Clinical Performance of the Low Profile Zenith Alpha Abdominal Endovascular Graft: 2 Year Results from the ZEPHYR Registry.

OBJECTIVE: The midterm outcomes of the low profile Zenith Alpha Abdominal Endovascular Graft from the ZEnith alPHa for aneurYsm Repair (ZEPHYR) registry are reported. METHODS: The ZEPHYR registry is a physician initiated, multicentre, non-randomised, core laboratory controlled, prospective registry. Inclusion criteria were patients with a non-ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm with a maximum diameter ≥ 50 mm or enlargement > 5 mm within 6 months, with a site reported infrarenal neck length of ≥ 10 mm and with the intention to electively implant the Zenith Alpha abdominal endograft. Patients from 14 sites across Germany, Belgium, and the Netherlands were included. The primary endpoint was treatment success, defined as technical success and clinical success. Technical success was defined as successful delivery and deployment of the endograft in the planned position without unintentional coverage of internal iliac or renal arteries, with successful removal of the delivery system. Clinical success was defined as freedom from aneurysm sac expansion > 5 mm, type I or type III endoleaks, aneurysm rupture, stent graft migration > 10 mm, open conversion, and stent graft occlusion. RESULTS: Three hundred and forty-seven patients were included in the ZEPHYR registry. The median clinical follow up was 743 days (interquartile range [IQR] 657, 806) with a median imaging follow up of 725 days (IQR 408, 788). Treatment success at 6 months, 1, and 2 years was 92.5%, 90.4%, and 85.3%, respectively. Freedom from secondary intervention was 94.3%, 93.4%, and 86.9%, respectively. The predominant reason for secondary intervention was limb complications. Freedom from limb occlusion (per patient) at 6 months, 1, and 2 years was 97.2%, 95.8%, and 92.5%, respectively. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses could not identify any independent predictor for limb complications. CONCLUSION: While treatment success is comparable with other commercially available grafts, the rate of limb complications at 2 years is of concern. The manufacturer's instructions for use should be followed closely. Further studies are necessary to investigate the root cause of the increased rate of limb complications with the Zenith Alpha Abdominal Endovascular Graft.

ZILVERPASS Study: ZILVER PTX Stent versus Prosthetic Above-the-Knee Bypass Surgery in Femoropopliteal Lesions, 5-year Results.

PURPOSE: To report the 60-month safety and effectiveness results of a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing the ZILVER PTX paclitaxel-eluting stent to prosthetic above-the-knee bypass for the treatment of symptomatic TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) C and D femoropopliteal lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were enrolled between October 2013 and July 2017. One of the secondary outcomes was primary patency at 60 months, defined as no evidence of binary restenosis or occlusion within the target lesion or bypass graft based on a duplex ultrasound peak systolic velocity ratio < 2.4 and no clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) in endovascular cases or reintervention to restore flow in the bypass at 60 months. Survival rates after 5 years were also analyzed. RESULTS: 220 patients (mean age 68.6 ± 10.5 years; 159 men) were included and randomized to ZILVER PTX (n = 113, 51.40%) or BYPASS group (n = 107, 48.60%). The 60-month primary patency rate was 49.3% for the ZILVER PTX group versus 40.7% for the bypass group (p = 0.6915). Freedom from TLR was 63.8% for the ZILVER PTX group versus 52.8% for the bypass group (p = 0.2637). At 5 years, no significant difference in survival rate could be seen between the ZILVER PTX and the bypass group (69.1% vs. 71% respectively, p = 0.5503). CONCLUSION: Even at 5 years, non-inferior safety and effectiveness results of the ZILVER PTX could be seen. These findings confirmed that the use of ZILVER PTX stents can be considered as a valid alternative for bypass surgery when treating long and complex femoropopliteal lesions.

Outcomes of Percutaneous Access to the First Versus Third Segment of Axillary Artery During Aortic Procedures.

