RESUMEN
Vinegar has been used for centuries as a food preservative, flavor enhancer, and medicinal agent. While commonly known for its sour taste and acidic properties due to acetic acid bacteria metabolism, vinegar is also home to a diverse community of lactic acid bacteria (LAB). The main genera found during natural fermentation include Lactobacillus, Lacticaseibacillus, Lentilactobacillus, Limosilactbacillus, Leuconostoc, and Pedicoccus. Many of the reported LAB species fulfill the probiotic criteria set by the World Health Organization (WHO). However, it is crucial to acknowledge that LAB viability undergoes a significant reduction during vinegar fermentation. While containing LAB, none of the analyzed vinegar met the minimum viable amount required for probiotic labeling. To fully unlock the potential of vinegar as a probiotic, investigations should be focused on enhancing LAB viability during vinegar fermentation, identifying strains with probiotic properties, and establishing appropriate dosage and consumption guidelines to ensure functional benefits. Currently, vinegar exhibits substantial potential as a postbiotic product, attributed to the high incidence and growth of LAB in the initial stages of the fermentation process. This review aims to identify critical gaps and address the essential requirements for establishing vinegar as a viable probiotic product. It comprehensively examines various relevant aspects, including vinegar processing, total and LAB diversity, LAB metabolism, the potential health benefits linked to vinegar consumption, and the identification of potential probiotic species.
Asunto(s)
Lactobacillales , Lactobacillales/metabolismo , Fermentación , Ácido Acético/metabolismo , Bacterias , Lactobacillaceae/metabolismoRESUMEN
Kluyveromyces marxianus CCT 7735 shows potential for producing ethanol from lactose; however, its low ethanol tolerance is a drawback for its industrial application. The first aim of this study was to obtain four ethanol-tolerant K. marxianus CCT 7735 strains (ETS1, ETS2, ETS3, and ETS4) by adaptive laboratory evolution. The second aim was to select among them the strain that stood out and to evaluate metabolic changes associated with the improved ethanol tolerance in this strain. The ETS4 was selected for displaying a specific growth rate higher than the parental strain under ethanol stress (122%) and specific ethanol production rate (0.26 g/g/h) higher than those presented by the ETS1 (0.22 g/g/h), ETS2 (0.17 g/g/h), and ETS3 (0.17 g/g/h) under non-stress condition. Further analyses were performed with the ETS4 in comparison with its parental strain in order to characterize metabolic changes. Accumulation of valine and metabolites of the citric acid cycle (isocitric acid, citric acid, and cis-aconitic acid) was observed only in the ETS4 subjected to ethanol stress. Their accumulation in this strain may have been important to increase ethanol tolerance. Furthermore, the contents of fatty acid methyl esters and ergosterol were higher in the ETS4 than in the parental strain. These differences likely contributed to enhance ethanol tolerance in the ETS4. KEY POINTS: ⢠K. marxianus ethanol-tolerant strains were selected by adaptive laboratory evolution. ⢠Valine and metabolites of the TCA cycle were accumulated in the ETS4. ⢠High contents of fatty acids and ergosterol contributed to enhance ethanol tolerance.