Anthracyclines versus No Anthracyclines in the Neoadjuvant Strategy for HER2+ Breast Cancer: Real-World Evidence.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Deescalation strategies omitting anthracyclines (AC) have been explored in early human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer (HER2+ EBC), showing similar efficacy regarding pathological complete response (pCR) and long-term outcomes as AC-containing regimens. The standard treatment for this tumor subtype is based on chemotherapy and dual HER2 blockade with trastuzumab and pertuzumab, with AC-containing regimens remaining a frequent option for these patients, even in non-high-risk cases. The primary aim of this study was to assess and compare the effectiveness of neoadjuvant regimens with and without AC used in the treatment of HER2+ EBC in the clinical practice according to the pCR achieved with each. METHODS: This retrospective multicentric study included patients with HER2+ EBC from Portuguese, Spanish, and Chilean hospitals (January 2018-December 2021). Patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) with dual HER2 blockade (trastuzumab and pertuzumab), followed by surgery, were included. Statistical analysis used chi-squared/Fisher's exact test for associations, multivariate logistic regression for pCR, and Kaplan-Meier method for event-free survival (EFS). IBM SPSS Statistics 29.0 analyzed the data. RESULTS: The study included 371 patients from eight hospitals. Among them, 237 received sequential AC and taxane-based chemotherapy with 4 cycles of trastuzumab and pertuzumab, while 134 received 6 cycles of TCHP (docetaxel, carboplatinum, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab). The average age of the patients was 52.8 years and 52.7 years, respectively. Omitting AC from the neoadjuvant approach did not preclude achieving pCR [p = 0.246, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.235-0.257] and was safe regardless of patient characteristics. Relapse rates were 6.8% (16 patients) in the AC group and 4.5% (6 patients) in the TCHP group. Over a median follow-up of 2.9 years, the estimated 3-year EFS was 92.5% in the AC group and 95.4% in the TCHP group (hazard ratio 0.602, 95% CI 0.234-1.547, p = 0.292, favoring TCHP). CONCLUSION: This study reports real-world evidence showing similar pCR and EFS outcomes with treatment regimens with and without AC and raises awareness of possible overtreatment and long-term toxicity in some patients with HER2+ EBC with the use of AC.

Exploring new pathways in endocrine-resistant breast cancer.

The most common breast cancer (BC) subtypes are hormone-dependent, being either estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), progesterone receptor-positive (PR+), or both, and altogether comprise the luminal subtype. The mainstay of treatment for luminal BC is endocrine therapy (ET), which includes several agents that act either directly targeting ER action or suppressing estrogen production. Over the years, ET has proven efficacy in reducing mortality and improving clinical outcomes in metastatic and nonmetastatic BC. However, the development of ET resistance promotes cancer survival and progression and hinders the use of endocrine agents. Several mechanisms implicated in endocrine resistance have now been extensively studied. Based on the current clinical and pre-clinical data, the present article briefly reviews the well-established pathways of ET resistance and continues by focusing on the three most recently uncovered pathways, which may mediate resistance to ET, namely receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand (RANKL)/receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B (RANK), nuclear factor kappa B (NFκB), and Notch. It additionally overviews the evidence underlying the approval of combined therapies to overcome ET resistance in BC, while highlighting the relevance of future studies focusing on putative mediators of ET resistance to uncover new therapeutic options for the disease.