PURPOSE: This article aims at investigating the outcomes of percutaneous access via the first versus third axillary artery (AXA) segments with closure devices during aortic procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients receiving percutaneous AXA access closed with Perclose ProGlide device (Abbott, Santa Clara, California) from 2008 to 2021 were included in a retrospective multicenter registry (NCT: 04589962). Efficacy endpoint was the technically successful percutaneous procedure (no open conversion). Safety endpoints were stroke and access complications according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium-3 reporting standards. The first (AXA1) or third (AXA3) axillary puncture sites were compared. RESULTS: A total of 412 percutaneous AXA accesses were included: 172 (42%) in AXA1 and 240 (58%) in AXA3. Left AXA was catheterized in 363 cases (76% of AXA1 vs 97% of AXA3, p<0.001) and 91% of fenestrated/branched endovascular repair (F/BEVAR) procedures were conducted from the left. A ≥12F internal diameter (ID) sheath was used in 49% of procedures. Open conversion rate was 1%, no major vascular complications occurred, and only one major non-vascular complication was recorded. Primary closure failure occurred in 18 AXA1 (11%) and 32 AXA3 accesses (13%), treated by covered (8.3%) or bare-metal (2.7%) stenting. Bailout stent patency was 100% at median follow-up of 12 months, with 6 of 6 stents still patent after >36 months of follow-up. Stroke rate was 4.4%. An introducer sheath >12F was independently associated with both access complications (p<0.001) and stroke (p=0.005), while a right-side access was associated with stroke only (p=0.034). Even after adjustment for covariates, AXA1 versus AXA3 showed an equal success rate (odds ratio [OR]=0.537, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.011-1.22 for AXA3, p=0.104). The combination of AXA3 and a >10F introducer sheath provided worse outcomes compared with >10F sheaths through AXA1 (OR for success=0.367, 95% CI=0.176-0.767, p=0.008). This was not confirmed for >12F sheaths, associated with similar outcomes (p=0.31 AXA 1 vs AXA 3). CONCLUSION: Major local complications with the percutaneous axillary approach and ≤12F sheaths are infrequent and solvable by complementary endovascular interventions. Stroke risk remains an issue. First and third AXA segments are both amenable for access with good results, but larger sheaths (12F) perform better in AXA1. CLINICAL IMPACT: Percutaneous access with vascular closure devices at the first or third axillary artery (AXA) segments during aortic procedures is burdened by a negligible risk of open conversion. Local complications with the percutaneous axillary approach are infrequent and solvable by complementary endovascular interventions. First and third AXA segments are both amenable to access with excellent results, but larger sheaths (12F) perform better in the wider first AXA segment. In this setting, bailout stenting does not appear to be associated with mid-term stent occlusion.

Durability and efficacy of the ELVeS® Radial® 2ring slim fiber for multiple ablations.

OBJECTIVES: To prove that the ELVeS® Radial® 2ring slim fiber (Biolitec AG, Wien, Austria) is safe and effective, with a reliable fiber durability. METHODS: This prospective, non-randomized, registry recruited patients with venous incompetence of the great saphenous vein, with or without concomitant incompetence of the small, anterior accessory and posterior accessory saphenous veins. Anatomic success, clinical success and pain were assessed. RESULTS: 150 patients (410 veins) underwent endovenous laser ablation (EVLA). Mean number of veins treated was 2.7 (1-7) with a mean total length of 80.7 cm. 98.3% occlusions were observed after 12 months. Clinical improvement was significant with reduced venous clinical severity scores at 1 month (1.7 ±1.9; p < .0001) and 12 months (0.7 ±1.3; p < .0001) versus pre-operation (4.4 ± 2.2). Mean pain level after 1-week was 5.8/100. No major surgery- or device-related complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: 1470-nm EVLA with the 2ring slim fiber is a highly effective treatment option well tolerated by patients. Despite intensive use, fiber integrity was preserved. CLINICAL REGISTRATION: The study protocol was registered in clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03810677).

