Longitudinal SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in Portugal and antibody maintenance 12 months after infection.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, Portugal has experienced three distinct SARS-CoV-2 infection waves. We previously documented the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 immunity, measured by specific antibodies, in September 2020, 6 months after the initial moderate wave. Here, we show the seroprevalence changes 6 months later, up to the second week of March 2021, shortly following the third wave, which was one of the most severe in the world, and 2 months following the start of the vaccination campaign. A longitudinal epidemiological study was conducted, with a stratified quota sample of the Portuguese population. Serological testing was performed, including ELISA determination of antibody class and titers. The proportion of seropositives, which was 2.2% in September 2020, rose sharply to 17.3% (95% CI: 15.8-18.8%) in March 2021. Importantly, circulating IgG and IgA antibody levels were very stable 6 months after the initial determination and up to a year after initial infection, indicating long-lasting infection immunity against SARS-CoV-2. Moreover, vaccinated people had higher IgG levels from 3 weeks post-vaccination when compared with previously infected people at the same time post-infection.

Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies after First 6 Months of COVID-19 Pandemic, Portugal.

In September 2020, we tested 13,398 persons in Portugal for antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 by using a quota sample stratified by age and population density. We found a seroprevalence of 2.2%, 3-4 times larger than the official number of cases at the end of the first wave of the pandemic.

Current laboratory and clinical practices in reporting and interpreting anti-nuclear antibody indirect immunofluorescence (ANA IIF) patterns: results of an international survey.

BACKGROUND: The International Consensus on Antinuclear Antibody (ANA) Patterns (ICAP) has recently proposed nomenclature in order to harmonize ANA indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) pattern reporting. ICAP distinguishes competent-level from expert-level patterns. A survey was organized to evaluate reporting, familiarity, and considered clinical value of ANA IIF patterns. METHODS: Two surveys were distributed by European Autoimmunity Standardization Initiative (EASI) working groups, the International Consensus on ANA Patterns (ICAP) and UK NEQAS to laboratory professionals and clinicians. RESULTS: 438 laboratory professionals and 248 clinicians from 67 countries responded. Except for dense fine speckled (DFS), the nuclear competent patterns were reported by > 85% of the laboratories. Except for rods and rings, the cytoplasmic competent patterns were reported by > 72% of laboratories. Cytoplasmic IIF staining was considered ANA positive by 55% of clinicians and 62% of laboratory professionals, with geographical and expertise-related differences. Quantification of fluorescence intensity was considered clinically relevant for nuclear patterns, but less so for cytoplasmic and mitotic patterns. Combining IIF with specific extractable nuclear antigens (ENA)/dsDNA antibody testing was considered most informative. Of the nuclear competent patterns, the centromere and homogeneous pattern obtained the highest scores for clinical relevance and the DFS pattern the lowest. Of the cytoplasmic patterns, the reticular/mitochondria-like pattern obtained the highest scores for clinical relevance and the polar/Golgi-like and rods and rings patterns the lowest. CONCLUSION: This survey confirms that the major nuclear and cytoplasmic ANA IIF patterns are considered clinically important. There is no unanimity on classifying DFS, rods and rings and polar/Golgi-like as a competent pattern and on reporting cytoplasmic patterns as ANA IIF positive.

First trimester combined screening in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: impact of pre-analytical variables on risk assessment.

BACKGROUND: Prenatal diagnosis of fetal trisomy 21 and other chromosomal abnormalities is based on invasive tests, such as amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling, which are carried out in women identified through screening as being at high risk for these abnormalities. The most widely used method of screening is the first-trimester combined test which utilizes maternal age, and measurements of fetal nuchal translucency thickness (NT) and maternal serum pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) and free ß-human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). OBJECTIVES: To assess the influence of SLE on the levels of NT, PAPP-A, and ß-hCG and whether any alterations in such levels may increase the rate of false positives and the subsequent number of invasive tests. METHOD: This was a prospective first-trimester screening study for trisomies 21, 18, and 13 by a combination of maternal age, fetal nuchal translucency thickness, and serum PAPP-A and ß-hCG at King's College Hospital, London, between March 2006 and February 2011. The study population included 47 cases with maternal SLE and 45,493 without SLE. The results of biomarkers in the SLE and non-SLE groups were compared. RESULTS: In the SLE group, compared to the non-SLE group, there were no significant differences in median maternal age, fetal NT, or serum PAPP-A MoM, but serum free ß-hCG MoM was increased (1.402, IQR 0.872-2.290 vs 0.994, IQR 0.676-1.508). CONCLUSION: In first trimester screening for trisomies, the measured value of free ß-hCG should be adjusted for maternal SLE to avoid false positive results and overuse of invasive tests.