Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability of Letermovir Coadministered With Azole Antifungals (Posaconazole or Voriconazole) in Healthy Subjects.

Letermovir is a human cytomegalovirus terminase inhibitor for cytomegalovirus infection prophylaxis in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Posaconazole (POS), a substrate of glucuronosyltransferase and P-glycoprotein, and voriconazole (VRC), a substrate of CYP2C9/19, are commonly administered to transplant recipients. Because coadministration of these azoles with letermovir is expected, the effect of letermovir on exposure to these antifungals was investigated. Two trials were conducted in healthy female subjects 18 to 55 years of age. In trial 1, single-dose POS 300 mg was administered alone, followed by a 7-day washout; then letermovir 480 mg once daily was given for 14 days with POS 300 mg coadministered on day 14. In trial 2, on day 1 VRC 400 mg was given every 12 hours; on days 2 and 3, VRC 200 mg was given every 12 hours, and on day 4 VRC 200 mg. On days 5 to 8, letermovir 480 mg was given once daily. Days 9 to 12 repeated days 1 to 4 coadministered with letermovir 480 mg once daily. In both trials, blood samples were collected for the assessment of the pharmacokinetic profiles of the antifungals, and safety was assessed. The geometric mean ratios (90%CIs) for POS+letermovir/POS area under the curve and peak concentration were 0.98 (0.83, 1.17) and 1.11 (0.95, 1.29), respectively. Voriconazole+letermovir/VRC area under the curve and peak concentration geometric mean ratios were 0.56 (0.51, 0.62) and 0.61 (0.53, 0.71), respectively. All treatments were generally well tolerated. Letermovir did not affect POS pharmacokinetics to a clinically meaningful extent but decreased VRC exposure. These results suggest that letermovir may be a perpetrator of CYP2C9/19-mediated drug-drug interactions.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of letermovir, a novel anti-human cytomegalovirus drug, in patients with renal impairment.

AIMS: Human cytomegalovirus remains a significant issue for immunocompromised patients and existing viral polymerase targeting therapies are associated with significant toxicity. Accordingly, the viral terminase complex inhibitor, letermovir, is in development. We assessed letermovir pharmacokinetics in renal impairment. METHODS: This was a Phase 1, open-label, nonrandomised trial. Estimated glomerular filtration rate based on the Modification of Diet Renal Disease equation was used to create three groups of eight subjects: healthy function (estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥ 90 ml min-1  1.73m-2 ), moderate (30-59 ml min-1  1.73m-2 ) and severe (<30 ml min-1  1.73m-2 ) impairment. Oral letermovir 120 mg was dosed once-daily for 8 days and blood collected for pharmacokinetic analyses. RESULTS: All 24 subjects enrolled completed the trial. Moderate and severe renal impairment increased mean unbound letermovir fractions by 11% and 26%, respectively, vs. healthy subjects. Exposure (AUCτ,ss and Css,max ) was increased with renal impairment [least square mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) total letermovir vs. healthy subjects, AUCτ,ss 192% (143-258%) and 142% (83-243%) for moderate and severe impairment, respectively; Css,max 125% (87-182%) and 106% (75-151%), respectively]. Clearance was decreased vs. healthy subjects. Correlation analyses indicated a correlation between decreasing renal function and increased unbound letermovir concentration (R2  = 0.5076, P < 0.0001). Correlations were identified between decreased clearance with both decreased renal function (R2  = 0.0662, P = 0.2249 and R2  = 0.1861, P = 0.0353 total and unbound clearance, respectively) and increased age (R2  = 0.3548, P = 0.0021 and R2  = 0.3166, P = 0.0042 total and unbound clearance, respectively). Multiple-dose letermovir 120 mg was well tolerated across groups. CONCLUSIONS: Renal impairment increased exposure to letermovir, although age was a confounding factor.

Phase 1 study of dalotuzumab monotherapy and ridaforolimus-dalotuzumab combination therapy in paediatric patients with advanced solid tumours.

AIM: Dalotuzumab is a highly specific, humanised immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody against insulin-like growth factor receptor 1. This multicenter phase 1 study (NCT01431547) explored the safety and pharmacokinetics of dalotuzumab monotherapy (part 1) and the combination of dalotuzumab with the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor ridaforolimus (part 2) in paediatric patients with advanced solid tumours. METHODS: Dalotuzumab was administered intravenously every 3 weeks starting at 900 mg/m(2) and escalating to 1200 and 1500 mg/m(2). Combination therapy included intravenous dalotuzumab at the defined single-agent recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) and oral ridaforolimus 28 mg/m(2) daily (days 1-5), repeated weekly. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed to evaluate the mean serum trough dalotuzumab concentration, which guided the RP2D. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were enrolled (part 1, n = 20; part 2, n = 4). No dose-limiting toxicities were observed in patients receiving dalotuzumab alone. One patient experienced dose-limiting stomatitis in the combination arm. Pharmacokinetic data showed dose-dependent increases in exposure (area under the curve from zero to infinity [AUC0-∞]) (87,900, 164,000, and 186,000 h*mg/ml for the 900, 1200, and 1500 mg/m(2) dose levels, respectively), maximum serum concentration (Cmax) (392, 643, and 870 mg/ml), and serum trough concentration (Ctrough) (67.1, 71.6, and 101 mg/ml). The mean half-life was 265, 394, and 310 h, respectively. Dalotuzumab pharmacokinetics were not affected by coadministration with ridaforolimus. One of six patients with Ewing sarcoma had confirmed partial response to dalotuzumab monotherapy at 900 mg/m(2). Time to response was 41 d, and progression occurred at 126 d. CONCLUSION: Dalotuzumab was well tolerated in paediatric patients with advanced solid malignancies. The RP2D of dalotuzumab is 900 mg/m(2) (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01431547, Protocol PN062).