ZILVERPASS Study: ZILVER PTX Stent vs. Bypass Surgery in Femoropopliteal Lesions, 3 year results and economic analysis.

BACKGROUND: To report the 3-year safety and effectiveness results of a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing the ZILVER PTX paclitaxel-eluting stent to surgical bypass and to conduct a health economic analysis up to 3-year follow-up of the two treatment modalities. METHODS: This is a study in symptomatic TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) C and D femoropopliteal lesions comparing endovascular ZILVER PTX stenting vs. surgical bypass surgery using a prosthetic graft (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01952457). Between October 2013 and July 2017, 220 patients (mean age 68.6±10.5 years; 159 men) were enrolled and randomized to the ZILVER PTX treatment group (113, 51.40%) or the bypass treatment group (107, 48.60%). One of the secondary outcomes was primary patency at 3-year, defined as no evidence of binary restenosis or occlusion within the target lesion or bypass graft based on a duplex ultrasound peak systolic velocity ratio <2.4 and no clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) in endovascular cases or reintervention to restore flow in the bypass. An economic analysis was conducted to analyze the cost differences between ZILVER PTX and bypass, which shows the perspective of the public authority/organization that pays for healthcare in the two countries (payor), Germany and USA. RESULTS: The 3-year primary patency rate was 53.30% (95% CI 61.40% to 45.20%) for the ZILVER PTX group vs. 58.20% (95% CI 67.10% to 49.30%) for the bypass arm (P=0.9721). Freedom from TLR at 3-year was 62.80% (95% CI 72.60% to 53%) for the ZILVER PTX group vs. 65.30% (95% CI 75.40% to 55.20%) for the bypass group (P=0.635). There was also no significant difference (P=0.358) in survival rate at 3-year between the ZILVER PTX group 78.50%, (95% CI to 87.70% to 69.30%) and the bypass group 87.40% (95% CI 97.6% to 77.2%). None of the deaths was categorized as related to the procedure or device. The economic analysis, taking into account procedural-, hospitalization- and reintervention costs, showed a clear cost-benefit for Zilver PTX in both investigated countries up to 3-year follow-up: Germany (Bypass €9446 per patient versus ZILVER PTX €5755) and USA (Bypass $26,373 per patient versus ZILVER PTX $19,186). CONCLUSIONS: The non-inferior safety and effectiveness results of the ZILVER PTX stent were associated with lower costs for the payer and confirmed that ZILVER PTX stent treatment can be considered as a valid alternative for bypass surgery in long and complex femoropopliteal lesions.

Multicentre International Registry of Open Surgical Versus Percutaneous Upper Extremity Access During Endovascular Aortic Procedures.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate access failure (AF) and stroke rates of aortic procedures performed with upper extremity access (UEA), and compare results of open surgical vs. percutaneous UEA techniques with closure devices. METHODS: A physician initiated, multicentre, ambispective, observational registry (SUPERAXA - NCT04589962) was carried out of patients undergoing aortic procedures requiring UEA, including transcatheter aortic valve replacement, aortic arch, and thoraco-abdominal aortic endovascular repair, pararenal parallel grafts, renovisceral and iliac vessel repair. Only vascular procedures performed with an open surgical or percutaneous (with a suture mediated vessel closure device) UEA were analysed. Risk factors and endpoints were classified according to the Society for Vascular Surgery and VARC-3 (Valve Academic Research Consortium) reporting standards. A logistic regression model was used to identify AF and stroke risk predictors, and propensity matching was employed to compare the UEA closure techniques. RESULTS: Sixteen centres registered 1 098 patients (806 men [73.4%]; median age 74 years, interquartile range 69 - 79 years) undergoing vascular procedures using open surgical (76%) or percutaneous (24%) UEA. Overall AF and stroke rates were 6.8% and 3.0%, respectively. Independent predictors of AF by multivariable analysis included pacemaker ipsilateral to the access (odds ratio [OR] 3.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2 - 12.1; p = .026), branched and fenestrated procedure (OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.2 - 9.6; p = .019) and introducer internal diameter ≥ 14 F (OR 6.6, 95% CI 2.1 - 20.7; p = .001). Stroke was associated with female sex (OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.3 - 9.0; p = .013), vessel diameter > 7 mm (OR 3.9, 95% CI 1.1 - 13.8; p = .037), and aortic arch procedure (OR 7.3, 95% CI 1.7 - 31.1; p = .007). After 1:1 propensity matching, there was no difference between open surgical and percutaneous cohorts. However, a statistically significantly higher number of adjunctive endovascular procedures was recorded in the percutaneous cohort (p < .001). CONCLUSION: AF and stroke rates during complex aortic procedures employing UEA are non-negligible. Therefore, selective use of UEA is warranted. Percutaneous access with vessel closure devices is associated with similar complication rates, but more adjunctive endovascular procedures are required to avoid surgical exposure.

