Covered stent grafts for relining of chronically occluded femoro-popliteal bypasses in frail patients.

In four high-risk patients with chronically occluded femoro-popliteal bypass suffering from Rutherford 4-5 chronic limb threatening ischemia we performed, as an alternative for redo surgery, endovasculair relining with covered stent grafts. During follow-up (3, 8, 14 and 20 months) one patient had redo percutaneous intervention and eventually below-the-knee amputation.

Molecular clonality analysis of esophageal adenocarcinoma by multiregion sequencing of tumor samples.

BACKGROUND: Intratumor heterogeneity has been demonstrated in several cancer types, following a model of branched evolution. It is unknown to which extent intratumor heterogeneity is applicable to esophageal adenocarcinoma. Therefore the aim of this study was to characterise intratumor heterogeneity in esophageal adenocarcinoma. METHODS: Multiregional targeted sequencing of four commonly altered genes was performed on 19 tumor regions collected from five esophageal adenocarcinomas. Alterations were classified as homogeneous or heterogeneous based on mutational and loss of heterozygosity analysis. RESULTS: Identical TP53 mutations and homogeneously loss of heterozygosity of the TP53 locus were identified in all separated tumor regions in each of five adenocarcinomas, and in the corresponding Barrett's esophagus and tumor positive lymph node of one primary tumor. Loss of heterozygosity of the P16 locus was homogeneous among all tumor regions in four adenocarcinomas, and an identical pattern of loss of heterozygosity was present in the Barrett's esophagus. Loss of heterozygosity of the SMAD4 and APC loci was observed in a heterogeneous pattern. CONCLUSIONS: Known driver alterations, such as TP53 and P16 are homogeneously present within each adenocarcinoma, and therefore occur early during carcinogenesis and subsequently clonally expand throughout the entire tumor. However, loss of heterozygosity of the SMAD4 and APC loci shows a heterogeneous pattern, indicating intratumor heterogeneity of esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Early onset esophageal adenocarcinoma: a distinct molecular entity?

Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is typically diagnosed in elderly with a median age of 68 years. The incidence of EAC has been rising over the last decades, also among young adults. The aim of the study was to investigate whether early onset EAC is a distinct molecular entity. To identify early onset EACs, the nationwide network and registry of histo- and cytopathology in the Netherlands (PALGA) was searched. Twenty-eight tumors of patients aged ≤40 years were selected and matched with 27 tumors of patients aged ≥68 years. DNA was isolated from surgically resected specimen and sequenced on the Ion Torrent Personal Genome Machine with the Ion AmpliSeq Cancer Panel. No differences in mutational load between early onset and conventional EACs were observed (P=0.196). The most frequently mutated genes were TP53 (73%) and P16 (16%). Additional mutations in early onset EACs occurred exclusively in: APC, CDH1, CTNNB1, FGFR2, and STK11. In the conventional EACs additional mutations were exclusively identified in: ABL1, FBXW7, GNA11, GNAS, KRAS, MET, SMAD4, and VHL. Additional mutations besides TP53 and P16 seem to occur in different genes related to cell fate pathways for early onset EACs, while the additional mutations in conventional EACs are related to survival pathways.

Single nucleotide polymorphisms in CRTC1 and BARX1 are associated with esophageal adenocarcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: Recently, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and Barrett's esophagus (BE) were identified; rs10419226 (CRTC1), rs11789015 (BARX1), rs2687201 (FOXP1), rs2178146 (FOXF1), rs3111601 (FOXF1), and rs9936833 (FOXF1). These findings indicate that genetic susceptibility could play a role in the initiation of EAC in BE patients. The aim of this study was to validate the association between these previously identified SNPs and the risk of EAC in an independent and large case-control study. DESIGN: Six SNPs found to be associated with EAC and BE were genotyped by a multiplex SNaPshot analysis in 1071 EAC patients diagnosed and treated in the Netherlands. Allele frequencies were compared to a control group derived from the Rotterdam Study, a population-based prospective cohort study (n = 6206). Logistic regression analysis and meta-analysis were performed to calculate odds ratios (OR). RESULTS: Rs10419226 (CRTC1) showed a significantly increased EAC risk for the minor allele (OR = 1.17, P = 0.001), and rs11789015 (BARX1) showed a significantly decreased risk for the minor allele (OR = 0.85, P = 0.004) in the logistic regression analysis. The meta-analysis of the original GWAS and the current study revealed an improved level of significance for rs10419226 (CRTC1) (OR = 1.18, P = 6.66 × 10(-10)) and rs11789015 (BARX1) (OR = 0.83, P = 1.13 × 10(-8)). CONCLUSIONS: This independent and large Dutch case-control study confirms the association of rs10419226 (CRTC1) and rs11789015 (BARX1) with the risk of EAC. These findings suggest a contribution of the patient genetic make-up to the development of EAC and might contribute to gain more insight in the etiology of this cancer.

