeroscopía , Infertilidad Femenina/terapia , Adulto , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios , Femenino , Humanos , Nacimiento Vivo , Países Bajos , Embarazo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmatic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment a large drop is present between embryo transfer and occurrence of pregnancy. The implantation rate per embryo transferred is only 30%. Studies have shown that minor intrauterine abnormalities can be found in 11-45% of infertile women with a normal transvaginal sonography or hysterosalpingography. Two randomised controlled trials have indicated that detection and treatment of these abnormalities by office hysteroscopy after two failed IVF cycles leads to a 9-13% increase in pregnancy rate. Therefore, screening of all infertile women for intracavitary pathology prior to the start of IVF/ICSI is increasingly advocated. In absence of a scientific basis for such a policy, this study will assess the effects and costs of screening for and treatment of unsuspected intrauterine abnormalities by routine office hysteroscopy, with or without saline infusion sonography (SIS), prior to a first IVF/ICSI cycle. METHODS/DESIGN: Multicenter randomised controlled trial in asymptomatic subfertile women, indicated for a first IVF/ICSI treatment cycle, with normal findings at transvaginal sonography. Women with recurrent miscarriages, prior hysteroscopy treatment and intermenstrual blood loss will not be included. Participants will be randomised for a routine fertility work-up with additional (SIS and) hysteroscopy with on-the-spot-treatment of predefined intrauterine abnormalities versus the regular fertility work-up without additional diagnostic tests. The primary study outcome is the cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate resulting in live birth achieved within 18 months of IVF/ICSI treatment after randomisation. Secondary study outcome parameters are the cumulative implantation rate; cumulative miscarriage rate; patient preference and patient tolerance of a SIS and hysteroscopy procedure. All data will be analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle, using univariate and multivariate logistic regression and cox regression. Cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed to evaluate the costs of the additional tests as routine procedure. In total 700 patients will be included in this study. DISCUSSION: The results of this study will help to clarify the significance of hysteroscopy prior to IVF treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01242852.
Asunto(s)
Fertilización In Vitro , Histeroscopía , Infertilidad Femenina/terapia , Enfermedades Uterinas/diagnóstico , Útero/anomalías , Protocolos Clínicos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Humanos , Histeroscopía/economía , Infertilidad Femenina/diagnóstico por imagen , Infertilidad Femenina/economía , Infertilidad Femenina/etiología , Análisis de Intención de Tratar , Modelos Logísticos , Análisis Multivariante , Países Bajos , Prioridad del Paciente , Embarazo , Índice de Embarazo , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Método Simple Ciego , Inyecciones de Esperma Intracitoplasmáticas , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía , Enfermedades Uterinas/complicaciones , Enfermedades Uterinas/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades Uterinas/economía , Útero/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that the follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) threshold in patients with elevated FSH levels in the early follicular phase (EFP) is higher than in controls. DESIGN: Pilot study. SETTING: Academic hospital. PATIENT(S): Six patients with elevated EFP FSH (>10 IU/L) and 13 controls. INTERVENTION(S): Treatment with a GnRH agonist in the midluteal phase before IV administration of recombinant FSH was started in an ultra-low-dose step-up protocol. The FSH threshold was determined by the mean of FSH levels of the above threshold value and the below threshold value. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Follicle-stimulating hormone threshold, FSH screening value, E(2), number of follicles. RESULT(S): The FSH threshold in the elevated EFP FSH group was 6.75 IU/L and was significantly higher than the FSH threshold of the controls (4.65 IU/L). The FSH screening value on day 3 was 12.0 IU/L in the patient group and 5.0 IU/L in the controls. Estradiol was significantly lower on the day that the largest follicle was 18 mm in the elevated EFP FSH group compared with controls (277 vs. 491 pmol/L, respectively). On the day of hCG administration, the number of smaller (10-13 mm) follicles was equal but the number of larger (>14 mm) follicles was higher in the control group compared with the elevated FSH group. In the control group, the basal FSH levels correlated highly with the FSH threshold levels (r = 0.8), but in the patients with elevated EFP FSH this correlation was absent. CONCLUSION(S): In normal women, basal FSH day 3 values represent the ovarian threshold for FSH. In women with elevated day 3 FSH, the FSH threshold is higher but not as high as basal FSH values. We postulate that the FSH threshold in patients with elevated EFP FSH is higher because of intraovarian factors. Basal FSH overshoots the threshold, probably because of the limited feedback by the ovary.