Percutaneous transaxillary access for endovascular aortic procedures in the multicenter international PAXA registry.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of a suture-mediated vascular closure device to perform hemostasis after an axillary artery access during endovascular procedures on the aortic valve, the aorta and its side branches. METHODS: A physician-initiated, international, multicenter, retrospective registry was designed to evaluate the success rate (VARC-2 reporting standards) of percutaneous transaxillary access closure with a suture-mediated closure device. Secondary end points were minor access vascular complications, transient peripheral nerve injury, stroke, and influence on periprocedural outcomes of puncture technique. RESULTS: Three hundred thirty-one patients (median age, 76 years; 69.2% males) in 11 centers received a percutaneous transaxillary access during endovascular cardiac (n = 166) or vascular (n = 165) procedures. The closure success rate was 84.6%, with 5 open conversions (1.5%), 45 adjunctive endovascular procedures (13.6%), and 1 nerve injury (0.3%). Secondary closure success was obtained in 325 patients (98%) after 7 bare stenting, 37 covered stenting, and 1 thrombin injection. Introducer sheaths 16F or larger (odds ratio, 3.70; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-11.42) and balloon-assisted hemostasis (odds ratio, 4.45; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-15.68) were associated with closure failure. A threshold of five percutaneous axillary accesses was associated with decreased rates of open conversion, but not with increased primary closure success. Primary closure success was 90.3% in the 175 patients with sheaths smaller than 16F, performed after the first 5 procedures in each center. Temporary nerve injury and stroke were observed in 2% and 4% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous transaxillary aortic procedures, in selected patients, can be performed with low rates of open conversion. The need for additional endovascular bailout procedures is not negligible when introducers sheaths 16F or larger are required.

Thirty-day Results from the ZEPHYR Registry: Outcomes of EVAR Using the Zenith Alpha™ Abdominal Endovascular Graft for the Treatment of AAA in 347 Patients.