Hereditary Factors in Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The vast majority of Barrett's esophagus (BE) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) cases are sporadic and caused by somatic mutations. However, over the last decades several families have been identified with clustering of EAC. Here, we review data from the published literature in order to address the current knowledge on familial EAC. SUMMARY: Although familial EAC comprises a relatively small group of patients, it is a clinically relevant category due to the poor prognosis of this type of cancer. Efforts should be made to identify specific genetic risk factors for familial EAC to enable identification of relatives at risk, since endoscopic surveillance can diagnose preneoplastic or early neoplastic lesions leading to early treatment, with improved outcome. KEY MESSAGE: Although familial EAC comprises a relatively small group of patients, this is a clinically relevant category due to the poor prognosis. Efforts should be made to identify specific genetic risk factors for familial EAC in order to facilitate the identification of other family members with a predisposition for this type of cancer. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Approximately 7% of BE and EAC cases are considered familial. Age at diagnosis is generally lower for patients with familial EAC as compared to sporadic cases, while other known risk factors for EAC, such as male gender and Caucasian ethnicity, do not differ between the two groups. In several described families with clustering of EAC the pattern of inheritance seems to be consistent with a rare autosomal dominant genetic trait. However, some association has been found with (attenuated) familial adenomatous polyposis, mismatch repair deficiency and recently with the genes MSR1, ASCC1 and CTHRC1. Nevertheless, no specific genetic predisposition has yet been identified.

Treatment and outcome of young patients with esophageal cancer in the Netherlands.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal cancer is increasingly recognized in younger patients. We compared clinicopathological characteristics, treatment, and survival of patients aged ≤50 years with patients aged >50 years diagnosed with esophageal cancer in the Netherlands. METHODS: From the nationwide Netherlands Cancer Registry we identified all patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer between January 2000 and January 2011. Proportions were compared using the χ(2) test for categorical variables. Overall and relative survival was calculated. RESULTS: Eleven percent of the patients (n = 1,466) were aged ≤50 years and adenocarcinoma was the most common tumor type (73.6%). Grade of tumor differentiation was comparable between both age groups (P = 0.460) as well as T-stage (P = 0.058). Younger patients presented more often with positive lymph nodes (70.1% vs. 66.4%, P = 0.010) and distant metastasis (50.5% vs. 44.7%, P < 0.001) but had surgery more often as compared to older patients: 40.6% versus 37.9%, P = 0.047. There was no significant difference in the 5-year relative survival between both age groups: 18.1% versus 17.2%, P > 0.05. A subgroup analysis among patients diagnosed with adenocarcinoma revealed similar results. CONCLUSIONS: Young patients with esophageal cancer present with more advanced disease stage and received more often treatment. However, they show comparable relative survival rates with their older counterparts.

Influence of young age on outcome after esophagectomy for cancer.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of esophageal cancer has risen among all age groups. Controversy exists about the clinical presentation and prognosis of young patients. The aim of this study was to compare the clinicopathologic characteristics and outcomes after surgery between patients with esophageal cancer who were <50 years of age and those ≥50 years of age. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with esophageal carcinoma who underwent esophagectomy between January 1990 and December 2010 in a single institution were selected from a prospective database. Patients aged <50 years at diagnosis (n = 163) were compared with those ≥50 years (n = 1151) with respect to clinicopathologic stage and oncologic outcome. RESULTS: Younger patients had less co-morbidity (p < 0.001). There were no significantly differences in tumor localization, histology, differentiation, or TNM stage in the two groups. In both groups, 37 % of the patients underwent neoadjuvant chemo(radio)therapy. One or more nonsurgical complications developed in 53 % of the older group versus 42 % in the younger group (p = 0.012). In-hospital mortality was 6.3 % for patients ≥50 years compared to 1.8 % for younger patients (p = 0.021). The 5 year overall survival was significantly better for the younger patients than for those ≥50 years (41 vs. 31 %, p < 0.001), but median disease-specific and disease-free survival did not differ between the groups (37 vs. 30 months, p = 0.140 and 49 vs. 28 months, p = 0.079, respectively). Multivariate analysis identified moderate, poorly, and undifferentiated tumors; tumor-positive resection margins (pR1-2); and TNM stage IIB-IV as independent predictors of disease-specific survival. CONCLUSIONS: A considerable proportion (12 %) of patients diagnosed with resectable esophageal carcinoma were <50 years. Phenotypic tumor characteristics and disease-specific survival were comparable for the two age groups.