Comprehensive de novo mutation discovery with HiFi long-read sequencing.

BACKGROUND: Long-read sequencing (LRS) techniques have been very successful in identifying structural variants (SVs). However, the high error rate of LRS made the detection of small variants (substitutions and short indels < 20 bp) more challenging. The introduction of PacBio HiFi sequencing makes LRS also suited for detecting small variation. Here we evaluate the ability of HiFi reads to detect de novo mutations (DNMs) of all types, which are technically challenging variant types and a major cause of sporadic, severe, early-onset disease. METHODS: We sequenced the genomes of eight parent-child trios using high coverage PacBio HiFi LRS (~ 30-fold coverage) and Illumina short-read sequencing (SRS) (~ 50-fold coverage). De novo substitutions, small indels, short tandem repeats (STRs) and SVs were called in both datasets and compared to each other to assess the accuracy of HiFi LRS. In addition, we determined the parent-of-origin of the small DNMs using phasing. RESULTS: We identified a total of 672 and 859 de novo substitutions/indels, 28 and 126 de novo STRs, and 24 and 1 de novo SVs in LRS and SRS respectively. For the small variants, there was a 92 and 85% concordance between the platforms. For the STRs and SVs, the concordance was 3.6 and 0.8%, and 4 and 100% respectively. We successfully validated 27/54 LRS-unique small variants, of which 11 (41%) were confirmed as true de novo events. For the SRS-unique small variants, we validated 42/133 DNMs and 8 (19%) were confirmed as true de novo event. Validation of 18 LRS-unique de novo STR calls confirmed none of the repeat expansions as true DNM. Confirmation of the 23 LRS-unique SVs was possible for 19 candidate SVs of which 10 (52.6%) were true de novo events. Furthermore, we were able to assign 96% of DNMs to their parental allele with LRS data, as opposed to just 20% with SRS data. CONCLUSIONS: HiFi LRS can now produce the most comprehensive variant dataset obtainable by a single technology in a single laboratory, allowing accurate calling of substitutions, indels, STRs and SVs. The accuracy even allows sensitive calling of DNMs on all variant levels, and also allows for phasing, which helps to distinguish true positive from false positive DNMs.

The performance of genome sequencing as a first-tier test for neurodevelopmental disorders.

Genome sequencing (GS) can identify novel diagnoses for patients who remain undiagnosed after routine diagnostic procedures. We tested whether GS is a better first-tier genetic diagnostic test than current standard of care (SOC) by assessing the technical and clinical validity of GS for patients with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD). We performed both GS and exome sequencing in 150 consecutive NDD patient-parent trios. The primary outcome was diagnostic yield, calculated from disease-causing variants affecting exonic sequence of known NDD genes. GS (30%, n = 45) and SOC (28.7%, n = 43) had similar diagnostic yield. All 43 conclusive diagnoses obtained with SOC testing were also identified by GS. SOC, however, required integration of multiple test results to obtain these diagnoses. GS yielded two more conclusive diagnoses, and four more possible diagnoses than ES-based SOC (35 vs. 31). Interestingly, these six variants detected only by GS were copy number variants (CNVs). Our data demonstrate the technical and clinical validity of GS to serve as routine first-tier genetic test for patients with NDD. Although the additional diagnostic yield from GS is limited, GS comprehensively identified all variants in a single experiment, suggesting that GS constitutes a more efficient genetic diagnostic workflow.

Systematic analysis of short tandem repeats in 38,095 exomes provides an additional diagnostic yield.

PURPOSE: Expansions of a subset of short tandem repeats (STRs) have been implicated in approximately 30 different human genetic disorders. Despite extensive application of exome sequencing (ES) in routine diagnostic genetic testing, STRs are not routinely identified from these data. METHODS: We assessed diagnostic utility of STR analysis in exome sequencing by applying ExpansionHunter to 2,867 exomes from movement disorder patients and 35,228 other clinical exomes. RESULTS: We identified 38 movement disorder patients with a possible aberrant STR length. Validation by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and/or repeat-primed PCR technologies confirmed the presence of aberrant expansion alleles for 13 (34%). For seven of these patients the genotype was compatible with the phenotypic description, resulting in a molecular diagnosis. We subsequently tested the remainder of our diagnostic ES cohort, including over 30 clinically and genetically heterogeneous disorders. Optimized manual curation yielded 167 samples with a likely aberrant STR length. Validations confirmed 93/167 (56%) aberrant expansion alleles, of which 48 were in the pathogenic range and 45 in the premutation range. CONCLUSION: Our work provides guidance for the implementation of STR analysis in clinical ES. Our results show that systematic STR evaluation may increase diagnostic ES yield by 0.2%, and recommend making STR evaluation a routine part of ES interpretation in genetic testing laboratories.