Comparison of Persistent Epithelial Defect Treatment With Sutureless Cryopreserved and Dehydrated Amniotic Membrane.

PURPOSE: To compare cryopreserved sutureless amniotic membrane (C-SAM) and dehydrated SAM (D-SAM) outpatient treatment outcomes for persistent epithelial defects (PEDs), analyze risk factors for treatment failure, and identify adverse events. DESIGN: Retrospective, interventional comparative clinical study. METHODS: This study was a multicenter retrospective interventional cohort from 2 tertiary corneal referral practices from 2016 to 2020. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) PEDs treated (2) outpatient with (3) either C-SAM or D-SAM. PEDs were defined as epithelial defects present for ≥7 days after failing prior conservative therapy. The primary outcome measure was the resolution or improvement of a PED. The secondary outcomes included analysis of treatment failures and identification of adverse events. A total of 220 PEDs from 204 eyes (197 patients) treated with either C-SAM or D-SAM met the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: A total of 100 PEDs (45.5%) resolved after single amniotic membrane administration, 46.5% (59 of 127) in the C-SAM group and 44.1% (41 of 93) in the D-SAM group (P = .727). Forty-nine PEDs neither improved nor resolved without a significant difference between the C-SAM (21.3%) and D-SAM groups (23.7%, P = .673). There was no statistically significant difference for PED resolution, PED improvement, PEDs that did not resolve/improve, or those requiring surgery between the 2 groups for initial SAM. CONCLUSIONS: C-SAM and D-SAM were both effective for treating PEDs with comparable outcomes for resolution, improvement, and need for additional surgical intervention. Specific differences in adverse events may help dictate clinical use. Inflammatory disease was a risk factor for nonresolution of all PEDs.

Acute Corneal Epithelial Rejection of LR-CLAL After SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to report a case of acute corneal epithelial rejection of living-related conjunctival limbal allograft (LR-CLAL) after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination. OBSERVATIONS: A 27-year-old woman developed acute epithelial rejection of LR-CLAL 2 weeks after receiving the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. She received the LR-CLAL transplant 4 years and 7 months previously and had a stable clinical course with no history of rejection. She had an ABO blood group and human leukocyte antigen compatible donor, no systemic comorbidities, and no rejection risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: The novel SARS-CoV-2 vaccine upregulates the immune system to produce an adaptive immune response. The SARS-CoV-2 vaccine may potentially be associated with increased risk of rejection in those with ocular surface transplants.

Anterior Scleral and Limbal Inflammatory Necrosis After Adjuvant Miltefosine for Recalcitrant Acanthamoeba Keratitis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to report a retrospective case series of anterior scleral and limbal inflammatory necrosis after adjuvant miltefosine for recalcitrant Acanthamoeba keratitis (AK). METHODS: A case series and literature review. RESULT: Four eyes of 3 patients with recalcitrant AK developed anterior scleral and limbal inflammatory necrosis with significant scleral-limbal thinning after treatment with miltefosine. The average age was 38 years, and the average duration of infection before miltefosine treatment was 239 days. All cases required urgent surgical intervention to either prevent or mitigate corneal-limbal perforation. CONCLUSIONS: Miltefosine has been observed to result in the resolution of AK when used as an adjunctive therapy. It may also lead to a consecutive inflammatory necrosis of the anterior sclera and limbus. This inflammatory response may be significant enough to cause rapid scleral-limbal thinning with subsequent perforation.

Ex Vivo Safety and Efficacy of Paired Peripheral Incisions in Descemet's Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Grafts to Facilitate Unscrolling.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the ex vivo safety and efficacy of using paired peripheral incisions to achieve a triple scroll conformation that facilitates unscrolling in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). METHODS: The safety of adding paired peripheral incisions to DMEK grafts was evaluated by assessing endothelial cell loss (ECL) and risk of tearing. ECL was measured using calcein-AM staining after incisions. The risk of tearing was evaluated by comparing incision lengths before and after simulated DMEK surgery using cadaveric eyes. Efficacy was evaluated by comparing the scrolling pattern and the width of grafts with different incision lengths (0.0 mm, 0.5 mm, and 1.0 mm). Surgical unscrolling times in simulated DMEK surgery by a novice DMEK surgeon were evaluated to determine whether incisions facilitate unscrolling in DMEK surgery. RESULTS: The mean ECL after adding incisions was 0.78% ± 0.23%. There was no significant change in incision length after simulated DMEK surgery (P = 0.6). In donor grafts aged less than or equal to 65 years, 60% (6/10) achieved a stable triple scroll with 0.5 mm incisions and 80% (8/10) achieved a stable triple scroll with 1.0 mm incisions. In donor grafts aged greater than 65 years, 0% (0/4) achieved a stable triple scroll. Mean graft width increased significantly after forming a triple scroll (5575 µm ± 1128 µm) compared with baseline (1563 µm ± 428 µm) (P < 0.001). In the hands of a novice DMEK surgeon, the mean unscrolling time was significantly shorter with incisions (2.61 min ± 1.41 min) versus without incisions (5.44 min ± 3.17 min) (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Paired peripheral incisions are safe and effective for inducing a triple scroll in DMEK grafts with donor age less than or equal to 65 years. Adding incisions may facilitate unscrolling for inexperienced DMEK surgeons.

