Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ; 28(22): 27655-27665, 2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33512682

RESUMEN

Imidacloprid is one of the most commercialized insecticides in agriculture in the world, with a broad spectrum of action. However, little is known about the effects of commercial formulations containing this active ingredient (a.i.) on non-target organisms in tropical soils. Our objective was to assess the toxicity based on the predicted environmental concentration (PEC) of imidacloprid, in the avoidance behaviour of earthworms and collembolans as well as in the reproduction of collembolans, in two representative soils of the Brazilian Cerrado with contrasting texture (clayey Oxisol and sandy Entisol). Ecotoxicity tests were carried out according to ISO protocols to assess the avoidance behaviour of earthworms (Eisenia andrei) and avoidance and reproduction of collembolans (Folsomia candida). In the earthworm's avoidance test, more than 80% of the individuals were found in the control, in all tested concentrations, indicating a possible habitat function loss in both soils. The avoidance behaviour of collembolans was observed in both soils, being more expressive (up to 75% of escape) in Oxisol. In Entisol, only the two highest concentrations were avoided (up to 63%). There was a negative effect on the reproduction of collembolans in both soils, with a higher EC50 value (0.255 mg kg-1) in Oxisol than in Entisol (0.177 mg kg-1), demonstrating higher toxicity in the sandy soil. These differences were attributed to the contrasting texture of the studied soils, probably due to lower retention of the a.i. in the sandy soil, causing an increased bioavailability. This study demonstrated that imidacloprid can be highly toxic to soil invertebrates, even in soil concentrations lower than those expected from recommended dose, causing an impact on the edaphic organisms and, consequently, compromising its functions in the soil ecosystem.


Asunto(s)
Artrópodos , Oligoquetos , Contaminantes del Suelo , Animales , Brasil , Ecosistema , Humanos , Neonicotinoides , Nitrocompuestos , Reproducción , Suelo , Contaminantes del Suelo/análisis , Contaminantes del Suelo/toxicidad
2.
Chemosphere ; 240: 124791, 2020 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31546189

RESUMEN

Produced water (PW) is a mixture of formation water and injected water from oil and gas reservoirs, which contain a complex composition of dissolved and particulate organic and inorganic chemicals. High quantities of PW are extracted with the oil, which can be discharged into the environment, re-injected into the wells or treated for reuse. The present study aimed to evaluate the soil ecotoxicity under an irrigation system using treated PW (water-oil separation, sand filter, activated charcoal filter, reverse osmosis) for sunflower production, predicting conditions for PW reuse in the semi-arid region of Brazil. The experiment was conducted in a greenhouse using natural soil in vessels. Water from public water supply was used as control. Soil samples from two production cycles of sunflowers were assessed using ecotoxicity tests with soil invertebrate's species representing macro and mesofaunal groups: Eisenia andrei (earthworms), Folsomia candida (collembolans) and Enchytraeus crypticus (enchytraeids). Leachates samples were evaluated with aquatic ecotoxicity tests to assess the soil retention function. Results showed impact of irrigation with PW in all treatments except reverse osmosis. Significant negative correlations were found among reproduction of soil invertebrates, high Na+ concentrations and electrical conductivity. The effects of other contaminants not analyses should not be discarded. It is important to highlight that salinity is not usually included in target values of soil quality. This study reinforces the importance of ecotoxicity tests in predictive and retrospective risk assessment, joining effects of contaminant mixtures or even that contaminants not considered in chemical scope of analysis or legislation.


Asunto(s)
Riego Agrícola , Organismos Acuáticos , Contaminantes del Suelo/toxicidad , Eliminación de Residuos Líquidos , Animales , Artrópodos/efectos de los fármacos , Brasil , Monitoreo del Ambiente , Yacimiento de Petróleo y Gas , Oligoquetos/efectos de los fármacos , Reproducción/efectos de los fármacos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Suelo/química , Contaminantes del Suelo/análisis , Agua/análisis
3.
Chemosphere ; 222: 645-655, 2019 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30731385

RESUMEN

Metsulfuron-methyl is one of the most used sulfonylurea herbicides, being applied alone in pre-emergence and with a mineral oil (as adjuvant) in post-emergence. In risk assessment of pesticides, ecotoxicity tests have been applied to assess the effects of products and mixtures under laboratory conditions, but they are limited in their ecological relevance when compared to field assessments. Considering the differences between laboratory and field exposure, and the lack of data on the effects of metsulfuron-methyl in natural soils, this study consisted in a set of tests to assess the ecotoxicity of this herbicide applied alone, combined with an adjuvant (mineral oil) and the adjuvant applied alone, both under laboratory and field exposure, with artificial and natural soil respectively. Reproduction tests with four non-target soil invertebrates species were performed in laboratory, while two experiments were performed in field evaluating avoidance behaviour, feeding activity, mesofauna abundance and pesticide residual. Laboratory results showed that metsulfuron-methyl alone is not a threat to soil fauna on the recommended doses. However, the presence of mineral oil as adjuvant showed ecotoxicity to Eisenia andrei, Enchytraeus crypticus and Proisotoma minuta on laboratory tests. Field evaluations indicated that metsulfuron-methyl and the adjuvant do not impaired the feeding activity of the soil fauna. The low abundance of native communities could be related to soil management. Results showed that laboratory and field evaluations are necessary to better understanding of the effects of pesticides to soil fauna and adjuvant addition should be considered on pesticides risk assessment.