Induction of nevi and skin tumors in Ink4a/Arf Xpa knockout mice by neonatal, intermittent, or chronic UVB exposures.

Nevi and melanomas correlate to childhood and intermittent solar UV exposure, xeroderma pigmentosum patients run increased risk, and p16(Ink4a) expression is often lost in malignant progression. To ascertain the effect of these risk factors, pigmented hairless Ink4a/Arf-, Xpa- knockout mice were subjected to various combinations of neonatal [7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene (DMBA) or UVB exposure] and adult treatments (12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate or subacute daily UVB exposure or intermittent overexposure). Nevi occurred earliest, grew largest, and were most numerous in mice exposed to DMBA followed by intermittent UVB overexposure [effect of six minimal edemal doses (MED), 1 x /2 weeks > 4 MED 1 x /wk]. Neonatal UV exposure enhanced nevus induction but lost its effect after 200 days. The Xpa(-/-) mice proved exquisitely sensitive to UV-driven nevus induction, indicating the involvement of pyrimidine dimer DNA lesions, but Xpa(+/+) mice developed many more nevi (>40 per mouse) at high UV dosages not tolerated by Xpa(-/-) mice. Ink4a/Arf(-/-) mice developed most skin tumors faster, but surprisingly developed nevi slower than their heterozygous counterparts especially after neonatal UV exposure. Despite raising >1,600 nevi, only six melanomas arose in our experiments with Ink4a/Arf knockout mice (five of which in Xpa(+/+) mice at high UV dosages). In contrast to human nevi, these nevi lacked hotspot mutations in Braf or Ras genes, possibly explaining the lack of malignant progression in the Ink4a/Arf(-/-) mice. Hence, although our experiments did not effectively emulate human melanoma, they provided clear evidence that intermittent UV overexposure strongly stimulates and the Ink4a/Arf(-/-) genotype may actually impair nevus development.

Single UVB overexposure stimulates melanocyte proliferation in murine skin, in contrast to fractionated or UVA-1 exposure.

Overexposure to short- and long-wave ultraviolet radiations (UVB, UVA) may contribute to melanoma development through combined genotoxic and mitogenic effects in melanocytes. This study compares the impact of UVA-1 versus UVB, and single versus fractionated exposures on melanocyte proliferation in hairless SKH-2 mice. A single erythemal dose was compared with an equal dose fractionated over 8 d, and dose-dependency was studied. Proliferation (Ki-67 positive-sign) in melanocytes (melanoma antigen recognized by T-cells-1 positive or micropthalmia transcription factor positive) was ascertained in double-labeled skin sections. Single erythemal UVB exposures caused a delayed, dose-dependent increase of melanocyte proliferation. The highest, 17-fold, increase (from 0.05% to 0.8% of melanocytes) occurred 4 d after UVB exposure, without any detectable effect on overall melanocyte numbers. Correspondingly, DNA repair-deficient xeroderma pigmentosum A (Xpa) mice proved exquisitely sensitive to melanocyte proliferation induction by UVB exposure. No discernable effects were measured from fractionated suberythemal UVB exposures, or from any UVA-1 exposure regimen. Hence, melanocyte proliferation appears to be most efficiently induced by a single UVB overexposure. Moreover, the ineffectiveness of UVA-1 radiation and the enhanced sensitivity of Xpa mice point at pyrimidine dimers as causative DNA lesions. Consequently, murine nevi and melanoma are expected to be most effectively induced by intermittent UVB overexposures.

UV exposure, genetic targets in melanocytic tumors and transgenic mouse models.

The genetic changes and corruption of kinase activity in melanomas appear to revolve around a central axis: mitogenic signaling along the RAS pathway down to transcription regulation by pRB. Epidemiological studies point to the importance of ultraviolet (UV) radiation in the etiology of melanoma, but where and how UV radiation is targeted to contribute to the oncogenic signaling remains obscure. Animal models of melanoma genesis could serve to clarify this issue, but many of these models are not responsive to UV exposure. Most interesting advances have been made by using transgenic mice that carry genetic defects that are known to be relevant to human melanoma: specifically, dysfunction in the tumor suppressive action of p16INK4a or a receptor tyrosine kinase/RAS pathway, that is constitutively activated in melanocytes. The latter types of mice appear to be most responsive to (neonatal) UV exposure. Whether this is due to a general increase in target cells by melanocytosis and a paucity or complete lack of pigment, or a possible UV-induced response of the promoter-enhancer of the transgene or a genuinely independent and additional genetic alteration caused by UV exposure needs to be established. Importantly, the full effect of UV radiation needs to be ascertained in mice with different pigmentation by varying the wavelengths, UV-B versus UV-A1, and the exposure schedules, i.e. neonatal versus adult and chronic versus intermittent overexposure. Intermittent UV-B overexposure deserves special attention because it most strongly evokes proliferative responses in melanocytes.