BACKGROUND: To report technical and clinical 30-day results following treatment with the Zenith Alpha™ abdominal stent graft from the ZEnith alPHa for aneurYsm Repair Registry (ZEPHYR). METHODS: Multicenter, nonrandomized, single arm, core laboratory-controlled, prospective registry collecting data on the Zenith Alpha Abdominal Endovascular Graft being used in subjects with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) from sites in Germany, Belgium, and The Netherlands between December 2016 and December 2019. Inclusion criteria were non-ruptured AAAs with a maximum diameter ≥50 mm or enlargement >5 mm over 6 months with an AAA neck length ≥10 mm (site reported). Primary outcome measure was treatment success at 30 days. Treatment success was defined as a combined endpoint consisting of technical and clinical success. Technical success was defined as successful stent graft delivery and deployment as well as successful removal of the delivery system. Clinical success at 30 days was defined as freedom from type I and III endoleak, aneurysm rupture, conversion to open surgery and stent graft occlusion. RESULTS: Three hundred forty-seven subjects were included from 14 sites with a median age of 73.0 years (IQR 68.0-79.0). Thirty-four patients were female (9.8%). The median AAA diameter was 58.3 mm (IQR 55.0-63.5). The median proximal neck diameter was 23.6 mm (IQR 22.0-25.2) with a median proximal neck length of 24.4 mm (IQR 15.0-34.8) and a median infrarenal neck angulation of 24.5° (IQR 15.0-35.0). The right and left common iliac diameter were 16.1 mm (IQR 14.1-19.4) and 16.2 mm (IQR 14.1-19.1), respectively. The treatment success rate at 30 days was 94.8% (N = 329). Technical success was achieved in 333 patients (96.0%). The clinical success rate at 30 days was 98.8% (N = 343). Three patients had limb occlusions at 30 day follow up (0.9%). One patient had a type Ib endoleak (0.3%). Seventy percent of vascular access approaches were percutaneous. The reintervention rate was 1.7% (N = 6) within 30 days. Indications for reinterventions were a false aneurysm at puncture site (N = 1), limb complications (N = 2), stentgraft-associated renal artery occlusions (N = 2), and an external iliac artery thrombosis (N = 1). CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular aneurysm repair using the Zenith Alpha Abdominal Endovascular Graft is effective in the short term. Long term results will be reported in the future.

One-year outcome of the paclitaxel-eluting Legflow balloon catheter in the treatment of long and complex femoropopliteal lesions.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy of the paclitaxel-eluting Legflow balloon catheter in the treatment of "real-world" long and complex femoropopliteal lesions. METHODS: The REFLOW study was a prospective, multi-national, non-randomized, single arm study evaluating the safety and efficacy of the Legflow paclitaxel-eluting balloon dilatation catheter in the treatment of stenotic or occlusive lesions >150 mm long in the femoropopliteal arteries of symptomatic patients (Rutherford 2-5). A total of 120 study subjects were enrolled in a period of 30 months, between October 2015 and May 2018. The mean age was 71.1 years and 79 patients were men (65.8%). Mean lesion length was 216.1 mm. 45.0% of the lesions were occluded, whereas 55.0% were stenotic. Primary endpoint was primary patency at 12 months, defined as absence of a hemodynamically significant stenosis on duplex ultrasound (systolic velocity ratio no greater than 2.4) at the target lesion and without TLR within 12 months. RESULTS: Technical and procedural success (<30.0% residual angiographic stenosis without major complications) was achieved in all 120 cases (100.0%). Primary patency was 84.6% at 6 months and 71.1% at 1 year. Freedom from TLR was 79.9% at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: If longer term follow-up confirms there is no safety-concern on these paclitaxel device, the excellent results of the newer drug-eluting devices, and the Legflow paclitaxel-eluting balloon in particular, is a valid and effective alternative to treat long and complex "real-world" femoropopliteal lesions.

One-year outcome of the everolimus-eluting, balloon-expandable Promus Element and Promus Element Plus stent in the treatment of below-the-knee lesions in CLI patients.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of the balloon expandable Promus Element and Promus Element Plus stents (both Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA), coated with everolimus, in the treatment of short, focal infrapopliteal lesions. METHODS: The PREVENT study was a prospective, multicenter, non-randomized, single arm study evaluating the safety and efficacy of the Promus Element and Promus Element Plus stent in the treatment of stenotic or occlusive lesions ≤40 mm long in the tibioperoneal arteries of patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI). A total of 70 study subjects were enrolled in a period of 26 months, between November 2012 and December 2014. The mean age was 77.84±6.62 years (62-90 years) and 47 patients were men (67.1%). Mean lesion length was 22.83±8.78 mm (5-40 mm). Twenty percent of the lesions were occluded, whereas 80.00% were stenotic. Primary endpoint was primary patency at 12 months, defined as absence of restenosis (≥50% stenosis) or occlusion within the originally treated lesion based on angiography. Secondary outcomes included hemodynamic primary patency on duplex ultrasound (PSV ratio ≤2.4), limb salvage and freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR). RESULTS: Technical and procedural success (<30% residual angiographic stenosis without major complications) was achieved in all 70 cases (100%). Primary patency was 93.8% at 6 months and 86.2% at 1 year. Freedom from TLR was 93% at 1 year. Limb salvage rate at 12-month follow-up, defined as absence of major amputation, was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows the safety and efficacy of the everolimus-eluting, balloon expandable Promus Element and Promus Element Plus stent in the treatment of below-the-knee lesions in patients with critical limb ischemia.