Violet 405-nm light: a novel therapeutic agent against common pathogenic bacteria.

BACKGROUND: The increasing incidence of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) and multidrug-resistant organisms demonstrate the need for innovative technological solutions. Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumonia, Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in particular are common pathogens responsible for a large percentage of indwelling medical device-associated clinical infections. The bactericidal effects of visible light sterilization (VLS) using 405-nm is one potential therapeutic under investigation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Light-emitting diodes of 405-nm were used to treat varying concentrations of S aureus, S pneumonia, E coli, and P aeruginosa. Irradiance levels between 2.71 ± 0.20 to 9.27 ± 0.36 mW/cm2 and radiant exposure levels up to 132.98 ± 6.68 J/cm2 were assessed. RESULTS: Dose-dependent effects were observed in all species. Statistically significant reductions were seen in both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. At the highest radiant exposure levels, bacterial log10 reductions were E coli-6.27 ± 0.54, S aureus-6.10 ± 0.60, P aeruginosa-5.20 ± 0.84, and S pneumoniae-6.01 ± 0.59. Statistically significant results (<0.001*) were found at each time point. CONCLUSIONS: We have successfully demonstrated high-efficacy bacterial reduction using 405-nm light sterilization. The VLS showed statistical significance against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative species with the given treatment times. The ß-lactam antibiotic-resistant E coli was the most sensitive to VLS, suggesting light therapy could a suitable option for sterilization in drug-resistant bacterial species. This research illustrates the potential of using VLS in treating clinically relevant bacterial infections.

Violet 405 nm light: A novel therapeutic agent against ß-lactam-resistant Escherichia coli.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Approximately 1.7 million patients are affected by hospital-acquired infections every year in the United States. The increasing prevalence of multidrug-resistant bacteria associated with these infections prompts the investigation of alternative sterilization and antibacterial therapies. One method currently under investigation is the antibacterial properties of visible light. This study examines the effect of a visible light therapy (VLT) on ß-lactam-resistant Escherichia coli, a common non-skin flora pathogen responsible for a large percentage of indwelling medical device-associated clinical infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 405 nm light-emitting diodes were used to treat varying concentrations of a common laboratory E. coli K-12 strain transformed with the pCIG mammalian expression vector. This conferred ampicillin resistance via expression of the ß-lactamase gene. Bacteria were grown on sterile polystyrene Petri dishes plated with Luria-Bertani broth. Images of bacterial growth colonies on plates were processed and analyzed using ImageJ. Irradiance levels between 2.89 ± 0.19 and 9.45 ± 0.63 mW cm(-2) and radiant exposure levels between 5.60 ± 0.39 and 136.91 ± 4.06 J cm(-2) were tested. RESULTS: VLT with variable irradiance and constant treatment time (120 minutes) demonstrated significant reduction (P < 0.001) in E. coli between an irradiance of 2.89 mW cm(-2) (81.70%) and 9.37 mW cm(-2) (100.00%). Similar results were found with variable treatment time with constant irradiance. Log10 reduction analysis produced between 1.98 ± 0.53 (60 minute treatment) and 6.27 ± 0.54 (250 minute treatment) log10 reduction in bacterial concentration (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We have successfully demonstrated a significant bacterial reduction using high intensity 405 nm light. Illustrating the efficacy of this technology against a ß-lactam-resistant E. coli is especially relevant to the need for novel methods of sterilization in healthcare settings. These results suggest that VLT using 405 nm light could be a suitable clinical option for eradication of ß-lactam-resistant E. coli. Visible light kills statistically significant concentrations of E. coli. Antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative bacteria exhibits sensitivity to 405 nm light. Greater than 6 log10 reduction in ß-lactam-resistant E. coli when treated with visible light therapy.