Asunto(s)
Arilsulfonatos/toxicidad , Herbicidas/toxicidad , Invertebrados/efectos de los fármacos , Pruebas de Toxicidad , Animales , Aceite Mineral/farmacología , Plaguicidas/toxicidad , Reproducción/efectos de los fármacos , Medición de Riesgo , Suelo/química , Contaminantes del Suelo/toxicidad
4.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ; 25(24): 24143-24149, 2018 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29948693

RESUMEN

Metsulfuron-methyl is a common active ingredient recommended for use in pre- and post-emergence control of annual grasses and broadleaf weeds in crops, usually applied with mineral oil as adjuvant to enhance its efficiency. Despite the increasing use of this herbicide, there are no information on its ecotoxicity effects to soil fauna. Avoidance and lethality tests were performed with earthworms and collembolans using tropical artificial soil contaminated with formulated products Ally® (600 g L-1 metsulfuron-methyl) and Assist® (756 g L-1 mineral oil) as adjuvant. Lethality test with earthworms showed no difference when tested with or without adjuvant. When Ally® was tested alone, it caused avoidance behavior only at high concentrations (5000 and 10,000 times field predicted dose). However, Assist® addition changed the response of soil invertebrates increasing the avoidance even at field predicted doses. The toxicity of the adjuvant was confirmed in tests exposing collembolans and earthworms to Assist® alone resulting in avoidance behavior. The results clearly show that the addition of mineral oil enhanced the ecotoxicity of metsulfuron-methyl. This study provides an important contribution to the knowledge on the toxicity of metsulfuron-methyl and indicates that adjuvants should be considered in risk assessment of pesticides, considering that under field conditions, these products are applied together.


Asunto(s)
Artrópodos/efectos de los fármacos , Arilsulfonatos/toxicidad , Ecotoxicología/métodos , Oligoquetos/efectos de los fármacos , Contaminantes del Suelo/toxicidad , Animales , Artrópodos/fisiología , Arilsulfonatos/administración & dosificación , Reacción de Prevención/efectos de los fármacos , Herbicidas/administración & dosificación , Herbicidas/toxicidad , Oligoquetos/fisiología , Contaminantes del Suelo/administración & dosificación
5.
Ecotoxicology ; 27(4): 395-401, 2018 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29492805

RESUMEN

Reference substances are recommended to evaluate the quality of laboratory test species and the reliability of ecotoxicity data. Boric acid (BA) has been recommended as reference substance in some standardized tests in OECD soil, but no data are available for Tropical Artificial Soil (TAS). For this purpose, avoidance tests with Eisenia andrei, lethality tests with E. andrei and Folsomia candida, and reproduction tests with E. andrei, Enchytraeus crypticus and F. candida were carried out in TAS (5% organic matter), following ISO guidelines, and compared between two laboratories. Collembolans were more sensitive than earthworms in lethality tests (LC50 = 342 and > 1000 mg kg-1, respectively). For both laboratories, the EC50 values were similar for reproduction of oligochaeta species (165 mg kg-1 for E. crypticus; 242 and 281 mg kg-1 for E. andrei), but significantly different for reproduction of F. candida (96 and 198 mg kg-1). Present results suggest that boric acid could replace the current pesticides recommended by ISO guidelines as reference substances on reproduction tests with soil invertebrates in TAS. Concerning avoidance tests, additional investigations should be performed with other substances that cause no neurotoxic effects on soil organisms.


Asunto(s)
Artrópodos/efectos de los fármacos , Ácidos Bóricos/toxicidad , Monitoreo del Ambiente/métodos , Oligoquetos/efectos de los fármacos , Contaminantes del Suelo/toxicidad , Clima Tropical , Animales , Pruebas de Toxicidad
6.
Chemosphere ; 198: 154-160, 2018 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29421725

RESUMEN

Despite glyphosate-based herbicides are widely used in agriculture, forestry and gardens, little is known about its effects on non-target organisms. The present work evaluated the ecotoxicity of four formulated products (Roundup® Original, Trop®, Zapp® Qi 620 and Crucial®) on soil invertebrates. Screening ecotoxicity tests were carried out with soil and oat straw collected in a field experiment, besides laboratory-spiked soils. Screening tests included avoidance behaviour of earthworms (Eisenia andrei), collembolans (Folsomia candida) and isopods (Porcellio dilatatus) in single and multispecies tests; reproduction of collembolans (F. candida), and bait lamina in field. Non-avoidance behaviour was observed in standard tests (earthworms) in soil, neither in multispecies tests (earthworm + isopods) using oat straw, while for collembolans it occurred for the product Zapp® Qi 620 even at the recommended dose. Reproduction of F. candida was not impaired even at high doses in laboratory-spiked soils. Feeding activity on bait lamina test was impaired in treatment corresponding to the red label product, Crucial®. Results showed the relevance of bait lamina test on screening the impact of herbicides in the field. The findings highlight the importance of considering different formulations for the same active ingredient in risk assessment of pesticides.


Asunto(s)
Glicina/análogos & derivados , Herbicidas/toxicidad , Isópodos/efectos de los fármacos , Oligoquetos/efectos de los fármacos , Contaminantes del Suelo/toxicidad , Animales , Reacción de Prevención/efectos de los fármacos , Glicina/toxicidad , Modelos Teóricos , Reproducción/efectos de los fármacos , Medición de Riesgo , Suelo/química , Glifosato
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...