EVOLUTION Study: 12-month results.

BACKGROUND: The EVOLUTION Study is a prospective, non-randomized study, investigating the iVolution stent (iVascular, Barcelona, Spain). The study was conducted at the vascular departments of four hospitals in Belgium. This manuscript reports the findings up to 12-month follow-up time for the total cohort. The primary endpoint of the study is primary patency at 12 months. Primary patency is defined as a target lesion without a hemodynamically significant stenosis on duplex ultrasound (>50%, systolic velocity ratio no greater than 2.4) and without Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) within 12 months. METHODS: Between April 2015 and November 2016, 120 patients with TASC A&B femoropopliteal lesions were included. The mean lesion length was 89.63 mm. Most of the lesions were stenotic lesions (60.00%). RESULTS: Primary patency rate for the total patient population was 86.30% at 12-month follow-up. Freedom from TLR at 12-month was 88.00%. CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm the already existing enthusiasm of the use of bare metal self-expandable nitinol stents in the treatment of TASC A&B femoropopliteal lesions. Longer follow-up and a comparison or addition with drug-eluting technology has to be studied in the future.

BeGraft Peripheral PMCF Study: 12-month results.

BACKGROUND: The BeGraft Peripheral PMCF study is a prospective, non-randomized study, conducted at the vascular departments of 4 hospitals in Belgium. This manuscript reports the findings up to 12-month follow-up time for the total cohort. The primary endpoint of the study is primary patency at 12 months. Primary patency is defined as a target lesion without a hemodynamically significant stenosis on Duplex ultrasound (>50%, systolic velocity ratio no greater than 2.4) and without target lesion revascularization (TLR) within 12 months. METHODS: Between June 2014 and March 2015, 70 patients with TASC II Class A (77.1%), B (14.3%), C (5.7%) or D (2.9%) aortoiliac lesions were included. The mean lesion length was 34.3 mm with a mean degree of stenosis of 83.16%. RESULTS: Primary patency rate for the total patient population was 94.4% at 12-month follow-up. Freedom from TLR at 12-month was 96.7%. CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm the already existing enthusiasm of the use of covered stents in the aorto-iliac field. Longer follow-up and more complex lesions have to be studied in the upcoming future.

Right-sided Cockett's syndrome.

Background Cockett and Thomas described and named Cockett's syndrome in 1965, commonly referred to as iliac vein compression syndrome (IVCS). It is often found as underlying cause in iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis (DVT). They described the syndrome mostly seen on the left side and predominantly in women during the second to the fourth decade of life. In this article, we present a patient with a Cockett's syndrome on the right side. Case presentation Our patient is a 52-year old female with edema of the right leg since 4 months. She had no signs of a DVT and did not benefit from a 3-month compression therapy. She was diagnosed using a CT-scan. Endovascular treatment was performed with a venous stent in the right common iliac vein (CIV). No postoperative complications were seen. After a 6-month follow-up, patient was free of pain and had no residual edema of the right leg. Conclusions Our patient presented with a non-complicated right-sided Cockett's syndrome. She was successfully treated with balloon dilatation and additional stenting of the right common iliac vein. Because of the clinical improvement of the patient together with the excellent long-term results and good patency results of the stenting, guidelines nowadays advise more and more venous stenting to prevent DVT and to relieve symptoms in case of vein compression syndromes.